User talk:Cielquiparle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award[edit]

Rack and Pinion Award

This award is given in recognition to Cielquiparle for collecting at least 15 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Peanut, California[edit]

On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peanut, California, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peanut is inhospitable to peanuts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peanut, California. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Peanut, California), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 18,155 views (756.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Clair Cline[edit]

On 17 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clair Cline, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while being held in Stalag Luft I, an American prisoner of war built a violin out of scrap material? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clair Cline. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Clair Cline), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive![edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Cielquiparle! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:43, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award[edit]

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Cielquiparle for collecting more than 100 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A citation barnstar for you[edit]

The Citation Barnstar The Citation Barnstar
For good work during WP: FEB24 drive! Davidindia (talk) 15:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award[edit]

Citation Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Cielquiparle for collecting more than 300 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cleo Damianakes[edit]

The article Cleo Damianakes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cleo Damianakes for comments about the article, and Talk:Cleo Damianakes/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bruxton -- Bruxton (talk) 02:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Edwardx (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wow great thanks @Bruxton & congratulations to @Edwardx too. Cielquiparle (talk) 21:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A peace dove for you[edit]

Hi Cielquiparle, I am glad to see your participation after what feels like awhile at AfD, because I consider your contributions thoughtful, well-researched and focused on building the encyclopedia. But I am sorry the recent discussion seems to have become a bit personalized, so I am writing to reiterate my respect and appreciation for your contributions. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 17:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciated @Beccaynr. I would just ask you this: You have eight articles about non-profit organizations listed on your User page. If all those articles were nominated for deletion tomorrow, would you be confident that they would satisfy the extreme standard of WP:ORG that you are advocating? I would argue that they would not. There is almost no information about a nonprofit that doesn't actually originate from the nonprofit itself; most of the coverage tends to quote directors and staff of the nonprofit; and even if nonprofits are promoting specific causes, you could easily have other editors arguing that any articles about a specific cause is about the cause, not the nonprofit itself and thus doesn't count, or that the articles are too promotional, or not in-depth enough about the organization, or that they focus on "routine" events that are not particularly relevant or are too news-driven, or that it's not comprehensive enough to write an entire article (when the policy specifically says the article needs to contain enough information to write more than "a very brief, incomplete stub"). IMO, it's possible to poke holes in any source. It's important to consider the "why" behind the policy and how it actually works in practice, not just enforce dogma. Cielquiparle (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For nonprofit organizations, the WP:NONPROFIT section of the guideline applies, and please note I do not think it will be productive to debate each of those articles on your user talk page. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 22:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Beccaynr "Usually notable" is not the same as "notable". Cielquiparle (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]