Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Power of God

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 13:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Power of God[edit]

The Power of God (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. The sources are primary sources + one trivial mention in a possibly secondary source. There's a walled garden of articles around Jaerock Lee and his books; he is definitely a notable person (although the article about him needs to lose a lot of promotional text) and one or two of his books might be notable - this one, however, does not appear to meet WP:NBOOKS (and as we know, notability is not inherited from the author to all their books.) bonadea contributions talk 19:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- In contrast with another of his books that claims to have been translated into 56 languages. I have little doubnt that this is merely a collection of sermons on a theme. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete on the same basis as the above editor. SFurthermore, WorldCat shows only 1 library holdings. DGG ( talk ) 17:05, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as above. Neutralitytalk 03:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.