Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 14, 2020.

NCIS: OSP[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 22#NCIS: OSP

Arathorn, son of Arador[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 22#Arathorn, son of Arador

Dírhael[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:45, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. No WP:ATT issues with deletion. It is mentioned in three articles: A mention in a video game plot summary, a mention at an actor's page that he voiced said video game character, and a mention in the plot summary of a fan film. Not convinced there's any one best targeting point out of any of these. Hog Farm (talk) 23:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vidyasagar(Indian music director)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:43, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bad spacing, no incoming links or substantive page history. Cheers, gnu57 21:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Charlotte Clair[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of anyone with this name at any of the possible targets, unable to clearly tell where this was meant to redirect to either. Iffy★Chat -- 19:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak retarget to Charlotte Flair (1st choice), since the F and C keys are adjacent to each other, and someone's finger might slip off the F key onto the C key, and I can also see someone forgetting the E. Weak delete (2nd choice) if that doesn't work-I did find an actress by the (stage) name Charlotte Claire on IMDb who apparently appeared in Jaihind 2 but isn't mentioned on its article. To complicate things further, Charlotte Claire redirects to the page about the French Revolution general Charles Leclerc, which I'm adding to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 21:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll level with ya—I've had a few friends unfamiliar with Formula One ask me "Who is this 'Charlotte Clair[e]' they keep raving about?" Of course, they mean Charles Leclerc, which, when pronounced properly with the silent S and C, sounds almost identical to Charlotte Clair[e]. Guess I was helping them out and anyone else who might get them confused, heh. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia bias[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia#Coverage of topics and systemic bias. --BDD (talk) 20:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bundle of many articles that appear like they should have the same target, but do not. Surprisingly, I am of the opinion that these should all target Wikipedia#Coverage of topics and systemic bias (which none of the previous redirects point to), but all of the current targets could very well be potential answers. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects-Wikipedia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how someone would search "Wikipedia" in the title of a Wikipedia article in this context (although there are some redirects that help people reach their destinations by including "Wikipedia," I don't know how helpful these would be). As cited in the "Deopahar" one's move, it was done for "more accurate search results," perhaps why some of them were moved. Regards, SONIC678 17:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all. I created the redirect from "Mădălina Diana Ghenea - Wikipedia" to Mădălina Diana Ghenea almost 7 years ago, because the original was a silly title. The original article/redirect does not need to live on. Regards, PKT(alk) 18:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all for the same reasons as PKT. --I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 18:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all some of them make no sense, others are just Wikipedia added to the name. But none are needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per above. Not necessary to include "Wikipedia" when we're searching in Wikipedia; this is not Google. @PKT: Is that a WP:CSD#G7 then? ComplexRational (talk) 18:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, I wasn't the author. I have no idea why I ever touched the article! I was probably patrolling New Pages, or something like that........ PKT(alk) 18:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Please check on my new article[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. SNOW close, it's basically an R3, so I've used that. Nick (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This...just doesn't make any sense, and can refer to any article on Wikipedia. Regards, SONIC678 17:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Redirect probably mistakenly left behind from a page move. --Bsherr (talk) 17:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It could be one of my articles, or anyone's; it is not a plausible title or search term. ComplexRational (talk) 18:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Leftover from an old page move to a better title, should have been deleted after the move in '14. Hog Farm (talk) 18:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, 'nuff said........PKT(alk) 18:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete. Given enough context it could apply to any article. --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 20:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - six years ago I forgot to nominate this redirect for deletion... Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 00:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete could also refer to articles outside of Wikipedia. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this was the name of the article for a little over 20 minuets in May 2014 with no connection to the subject. There is no need for it. I think this could qualify as a WP:SNOW.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 01:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Snow – There is a clear consensus to delete this redirect. My rationale for deleting this redirect is that it violates WP:OWN. --Soumyabrata stay at home wash your hands to protect from coronavirus 05:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I agree. This isn't worth keeping at all. Somebody can probably close this immediately. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It's sad that a CSD criteria couldn't be used to avoid this obvious discussion. Natureium (talk) 15:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chaotic Neutral (example of a full article)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure someone would search with this disambiguator...back in 2006, the page about its associated DnD alignment was moved from this title, turned into an article about the alignment, then redirected here, and later turned into a disambiguation page. Maybe delete this title, or if that doesn't work, retarget back to Chaotic Neutral? Regards, SONIC678 17:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Very unlikely search term. The out-of-standard disambiguation is clearly a relic of something that should never have been in article space and should have been handles in a sandbox (or nowadays in draft space, though that didn't exist at the time). There's no need to retain it, and the bare term goes to the proper disambiguation page. oknazevad (talk) 18:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, no point in this redirect anymore..........PKT(alk) 18:58, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unlikely search term. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - We shouldn't keep this. I agree. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Keep Calm and Click Edit[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created and unused. The redirect target is just too narrow. This could just as easily point to pages concerning edit warring, disruptive editing, or several other conduct policies and guidelines. It ought to be deleted. Bsherr (talk) 17:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to WP:CALM, which seems like the most logical place for this to link to. I agree that it's a bit vague though, and I wouldn't miss it too much if it were deleted. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 19:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I would hesitate only because this phrase is not used in that essay, it's not a Wikipedia:Shortcut, and it's not a likely search term. So what would be the purpose of the redirect? --Bsherr (talk) 12:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The purpose would be as a tongue-in-cheek way to refer to the relevant page in talk page discussions, along the lines of, e.g. the various silly redirects to ANI. But yes, it's not all that useful and kind of vague, so I don't feel too strongly about it. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 23:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - As stated above, this is too vague. It relates to quite a bit, and no one single target would really fit. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep WP:CALM and Carry On per SpicyMilkBoy. --Soumyabrata stay at home wash your hands to protect from coronavirus 06:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not a valid search or link term. Natureium (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Waluigi pinball[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why we need a redirect for one specific race track from this game, especially with an incorrectly capitalised title. It has never had any article content. – numbermaniac 14:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Over to You[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Over to You: Ten Stories of Flyers and Flying. The Roald Dahl book is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC rather than the non-notable track on the Black Sabbath album. (A DAB hatnote for the song could be added to the Dahl book page if necessary.) Muzilon (talk) 10:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Possibly dabify There's an Olympic medalist horse "Over to You" List of Olympic medalists in equestrian, and a see also for Over to You Now -- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 12:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    That's great research. I've gone ahead and made the disambiguation page and added a hatnote to the current target. I express no opinion as to whether and which is the primary topic, and thus whether the redirect should be retargeted. --Bsherr (talk) 17:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The new Over To You (disambiguation) page is a good idea. However, I would tend to favor the redirect now being retargeted to that DAB page rather than the Black Sabbath song, which does not seem to have been the subject of WP:SIGCOV. Muzilon (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd support that --Bsherr (talk) 01:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move dab over redirect. Per above. --Bsherr (talk) 01:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move dab over redirect. With thanks to Bsherr. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Computer Science (art)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Super obscure synonym, created from a page move. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - My first thought is that this ought to point to a different article, but then the redirect is rather unclear in the first place. Is it meant to involve artwork created with the aid of computers? Artwork portrayed on computers? Artwork created by computer programs themselves, running independently without people? Deletion seems to be the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Original content[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect created in 2008. Pretty sure the target is not what it means today. Paul_012 (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - In this context, both "original" and "context" are fuzzy concepts. I'm inclined to think that we should simply let people use the search engine. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as ambiguous. Could also refer to copyright infringement issues, among other things. Narky Blert (talk) 10:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It's probably most likely to be encountered in the context of Content (media), but we don't seem to have relevant coverage, and the phrase is ambiguous anyway. – Uanfala (talk) 12:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This redirect may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Monobook[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist #WearAMask😷 16:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found this discussion and thought this anomaly of targeting is worth a discussion here. I don't recommend a particular action at the moment, just throwing this out here for thoughts. — J947 [cont] 06:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The linked discussion was for a mainspace redirect, so it's not the same situation. This is a Wikipedia space redirect, and so only has to be "notable"/relevant in the context of Wikipedia, not the larger world. There's no harm in the redirect; on the contrary, what would be harmful is the lack of a redirect: a user looking for help or information about Monobook and finding nothing and not getting any result when they type in "Wikipedia:Monobook", which one would expect to find help or get useful information. —Lowellian (reply) 15:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Lowellian: Sorry, I didn't make it clear. There are two redirects being discussed here which have very similar names, but point to different targets. I made the discussion to sort out where these redirects should target; they probably should both target to the same place. I found this targeting anomaly by reading the closure of the aforementioned discussion. — J947 [cont] 20:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree that they "should both target to the same place". Someone typing in "Wikipedia:Monobook" is probably looking for information about the skin or to edit the skin, and someone typing in "Wikipedia:Monobook.js" is probably looking for the JavaScript file, so they are not the same. —Lowellian (reply) 03:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
keep per this. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Soulji[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. No other mention. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not mentioned anywhere else in WP. Useless redirect. Narky Blert (talk) 10:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No notability and no reliable sourcing that I can see. It doesn't seem possible to discuss this person's musical career anywhere. I agree. Deletion is the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Enwiki has nothing about "Soulji". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Macedonia(kingdom history)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed disambiguator (missing a space before the open paren). Apologies if this is the wrong venue: this redirect does have history (it was an unsourced, rambling schoolboy essay created in 2010 and blanked-and-redirected 20 minutes later), but I do not think it has to be preserved as potentially useful content (it is not) or for the sake of licensing and attribution (it has not been copied/merged elsewhere, as far as I can tell). Cheers, gnu57 03:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom and because the qualifier is ungrammatical. (Yes, this is the correct venue; and good background reaearch.) Narky Blert (talk) 04:27, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I agree. This seems to be a pretty clear-cut case. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: malformed disambiguator, implausible search term. This is absolutely the correct venue: we don't have qualms deleting unsalvageable content found in the the ancient layers of a redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 12:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, although it's a shame if the original content can't be merged elsewhere and preserved—perhaps it could be archived on the target's talk page. Personally I find it charming! P Aculeius (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: copied the rambling schooboy essay to the talk page of "Macedonia (ancient kingdom)", along with the perfectly accurate description given in the nomination above. Now nothing will be lost when the redirect is deleted. P Aculeius (talk) 14:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

.csproj[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of filename extensions (A–E)#CSPROJ. (non-admin closure) feminist #WearAMask😷 02:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Maybe add to List of filename extensions (A–E) and retarget? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: I added the file extension to the list you mentioned. This is the C# project file for Microsoft Visual Studio. Stefán Örvar Sigmundsson (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget: It is a reasonable search term for someone seeking Microsoft Visual Studio, but it would be less confusing if retargeted to the List of filename extensions (A–E), since it has now been added and provides a link to Microsoft Visual Studio. Someone who is trying to determine what the associated application is will be left without confirmation that Microsoft Visual Studio uses this extension if brought straight to the article on the application. —Quondum 12:57, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

❶[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 22#❶

Nina Коvacheva[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The K and the o are Cyrillic. {{R from move}}. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Redirects and titles with mixed alphabets are useless clutter, no-one can type them from a single keyboard. Narky Blert (talk) 02:13, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – at least for now – per K4. It is useful at the moment from old links and deletion doesn't help anyone. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 03:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. There's long-standing precedence for deleting redirects such as these. Steel1943 (talk) 05:40, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • In a redirect context, high utility with little drawback should definitely be considered a better argument than leaning back upon precedent. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 02:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ mazca talk 00:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Steel1943. Even if many people make a mistake, it's still a mistake, and keeping redirects such as these would only encourage that. ComplexRational (talk) 01:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Look. The pageviews here are from old links. They are not mistakes, just a result of the MediaWiki structure. There is nil point in deleting this redirect right now. — J947 [cont] 02:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      Except for the unnecessary confusion of being offered two seemingly identical options in the searchbox. That just makes WP look bad. Narky Blert (talk) 04:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Narky Blert: So you're saying that such a minor anomaly as that outweighs K4 and the high prevalence of old links here? — J947 [cont] 05:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        I'm saying that it's bad for the encyclopaedia and that WP:5P5 trumps the literal interpretation of all rules. Narky Blert (talk) 05:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • Please follow MOS:LISTGAP. So you're saying that minor confusion trumps helping 20-odd readers a month? The minor confusion is very unlikely to be found anyway – this is a ridiculously uncommon search term, the views presumably come from fairly-used old links which are pointless to break. — J947 [cont] 06:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
          • Also – I don't know about others, but I can see in Vector the Cyrillic К as different from a normal K. — J947 [cont] 06:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
            • And following this discussion, I think it reasonable to surmise that many of the pageviews come from the two seemingly identical search options, which again proves that it is a mistake. ComplexRational (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
              I don't think so at all; the first time the target comes up in the dropdowns is when you have typed Nina Ko and the Cyrillic redirect never shows up in the dropdown menu – that's what happens to me, at least. — J947 [cont] 05:04, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Office (U.S. seasons))/redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects were left over from moves to get away from incoming links. Looking at their histories, they were kept to avoid "recklessly caus[ing] linkrot" in 2012, but it doesn't seem like anything links to them now, further making me wonder if we should still keep them here, or how useful they are. Also, the last four have double parentheses at the end. Regards, SONIC678 00:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Unnecessary clutter. Accidental leftovers of no value from page moves. Narky Blert (talk) 04:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - None of these should be kept. I agree. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as per above. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. TheTVExpert (talk) 19:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. I also don't think Wikipedia supports referring to the United States as "the U.S." per MoS. --Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 20:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • MOS:US allows it. — J947 [cont] 05:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • There has been recent mass renaming of (UK TV series) and (U.S. TV series) pages, presumably to make them comply with MOS:US. I've never looked for the relevant discussion. Narky Blert (talk) 05:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom / above --DannyS712 (talk) 07:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Unlikely search terms. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_April_14&oldid=1072177306"