User talk:Hraefen

This user is semi-retired from Wikipedia. If you leave me a message, it will responded to in an average of 2-5 days.

The Daily Cardinal[edit]

All the links are dead... it's not vandalism.

Triple meter additions[edit]

Please add additional songs in the appropriate decade with as much info as you have. Feel free to add songs even if you don't know the artist/year/album etc. Please do not wikilink anything.

This template should speed up the process.
() "" by - album:

Triple meter 80s[edit]

(1985) "The Only Mistake" by Joy Division- album: Still
(1986) "Another World, Another Day" by Soul Asylum- album: Made to Be Broken
(1987) "They Can Never Tear Us Apart" by INXS- album: Kick

Before Braille[edit]

Hi! Anything else you can add beyond an opening sentence would be greatly appreciated. Who's in the band? Where are they from? Any hits? Any notable tours? Whole bunch of questions begging to be answered. Thanks and have fun! - Lucky 6.9 04:46, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cool beans. :) Good luck with the article! - Lucky 6.9 05:57, 25 November 2005 (UTC) ==[reply]

Well, don't worry I'll do my best to help you :)

I can help you translate things into Spanish and I can review your translations. I saw ,for instance,you cannot typewrite Spanish characters like accents or eñes, my keyboard can do it very well, so...

By the way, you can review my contributions in the English wikipedia, because English is not my mother tongue, as you could notice.

One thing (please don't take amiss my words, mmm)in Spanish, in the titles of books or CDs or whatever, it is not obligatory to start all verbs, nouns, adverbs and pronouns with a capital letter as in English, you can feel free to do it, but the only word which has to start with a capital letter is the first one :)

Your lists are quite complete, I don't know what to add, but I will keep on searching things for them :)

Do take care!

Sweet regards!

Gaudio 11:27, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Linguistic history of Spanish[edit]

Are you working on this? Because if it's done it it should be merged into either History of Spanish or Iberian Romance Languages, I think. Even if there's more it maybe should go into one of those articles? Herostratus 00:32, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry to bother you -- I can see you're an experienced and erudite editor. Just doing New Page Patrol. Herostratus 00:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lo pasado, pisado :-) (all forgotten. I didn't take it personally anyway). I'll try to help anyway I can, plus letting the word out at the Argentine Board.

Wikipedia:Argentina-related_regional_notice_board I think there are similar ones for other countries/cultures

Done

User:Ejrrjs says What? 22:44, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Source in "History of the English Language"[edit]

I got it from the Wikipedia article "Latin Influence in English". How would I cite that?

Hello[edit]

Hi - Thanks for your welcome, and nice to know that you'll be starting a new article on Spanish words with Dravidian origins. I'll try helping out...Cribananda 00:18, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Apple, "Criminal"[edit]

Languid accurately describes Apple's style, particularly in "Criminal," and I'm not the only one who thinks so.

"...Apple's trademark languid, off-time verse style..."
"...Apple's languid vocal delivery..."
"...she sings in a languid voice..."
"...her disc's languid sound..."
"...this song that displays a languid Fiona..."

Not all of these refer specifically to "Criminal," but her style in general is not exactly hyperactive. I don't feel compelled to add the judgment back in and I don't have a problem with bold edits, but there's no need to talk trash. --Tysto 18:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

-walla[edit]

Your question on Khirad's talk page page has been answered. :)

Yeah, sorry I didn't get to it. But I'm somewhat relieved. -vāla (वाला) can be used so many ways, and I would've just bored you with my Hindi grammar books! By no means exclusively a Parsi thing, no! But whenever you do see a name with the suffix there is always that possibility - especially after an anglo word. Khirad^talk 05:03, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Spanish words of various origins[edit]

Then you should remove español for the same reason. You are right, caput and cauda come from Latin but cap and cua are not Spanish words. I had more doubts with español than with capicúa. Can you check the "Breve diccionario etimológico de la lengua española", please? My references are español and capicúa. Surogase 22:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, España comes from Phoenician i-sch phannim meaning rabbits' island or rabbits' coast, but español is of provençal origin according to the "Diccionario de la Lengua Española published" by the Real Academia Española (the same dictionary that says that "capicúa" is of catalan origin). Surogase 11:47, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just a small correction, español comes from Provençal, not Catalan. I get your point with List of Spanish words of Latin origin, but why not a subsection for romance languages or a List of Spanish words of Romance language origin? The reason I put that words in the list is that although they ultimately come from Latin, they entered Spanish from other languages and are still identical to the words in the language of origin. So it is not a direct "evolution" from Latin but an import from another language that did the evolution. Another case would be grupo from the Italian gruppo. What about Spanish words of Basque origin in List of Spanish words of various origins? Surogase 22:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I'm on him. :) --Golbez 23:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spain and Arrianism[edit]

Hi, Hraefen. I am very sorry for disturbing you but I have seen that you have re-added some material I removed from Reconquista. In the discussion section I added a note about that as far as I know, vast majority of Spaniards by the time of the muslim invasion were not Arrian. Could you please discuss with me about why do you think Arrianism was common among Spaniards inhabitants (It was common among the Visigoth as far as I know, but vast majority of Spaniards were not visigoths but under visigoths rule). I am very sorry for disturbing you by asking this.

Thanks a lot and best regards, jamuki

University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum[edit]

Alas I am far, far away from Wisconsin. Hope someone will add photos of the arboretum; I would very much like to see them. All the best, and happy new year, -- Daderot

Maybe I'll get out there myself (when there's still snow) and then maybe one in the summer. It's a beautiful place.--Hraefen 03:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

changes[edit]

Yes, I have been making changes. If you have been monitoring my changes you should notice that I have added footnotes for racial/ancestry makeup. Footnotes have indicated UK CENSUS, US CENSUS etc. You can look at the Scottish people page for instance. I have noticed that another user seems to make massive generalizations about ancestral statistics and I make the necessary changes using Census reports. Furthermore, I have been responsible for making sure statistics are accurate when it comes to stating ethnicity. I have noticed on other pages, no effort is made to back up facts with professional sources70.30.71.252 16:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bat Lake / Rat Lake[edit]

I really don't know what reference would give the official name of the lake. Local usage (here in Mountain Lake) is Rat Lake. I'm not sure what Delft residents call it. There is a DNR or wildlife sign posted at the lake, and I'm not even sure what it says. I'm thinking that sign says Bat.

An interesting fact about that lake is that for the past several years there has been a pair of Red-necked Grebes nesting there. This is the farthest south in modern records that this species has nested, not counting along the Pacific coast.

Anyway, my preference is Rat Lake. JonHarder 02:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have my curiosity up concerning these lakes. As a county wildlife club member, I visit most of these lakes in the spring and summer during the spring bird migration. This is what I found:

1992 Cottonwood County General Highway Map lists the disputed lake as Bat Lake.
Cottonwood Couny Highway Map (2003) names it Rat Lake.
Minnesota Place Names names it Rat Lake stating the name comes from the muskrats that inhabit it. If you're interested in how places got their names, this is a great site. To find lakes, select a county, then Go! and then select Lakes & Streams below.

I am going to give preference in the article to the Rat Lake name. I am also putting the lakes in a two column table, dividing them by watershed.

I noticed a couple of discrepancies.

Parso Lake is not on either of my maps or the MN Place Names site.
Summit Lake which I have never heard of before, is listed on dry on the MN Place Names site. I am removing it from the list.
Harder Lake was omitted from Dale Township. This is supposedly named after one of my ancestors.
Swan Lake was omitted from Dale Township.
Three Lakes was omitted from Lakeside Township. Perhaps one of these three is Parso?

JonHarder 03:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marsh Lake[edit]

Was your disambiguation link in the Marsh Lake article, back to Minn, automatic? I was about to add a see also, when the car wouldn't start, anyway is disambig link still required? Lommeri 20:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello. I noticed your AFD vote on Principality of Marlborough and thought you might also be interested in these similar votes that are currently underway: [1], [2], [3] and [4] --Centauri 02:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Embarrass[edit]

Hi, Regarding the word embarrass, the word entered the English language through French, but into French from Spanish.^[5] BestPrimetime 00:57, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This illustrates my problem with the English etymology pages on Wikipedia. It's ultimately from Latin and it took a trip through Portuguese, Spanish and French. I think the obvious answer is to list them all at Latin, but apparently others feel it's much easier to list it three times at all three Romance languages, but not at Latin. Bass ackwards. Check out the Spanish etymology pages to see what I hope the English etymology pages will eventually become. I would spearhead the movement myself, but I just don't feel like having the 8,023 edit wars and arguments necessary to do it.--Hraefen 20:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You just made up that bit about it being from Latin. It's likely originally from an Iberian Celtic language. If you'd like to learn more about the word embarazar feel free to read the article I wrote about it. --Primetime 22:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you've already found it at List of Spanish words of Celtic origin, so let's just leave it at that and leave the whole Portuguese thing out of it.--Hraefen 22:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Come to think of it: almost all words in Spanish, English, etc., are derived from Proto-Indo-European. For example, the "List of Spanish words derived from Arabic," page is technically incorrect because many of those words came from Aramaic. So, perhaps a note should be added to these pages specifying that it's for words directly derived from Language X. --Primetime 23:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I fully agree that some of the words currently listed as being from Arabic may in fact be ultimately from some other language. I am fully behind any attempt to provide alternate theories for anything as long as a source is provided. The source I used when creating the Spanish etymology pages says all of the words at the Arabic page are from Arabic. If you have a source that says differently, by all means go ahead and add that info, but please do not subtract info or recategorize a word (i.e. move it to a different page) without discussing it first because the source provided bears out any given word's current classification. It's ok, in fact desirable IMHO, for multiple theories to be given and for one word to appear on more than one page. Are there specific Arabic words that we should discuss?--Hraefen 00:04, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

American Parsi[edit]

Cross post from Talk:Parsi

-What's with the American Parsi picture? It does not belong on a article about the history and development of Parsis. It's a family photo, that's all. -User: Afghan Historian

Please delete the photo american parsi from the article... it doesn't serve any purpose... I would appreciate if we could include the photo of a Parsi from Bombay, since many of them still wear their traditional dress at home and what is the source that proves that the lady in the picture is a parsi... Aravind Parvatikar 14:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Ripple[edit]

Hi. A couple weeks ago, you voted in a discussion at WP:AFD involving the deletion of the article on Sean Ripple, from The American Analog Set. This is a courtesy note to let you know that I've listed this article at WP:DRV for deletion review. Whether you voted to keep or delete, I invite your input at the DRV discussion[6]. Thanks! :)

— Adrian~enwiki (talk) 04:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ISBN[edit]

This is regarding your edits at the following page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_English_words_of_Tamil_origin

1. What if the book does not have ISBN. Is it not reputative or authoritative.

2. 90 % of books published in India do not have ISBN. Books publihsed before 1970 do not have ISBN. What to do for such books.

3. Do you mean to say that a book is not authoritative if it does not have ISBN.

4. What is the ISBN of the Hebrew and Greek Bible

5. There has been enough evidence given for the Origin of the word ginger. Can we know you level of Knowledge in Dravidian languages that gives you the ability to pass judgement about Tamil Words Doctor Bruno 16:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversions[edit]

Look at this [7]. 158.91.206.205 is the IP I used before I was registered. The date did not seem right to me so I researched the date the language was extinct and it was the eighteenth century not the 1800s. The writer must have been confused. I just found that you gave me a warning here [8] for correcting it. It was changed back but if you still think it is incorrect tell me.Tim Q. Wells 01:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish language[edit]

Hi Hraefen, I am also interested in contributing to issues on Spanish language and etymology so if you like we can exchange ifo POV. I have just found the article you have created/contributed to :"List of Spanish Words of Arabic origin", I was trying to create another page of similar content. Doing so is very hard, it is nearly impossible to find all words of arabic origin and have never found a complete list anywhere. What is the aim of this article? Is it supposed to include ALL Spanish words of arabic origin or just an example of some? In any case, the list, in its present state offers only a fraction.--Guzman ramirez 09:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool thanks Hraefen. I dont know if you know any Spanish but a site that can help (its helpful as only one source is needed) is the Real Academia de la Lengua Española www.rae.es which is the official and ultimate source on Spanish etymology. When u are in the site, you have to click on "Diccionario de la lengua Española" on the top right of your screen. Once you are in, you just write the word you are interested in and it will tell you its origin.

hmm are you sure this is a proper way to proceed? Check out my page: Spanish Words of Arabic origin

Sorry for bombarding your userpage, but I have to defend the RAE: I have just checked up on esquirol and it says:

Del catalan. esquirol, y este de L'Esquirol, localidad barcelonesa de donde procedían los obreros que, a fines del siglo XIX, ocuparon el puesto de trabajo de los de Manlleu durante una huelga.

Esquirol has nothing to do with Greek. It comes from a town in Catalonia called l'Esquirol where, in the 19th century, workers carried on working during a General Strike. (an esquirol, as u surely know, means someone who breaks a strike by working.)

Believe me you can trust the RAE and it generally does not stop at the first, second or third degree of origin (if there is one).

The RAE, as the academie française for the French language, "owns" in a way the Spanish language (together with the academies of every Spanish speaking country). It is they who decide what is correct and incorrect Spanish. Any source which contradicts the RAE is simply misinformation.--Guzman ramirez 22:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No one owns any language. The RAE has the political clout to make its influence felt in things like dictionaries and school textbooks, but etymology encompasses many languages other than Spanish. Being the most influential body in setting standards for pronunciation, vocabulary, etc. If you want to be deferential to them in all areas and take their version of the story as infallible in your own research/studies, fine. But no dictionary of etymology is 100% correct, end of story. It doesn't matter if the organization which produces it is sanctioned by a government or not. And assuming that the city of l'Esquirol is named for a squirrel (I guess I can't say for sure that it is right now), the word definitely comes from Ancient Greek.--Hraefen 22:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hehehe, you know yesterday I was thinking about why you might think Esquirol comes from Greek, and I finally worked out that you probably think Esquirol means squirrel in Spanish! The Spanish word for squirrel is ardilla (pronounced ardeeyaa).--Guzman ramirez 10:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, the RAE, being a website is not 100% correct, that is why it is updated every year correcting its mistakes and incorporating the results of new etymological studies.--Guzman ramirez 10:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Linguistics[edit]

Hola Hraefen, I am interested in doing a map, but I'm leaving on Saturday to study abroad in France this summer. I'll be back at the end of August, though. Go Badgers! Fay2 17:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA[edit]

I understand you have decided to take it personally that the triple metre song lists were deleted, but you need to realise that there was consensus to delete, involving multiple editors, and that the comments made in those debates were valid and went direct to policy. Numerous entries were either unverifiable (as not published in sheet music form) or wrong (asserting 12/8 as triple when it is not). Also, you may not make personal attacks. Note that if you do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Just zis Guy you know? 22:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal? Attack? I was simply spouting off to someone who seemed to be upset about the deletion as well. A little commiseration. I never brought anyhing your way, so I contend that you're the one being personal. Your side won the afd, so why do you even take the time to entertain the grumblings of the losing side? You seem to have an overly-strict interpretation of what constitutes an attack. I did not swear or call names. I simply said that you're spiteful and confrontational (which you keep proving by not letting this feud DIE) and said that your knowledge of triple meter is dated. So what? Those are criticisms of your interpersonal skills and your knowledge, both of which are things that affect content and discourse on Wikipedia (especially now that you're an admin). I thought this feud had died and I hope it does. The ball is in your court. All you have to do is not reply.--Hraefen 15:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you were spouting off. Please don't. I am a big boy and can take a fair bit of abuse, but the people who argued in good faith for deletion of that content on grounds of firm policy are entitled to your assumption of good faith. Oh and next time you want to rake over the coals of a long dead argument, do consider not doing so. And if you must, don't blame others for starting it, inna "you-invaded-Poland" stylee. Just zis Guy you know? 22:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess by "rake over the coals" you mean that I made a post at someone else's talk page here, not yours. My comment there named no one specific and you had the option not to respond. And I don't buy your argument that you're doing this on behalf of "the people who argued in good faith..." With every continued post on my talk page (have I gone to yours? no) you are proving my contention that this is an axe your are grinding gleefully. What's more... it's all completely inconsequential as far as the content of Wikipedia is concerned. I've not contested the outcome of that afd and I've not made any comment to you that wasn't in response to something you brought up. So why do you keep coming back here? I obviously don't respect your opinion (is that in violation of WP:JzG is infallible?), so please (see, I can be nice) don't post here unless it concerns something of consequence. Let's see if you can respect this reasonable plea or if you need to have the last word in this matter.--Hraefen 04:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you about Spain[edit]

Hello, I agree with you about Spain being a pretty interesting country. Spain does have a lot of Germanic blood. However I think most people confuse Latin Speaking with acutally being Mediterrian while Spaniards are also Mediterrian. They are a composite of Mediterrian/ Nordics as most Spaniards say on the Ethic survey of Spain. Thanks (24.60.161.63 18:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]
I'm not entirely sure what this is in reference to. So, do you have a citation for "as most Spaniards say on the Ethnic survey of Spain?" I would be very interested to see something like this. There has been some fierce debate on this very topic and I'd like to see some info that isn't from a website that has an obvious pro- White/Germanic agenda. Thanks.--Hraefen 18:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is from the the Offical national Census of Spain Found here at the CIA world fact book:https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/sp.html#People. This was one of the websites I found that published the Spanish Census. If you look under Ethic groups it shows most Spaniards agree that they are of Mediterrian/Nordic stock. What are they debating about? I think most people are confusing with acutally being Germanic with having Germanic culture and language. That what it seems like to me. Thanks.

(24.60.161.63 19:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

XGustaX what is your problem with Spaniards? Why do you want them to be German or Germanic? You have serious issues related to race... Have you ever been to Spain? Do you know anything about its history or people? The CIA factbook is not the "Official national census of Spain". And the statement that Spaniards are a "composite of Mediterranean and Nordic types" says nothing except that the CIA has not dared to divide Spaniards into ethnic groups (Catalans, Basques, Galicians, Canarians etc...) So it has simply decided to mention in this section that, as in every Mediterranean country, some people are dark and some people are blonde....how useful :-).

--Guzman ramirez 18:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We are not talking about Language. We are talking realtives, which clearly they are. My sources stand Hraefen. The National census does also break people Catalans etc, into groups but in terms of language and culture not ethicity. They are all still a compostite of Mediterrian/Nordic stock. As most of Spain is mixed. I am from Spain, I know you wouldn't compare Spaniards to the Maltese who are clearly majority darker then Spaniards.((24.60.161.63 19:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]
We are not talking about Language. We are talking realtives, which clearly they are. My sources stand Hraefen. The National census does also break people Catalans etc, into groups but in terms of language and culture not ethicity. They are all still a compostite of Mediterrian/Nordic stock. As most of Spain is mixed. I am from Spain, I know you wouldn't compare Spaniards to the Maltese who are clearly majority darker then Spaniards.((24.60.161.63 19:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

What you talking about XGustaX? Youve never been to Spain in your life. You are a Swedish Argentinian who lives in the US. You say it clearly in your User page. As for who is "darker"... I dont know and its not really an issue. Why are you obsessed with these dubious racial themes? And what national census are you talking about. There is no census that divides Spaniards on racial grounds. Not even with Roma Spaniards. Please stop spreading your own ignorance about my country I find it quite offensive. I think you should direct your opinions to an internet forum more in tune with your ideology. --Guzman ramirez 20:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bigote[edit]

As always, my source is www.rae.es. Get into the site, click onto "Diccionario de la lengua Española (top left) then type in the word (Bigote) in the space given and click consultar. I like this etymology. Apparently clean shaven Spaniards associated moustaches with Germans and their tendency to say "By God" all the time. Thus the word for Moustache in Spanish became bigote.--Guzman ramirez 18:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No there is no word similar to bigote in French (its Moustache in French as well). It does say quizas, although in past editions of the RAE it doesnt. There is no known alternative etymology for the word Bigote and it is certainly of germanic origin.I think it should be mantained...

--Guzman ramirez 19:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is Germanic, for sure, but I really am just not buying the story offered by RAE. If RAE is not confident enough to give this etymology without the "quiza," why are you? The English word bigot shares a very similar etymology, so there seems to have been different meanings of the word in French/Old French. [9]. So, they ultimately come from a Germanic source, but this is not the same thing as saying that Spanish bigote comes from German. The problem is, the RAE did not give a date of entry. At what point in time were Spaniards and modern German speakers in a context of enough cultural contact to borrow words directly from one another?--Hraefen 20:07, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok you are right. We must be sure about the etymology. Ill see if I can find some study on the issue!--Guzman ramirez 20:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
When the Kingdom of Spain passed under the hands Charles I of Spain and V of Germany, the Iberian peninsula recieved a number of German soldiers from the German Holy Roman Empire. These soldiers had the custom of saluting by putting their finger on their upper lip and shouting "Bei Gott!", which was interpreted by Spaniards as the word used for moustache. Voila! --Guzman ramirez 11:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. That is definitely more plausible. What's the source of this info?--Hraefen 15:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All sources are in Spanish: I just typed "Etimología de Bigote" on google.
Being in Spanish is not a problem for me. The problem is, many etymologies that one finds on the internet are often either over-simplified (intermediate forms/languages are often left out) or they're straight-up incorrect folk etymologies. And ususally, if the story is really "interesting" to non-etymologists and if it is presented very matter-of-factly without mentioning the uncertainties that often go with word histories, the more likely it is to be wrong. Spanish gringo and English fuck are both good examples. Anyway... I just want to be sure that any source we use is credible, not just some random website that no scholars would try to hold to any standards. this site [10] says the term originated from "normandos (escandinavos)" which I'm assuming means they were speakers of some form of either Swedish or Old Norse/Norweigan. It's Germanic, but it's not German. Can you find a number of "reputable" sources and then we'll compare them? We might end up just giving multiple theories on this one. It's the uncertainty of etymology that can make it fun. The exact history of some words are difficult to pin down. Let's keep at it though. I'll look in "Breve diccionario" tonight when I go home.--Hraefen 23:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So far only this one...http://reflexionesdeunhumanista.blogia.com/2006/042601-curiosidades-etimologicas.php Ill have a look for more tommorrow...

Jo Vargas refs[edit]

Hi, There's an ~~independent~~ wiki article at de:Jo Vargas (on inspection, the editor seems to have translated my fr.wiki article and added a little). All the material is on the Web somewhere e.g. [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] etc. Dlyons493 Talk 20:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Songs in Triple Meter[edit]

please let me know what i can do to get those lists back. Streamless 14:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

disambiguation pages[edit]

(regarding I Remember (disambiguation)) On disambiguation pages, please observe the rule of one link per entry per Disambiguation Manual of Style. Thank you.--Hraefen ^Talk 16:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does this rule apply strictly when Wikipedia doesn't have an article on the subject, though? The policy mostly makes sense, but in the case of the I remember song, a user could aptly be directed to either Damien Rice or O... so why not link both? ~ Booya ^Bazooka 16:51, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to Damien Rice would be fine if O did n

This must have been the exact moment that Hraefen left Wikipedia. Right in the middle of a word. It's creepy. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 16:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ow, My Balls Hurt[edit]

My apologies for adding the csd tag to the article. I didn't even bother to check the redirect for notability. I'll try to avoid this kind of behavior in the future, and please feel free to remove the tag. Again, please accept my profound apologies. Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 00:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Cheers, Dloh cierekim Deleted? 00:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fall Apart[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fall Apart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. DarkAudit (talk) 18:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Passion Pit[edit]

A tag has been placed on Passion Pit, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BananaFiend (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ball and Biscuit[edit]

I have nominated Ball and Biscuit, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball and Biscuit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? LukeTheSpook (talk) 20:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Good Things[edit]

I have nominated Good Things, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Things. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 12:54, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boo come back![edit]

Boo, come back, help me with Dakota County :) I'm really curious as to why those articles were AFD let alone Speedy deleted. Speedy delete does not apply to any of them and in fact was erroneously interpreted IMO. CDs have always been a WP mainstay, so this is strange indeed. Sorry you've been slighted. .:davumaya:. 06:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Shit on your neighbor[edit]

I have nominated Shit on your neighbor, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shit on your neighbor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Peripitus (Talk) 04:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hyperactive (disambiguation)[edit]

I have nominated Hyperactive (disambiguation), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperactive (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "You betcha"[edit]

A page you created, You betcha, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. -- Matthew Glennon^{(Talk to me)} 22:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SPUI[edit]

Although it happened years ago I feel compelled to congratulate you for for this comment [16], I first saw it a long time ago but it has to be one of the funniest things I have seen on Wikipedia. I'm sure he totally deserved it.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 23:20, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I try to kep my cool, but I don't feel bad about what I did given that I've seen this user make many similalrly unilateral, unpopular edits since. Some people just suck.--Hraefen ^Talk 20:04, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life[edit]

I am leaving you this note because you have edited this article in the past. While vandal-watching today I noticed the removal by CaseyHamMD (talk · contribs) of the entire "Criticism" section. This looked to me like common vandalism, so I reverted it with the rollback tool. Checking the article history, I saw that rollback had reverted a string of 12 edits and, checking them, it was clearly not a case of simple vandalism: on the other hand, the edits showed a pattern of removing properly-sourced criticism and inserting favourable opinions which suggested that CaseyHamMD had a COI and was not editing from a NPOV. He had made one earlier edit of a similar type, which I have also reverted.

He is a new editor, first edit 24 Sep, and his talk page was blank. I have given him a standard welcome paragraph and a note explaining what I have done, outlining relevant WP policies, and inviting him if he wants his changes made to outline them on the article talk page and try to reach consensus.

As I personally know nothing about the subject, I am posting this note to editors who have worked on the article and seem to be still active, so that they can take part in the discussion and/or watch the article.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... I'll be watching the page for any edit wars.--Hraefen ^Talk 21:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Disambiguation link repair[edit]

Leadershp Institute[edit]

Proposed deletion of Leadership Institute[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Leadership Institute, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. It is me i think (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Kampot pepper[edit]

Proposed deletion of Snuggie[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Snuggie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable infomercial product. Article borders on spam

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rtphokie (talk) 01:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Rumor[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Rumor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mosmof (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the point of notifying me of a speedy that is deleted by the time I log in less than 24 hours later? Gee... thanks.--Hraefen ^Talk 01:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is speedy deletion. In any case, whether you saw the notice before the deletion took place or not, I thought the decent thing to do would be to let you know why it was eligible for speedy deletion, rather than you finding out about it later and not knowing why. --Mosmof (talk) 02:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - Yeah, I get that it's speedy and I do appreciate you informing me (it is always appreciated), so I guess maybe my gripe is against speedys in general. What is so damn important that it has to be done in under a day? Not everyone who would potentially have an important contribution to a deletion debate is the type of person that logs into Wikipedia every two hours. It puts all of these types of decisions in the hands of the Wikipedia addicts, and I don't think that is in the benefit of Wikipedians as whole or non-Wikipedian Wikipedia users. But, that's not your fault, so sorry for the snarkiness.--Hraefen ^Talk 20:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hard Lines, Sunken Cheeks[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hard Lines, Sunken Cheeks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONGS

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Canniba loki 01:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slaughtered[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Slaughtered, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONGS

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Canniba loki 01:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Million Miles (Bob Dylan song)[edit]

I have nominated Million Miles (Bob Dylan song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Million Miles (Bob Dylan song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ~~Juvenile Deletionist~~ 19:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cigarettes and Chocolate Milk[edit]

I have nominated Cigarettes and Chocolate Milk, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cigarettes and Chocolate Milk. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ~~Juvenile Deletionist~~ 19:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Goodbye Marie[edit]

I have nominated Goodbye Marie, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodbye Marie. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:12, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CMJ New Music Monthly[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article CMJ New Music Monthly, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable publication; article contains little of encyclopedic value

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fayenatic (talk) 13:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crumpets and muffins[edit]

Hope I've answered your question on the crumpet talk page. 86.159.192.98 (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Murgh[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi[edit]

A tag has been placed on Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Edison (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Hraefen! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Tyler Spencer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Brendan Gamble - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but no thanks, robot. Delete at will. --Hraefen ^Talk 04:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Spanish words of Italic origin[edit]

I have nominated List of Spanish words of Italic origin, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spanish words of Italic origin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cnilep (talk) 17:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have also nominated List of Spanish words of African origin within the same discussion. Cnilep (talk) 17:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Red Vines (disambiguation)[edit]

I have nominated Red Vines (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Vines (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Omega Supreme (disambiguation)[edit]

Hello, just to let you know that this dab has been nominated for deletion using Template:db-disambig. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. Best wishes, Boleyn2 (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Stupid Boy (disambiguation)[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Stupid Boy (disambiguation). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stupid Boy (disambiguation). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split List of Spanish words of Italic origin[edit]

I wonder if I could ask you to comment at Talk:List of Spanish words of Italic origin on whether you oppose or support splitting the list? Thanks, and happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 18:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. Cnilep (talk) 18:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Holyman page[edit]

Hello Hraefen

You created a page called Holyman back in 2006 which has no content and redirected to Blind Melon (album). I have used the page to write about an Australian company with the same name, please feel free to revert if you need to write about the song.

Regards Philphos (talk) 19:35, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I just added a link to the song at the top.

Articles for deletion nomination of The Detachment Kit[edit]

I have nominated The Detachment Kit, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Detachment Kit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 12:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silver Scooter[edit]

The article Silver Scooter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:MUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regancy42 (talk) 00:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Silver Scooter[edit]

I have nominated Silver Scooter, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Scooter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Regancy42 (talk) 00:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Break the Chain[edit]

A tag has been placed on Break the Chain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Akerans (talk) 23:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's in Your Eyes change[edit]

Hi,

You put a comment in the It's in Your Eyes redirect (which is now a disambiguation page).

If you would like to start an article that you think is more deserving of this namespace, please create a disambiguation page [..] along with a link back to this article namespace

I'm not sure what you meant by this- there's no point linking back to the disambig page, and the previous contents was just a redirect. Could you please clarify this if it was important to you? Thanks. Ubcule (talk) 19:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good.--Hraefen ^Talk 16:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aviatress[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aviatress requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bjmullan (talk) 00:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This is a new page where you can test editin on my computer.[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 20:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell are you talking about? --Hraefen ^Talk 21:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion for List of Spanish words of Italic origin[edit]

List of Spanish words of Italic origin has been re-developed into an appendix on Wiktionary; see Wiktionary:Appendix:Spanish words of Italic origin. I have therefore re-nominated the Wikipedia page for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Spanish words of Italic origin (2nd nomination). Cnilep (talk) 07:03, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pobody's Nerfect listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pobody's Nerfect. Since you had some involvement with the Pobody's Nerfect redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Cnilep (talk) 02:25, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Banquet (Phones Disco Edit) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banquet (Phones Disco Edit) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banquet (Phones Disco Edit) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 11:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Guffin bean listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Guffin bean. Since you had some involvement with the Guffin bean redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Speciate (talk) 18:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Polyvinyl Record Co.[edit]

The article Polyvinyl Record Co. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability in independent, reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lagrange613 (talk) 14:25, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Hraefen! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Speedy deletion nomination of Break the Chain[edit]

A tag has been placed on Break the Chain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Trivial history (including a short period where it was an NN band bio); I am seeking to make a fresh article from it

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Ryulong (竜龙) 09:14, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Break the Chain listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Break the Chain. Since you had some involvement with the Break the Chain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —Ryulong (竜龙) 18:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Things That Matter[edit]

A tag has been placed on Things That Matter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. aηsuмaη ^༽Ϟ 13:35, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a song redirect. There is no competition for the namespace. If there was, dismbiguation is always an option. Why is this s problem? Why is this a good use on ANYONE's time? Damn. - -Hraefen ^Talk 16:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lake Louise Minnesota.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Lake Louise Minnesota.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —innotata 21:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jack the Stripper[edit]

There is a call to speedily delete the page Jack the Stripper (disambiguation). PatGallacher (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let Me Go (song),[edit]

A tag has been placed on Let Me Go (song),, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. GoingBatty (talk) 00:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Clark Gable (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Clark Gable (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cindy(talk to me) 11:43, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Start Choppin[edit]

Hi, I noticed you created this as a redirect. I have created the article for it; I'd like your opinion.--Laun chba ller 11:41, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of God Is in the House (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on God Is in the House (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Widefox; talk 00:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moses Patrou[edit]

The article Moses Patrou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musician. No evidence of in depth coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seldom[edit]

The article Seldom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Romance (Seldom album)[edit]

The article Romance (Seldom album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Album does not meet WP:NALBUM and the band's article has been deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of We All Stand[edit]

The article We All Stand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aveda (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Aveda (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Direct hatnotes preferable in these circumstances, per WP:2DABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 10:03, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amitriptyline (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Amitriptyline (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS, a hatnote is best in these circumstances. One WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, one entry not notable enough for own article, but meets MOS:DABMENTION.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aveda (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aveda (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PamD 16:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Psycho Holiday[edit]

The article Psycho Holiday has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 14:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Power of God for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Power of God is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Power of God until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 19:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Recluse (Cursive song)[edit]

The article The Recluse (Cursive song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 09:16, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Distopian Dream Girl[edit]

The article Distopian Dream Girl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 14:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Psychedelic Warlords (Disappear in Smoke)[edit]

The article The Psychedelic Warlords (Disappear in Smoke) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 08:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of War Nerve[edit]

The article War Nerve has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 12:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Innocent When You Dream for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Innocent When You Dream is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innocent When You Dream until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blackbombchu (talk) 22:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Merry Blues[edit]

The article Merry Blues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 18:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Take the Long Road and Walk It[edit]

The article Take the Long Road and Walk It has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I'm a Mess (The Rasmus song)[edit]

The article I'm a Mess (The Rasmus song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 09:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heart Cooks Brain[edit]

The article Heart Cooks Brain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 00:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Myxomatosis. listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Myxomatosis.. Since you had some involvement with the Myxomatosis. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MSJapan (talk) 21:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heartless Moon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heartless Moon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heartless Moon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 08:14, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Hraefen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chawal listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chawal. Since you had some involvement with the Chawal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American conservative atheists has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:American conservative atheists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 02:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Mendota Beacon for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Mendota Beacon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mendota Beacon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 23:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanchar[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sanchar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Yashovardhan (talk) 06:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cop Shoot Cop (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Cop Shoot Cop (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 03:26, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nobody Move, Nobody Get Hurt[edit]

The article Nobody Move, Nobody Get Hurt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources; no apparent notable media coverage of this topic. This is essentially a list of songs that either sample or reference a Yellowman song that doesn't even have its own article. In fact, none of these songs has its own article, which arguably defeats the purpose of a disambiguation page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. whttM (talk) 14:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Idiot moron imbecile listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Idiot moron imbecile. Since you had some involvement with the Idiot moron imbecile redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 05:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Love Help Me[edit]

The article Love Help Me has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camp Onomia[edit]

The article Camp Onomia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Here's the Plan[edit]

Hello Hraefen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Here's the Plan for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mark^Dask 20:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hraefen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Triptofan listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Triptofan. Since you had some involvement with the Triptofan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let Me Go (song), listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Let Me Go (song),. Since you had some involvement with the Let Me Go (song), redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Certes (talk) 11:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pirates and global warming listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pirates and global warming. Since you had some involvement with the Pirates and global warming redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:American Parsi.jpg[edit]

The file File:American Parsi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Down Below for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Down Below is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down Below until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:21, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hraefen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Intro listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Intro. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Intro redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 18, 1976 listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect June 18, 1976. Since you had some involvement with the June 18, 1976 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho (talk) 09:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Things That Matter listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Things That Matter. Since you had some involvement with the Things That Matter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. SITH (talk) 10:50, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion[edit]

"Over to You" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Over to You. Since you had some involvement with the Over to You redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Muzilon (talk) 10:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"West Greenlandic" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect West Greenlandic. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 9#West Greenlandic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 12:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Quicker Than Light" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Quicker Than Light. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 20#Quicker Than Light until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Lennart97 (talk) 17:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Selfish One[edit]

You created a redirect to Red Hot Rhythm & Blues. I just heard the Jackie Ross version and her article has a lot more information on what may actually be a notable song.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Life Stinks (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Life Stinks (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Every Breath[edit]

A tag has been placed on Every Breath requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mcampany (talk) 02:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Hraefen

Thank you for creating Carlton Lake.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Ableton live users[edit]

Hello Hraefen,

some years ago you spoke up for Category:Ableton Live users. That catgegory has inspired me to create Category:Bitwig users in the same style, which is now up for deletion. Any input is welcome :-) Hirnlego (talk) 18:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The Paris Exemption" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Paris Exemption and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#The Paris Exemption until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 18:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Prolific bean" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Prolific bean and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 14#Prolific bean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 08:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mud Hen Lakes" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mud Hen Lakes and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 12 § Mud Hen Lakes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 05:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paper Thin Walls[edit]

A tag has been placed on Paper Thin Walls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. InDimensional (talk) 16:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]