User talk:RHaworth/2017 Sep 07

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is an Online Ambassador on the English Wikipedia
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits – already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Proposal for deletion

Dear RHaworth, I've reviewed your concern on this article, which is "insufficient evidence in English of notability". It seems you believe sources MUST be in English to assure notability. When taking a look at the guidelines in WP:NOENG, it is mentioned that "Citations to non-English reliable sources are allowed on the English Wikipedia. However, because this project is in English, English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when available and of equal quality and relevance." As well as in WP:GNG where it states "Sources do not have to be available online or written in English". And all provided sources are reliable local newspapers. I know English sources are preferred, but that only applies IFF English and non-English sources are of equal weight in term of verifiability. I could have included English sources like Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Powell's book's page, but that would violate the guidelines by promoting a product that is related to the subject.

Since machine translation, google translate for example, can be used for further validation, am I missing anything? Please advise. Sincerely, -- Aaehasa (talk) 22:21, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Aaeheasa My current understanding of that information and sources are that they're trivial and offer nothing of what our notability standards actually consider notable; inherited notability cannot be applied either. SwisterTwister talk 00:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

SwisterTwister The concern of RHaworth was "insufficient evidence in English of notability". Since "in English" is included in the concern statement, whether these sources are trivial or not is another case that can be discussed on the article's page. Sincerely, -- Aaehasa (talk) 11:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Request for deleted article text

Hello, Thanks for the review of the pages Teal IT and Digiteal. I was thinking to add more content later on but since it has been speedily deleted I would need to start over. Could you please provide me the text of those two articles ? Thanks in advance, Cedric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedneve (talk • contribs) 15:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

RHaworth, thanks. Indeed, the "enable email from others" was not active. I changed it now. Thanks in advance for the deleted content. I read more about the wikipedia writting conventions and I understand better why those articles were removed too. Thanks for you contributions and for keeping it clean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedneve (talk • contribs) 16:29, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Church of St Dyfnog, Llanrhaeadr

Hi, you deleted this page about an hour ago. Would it be possible to restore it. The background is confusing but the bottom line is that I feared I had confused two churches of the same name. I therefore blanked the page, intending to undo my edit when I had confirmed that they were in fact one church. When I came back to do this, you had already deleted the page, which included a fair bit of data I'd already included. It would be rather a pain to have to start from scratch. Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 15:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

You're an absolute star! Could you tell me, once I'm done, how I move the article from draft into mainspace? Thanks again. KJP1 (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Incredible! Ten years and 16,000 edits and you still need to ask! OK, with the default skin it may be hidden behind a ridiculous "more" pull-down list containing just one item. But somewhere at the top of every page you will find a "move" link. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

As you will have already gathered, the technical aspects of Wiki are amongst my lesser strengths! I therefore remain hugely grateful for your assistance and for your forbearance. With thanks and best regards. KJP1 (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC) P.S. I may return should I prove unable to follow your very clear instructions.

Fingers crossed, I seem to have managed, after one failure. The issue is that, with one exception, I've always created articles in the mainspace, so have never had occasion to move any. Thanks again. KJP1 (talk) 17:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Siacoin

It might be getting close to time to have a real article there. Can I see the deleted version? — Endercase (talk) 18:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Silly Mig Bac slogan

Twoallbeefpattiesspecialsaucelettucecheesepicklesonionsonasesameseedbun. I see that you have recreated the aforementioned redirect after speedily deleting it per WP:G4 without first placing a request at DRV or a discussion with another editor about the matter, as well as fully protecting it without a valid reason other than that it is "repeatedly un-redirected", I feel that this is inappropriate, the discussion at RfD was closed as delete after you inappropriately speedily deleted it with a G1, which I also don't think wasn't appropriate. Note, this is just a friendly reminder about your actions, I have not yet decided to take it any steps further though I plan to open a DRV if you do not object to the idea. --- CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

I now see that you have changed the heading of my comment, no wonder I could not find it in the first place. --- CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Champion, we have speedily deletion methods for redirects which are implausible or count as attacks. It is usually a waste of time discussing other redirects. But do what you will, I shall not touch it in future. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

ExecuSearch

Hi, I apologize for my last draft as it seems I infringed on wiki's copyright guidelines. This was not intentional and I aim to correct this as soon as possible. With that said, please let me know if I will be able to create a new draft that falls in line with wiki's guidelines to be submitted for review/approval. I appreciate your help. Best, Sung — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sungielee11 (talk • contribs) 13:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Just following up on my last response. Please let me know if I will be able to create a new draft that falls in line with wiki's guidelines to be submitted for review/approval. Thanks in advance. Best, Sung — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sungielee11 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

  • I can see nothing preventing you creating a new draft but it would be far better if you were to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Lenny Simpson

Hello, I apologize for my ignorance of wikapedia proctocol but I truly have been trying to create an accurate, verifiable page for a person of note. Please please if you will restore my page or send me the text I will work on it off-line. I did not realize the issues with on-line storage. — janet Gaino Janetgaino (talk) 19:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

gang documentation page deletion

Hi I don't understand why my page has been deleted Gang Documentation. I couldn't include a link because the page no longer exists. According to Wikipedia speedy deletion (claim of significance)criteria the article meets criteria. And the article was not about a made up topic or something that i or anyone i know personally coined. There were citation sources and links to govt. websites which validated the existence of the subject. Can you please explain? And how can i go about restoring the page. This subject is very important and relevant and prevalent to a lot of people and without this page there is no easily accessible, reliable concise way for people with limited resources to access the information. — Channing Moreland (talk) 23:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

  • "I couldn't include a link" – but you just did!!! I do not need a lecture on notability. Feel free to try again – with a lower case d and more like an encyclopedia article and less like a student essay (even though it is). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok, can you please email the deleted content. My email is linked to my account Channing Moreland (talk) 18:16, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Text emailed. Hint: all external links should be shoved to the end of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
For deletion of absolutely countless junk pages over the years Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Dead AfCs

Is there a faster way to nominate the hundreds of G13 pages piled up? I saw one editor use AWB but I can't make it work on iphone. — Legacypac (talk) 14:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Humber Street Gallery

Can't see if there was a talk page response because it got deleted, but what was the problem here? I got the impression from other articles here and there that repeated local/national press coverage was enough to establish notability for a gallery or museum, let alone the "credible significance" required here. -- Gapfall (talk) 15:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Sam Chui's Little Theorem

Hi RHaworth, Could I see the content of the page Sam Chui's little theorem before you deleted it? I know it's unimportant but I just want to know what it was like. Thanks in advance, Ezhao02 (talk) 01:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

I just did that. Can you email the content to me? Thanks, Ezhao02 (talk) 21:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Ezhao02 (talk) 17:25, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nobelpharma

Hi RHaworth. You indefinitely protected Draft:Nobelpharma from being moved a while back for reasons that I think had to do with undisclosed unpaid editing and edit warring, etc. A newly created account has just submitted the draft for AfC review with this edit. No improvements were made to the draft so it remains unchanged from the version moved back to the draft namespace by SwisterTwister. It seems a little unusual that the first edit of a new account be to add {{AfC submission}} to a pretty obscure draft without having some prior knowledge of Wikipedia or some connection to the subject matter. It's only one edit so maybe an WP:SPI is not warranted at this point, but I am curious if you noticed the edit and what's your take on it if you did. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Just an update. The draft was deleted per WP:G11 by Jimfbleak. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Understand. It won't come to that hopefully. Maybe WP:SALTing the name will prevent the page from being recreated? -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

I Sabi Work Nigeria Limited

Hello, I write to know why my article was deleted by you,sir. the website cited for plagiarism: https://isabiwork.ng/the-helping-hand-called-isabiwork-ng/ is actually my company's site. The work therein is my work. You can find my name as the author of the work on it. I plead that you kindly restore the work and tell me what to do to facilitate its publication on wikipedia. Regards, Moses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mosesfelix1 (talk • contribs) 09:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Chris Lynn

Thanks for deleting my article Can you please explain to me what i did wrong? other than a nerdy smart ass response? I did everything that was asked and provided proper documentation, and all you do is come back with some BS response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesportsman1984 (talk • contribs)

FYI

Hey RHaworth. See this deletion log entry, followed by this. Cheers -- Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

User:MrCharlesBlack/sandbox

First, I would like to thank you for deleting my page. It was previously located at User:MrCharlesBlack/sandbox. You are a gentlemen and a scholar. Next, I would like to inquire as to how I could best write an article that meets with your approval. I notice that other social action groups and news sources have Wikipedia pages. So, what did they do differently? Perhaps a man of your philanthropic inclinations would be inclined to help. Please take time to respond as soon as you finish reading this message. -- MrCharlesBlack (talk) 15:07, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

  • My philanthropic inclinations do not extend to blatant self-promoters. I note that all the blog entries on multifest.org are by Charles Black. Kindly have the decency to wait until a) your organisation becomes more than just a web presence and actually has some activities, b) becomes notable and c) someone with no CoI writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Lázně Poděbrady

Hi, I would like to avoid deletion of page Lázně Poděbrady and improve this page with sources of relevancy. Could you please move this deleted page somewhere I can see it? Thank you very much! --Hypertornado (talk) 08:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Vedamo

Dear RHaworth, I am writing to you because you deleted Vedamo page on July 10. I want to recreate the page and it is written that I first need to contact you. What shall I do, so I could have the page created without being deleted again? Thank you in advance, MStoilkova Mstoilkova (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

  • I really should ignore you: you put your message in the wrong place; you vandalise someone else's message and you shout the article's title. What shall you do? The good news is nothing: simply have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your service is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Dear RHaworth, Excuse me for that. I really did not mean to violate any of the rules. This is not "my service", but I personally have used it few times. It is a social responsible project that help a lot of kids disabled from regular education to receive such. I consider I could create an article about Vedamo in Wikipedia, because it is beneficial for people to read about the project and gain knowledge on different educational tools and how they are implemented in different settings. May I still recreate the article? Mstoilkova (talk) 8:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Manual ping

because I think I screwed it up, please see this convo. — StarM 23:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of the MBN Explorer page

Dear RHaworth, I am contacting you regarding the page MBN Explorer which you have recently deleted. I would like to bring to your attention that the text was taken from the webpage of MBN Research Center which I am representing. Therefore, I am the copyright holder of this text. According to the Wikipedia policy on copyright violation, "if the contributor is the copyright holder of the text, even if it is published elsewhere under different terms, they have the right to post it here under CC BY-SA and GFDL without violating copyright, so long as they provide a suitable release to the world under Wikipedia's licenses or a free license that is compatible with them." In this connection, I am kindly asking you to restore the page, so that we can extend the content, update the texts and provide necessary links and references. Kind regards, Solov'yov (talk) 12:55, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks this highly specialised piece of software is notable enough for here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello RHaworth, I would like to write a Wiki article about MBN Explorer software. I saw that such a page has been created and then it was deleted by you. I think such an article is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. MBN Explorer is a well-known software for atomistic computational modeling. It is widely used by my colleagues and other scientists in this field, particularly, in several large-scale European research project. This page will complement the description of other well-known software on atomistic modeling, like NAMD, CHARMM or GROMACS. Therefore, I think it will be of interest to a large number of people. I don't have any CoI (as far as I understood, this was an issue in the previously created article). I wonder if it is possible to restore the deleted page. Kind regards, VerkhA (talk) 09:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with your claim about sock puppetry. I've set up proper account preferences. Would you please e-mail me a copy of deleted article so that I can rewrite it according to Wikipedia policies. Thanks.VerkhA (talk) 13:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment. The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project. Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions. Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

why put nowiki around ~~~~ ?

Here's why. -- Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

  • So don't have it at all! I think it would only work if it was insisted that the template was always substed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:22, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
    I know that – but WikiEditCrunch (talk · contribs) seemed to want it. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Assorted Jelly Beans

Can you explain how this page fits the criteria of A7? I'm willing to assume good faith that you saw something I didn't but releasing two albums on a notable label and being featured on a notable soundtrack sounds definitely like enough claims of significance to me (might even be sufficient for notability per WP:MUSIC #5). If it was just a mistake, please restore the article. Regards SoWhy 20:30, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Impact guru wikipedia page

Hello RHaworth, Hope you are doing great. This talk is regarding deletion of Impact guru wikipedia page. This page has been made following all wikipedia guidelines with unique content. Please follow back your action and elaborate for not doing the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvdpkg (talk • contribs) 06:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Somewhat reluctantly I have restored this page to Impact Guru. The most recent speedy tag said "page that was previously deleted via a deletion discussion" but I cannot find such a discussion. And, unusually, I am not even going to start the deletion discussion but Bri may well want to do so. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

PaulNandrajog

Hi, I've edited that page. I was learning about the platform. I would like you to revoke your deletion as I would like to contribute relevant information regarding my industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulNandrajog (talk • contribs) 11:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

K-theory of a category

FYI: I tried to follow procedure in requesting a contested reverse-move. Please feel free to apply Clue to the user and their silly objections that make this a burecratic nightmare. — Hasteur (talk) 15:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Again I see you've had a hand in some of TakuyaMurata's "creations". Can you please talk to them as my AGF fountain has dried up and their vandalistic disruption is no longer anything but patent disruption. — Hasteur (talk) 14:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  • I was just about to write to you about this. I think Taku has been talked to enough. They are now deaf. If you do any more moves to mainspace, leave me a note and I will move-protect. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Universal Kids Network

Thanks for the protect on this; just wanted a way to deal with the vandalism. Nate • (chatter) 22:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Deleted article comparison

How does Rosemarie Truman compare to the draft of the same article that you deleted in July? — Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Judge for yourself. I have restored all the draft space edits to the history of the live article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:22, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Devashish Roy

Hello RHaworth,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Devashish Roy for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. — Elliot321 (talk) 16:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Ditto

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Devashish Roy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRehse (talk) 18:07, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Modern Philosophical Biology

Transferred to s:talk:Popular Science Monthly/Volume 8/March 1876/Modern Philosophical Biology I

About my page deletion

Transferred to user talk:Zakirshikhli

Vanished User

I changed by user name from Ezekiel Nimoh to Vanished user 5g6brbadLOiImSJylcnP but on the history revision pages I have contributed to but on the right of some pages I have contributed to it says Ezekiel Nimoh a lot of times when others revert me such as 'Reverted 1 edit by Ezekiel Nimoh'. I don't want my real name shown on any part on the revision comments. I am not going to edit Wikipedia anymore after this has been done and I have not edited in a year. So can you use redaction to remove the 'Ezekiel Nimoh' parts on the right of the history page? I have already changed my username it doesn't say my name where I have contributed. I want my name redacted on the revision pages of Sunset, Daytime, Dawn, Dusk, Night, Midnight , Prime Meridian, 180th meridian, Polar Night, Geography of the Solomon Islands, Northern Hemisphere White Christmas (weather), and Darkness. Please do this even if it takes you a month because I don't want my name shown. Thanks! Vanished user 5g6brbadLOiImSJylcnP (talk) 18:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

  • I call your attitude an unhealthy schizophrenia. You cannot dissociate yourself from your edits – so put them behind you as "follies of your youth". But not try to pretend that you did not do them. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Firstly I don't have schizophrenia, I am a normal healthy person. I hate that you said this. Secondly what did you mean by 'put my edits behind me' as follies. — Vanished user 5g6brbadLOiImSJylcnP (talk) 19:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

  • "Put my edits behind me" – do not try to pretend that you did not do these edits. Be honest, most importantly, with yourself. Accept that you did the edits but recognise that they were inappropriate and that you will not do similar in future. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Zero Time Exercise page

Hi RHaworth, Zero Time Exercise page was recently deleted, but I think it is worth to keep.... As it is a new exercise concept advocated by The University of Hong Kong (a renowned university in Hong Kong) ([1]), and the exercise has been widely covered by the media in Hong Kong, some Hong Kong TV programmes even devoted a session to introduce this exercise concept: e.g. South China Morning Post: [2] Radio Television Hong Kong: [3] [4] [5] (30:24-) Also, it has been been published in academic conference paper ([6]). — Bao Bao Leung 0218 (talk) 02:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

  • I am fine with naked people but naked URLs really annoy me. If, and only if, you have no CoI, re-submit via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
@RHaworth: Hi RHaworth, as per your advice, I have created a draft for peer review. Thanks! Bao Bao Leung 0218 (talk) 02:49, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Template:Gujarati_writers

I have NO idea why it shows I tried to G6 a big template. [7]. That just makes no sense at all! Seriously I remember looking at the page carefully because it was a template in Draft but did not see any action needed. I very rarely even use G6. Thanks for catching the incorrectly placed tag and moving the template to the correct namespace. — Legacypac (talk) 05:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Please learn to provide a section heading when you start a new message thread. I was puzzled but I took it as a request to preserve the edit history which was in draft space at that moment. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of User:Shailesh.destylio/sandbox

Hello RHaworth, My apologise for keeping a sandbox version page with non curated data that meets Wiki guidelines on page User:Shailesh.destylio/sandbox. We have been genuinely working on getting the notability content on the page.

We mistakenly published the sandbox page that had information that was work in progress. We are working on the page that will surely meet all the guidelines. Request you to give us a chance to correct the content that meets all Wiki guidelines along with all notability content. Please help! Shailesh.destylio (talk) 08:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Seeing the Destylio advert and looking at your contribs history, suggests strongly to me that you are doing undeclared paid editing. Stop talking about yourself as "we" – corporate accounts are not allowed. If you must, submit at draft:SHM Group with a proper AfC tag and a proper declaration of paid editing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Yes, I am looking after creation of SHM Group page under paid editing. I will declare the details as suggested. Can I still use my account and publish the page ? Do I have any limitation when I publish it under declaration of paid editing ? How do I ask admins to check this page before it is being published? Thanks for your help, Shailesh.destylio (talk) 13:12, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Probably a good idea to request a change of username. Limitation? Only that volunteer Wikipedians consider paid editors a lower form of pond life, possibly lower than IP addresses. Note that drafts are not necessarily checked by admins. To get it checked, assuming you have done the job properly via AfC, simply click on the "submit your draft for review" review button and follow the instructions. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

File:420 DDAY Jozi 2013.jpg

Highya RHaworth could you please supply a reason for deleting File:420 DDAY Jozi 2013.jpg. Please note it is attached to Daggafari, Highest regards, MickeyDangerez (talk) 09:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Could I please update the license? -- MickeyDangerez (talk) 09:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Issue is self resolved. Thank you -- MickeyDangerez (talk) 09:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Spamspamspamspamspam

Spam at User talk:Palaparthi sanjeev kumar. — fortunavelut luna 14:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

No worries: sorted by the Mighty Shih  :) who incidentally I think I forgot to thank for also sorting stuff I dumped on Jimfbleak's page earlier and which therefore I should probbaly thank him for there but which actually I'll do here in this thread on RH's page and thus save myself two-thirds of the work. If you know what I mean. Thanks all! — fortunavelut luna 14:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Just trying my best to keep up :o) Alex ShihTalk 14:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Question about content of deleted draft

Hello there, I see that you deleted Draft:TheRadBrad on 28 September 2015, I am somewhat working on a draft regarding the same individual (I was unaware that one had previously existed) and I am wondering what the content of that deleted draft was? Was it anything? Thanks for your time! -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 14:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Creating or Open the article

I would like to create article about Kamlashankar Vishvakarma. Wiki has suggested me to contact you before creating article bcoz you deleted it previously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudhirrawat (talk • contribs) 07:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Automatic Learning Growth

Hello, could I please come to know the reason for deletion of the page named as Automatic Learning Growth? In my aspect, I guess I didn't promote a particular subject rather mentioned the importance of learning a language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaya21 (talk • contribs)

Thank you

Thanks you for deleting the redirects left behind page moves. Some articles were worthy of being kept (I've checked if there is enough coverage to establish their notability) but not in the mainspace some being totally unsourced. Should I refrain from moving pages if it's the case? Although I believe I'm doing the right thing, I could use a second opinion. — Robert G. (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Very much the right thing. Keep up the good work. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tejinder Sekhon

Hi. You deleted my page Draft:Tejinder Sekhon. I received a notification saying it's been rejected for advertisement, but I honestly do not get why that's the case. It was purely a bio about Tejinder and his achievements. Tejinder is my client, so I submitted the article on his behalf. Can I also please get a copy of the deleted article please, as I spent quite a bit of time trying to format it. Thanks. Vikrantsinghuk (talk) 17:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your client is notable and writes about him here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I've offended. Nobody told me there were rules and a need of decency to contribute, I simply contributed as an associate and friend of Tejinder's. How notable does one have to be to earn a Wiki article? Steve Jobs level, or is there hope for those that are less known? — Vikrantsinghuk (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Abdullah Al-Salloum

Hello, RHaworth. This AfD has been open for more than two weeks and re-listed twice. Looking at the discussion and the last re-listing comment; would you – please – consider WP:WDAFD or perhaps help examine sources and evaluate notability; assisting to expose what's required to get this article rescued? Thank you. --Aaehasa (talk) 11:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Why on earth should I withdraw the AfD? The page looks to me like vanity. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Because, at first, your concern was "Lack of evidence of notability in English." and AfD's discussion made it clear. However, since your concern has changed, can you advise on how to present the facts given in sources without making the article look like vanity? I can work with your sufficient quick/simple tricks and tips. Thank you. --Aaehasa (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

  • If the current AfD closes with delete, then simply wait until an editor with a longer and more diverse contributions history thinks this guy is notable and writes about him here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Wise response Roger. I would not care if it is deleted, I would care more if could rescue it, and I thought you'd be helpful making me that guy who would get the credit for rescuing something in here and builds his own diverse contributions history. Thank you anyway. :-) --Aaehasa (talk) 23:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Question

When a user vandalizes Wikipedia they get warned and if they keep doing it they get blocked. But what happens if an administrator vandalizes Wikipedia? Theultimateboss123 (talk) 12:10, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

GarageGeeks

Hi Roger, Could you elaborate on your speedy deletion of the article recently created for GarageGeeks – a world recognized non-profit in the technology/innovation/entrepreneurship space? I claim that this organization easily passes the 'credible claim of significance or importance' based on the material I provided in the talk page.

Based on this page Wikipedia:Common claims of significance or importance the GarageGeeks qualifies on multiple basis:

  • "Has a notable founder or president" – Yossi Vardi is a founding member.
  • "Attended by multiple notable people, groups, bands etc" – Here is Sergey Brin, founder of Google, being introduced by Yossi Vardi (see above) at the GarageGeeks – [8]
  • "Attended by multiple notable people, groups, bands etc" – Here is Jimmy Wales, the founder of WikiMedia being interviewed by Yossi Vardi at GarageGeeks – [9]

As you can see the GarageGeeks satisfies multiple claims of significance and importance' and as such I believe your speedy deletion is in error. Please Advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohadpr (talk • contribs)

How is notability related? I am commenting on your speedy deletion and how I believe this page does not qualify to get speedy deleted because as demonstrated in my comments above it meets the requirements of 'Common claims of significance or importance'.

If you'd like to insist on notability of GarageGeeks, which does not seem to be a requirement for deleting under 'speedy deletion', here is a demonstration of notability for GarageGeeks.

  • Is it significant: Yes, the entire video piece is about GarageGeeks.
  • Is it reliable: Yes, this is one of the world's most renowned tech journalists working for the WSJ
  • Is it independent of the subject: Yes, this is the WSJ's website.

Ohadpr (talk) 07:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Dream Bags

Why did you enter Dream Bags for speedy deletion? I have contested the speedy deletion, but apparently to no avail as you have just deleted it anyway without any further discussion. Feeling like a dictator, are you? -- dusoft (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

  • It is article suicide to develop articles from scratch in mainspace. User user space or draft space. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Curve (company)

Hi @RHaworth:, you removed the draft page for Draft:Curve (company) draft page which was tagged for speedy deletion – because it was not correctly tagged with a paid disculosure (the company is my employer, although the article was neutral and well cited – far more so than a number of other company pages currently live). Would it be possible to reinstate the draft, so I can correctly add the paid-disclosure tag? Please also help/advise on which of the content was not neutral, and I will be happy to amend. Thanks in advance for your help. -- Cgm101 (talk) 14:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) I answered on my talk too. Happy shopping!¬  ;) — fortunavelut luna 13:53, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
  • The lack of neutrality lies in the editor as much as in the text. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Want to rewrite a deleted page

You deleted my page for "advertising" and I get that, my bad. I would like the opportunity to rewrite and or reword the article so as not to be like and advertisement. So what articles do I need to read to do this or what do I need to do? Thanks. HorrorPackFan (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Certainly the style of your article suggested that you have not looked at any other Wikipedia articles. So look at and study articles about services similar to yours. And then go away and wait for someone with no CoI to write it up for you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Ship Patrick Henry page

Hi you deleted this page Ship Patrick Henry and said it is for copyright infringement. However, I am author of the page: http://webpages.charter.net/mcarolan/ThomasCarolan.html and also the wikipedia page I put up. Can you tell me what to do to get page in condition to put up on wiki? I am new...Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Binx1966 (talk • contribs)

On the page at charter.net place a notice on the bottom saying that the content is licensed under {{cc-by--sa-4.0}}. Re-instate and point out that the licence at charter.net in an HTML comment within the article, in an edit summary and on the talk page. The new page should have a title of SS Patrick Henry (1839). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Restoration of article, title 'Déanism'

Dear Sir, In the interest of avoiding a repost, I respectfully request the text of the page Wikipedia claims you originally submitted for deletion, titled, Déanism. If this page was on the feminine-essentialist religion that originated in the late 1960's in England, then that is the correct page, and I would appreciate viewing the text of it. If not, or if the page was merely started and never added to beyond a title, I apologize for bothering you and will create a new page. Thank you. Minnaloushe4444 (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Howard Hinton

Dear RHaworth I have just returned to my draft article on Howard Hinton after many weeks to find you deleted it. I am an unpractised beginner in Wikipedia and have great trouble remembering formatting code and protocols. The article was deleted because I quoted a sentence from an online source, which I cited in a footnote. Coming from an old research background I thought quoting and citing was appropriate. My mistake. However, I put dozens of hours into the Hinton article reading widely in books, journals and online, and your deletion has wiped it all away. Several of those print sources have been returned to the library and another owner. When the notice about speedy deletion was posted I removed the offending sentence and the citation, and thought this would prevent deletion, but not so. I'm afraid I didn't keep a separate file. Can you please give me access to the text. I hope to complete the article on this very worthy subject (witness his inclusion in the Australian Dictionary of Biography). I now know the policy on direct quoting. Thank you. Dirrigeree (talk) 01:52, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Learn wikilinks

Pile of G6-able redirects

As the one who deleted most of my taggings of obviously created in error sandbox redirects such as Danquintin/sandbox, would you mind deleting the rest of them, listed at User:Train2104/sandbox, so I don't have to tag them all one by one? Thanks. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Horrible bus pages

Hi, Indefinite full Salting of 3 pages you once deleted in July. Could you not mind indefinitely fully create-protect Bulim Bus Package, Woodlands Bus Package and Loyang Bus Package because there is a risk these pages will be repeatedly recreated even after you deleted. Thanks, 45.120.203.104 (talk) 08:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Kannadian filmmaker

Authenticating an award winning filmmaker of Indian Regional Language Kannada film Industry== Hi, I would like to know what authentication would you require about the filmmaker, whose film has won state govt Best Debut Film Of Newcomer Director 2016 Karnataka State Film Awards, Best Film in Bangalore International Film Festival[10], and is the only 3rd film to be selected to be streamed on Netflix [11] for which I have the supporting links attached. Please let me know what more proof or criteria would be required to avoid deleting of the article. — RAGZU (talk) 11:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Deleting templates under CSD T2

Please do not delete templates like Template:Italian-short-film-stub under WP:CSD#T2 unless that criterion (summarised as "Misrepresentation of policy") really does apply. Stub templates (which are all built around {{asbox}}) are largely informational, they do not not state any policy, so cannot be misrepresenting policy. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Babloo Prithiveeraj

Hi there,

I feel the 2017 deletion of the article Babloo Prithiveeraj was almost done without considering the mass changes between it and the 2015 version. The actor is well known, in both the film and television circuit across South India, and has enjoyed recognition for over 25 years. Through my experiences and knowledge of Tamil cinema, he is probably the most high profile personality remaining without a Wikipedia page. It's actually a bit strange to see no page for someone with a career as distinguished as his. Please could you allow the page to be recreated / unblocked.

Thank you. Editor 2050 (talk) 23:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Dani Secomb

Hi again, i'm still struggling to make any progress, will you acknowledge you're receiving my messages? I have been reading that on my sandbox where I see that its been deleted, I read that there should be a 'contest the deletion, or something similar, I can't find it – PLEASE please can i get my work back and point me in the direction of how to make it correct? How can I make progress, i've clicked on nearly everything on this site now at least i'm learning a lot haha. — Janeykeithy (talk) 09:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello there I've been searching around these Wiki pages for over a day now. Tuesday night I worked all night on a page, it was my first attempt as a wiki anything all this time later i've found waht i think is an indication that you deleted it? Can i get it back please? If i had not done something correctly it's because i'm just learning how Not sure i'm finding this a terribly friebndly community either to be perfectly honest But hopefully i'm right that it was you who deleted it, and even though i don't know the link (it was in my sandbox that's all i know and i submitted it for review then spent then til now clicking so many areas.. if you can find it please please return it to me So seriously if i make an error it just gets thrown out? could you advise me on how to be successful? — Janeykeithy (talk) 07:03, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm just another editor. You posted in the right place just wait for this Admin to reply. Your sandbox was deleted because it was judged to contain material not suitable for wikipedia's goals. I don't know what was there. Legacypac (talk) 12:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RHaworth/2017_Sep_07&oldid=1180097395"