Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 August 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< August 07 August 09 >

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dakrua[edit]

Dakrua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. Non-notable band. SL93 (talk) 23:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Relucio[edit]

Ryan Relucio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 25. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:37, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - @GiantSnowman: There are sources sthat how he is notable in Northern Mariana Islands among many other sources, like [1], [2], [3], and [4] among many other sources. In addition, he is a young international capped player with an ongoing career. I look at the other sports WikiProjects and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I wrote this another 30 are probably deleted. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 02:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    All the Saipan Tribune articles count as one source, and the mvariety page is obviously a press release from Seton Hall so is not independent. The article needs SIGCOV in multiple independent secondary RS, which it lacks currently. JoelleJay (talk) 04:04, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And yet WP:SPORTCRIT is met with one reference, let alone 3 over a 2-year period in a national newspaper. The first in particular is very in-depth. Nfitz (talk) 23:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Saipan Tribune is not a "national newspaper" in any sense that would indicate notability beyond that of every online paper serving a community <60k. As I said before, the three refs count as one source since they represent commentary by one newspaper (in fact, by just one reporter from one newspaper). JoelleJay (talk) 02:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And yet WP:NSPORT is met. Nfitz (talk) 15:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
...Which doesn't mean NSPORT is met, since that requires multiple sources. He does not meet our notability standards, he meets the minimal requirements for an athlete bio to be in mainspace when unchallenged and is afforded somewhat more presumption that further coverage exists. However, when others have looked and not been able to locate more independent SIGCOV, that presumption is rebutted. JoelleJay (talk) 20:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep NSport is met - this reference is very good. Nfitz (talk) 23:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Which part of NSPORT? Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:SPORTCRIT, as I already mentioned. Nfitz (talk) 23:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Meeting this requirement alone does not indicate notability, but it does indicate that there are likely sufficient sources to merit a stand-alone article. This doesn't absolve the subject from actually meeting GNG, it's literally just the bare minimum for all athlete articles. One piece of purely local non-trivial coverage of his collegiate career does not cut it. JoelleJay (talk) 01:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete there is not enough significant coverage of this person to meet the GNG --Guerillero Parlez Moi 12:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails WP:SPORTCRIT A person is presumed to be notable if they have been the subject of significant coverage, that is, multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable. The Blue Ayuyus’ Relucio gets recognition has some significant coverage, but a lot of interviewing and lacks a disinterested tone. A WP:BLP has to be more than a pseudo biography or just mainly statistics. -- Otr500 (talk) 12:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing per SNOW - If anyone disagrees with my close please leave a message on my talk page and I will undo my close and leave for an administrator. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarta (talk) 13:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vanisha Kumar[edit]

Vanisha Kumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I've added additional sources to ensure that this article passes WP:GNG. As for WP:SIGCOV I found multiple articles about her in about 2 minutes on google, but if you misspell her name you get nothing. Good old google I guess. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 05:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources added which show notability. GiantSnowman 09:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep there are clearly sources which provide significant coverage and pass GNG. It would be helpful if the nominator would actually check before going straight to AfD.--IdiotSavant (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per above. Besides the sources already on the page I have found these additional sources which shoe she is notable in Fiji: 10 and 11 among many many other sources not listed here which shoe she is notable in Fiji. She is probably only foreign based Fiji women's player and clearly significant figure in Fiji football. All the other Sports WikiProjects don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 10, but why should any Sports WikiProject have 10 deleted per day? By the time I finish writing this, another ten will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep also per above, which does indicate evidence of notability. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources added above passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep:Meets GNG. Indianfootball98 (talk) 06:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per significant sources found above.--Mvqr (talk) 11:20, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above and Vanisha Kumar meets notability guidelines of Wikipedia and passes GNG. BBSTOP (talk) 10:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources discussed above. Why hasn't this snow keep been withdrawn by User:Sportsfan 1234? Nfitz (talk) 00:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asilika Gasau[edit]

Asilika Gasau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing per SNOW - If anyone disagrees with my close please leave a message on my talk page and I will undo my close and leave for an administrator. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarta (talk) 13:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cema Nasau[edit]

Cema Nasau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per sources added which show notability. GiantSnowman 11:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - have added sources, which were easily found. In addition to the routine stuff to demonstrate facts, there's substantial coverage in two Fiji Times articles. Again, it would be nice if the nominator looked before nominating. It would also be nice if they tagged relevant wikiprojects - in this case, WikiProject:Fiji - rather than excluding them.--IdiotSavant (talk) 10:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per above. Besides the sources already on the page I have found these additional sources which shoe she is notable in Fiji: 15, 16, and 17 among many many other sources not listed here from Fiji Sun, Fiji Village, FBC News, Fiji Live, and Fiji Times etc which show she is notable in Fiji. She is clearly significant figure in Fiji football. All the other Sports WikiProjects don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 10, but why should any Sports WikiProject have 10 deleted per day? By the time I finish writing this, another ten will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources added passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:24, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, certainly has significant coverage and it is nice to see that the Women's international team in Fiji is getting this good coverage.--Mvqr (talk) 11:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Notable footballer, meets WP:GNG. BBSTOP (talk) 10:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Per all above. Indianfootball98 (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Fiji Times, Fiji Sun and Fiji Village have articles showing more than a passing mention Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zak Best[edit]

Zak Best (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG. ––FormalDude talk 21:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: This article needs improvement on citation otherwise it is notable and meets WP:GNG. BBSTOP (talk) 10:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

B. J. Averell[edit]

B. J. Averell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable reality television contestant. Won one season of The Amazing Race in 2006, and nothing since then. Bgsu98 (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep according to the article he's done a couple of other things after the reality TV thing, contrary to nom Andre🚐 05:17, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nickelodeon Animation Studio. Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon Animation Podcast[edit]

Nickelodeon Animation Podcast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG. Only available sources are trivial mentions or unreliable. TipsyElephant (talk) 20:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Noddy[edit]

Johnny Noddy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 19th century nonnotable colloquialism referenced to a novel. I failed to find any good referenbces, although I did find a couple of similar uses. Loew Galitz (talk) 21:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not particularly notable phrase Andre🚐 05:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Blanket sleeper. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Denton[edit]

Dr. Denton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable product called 'Dr. Denton', a type of pyjama or blanket. No sources and I cannot find any additional information about this brand of blanket anywhere, and I have never heard of this brand either even thought it is allegedly a genericised trademark.   Kadzi   (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions.   Kadzi   (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, looking at this, I feel like it probably would pass notability, but i'd want to dig a bit deeper before committing to that stance. I have found this article from the LA times back in 1978, which is a significant coverage of the product(s), though I don't know what exactly it is (reads like a review of sorts). For a company dating back to the mid-1800s, i'd imagine there would be other sufficient material out there. Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Femke (talk) 19:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WoodenBoat[edit]

AfDs for this article:
WoodenBoat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMAG Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:31, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Source inspection wanted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, it appears to be a real magazine about wooden boats with some coverage, like in the Bangor local news in Maine, and it's been around for a while. The article is a stub but appears to meet notability. Andre🚐 05:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
    1. Compton, Nic (2008). Iain Oughtred: A Life in Wooden Boats. London: Adlard Coles Nautical. pp. 58–66. ISBN 978-1-4081-0515-3. Retrieved 2022-08-15 – via Google Books.

      The book notes: "In 1974, into this fertile environment, former boatbuilder Jon Wilson launched what was to become the voice of the movement: WoodenBoat magazine. Aimed at the amateur and professional boatbuilder, it was packed to the gills with practical and historical articles about (mostly) indigenous American craft. Within a year the magazine had attracted 8,000 subscribers, and by the end of its third year it employed a staff of twelve and its circulation and had risen to 25,000. By 1981 it was secure enough to move to grandiose new offices in Brooklin on a 60-acre estate overlooking Eggemoggin Reach, on the east side of Penobscot Bay. There, with the participation of eminent figures such as yacht designer Joel White and authors Maynard Bray and Peter Spectre, the magazine continued to expand and set up its own programme of boatbuilding and sailing courses. By the mid-1980s, its circulation was over 100,000, where it has remained ever since. Clearly, as Wilson wrote in his very first editorial, it was a magazine 'whose time has come'."

    2. Pillsbury, Fred (1982-03-09). "His magazine sells, knock on wood: A man turns his love for wooden boats into successful publication". The Boston Globe. p. 37. ProQuest 1466612179.

      The article notes: "Brooklin, Maine — WoodenBoat, "the magazine for wooden boat owners, builders and designers," must have the most spectacular view of any publication in New England. Its headquarters, in a brick, 35-room house on 60 acres of woods and open space here, look south over Eggemoggin Reach — shimmering salt water, spruce-covered islands, distant blue hills, gulls, white sails in the summer. Several of the 24 staff members face their desks away from the windows so they can do their work. The rest just enjoy it. WoodenBoat has other attributes, such as a 70,000 combined circulation (which doubled in the last three years), $1 million in annual sales, and Jonathan Wilson. A 36-year-old college dropout and ex-boatbuilder from Rhode Island, Wilson started the magazine in 1974 with a budget of $14,500 — $11,000 from the sale of his Alden ketch, $3500 borrowed."

    3. Agrifoglio, Rocco; Metallo, Concetta (2015). "Preserving Knowledge Through Community of Practice: A Multiple Case Study". In Mola, Lapo; Pennarola, Ferdinando; Za, Stefano (eds.). From Information to Smart Society: Environment, Politics and Economics. Cham: Springer Nature. p. 109. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09450-2. ISBN 978-3-319-09449-6. ISSN 2195-4968. Retrieved 2022-08-15 – via Google Books.

      The book provides one page of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "WoodenBoat is now an online CoP of owners, admirers, builders, and designers of wooden boats (woodenboat.com). Founded in September 1974 by Wilson WoodenBoat, WoodenBoat was born as an American magazine for boat amateurs and, then, it is become an important virtual place for people who share interest and passion for old and new wooden boats. Today, WoodenBoat reaches readers and community members by various ways such as publications, website, forum and blog, thematic events, and photo and video gallery."

    4. Genter, Ethan (2022-01-14). "New owners want to grow a Maine magazine for wooden boat enthusiasts". Bangor Daily News. Archived from the original on 2022-08-15. Retrieved 2022-08-15.

      The article notes: "When Jon Wilson started WoodenBoat magazine in 1974 in an off-grid cabin in Brooksville, it filled a niche in the world of wooden boats as a good professional trade journal. The company has since become a mainstay in the wooden boat community with about 60,000 readers. ... Matt Murphy, the editor of WoodenBoat magazine, and Andrew Breece, the publisher of the company’s magazine division, purchased the company on New Year’s Day and plan to keep filling the pages with stories on the emerging technologies and traditional methods of boat building — while also expanding the company’s digital presence."

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow WoodenBoat to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 08:12, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ian Irvine. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Three Worlds Cycle[edit]

The Three Worlds Cycle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing a pass of WP:NBOOK; in fact, I couldn't find a single reliable review online (Googling "three worlds cycle" review and "view from the mirror" review). There's some stuff on Goodreads and some blog posts, but not much else. Suggesting redirect to Ian Irvine, the author of the series. Ovinus (talk) 20:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Ovinus (talk) 20:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, rename to Three Worlds (Ian Irvine). This is not a book, so no wonder it is not "reviewed". But the term may be found on book covers, not only on fansites and blogs. This is a descriptive term used by the author themselves for the book cycle. I suggest renaming because there are several other series referred to as "Three Worlds books", "Three Worlds series", etc. The author themselves uses the latter two, meaning that "Cycle" is not part of the "proper name". Loew Galitz (talk) 21:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Are there reviews of any of the individual books, though? I could not find anything reliable for "view from the mirror", nor "a shadow on the glass", "the tower on the rift". Ovinus (talk) 21:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • That's not the point. And same here, I am pondering on the idea to AfD all articles about Irving's books, because all of them seem to be in-universe fancruft. But I am lazy, and pages are harmless, so I leave the job to "hardcore deletionists" Loew Galitz (talk) 22:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • P.S. And I think that Three Worlds (Ian Irvine) may be a good "merge/redirect" target for reliable info about all its novels. Loew Galitz (talk) 23:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        • Hm, I don't consider myself hardcore... :P Anyway, I agree that that's a conceivable target, but where is the reliable info? I really can't find anything besides self-published sources. The most likely redirect target is Ian Irvine, which I've added to the nom statement. Ovinus (talk) 01:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Ian Irvine. Non-notable book series; pretty much unreferenced and no references provided in disucssion here so far. Yes, it exists, that doesn't meen we need a catalogue/fancruft entry about it. WP:NOTCATALOGUE, etc. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per Piotrus. Coverage of these books in reliable sources appears to be either vanishingly insubstantial or entirely nonexistent. Even if there were reviews of the individual books, they wouldn't confer notability on the series as a whole. But no harm pointing readers to the author's article, which can justifiably at least tell them the names of the books in the series and when they were published. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect/Merge to WP:PRESERVE. There aren't sources to confer notability on this as a separate article but it does tie together several notable books written by Ian Irvine. Archrogue (talk) 19:47, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Lewavuni[edit]

Maria Lewavuni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raijieli Lewasoqevula[edit]

Raijieli Lewasoqevula (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Silina Qarawaqa[edit]

Silina Qarawaqa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laniana Qereqeretabua[edit]

Laniana Qereqeretabua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stella Naivalulevu[edit]

Stella Naivalulevu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Nyirenda[edit]

Patricia Nyirenda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yefim Shubentsov[edit]

Yefim Shubentsov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this person might or might not be notable, this article is wholly an advertisement and should be deleted under WP:TNT. It seems too old to delete via WP:G11. TartarTorte 18:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chocolate butter[edit]

Chocolate butter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage. At best, merge to Butter as just another flavoured butter type. Geoff | Who, me? 17:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco Sondelli[edit]

Francesco Sondelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG ---FMSky (talk) 13:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:37, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SwissDisk[edit]

SwissDisk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP as it has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary independent sources. The company has only received coverage in reliable independent sources as a result of an event in 2009 (see the three refs currently in the article) and the coverage about the company itself is hardly significant ([10] and [11] are passing mentions, and [12] only contains a few sentences with some basic background info on the company). Google Books and Google Scholar searches also only return passing mentions afaics. Felida97 (talk) 16:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, this page was created just to promote the CNet article, which in itself is enough reason to delete it. Note, I am the owner of SwissDisk. Ben Collins (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom Andre🚐 05:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Although this company has been around for a while, I am unable to locate any references *about the company* that meet NCORP's criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 17:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TrippNT[edit]

TrippNT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Lack of in-depth independent coverage. Searching only finds a few directory/database type listings, and mentions at catalogs selling their products. MB 16:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, few mentions and only mentions are trivial Andre🚐 05:10, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: An article about a small business, with a history of WP:SPA edits. The company has featured in "Inc 5000" lists [13] but that is trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Aside from that, as others have said above, all that is found is sporadic product listings. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 16:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is a company therefore WP:NCORP applies. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 17:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Views are split primarily between keep and merge (neither of which requires admin action) with a side order of delete (which did not appear to have sufficient consensus). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stereo Satellite[edit]

Stereo Satellite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable band that hasn't released anything -- FMSky (talk) 10:34, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so if someone forms a band and it has at least 2 musicians with a wikipedia article in it, that band is automatically notable and must be kept, even if that band never released anything? --FMSky (talk) 13:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - WP:NBAND, "or merge". --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    This is what it says: "Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles." The criteria says it "may be notable" if it meets this, so we still need to decide if this is enough. Zeddedm (talk) 20:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The above recommendation to keep/merge is the type of bureaucratic thinking that saddles Wikipedia with pointless articles that say nothing beyond how something exists, and dubiously precious edit histories of the same. WP:NBAND starts with the phrase "may be notable" if one of the criteria is satisfied. Well this band may be notable because it has certain musicians in it, until you do a little research and find that they achieved practically nothing beyond forming one day and telling a few media outlets that they existed. They created one single self-released video and then nothing else happened. The band's brief existence can be mentioned at each member's article. See also WP:EXIST and WP:SPEAKSELF. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:15, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - WP:CHEAP. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A redirect is indeed cheap, but so is reversing it. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:42, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - Better to have the term point to something, instead of pointing to nothing. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:21, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Week Keep - There is actually a lot of news from the band was formed and released a single, but nothing after, I have added 8 new citations. Per WP:NMUSIC they may also qualify "Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles." Zeddedm (talk) 20:53, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that several new sources were added to the article on 26 July 2022‎ (UTC), after this nomination for deletion and after most of the commentary above occurred.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I already voted above. The new sources are a triumph of quantity over quality and accomplish nothing. They all say the exact same thing, and merely repeat the two sources that were there before the AfD. Read all the sources and you will learn ten times that the band announced its formation in December 2017 and self-released a video for the song "Glass Houses". Those sources are all from the same two-week period, repeat the same basic information, and are probably all retreads of the same promotional announcement. Of interest: source #9 is an outlier because it says that an album was planned for 2018, which never happened, and neither did anything else for this band. So they managed to send their promo announcement to ten different magazines on their way to accomplishing nothing. Good for them. They still don't qualify for an article here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:26, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    This is why I said Weak Keep. I am not too thrilled about it. But whether all news is the same all not, as long as they are not exactly copied word-by-word, then they are considered new sources and count towards notability, because it shows that different publications have coverage on them. The publications have found them to be news worthy to write about them. Zeddedm (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 14:09, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 19:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One Rail Australia east coast divestiture business[edit]

One Rail Australia east coast divestiture business (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was initially proposed for discussion on the Talk page for its previous name, One Rail Australia (East Coast). Some elements of the article were misleading so the article was subsequently edited to more accurately describe the subject pending a decision on deletion.

Background (see One Rail Australia article for details):

  • Rail operator Aurizon purchased the assets of One Rail Australia on 29 July 2022.
  • The company regulator mandated a condition of its approval of the sale: One Rail Australia's assets related to its bulk haulage on Australia's east coast were to be divested by Aurizon.
  • Research has not revealed any incorporated business undertaking the divestiture task; it could well be a business unit with a chinese wall shielding against the rest of Aurizon's management, or another arrangement not publicly available.
  • The divestiture business (the term used by the company regulator) will cease once One Rail Australia's east coast assets are disposed of by way of sale or demerger to Aurison shareholders.
  • The One Rail Australia article contains all the information in the article proposed for deletion.

The main reasons for proposing the article's deletion are that the business is ephemeral and not notable in its own right, and that all information in the article is already in the parent company's article.

Accordingly, I propose deletion. Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 12:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - "One Rail Australia (East Coast)" appears to be a fabrication. Evidence indicates 1Rail continues to exist (now under Aurizon ownership), just without the SA/NT operations which were transferred directly to Aurizon. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 14:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
?Merge - The reason I created the One Rail Australia (East Coast) page was that I thought it best that the existing One Rail Australia page covered the period between 1997 (when ASR was formed and bought the remnants of AN) & 29 July 2022 (the day Aurizon acquired ORA). This page was meant to be a stop-gap page for the east coast business (which is still trading as ORA) until it is sold, at which point it would be either re-named or merged to a different page.
We could merge/keep the east coast business in the One Rail Australia page under its own heading for the time being, adding a note that this section would be transferred/removed once the Divestiture Business has been sold/de-merged. Thoughts? MatthewH01 (talk) 08:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Wiggles. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Hamilton (entertainer)[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Kelly Hamilton (entertainer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per the nomination note and arguments made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Hamilton (entertainer), which was procedurally closed due to issues with the nomination page itself. jp×g 10:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I don't think this page should be deleted. We just need to obtain more information about her from reliable sources to make this page better. It'll be a team effort and will be worth the wait once the work is all done. Dipper Dalmatian 11:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this information exists. Like I said -- this person was an auxiliary member of a performing group for a little over a year, and then left. It's not apparent that they wrote any songs, or formed an integral part of the group. This can easily be mentioned on the main page for the group. There are no news results providing WP:SIGCOV or WP:NMUSIC (except for a single Daily Mail piece, which is inadmissable). jp×g 11:49, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to The Wiggles, any information about her can be mentioned in that article. Sungodtemple (talk) 12:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect seems to be the most sensible option.-KH-1 (talk) 05:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addite Shirwaikar Malik[edit]

Addite Shirwaikar Malik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG  and WP:NACTOR . [ It has some sources but these sources do not tell about her project. DNA (COVID Recorery [14]) , The Times of India (Mohit Malik Interview[15]) The Times of India ( family life ([16] ) NDTV ( Baby Boy [17])] PravinGanechari (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. PravinGanechari (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This source from the article for example, talks a bit about the TV shows she has acted in. Lack of enough sources in the article may be resolved, but the subject has definitely worked in quite a lot of notable TV show hence doesn't warrant deletion. Another source I found about her role in Shararat (TV series) ([18]). - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Fylindfotberserk Sir
    • The Times of India wrote "The actress, who has been part of TV shows like Kumkum - Ek Pyara Sa Bandhan, Shararat, Kahaani Ghar Ghar Kii and Baat Hamari Pakki Hai has been away from the small screen since her last show, 26/11 went off-air in 2013."
    • I have checked now this actress is not in lead role but in small role in this serial. ( Kumkum – Ek Pyara Sa Bandhan, Shararat (TV series), Kahaani Ghar Ghar Kii, Baat Hamari Pakki Hai).
    • The page creator left a message on the talk page ( 8 January 2020[19]). It appears that no new source has been added to this page in the past two years and six months since this message.
    I am new user sir I have only four months experience. It is a good thing if this page survives with consensus. I did not find any reliable source in this page so I brought this page Afd. Sorry sir PravinGanechari (talk) 13:07, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep, has coverage from Times of India and has acted in many notable shows, although with minor roles. Sungodtemple (talk) 12:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sources have been added after the AfD nomination; they do seem a bit questionable, but nobody here has discussed them. Sandstein 19:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Co-Wheels[edit]

Co-Wheels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP/WP:SIGCOV Kleuske (talk) 08:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ruma Sharma[edit]

Ruma Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't pass WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG PravinGanechari (talk) 11:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nominator has withdrawn, and no delete !votes are present. North America1000 15:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tsegaye Mamo[edit]

Tsegaye Mamo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article exists in draft space, where it belongs. The article does not make clear what position the subject holds, and the sources are one Facebook post and one news piece that is not about the subject. This version should be deleted while the article is improved in draft space. Mccapra (talk) 10:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Ethiopia. Mccapra (talk) 10:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Subject appears to be notable, but I am unable to find any source that proves this. The French Wikipedia article asserts that he is an MP in the upper house of parliament, but sadly does not provide a source. I was unable to find any source in Latin-script; I'll try searching using Amharic, but sadly it doesn't seem like Google automatically translates this so it'll be a process. Curbon7 (talk) 05:05, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Got it [20]. Notable per WP:NPOL, seems to have served in 2011, but I literally can't figure out much more. Regardless, Keep. Could be good to toss to the editors at WP:WikiProject Ethiopia so it's not a perma-stub, as I can't make head-or-tails of this. Curbon7 (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw thanks for finding that. I agree the subject is now clearly an NPOL pass and will add the project tag for Ethiopia. Mccapra (talk) 07:44, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matalena Daniells[edit]

Matalena Daniells (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Most sources are trivial. [21] is fully of quotes and cannot count towards GNG and [22] seems to be a reasonable source, but one source falls well short of both GNG and SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - there's more than enough here to meet GNG - there the Queensland College of Teachers, Pasifika Sisters, GameDay and 2019 Samoa Observer articles all contain significant, non-routine information. --IdiotSavant (talk) 04:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I've now added more sources from Gale OneFile, expanding the coverage of team selections to more than just team lists. Again, there's plenty here. IdiotSavant (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Of your list above, all but the Samoa Observer articles fail independence or are not RS, while the SO articles only have trivial, routine mentions. None of those count towards GNG. Can you share what is in the Gale media? JoelleJay (talk) 02:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - agree with IS that there is sufficient coverage to demonstrate notability. GiantSnowman 14:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per above. Also, she was captain of the Samoa national team. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails GNG. Queensland College of Teachers isn't independent as Daniells was nominated for one of their awards. Pasifika Sisters is a blog and of dubious reliability. Samoa Observer contains a few lines on her. Gameday - "This story originally appeared on the official Olympic FC website" meaning it isn't independent of her. Dougal18 (talk) 10:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Sustained non-routine coverage in independent reliable sources, as we would expect for an international football captain. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, leaning delete per Dougal18. I've removed the blog source as those are never, ever allowed on BLPs. Despite the ref bombing, I still haven't seen any independent SIGCOV of this person.
Article source analysis

1. FB Ref: stats page, ✗ Fail
2. Queensland College of Teachers finalist announcement: not independent, ✗ Fail
3. Samoa Observer 1: routine match recap (and non-grammatical title doesn't give much confidence in quality), ✗ Fail
4. MyGameday reprint of press release: not independent, ✗ Fail
5. Westside News article on Queensland teaching award: cannot access, but unlikely to contain independent SIGCOV, Not sure.
6. Innisfail Advocate 1: cannot access, but presumably a match recap so unlikely to have SIGCOV, Not sure.
7. Innisfail Advocate 2: cannot access, appears to be award announcement, Not sure.
8. Samoa Observer 2: almost entirely quotes, no SIGCOV and not independent, ✗ Fail
9. Moreton Bay United: club website, not independent, ✗ Fail
10. Football Queensland: governing sports org website, not independent, ✗ Fail
11. Loop Samoa 1: single independent sentence mentioning her, no SIGCOV, ✗ Fail
12. Stuff.nz: passing mention, no SIGCOV, ✗ Fail
13. Solomon Star: routine match recap, passing mentions, ✗ Fail
14. Pine Rivers Press 1: cannot access, Not sure.
15. Innisfail Advocate 3: cannot access, but presumably transactional report on Daniells playing for Samoa, unlikely to have independent SIGCOV, Not sure.
16. Loop Samoa 2: named in a list of players, no SIGCOV, ✗ Fail
17. Pine Rivers Press 2: cannot access, Not sure.
18. Loop Samoa 3: named in a list of players, no SIGCOV, ✗ Fail
19. Pine Rivers Press 3: cannot access, Not sure.

Can someone with Gale access describe the newspaper articles that cover her? JoelleJay (talk) 02:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JoelleJay:
Ref 5: Passing mention (Centenary State High's Matalena Daniells, a former Samoa Women's National Football Team captain, made it to the finals after inspiring students to excel and participate in sport.)
Ref 6: Passing mention (However we have also been very fortunate to have an influx of young and energetic players come into the team, Matalena Daniells..)
Ref 7: Award announcement for a "Pierre De Coubertin Award"
Ref 14: Brief interview, almost all verbal quotes from subject
Ref 15: Announcement about being named in the Samoan team for the Oceania Football Confederation (OFC) Women's Nations Cup, with some brief interview quotes
Ref 17: Like ref 14
Ref 19: Report on her captaincy during the Pacific Games (MATALENA Daniells, the Moreton Bay United Jets defender, has led Samoa to its first medal in the Pacific Games.) More than a passing mention and mentions her brother, but a very short article.
Very few actually describe her in any detail, although I tend to consider that if a media outlet wants to interview someone, there has to be some noteworthy reason to do so. Ref 5 and 6 are definitely not sigcov. Bungle (talk • contribs) 18:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! It doesn't look like there's sufficient independent coverage to support an article. I don't think being interviewed is a great indicator of potential notability, either, especially when it's in local press. And if even local sources aren't discussing her in detail, I think that's decent evidence she is not notable. JoelleJay (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per above. JoelleJay (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per JoelleJay's source analysis. Article lacks evidence of SIGCOV as required by NSPORTS and GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 03:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep One significant references falls far short? That's a bit of an exaggeration. Gale access is available through Wikipedia Library to everyone. I've only pulled Reference 15; a 10-paragraph article is more than an ammouncement - meets GNG. Nfitz (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment GNG needs multiple sources. Seven of those paragraphs in ref 15 are quotes or have no info on her. Dougal18 (talk) 10:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:16, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of people on the postage stamps of Ukraine[edit]

List of people on the postage stamps of Ukraine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTN and WP:NOT. Fram (talk) 08:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Rlink2 (talk) 21:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lokesh Cinematic Universe. ✗plicit 11:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rolex (character)[edit]

Rolex (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable character who played a cameo in a single film. Fail Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). DareshMohan (talk) 06:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DareshMohan i created this page, so that one the character appear in more Lokesh Cinematic Universe films, i will add information relating to only Rolex character, you can use peter parker as an example of what i'm trying to do, please consider on not delete my article, i will right to improve the article if possible
regards Auhabeeb Auhabeeb (talk) 20:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, understand what you mean. Create the article again in the future if this character comes again. DareshMohan (talk) 23:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eating disorders and development[edit]

Eating disorders and development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant content to eating disorder - as far as I can tell, the only thing that this article has which eating disorder does not, is DSM-5 copyright violations for the diagnostic criteria. The AN "diagnostic history" section has some possibly interesting statistics, although the sources are of questionable reliability (two are deadlinks, one is from CNN) and ultimately the epidemiology at Anorexia nervosa#Epidemiology and Eating disorder#Anorexia seem to be more detailed. Contrary to the article's title, there does not seem to be any substantive discussion of the development of eating disorders except for claims in the lead that it is related with childhood development (this is covered in a few sections at eating disorder). Darcyisverycute (talk) 06:36, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Junction, Indiana[edit]

Percy Junction, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is, yes, a rail junction, but sorting it took some effort. It was a wye on the Chicago, Attica and Southern Railroad, with the main line running due north-south and a branch heading off to the northwest. If you go to GMaps, you can still see one branch of the wye as a wide arc in the field just southwest of the GNIS coordinates, but as one might imagine there's no other trace of anything railroad-related from a line that was abandoned in 1946. The topos and aerials don't go back anything like far enough, soe they aren't much help. I was, however, able to find two references (besides name drops of it as a station) which together show matters clearly. First, in this newsletter, at the bottom of page 5, there is a photo of the station and its surrounding buildings. Along with that, I found this map which shows the same three buildings, and nothing else at the junction. So it's just a rail spot of no particular note, and not a settlement. Mangoe (talk) 02:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per WP:GEOLAND. I found many newspapers.com references to it as a town including [23]. Altogether there were 217 newspapers.com references, I will clip a few more. Jacona (talk) 14:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • striking my previous support. There are many newspapers.com references, this probably does meet WP:GEOLAND, but I'm not going to put in the time to post the references, so I'm leaving it to someone else to make an argument one way or another. Jacona (talk) 11:27, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ami Cusack[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Ami Cusack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Bgsu98 (talk) 03:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. There seem to be a number of other pages for survivor contestants, but most seem to be quite a bit more notable than this one. I don't think a few modelling gigs raise the profile comparable to other notable former Survivor contestants. On the other hand, it could be notable simply due to her probably being selected to have LGBT+ representation on the show, but if that were the case, there would likely be more discussion about it in independent media, which I was unable to find.
Chagropango (talk) 10:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, no real evidence of notability Andre🚐 05:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Three Little Pigs Sing a Gig[edit]

Three Little Pigs Sing a Gig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM, no indication of notability. Notability is not inherited from its source material or any cast members. Yeeno (talk) 03:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Goldsmith[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Kelly Goldsmith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Academic credentials also appear to be non-notable. Bgsu98 (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you walk us through how her academic credentials are non-notable? Dnllnd (talk) 12:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Back to add that based on WP:PROF she meets 6 without much issue. She's frequently cited in the media, including coverage as recently as the past week.--Dnllnd (talk) 12:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PROF#C6 requires that the subject be the head of a major university or major scholarly society. Our article says nothing resembling this. Maybe you mean #C7? —David Eppstein (talk) 16:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I did mean #C7. My apologies and thanks for the catch. Dnllnd (talk) 18:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Only three references to media coverage are cited on the same topic. Can we bring up some more to ensure criterium 7 is met? JamesKH76 (talk) 17:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How many more are needed? There's only a caution against local media in the #C7 guidelines. The ones that are already there aren't local media - they're large, notable publications. The person who nominated the page for deletion never explained why there was a problem as we've already covered that she meets academic notability, based on WP:PROF, in addition to having been on TV. Dnllnd (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I haven't participated at AFD:PROF in a bit, but I think she should meet C5 as the holder of a named chair at Vanderbilt. Our article is out of date in this respect but it's described here. Larry Hockett (Talk) 15:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as she now meets NPROF #5 per Larry's comment. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The new information demonstrating a pass of WP:PROF#C5 makes this clear. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Miguel Costa (sailor)[edit]

Miguel Costa (sailor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. I cannot find any references to this person aside from database references (which means it fails SPORTBASIC) though I was a bit hampered by the common name. ~ Matthewrb Talk to me · Changes I've made 02:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Some comments here but trying to read through the lines, I can't tell if you want the article Kept or Deleted, just what should be done IF the article is deleted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Found virtually nothing with an online search, and the single source in the article contains zero prose. This fails WP:BASIC and WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 20:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Non-notable sportsperson. SWinxy (talk) 05:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (note: my original comment did not address what to do with this article, so !voting here). Fails GNG/BASIC. A valid ATD would be something like List of Portuguese Olympic sailors (which would serve readers much better than these database entry stubs), but no such list exists. wjematherplease leave a message... 07:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 14:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Boyet Sison[edit]

Boyet Sison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources mentioned are only about his death, no GNG. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, and Philippines. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Articles are obituaries. They're not about his death, which would fail WP:ONEEVENT, they're occasioned by his death. It's not uncommon for someone to only meet GNG after they die because of obituaries.--Jahaza (talk) 05:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jahaza: Okay, but there are NO sources that mentions about his life and career execept about his death. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 06:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That's not quite true see here[24] and, e.g. here[25].--Jahaza (talk) 06:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jahaza: the first source you mention still mentions about his death, the second I dont know (needed experts about this). Please find other sources that mentions about his LIFE and CAREER, if theres none, there is a chance that it may be redirected or deleted. Please research properly. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 06:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You can also research! The "first source" is an entire page of stories in which he is tagged. Most of them are not about his death. There's nothing in policy as far as I know that says that obituaries can't be the main sources for an article, so long as the person is not notable merely for how they died.--Jahaza (talk) 06:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per Jahaza. If you filter out recent results on Google, you can see Sison appearing frequently in news sources prior to his death, but most of the sources weren't just particularly good/reliable for encyclopedic inclusion. The obituaries are providing specifically citeable sources, but it's clear they are about a career and ONEEVENT does not apply. matt91486 (talk) 11:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep since sources verified that he has several notable roles (as host) on various TV and radio programs. With that in mind, articles regarding the recently deceased are perfectly valid sources, in fact they're important for notable people in the 2000s and earlier whose potential references might have been only available offline. --Lenticel (talk) 22:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Easy keep. Another nom where WP:BEFORE was not done, and one of the policies like WP:GNG was misrepresented. Obits are perfectly valid sources and are often used as such in the "Recent deaths" section of WP:ITN. Please, stop making up bogus policies. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Jahaza. This page only just focused on WP:BASIC (where that meets the criteria) which is under WP:NBIO. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 11:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Can someone withdraw this nomination, I understand the votes above and their comments. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 10:11, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

World Association of Kickboxing Organizations[edit]

World Association of Kickboxing Organizations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No reliable and independent sources, no significant work. Zafir94 (talk) 02:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reconsider nomination after additions to the article nominated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus was clear: out of 3 entries, 1 strong keep and 2 keep. Lethweimaster (talk) 14:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
AfD closures are not strictly a vote-counting process but thank you for your comment. Liz Read! Talk! 16:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shania Tjoen A Choy[edit]

Shania Tjoen A Choy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 05:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Samanie Loe-A-Foe[edit]

Samanie Loe-A-Foe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 05:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Mariana de Jesús de Paredes. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christ Child Crucified on Mount Pichincha[edit]

Christ Child Crucified on Mount Pichincha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Looking for sources turned up little other than blogs and a handful of sites talking about the story of its appearance. Likely warrants mention in Mariana de Jesús de Paredes but isn't notable on its own. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 02:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have *zero* good sources... Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, fails WP:GNG and the SPS presented doesn't work at all because its not published by an expert. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Mariana de Jesús de Paredes. Contrary to what the article implies this is clearly a shrine celebrating the supposed appearance of Christ to her. However (perhaps surprisingly) little is said about it in that article. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to consider Merge option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:12, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nuhely Emerenciana[edit]

Nuhely Emerenciana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Previously deprodded with no reason given. –dlthewave ☎ 05:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kjartan Antonsson[edit]

Kjartan Antonsson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 05:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Momir Mileta[edit]

Momir Mileta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 05:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Serbia. –dlthewave ☎ 05:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:53, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Delete' - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources below which show notability. The ones from his club don't count towards SIGCOV btw. GiantSnowman 07:52, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - @GiantSnowman:, I found these sources: [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], and [32], among many many other sources not listed here (for example there are more Serbian sources and more articles about him in the newspaper mbl.is and in the fotbolti.net website). In addition, he spent 10+ years in the Serbian, Icelandic, and Cypriot top flight, so is bound to have a lot of additional offline coverage and sources. All the other Sports WikiProjects don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 10, but why should any Sports WikiProject have 10 deleted per day? By the time I finish writing this, another ten will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 00:06, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources discussed above. I'm concerned that User:Dlthewave nominated 4 different snow keeps within a few minutes - this suggest that WP:BEFORE was not done. Nfitz (talk) 00:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pétur Björn Jónsson[edit]

Pétur Björn Jónsson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 05:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain View Academy (San Francisco)[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Mountain View Academy (San Francisco) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kept in 2018 under the argument that although schools are no longer considered inherently notable, we should still consider them notable in case they turn out to be notable. I will be frank in saying that is the silliest argument I have ever seen succeed at AfD.

I did a thorough BEFORE check using basic Google resources, Newspapers.com, and the Wikipedia Library, and I was not able to find sufficient SIGCOV to justify keeping the article. Please be careful when you search not to conflate this school with other schools in California which have similar names, such as the Mountain View Academy in Mountain View, California, which is still operational. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and California. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. I couldn't find anything myself. Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as it appears to be a hoax article created by a banned sockpuppet account whose only editing in mainspace was to create this article (with the rest of its edits focused on its own Talk page and trolling others regarding blocking policies, etc.). Like the nominator and previous commenter, I wasn't able to find coverage that wasn't the prep school in Mountain View or the charter school in Colorado Springs. It's to the point that I'm not even sure if the few facts contained within the article are verifiable or true. There is only one source cited in the article, a link to a video of a San Francisco Board of Supervisors meeting, which is listed as two separate footnotes...possibly to make it look like there might be two different sources? What is "p. 18" in the context of that video? I have tried to find it but it makes no sense; there is no document or slide deck contained within the video, and item no. 18 on the meeting agenda (on "Workforce Development") is completely irrelevant. At any rate, given the article's creation by a banned sock; lack of any reliable sourcing whatsoever; no additional coverage found through two AfD discussions; and the fact that it is polluting the Google search results for the actual Mountain View Academy in nearby Mountain View, I would prioritize this for deletion ASAP. Cielquiparle (talk) 21:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Patrik Bengtsson[edit]

Patrik Bengtsson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails SPORTBASIC and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 05:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Sweden. –dlthewave ☎ 05:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, online coverage here and here, but mainly based on offline coverage in newspapers from the period. I can't access any full article without physically going to a library, but a cursory search in the Swedish Royal Library archive which shows fragments of articles reveal a number of articles very likely constituting significant coverage – including one fragment stating "[...] kunde Patrik Bengtsson för första gången i sitt 21-åriga liv gotta sig åt helsidesrubriker i alla de stora tidningarna" (rough translation: "[...] Patrik Bengtsson could for the first time in his 21-year-old life indulge in full-page headlines in all the major newspapers"). Not strange considering he played some 30 games in Allsvenskan for IFK Göteborg and 2 games in the Champions League group stage. – Elisson • T • C • 07:18, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per Elisson. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:53, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 19:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per Elisson. All the other Sports WikiProjects don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 10, but why should any Sports WikiProject have 10 deleted per day? By the time I finish writing this, another ten will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 23:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per sources presented above and per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 16:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, top flight Swedish footballer and Elisson demonstrates that sourcing exists.--Mvqr (talk) 11:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per what's been dug up in the AfD discussion above. /Julle (talk) 09:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources discussed above. I'm concerned that User:Dlthewave nominated 4 different snow keeps within a few minutes - this suggest that WP:BEFORE was not done. Nfitz (talk) 00:17, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jang Ji-hun[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Jang Ji-hun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undeleted here based on the claim that additional sources likely exist, however none have been found and the article fails SPORTBASIC #5 which requires that at least one SIGCOV source be included in the article. –dlthewave ☎ 04:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And another article here[36]--Jahaza (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Jahaza's sources are enough to make me believe that significant coverage exists. Rlendog (talk) 13:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Appears to meet GNG. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birch Island, Illinois[edit]

Birch Island, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable island mislabeled as a community, fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Successfully prodded for this reason in 2021 and re-created in 2022; original deletion rationale still stands. –dlthewave ☎ 04:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. –dlthewave ☎ 04:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • flipping obvious delete and we need to stop allowing this sort of stub at all. Mangoe (talk) 20:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:V and WP:GEOLAND. There are no reliable sources to verify the subject's existence - the GNIS is not a reliable source for these purposes. The coordinates given point to part of a wildlife refuge next to the Mississippi river on the Illinois/Missouri border with no settlement in sight. Even if it does exist (or did exist), GEOLAND only gives near-automatic notability to legally recognised populated places and we have no evidence this is legally recognised. Hut 8.5 17:38, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Hut 8.5: While the GNIS claim of it being a populated place is, indeed, unreliable (likely a data entry glitch) and consensus agrees with this, GNIS is definitely a reliable source for the fact that an island was surveyed to exist at this location. jp×g 12:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but we would need much more substantial coverage of it for it to be notable as an island than as a populated place, and we're struggling to find anything at all. Hut 8.5 17:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, although I must say that previously made arguments are rather bad. GNIS is, whatever. There should be other sources, yes -- and an attempt should be made to find them. I hate to say the same thing over and over, but there have been tons of geostub AfDs where "no sources" turned out to be "lots of sources" when someone gave it a detailed look. So I will do that here... Here we see a Birch Island in St. Ignace, here we see one in Wisconsin, Wisconsin again, Massachusetts, Lake Huron again. This one actually talks about a Birch's Island in the Mississippi between Illinois and Missouri, so it seems promising, but the map inset clearly shows some different place (Kaskaskia) quite a few miles south. I don't see any SIGCOV for this. Stick a fork in it. jp×g 12:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, JPxG, that's basically what I found when I prodded last year. I didn't explain my entire process in this nomination but when I find an apparent GNIS error, I do search for sources and check historical topos to ensure that it isn't likely to meet GNG or other notability criteria as a geographic feature. –dlthewave ☎ 16:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dlthewave: All right, I'll strike some of my cantankerousness then :^) jp×g 16:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:02, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orthea Riley[edit]

Orthea Riley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anant Mohani[edit]

Anant Mohani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and India. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I highly doubt a player with this few matches would have GNG passing coverage in offline or non-English language media, and therefore he likely fails GNG. There's no suitable redirect here either as he played for a couple of sides. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: WP:NCRICKET is specific. Mohani does not pass it 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given that Central Provinces and Berar, one of his teams, played less than 20 senior matches in a very short timeframe, I'm happy to redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers here, with a note added perhaps. It's not ideal, as RF22 says, but is a better option than outright deleting. There is years of precedent for redirecting cricketers to lists going back to 2018. Arguments citing NCRICKET are generally considered to not be of value at AfD these days so we have to, I'm afraid, discount this argument here. It comes down to an ATD existing. An alternative redirect target would be List of people from Nagpur if there is no consensus that redirecting to the MP list is appropriate. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, no redirect - I'm not finding any significant coverage, and I'm not impressed by the suggested redirect targets. List of people from Nagpur is for notable people only, and I really don't see the value in redirecting to a list where the subject only appears as a redlinked name. –dlthewave ☎ 17:28, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Feel free to create a redirect from this page title. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Madan Joshi[edit]

Madan Joshi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and India. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the only way this could ever have passed any guide was under the old NSPORTs notability guides that were purely participation-based. Those have now been deprecated. Fails WP:GNG. FOARP (talk) 05:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Despite having a reasonable career, I'm not sure his statistics in this case would have been able to bring enough GNG passing coverage to warrant a weak keep in this situation. There is likely coverage offline and/or in non-English language sources, but I'm still not sure it will be enough. There's no suitable redirect here as he played for a few sides. There is though a film actor/director of the same name who looks around the same age. I'd be interested to know if they're the same person as there seems to be reasonable coverage of him. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • A lot of Indian film articles link to this one fwiw - although I suspect that's more to do with inappropriate addition of red links to everything. I've asked over at the Indian film project is anyone can find out if this is the same chap or not. If it is, he's clearly notable. But I'm not convinced. Based on number of games, this would then be a redirect to List of Vidarbha cricketers - 16 games for them. A note would need adding, but this has been the long standing position with cricketer articles. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like they're different people. The actor/writer is Madan O. Joshi, while the cricketer is Madan K. Joshi. StAnselm (talk) 21:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I've delinked all the relevant incoming links - ironically it was only yesterday that someone tried to tell me that I was wrong when I suggested redlinks be removed from lists... If this article is redirected then I suggest it first be moved to Madan Joshi (cricketer) to save future links to the wrong place. Blue Square Thing (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers. Sandstein 19:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mehmood Hassan[edit]

Mehmood Hassan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and India. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep/Redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers It's my belief that somebody playing this number of fixtures, at the time he played them, will have GNG passing somewhere in either offline or non-English language sources. However, in a simple internet search I've only been able to find passing mentions, so therefore have gone weak keep. There is a suitable redirect here though, per WP:ATD, which can be used if it's a preferred option if nothing significant crops up. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (or redirect) - I found no evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG. Please ping me if good sources are identified. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:34, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is probably going to need to be a redirect - we're going to lose an awful lot of articles on brown people at this rate btw, perhaps one for the diversity people at the WMF to consider. The List of MP cricketers is an obvious redirect target and there is a long standing consensus going back to at least 2018 that suggests we redirect when we really can't find sources about cricketers. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:40, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rugbyfan22's argument is actually one for deletion, given that they say that they have only found passing mentions. There's broad community consensus by now that sportspeople with no substantial coverage in reliable sources don't get an article, just like everybody else. Sandstein 19:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ashwini Chaturvedi[edit]

Ashwini Chaturvedi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and India. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep It's my belief that someone playing this number of fixtures, at the time he played them, will have GNG passing sourcing in either offline, or non-English language sources. I've gone weak keep as in a simple online search, I've only been able to find passing mentions, but I believe with his record there will be coverage somewhere. There's no suitable redirect here given he's played for a number of different sides. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That may be your belief, but the presumption of notability for first-class cricketers (along with all participation-based criteria) was rejected by community consensus earlier this year because it turned out not to be a good predictor of significant coverage. To comply with the guideline, you'll need to provide SIGCOV sources to support your Keep !vote. –dlthewave ☎ 02:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mankading a batsman (with Mankad in the opposing team, although not batting at the time...) brings with it a likelihood of coverage somewhere. Playing against the touring England side also does, as does a Wisden bio. This is either a very weak keep or a redirect to either List of Uttar Pradesh cricketers (26 of his 37 first-class matches were for UP; the next highest is 7 matches) or, possibly, List of Mankading incidents in cricket. Per long-established precedent in the case of cricketer articles when an ATD exists. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How do we know he was involved in a Mankad? StAnselm (talk) 21:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I followed the "what links here" to a list of mankad incidents - the scorecard then checks out. I presume it would have received some press coverage - they invariably do. Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep extended career at top-flight domestic level and some top-flight coaching also, and per the offline arguments above Bumbubookworm (talk) 21:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question. I hear the argument about "a likelihood of coverage somewhere." But WP:SPORTBASIC explicitly mandates: "Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources." Do we have at least one such example of SIGCOV? Cbl62 (talk) 13:36, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    We don't Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Absent an actual showing of even a single example of SIGCOV, SPORTBASIC (quoted above) quite clearly mandates that we delete. Also, the arguments that we should assume that coverage exists runs contrary to WP:NCRIC which states that, even in the case of players at the highest domestic level, significant coverage "should not be assumed to exist." Cbl62 (talk) 04:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails GNG and NSPORTS, specifically SPORTBASIC #5 which requires SIGCOV sourcing to be present in the article. The mere likelihood of sources is insufficient to establish notability. –dlthewave ☎ 04:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Utica Phoenix[edit]

Utica Phoenix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage by independent sources. Google only returns 5 pages of results, a portion of which is false positives, and the rest is trivial or connected (their social media, alumni mag mentions, etc.). There was one instance of substantial local coverage (they were sued in 2013) but it never received any attention outside of local news, so WP:AUD applies. GBooks doesn't turn up anything helpful, and neither do GNews and GNews Archive. Apocheir (talk) 03:43, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete non notable publication that got in trouble for defamation. Andre🚐 05:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Not sure how to resolve this when the nominator says Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV and the discussion participants say, "Yes, it does". Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tamisha Williams[edit]

Tamisha Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:44, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pass GNG and SIGCOV. See: Badminton Pan Am, The Barbados Olympic Association, Barbados Today, Caribbea n Life, Daily Nation. Stvbastian (talk) 11:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pass GNG and SIGCOV. Gold at Carebaco International and Suriname International, participant in 2022 Commonwealth Games, 2019 Pan American Games. Florentyna (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daniela Ramírez (footballer)[edit]

Daniela Ramírez (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poisson (restaurant)[edit]

Poisson (restaurant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Appears to be a WP:MILL restaurant. The article makes no claim of notability. Besides typical restaurant review coverage, there is not much - No in-depth significant independent coverage. Routine reviews in the food section are not sufficient. MB 01:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, and Singapore. MB 01:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Opened in April 2022, Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion nor the Yellow Pages. The restaurant is WP:MILL having won no prestigious awards and the usual run-of-the-mill restaurant reviews. HighKing++ 12:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Iren[edit]

Emmanuel Iren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough significant coverage found in multiple reliable sources. Reading Beans (talk) 01:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Big Whiskey's[edit]

Big Whiskey's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Small restaurant chain with about a dozen location. Only source is a company website. Searching does find a few routine local newspaper articles on the opening of individual stores, but nothing on the company overall. Most hits are things like yelp, doordash, grubhub, etc. Lack of independent in-depth coverage. MB 01:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete regional franchise with only 75 google results and a few local franchise industry publications, but mostly not significant Andre🚐 05:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precise Software[edit]

Precise Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article edited extensively by SPAs. Company is not notable and fails WP:CORPDEPTH, all press is just WP:ROUTINE announcements of acquisitions. BrigadierG (talk) 01:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:A7 Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nazeer Kataria[edit]

Nazeer Kataria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely zero sources. Fails WP:GNG. ~StyyxTalk? 00:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've had tooooooooo many A7 issues recently, so taking it safe. xD ~StyyxTalk? 00:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as clearly not notable. —VersaceSpace 🌃 01:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete A7. Mccapra (talk) 04:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It certainly appears that speedy delete would be appropriate for this article, but did any Urdu speakers try checking Urdu sources? Chagropango (talk) 05:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    This is a really good idea, I don't know Urdu but I tried search the Urdu wikipedia using the spelling from google translate and I wasn't able to find anything. I know this isn't what you were aiming for but it was the best I could do. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 06:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    There's nothing really in Urdu search results. Maybe I'm not typing up his name correctly, specially that "Kataria" part (which google translates as "قطر" {Qatar}). I tried searching up all known ways of writing "Kataria", also searched his first name and business name/details, but nothing really came up during my search. Thanks Ahated (talk!) 17:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete Unless someone can find an Urdu source that can save this then it should be removed. Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 06:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Don't see how it meets WP:GNG, but admit have not looked for Urdu sources. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete  – per A7. Nothing in Urdu or English, available online for the subject. Ahated (talk!) 17:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Moret[edit]

Dan Moret (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMMA. His highest ranking was 41st at lightweight, his current is 113th. A quick WP:BEFORE doesn't show any significant or in-depth coverage. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 00:14, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete His record isn't very impressive at the highest level and he clearly fails to meet WP:NMMA. More importantly, I don't see that WP:GNG is met. There are a lot of references given, but they tend to be database entries, fight announcements, and reporting of fight results. That's the stuff that every pro MMA fighter gets and isn't really anything that shows notability (or can be considered significant independent coverage). Papaursa (talk) 22:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2022_August_8&oldid=1104668650"