User talk:Hey man im josh

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jason Hanson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Sugarhill Ddot - 2024

Hello, pls can you help review Sugarhill Ddot article. Thank You.. You are an administrator. 2RDD (talk) 20:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

@2RDD: Sorry, but I do not review articles upon request. Someone from the new pages patrol team will do so at their earliest convenience. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Okay. Thank You! 2RDD (talk) 20:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

List of Green Bay Packers records

Still needs some work, but wanted to get your initial thoughts on List of Green Bay Packers records. Is there any glaring omissions? Does the format work? Some things I am struggling with:

• Should I highlight any Packers records that are also NFL records?
• I was planning to add a section on "Streaks" or "Leading the league". Could include consecutive starts by a QB, 1,000 yard seasons, consecutive seasons leading the league, etc
• Maybe expanding (and obviously sourcing) the lead.

I am trying to set the article up so there isn't too much fluff (just the main records) and is easily updated. Any feedback or thoughts you have would be appreciated! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

@Gonzo fan2007: I do like the leading the league stats, and I think those records hold up better than volume stat records and help to paint the picture of how good a player was at one point. I agree with highlighting league records that are listed. It's relevant and interesting information that provides great value to the page while mixing in with the existing content. Just gotta call it out in a way that's accessible.

Streak records get tricky. It's really easy to get spun off into cruft territory. Just some quick thoughts, I'll try to take a better look tomorrow! Hey man im josh (talk) 21:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Page Deletions Following Procedural Keep

Hello,

Shortly after your Procedural Keep determination to the set of sports broadcasting contract pages (housed at [Sports Broadcasting Contracts in Serbia]), a number of the individual country pages were nonetheless deleted by another user. Specifically, as of this note, the following pages have been deleted:

Sports broadcasting contracts in Australia

Sports broadcasting contracts in Israel

Sports broadcasting contracts in Japan

Sports broadcasting contracts in Spain

As these deletions go against the Procedural Keep decision, can you please un-delete these pages, which is something I don't think I can do myself? Perhaps some semi-protection might be in order. Thank you. Coining (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

@Coining: I will not be undeleting those pages because they had their own separate AfD discussions which can be found in the deletion summary of those pages. For instance, Australia had Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Australia. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

All four of those pages had their requests for deletion requested to be withdrawn by the original nominator (some of those requests for withdrawal are still in the deletion discussions, and some of them were deleted from the deletion discussions (as can be seen in their edit histories) -- which is something that is not supposed to happen, as I understand deletion discussions should involve adding comments, not deleting prior ones. In any case, visitors to those deletion discussions were directed to go to the consolidated discussion on the Serbia page, and that is where the much more robust discussion occurred - and where I left my comments. I respectfully do not think that on these four pages there was a properly informed user community about where to weigh in, and so the deletions of these pages were premature. Coining (talk) 16:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

...which is something that is not supposed to happen – I don't think a user reverting their own request to withdraw an AfD, before that AfD has been withdrawn, is a problem.

• Sports broadcasting contracts in Australia – AfD with 5 participants, all of which voted to delete (Explicit closed this as deleted)
• Sports broadcasting contracts in Israel – AfD with 6 participants, all of which voted to delete (Explicit closed this as deleted)
• Sports broadcasting contracts in Japan – AfD with 3 participants, all of which voted to delete (Explicit closed this as deleted)
• Sports broadcasting contracts in Spain – AfD with 5 participants, all of which voted to delete (I closed this as delete)
• Sports broadcasting contracts in South America (bundled with 2 other pages) – AfD with 2 participants, all of which voted deleted (relisted by me based on a lack of participation)
• Sports broadcasting contracts in Italy – AfD with 2 participants, all of which voted deleted (relisted by me based on a lack of participation)
• Sports broadcasting contracts in Russia – AfD with 2 participants, all of which voted deleted (relisted by me based on a lack of participation)
• Sports broadcasting contracts in the Netherlands – AfD with 2 participants (AfD was withdrawn)

The links on the articles always led to the individual as opposed to bundled AfD discussion, so I don't give a lot of weight to the "properly informed community about where to weigh in", aspect. I believe there was adequate participation and policy based rational used in those discussions which resulted in delete. Looking at your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Serbia, which you're implying would be the argument used in these other discussions, your argument was, "These articles help out of country viewers determine streaming options, and as such they serve a reference function worthy of encyclopedic value." – As a closer, I would not have given much weight to this argument because Wikipedia is not a TV guide and these articles, in these instances, are/were not necessarily encyclopedic. You're welcome to appeal with @Explicit, the closer of 3 of those 4 discussions, but frankly, I don't see enough to reverse the closure of these in these instances. Participation was adequate, people weren't led to the wrong discussion from the articles, and the rational given at the deletion discussions were appropriate. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate where you are coming from, but at the very least I was led to the wrong discussion, and I don't think it can be presumed that others weren't as well. At the very least, the customary 7-day period of deletion discussions should be extended for the days when users looking at the discussion would reasonably think that their comments should go elsewhere. I will, however, take up with @Explicit. Coining (talk) 16:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Requests for Permissions

Hello! I am really sorry to disturb you, but I really just wanted to ask something, I hope that is okay! I am really interested in getting rollback rights so that I can use Huggle, that really interests me, and I would love to be able to use this to help me with my efforts on Wikipedia. I have put my name forward on the request for rollback rights, but it is quite a long backlog, and I was wondering if there was anything that you could do to help me. I am asking you as I saw you posted on that page a few days ago, and I was wondering if you were aware of how long the wait time might be?

I do apologise for this, but I love Wikipedia and I love helping out and having Huggle as a tool that I can use would be wonderful for me and I would love it if you could help me :)

Sorry to be a pain,

Thanks so much! MrBauer24 (talk) 23:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

@MrBauer24: I typically don't review rollback requests. I did however process one recently because the user was blocked, so it was easy and obvious to say not done in that instance. An admin will process the requests at their earliest convenience. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of List of Dallas Cowboys first-round draft picks

Congratulations, Hey man im josh! The list you nominated, List of Dallas Cowboys first-round draft picks, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

• Wow, congratulations, Josh! What an achievement! I'm sorry that it's an article about the Cowboys but you can't have everything. ;-) Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

  @Liz: Haha thanks for the laugh. Believe me, I'm not a fan of theirs either!! But, I sucked it up because I wanted to complete the series on first-round picks, which I have, and just need to finish nominating all of them. As a Lions fan, I didn't feel great about promoting the Bears article either, but at least it wasn't those damn cheese heads!! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

There's that rare thing again!

HEY, look what's up there! Congrats again, Josh! Regards, John - Bringingthewood (talk) 23:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, thank you! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Pages created by me

Excuse me, where would my pages have issues with neutrality? 82.84.225.97 (talk) 18:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Request for protection

Hello @Hey man im josh, I want your help with the page North India. A user whose account seems to be used solely for the below mentioned purpose has been trying revert back to a self created version of the article with dramatic changes again and again. This version [1] was established six months ago by a talk discussion Talk:North India#Region. The user Katkar123596 is refusing to accept the talk consensus version or discuss in the talk page and reverting again and again. Could you please raise the protection of the page to extended confirmed? PadFoot2008 (talk) 14:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Hey @PadFoot2008: Your best bet would be to make a request at WP:RPP/I. I'm just a bit busy at the moment to help out. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Hey man im josh, I don't want to be a disturbance, but could you please spare just a few minutes to look into this matter? I have lodged a request, but this an important article, and I hoped you could quickly sort things out. The page just needs to be protected. PadFoot2008 (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Elvio Porcel de Peralta

Hi Josh! I thank you for nominating for deletion and thus bringing to my attention Elvio Porcel de Peralta. I expanded the article and he turned out to be a pretty interesting subject. Probably will nominate him for DYK at some point soon: ... that footballer Elvio Porcel de Peralta received a record 97 ejections? BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@BeanieFan11: As soon as I saw 97 ejections I knew I messed up! Nobody gets elected that many times without WP:SIGCOV lol. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

I think the deletion of the page would violate the AfD

While I understand why you deleted the Vaggie page, but such a deletion violates the decision reached at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaggie and so it should be restored and changed to a redirect to List of Hazbin Hotel and Helluva Boss characters#Vaggie. So, please restore the page and change it to a redirect to the target I just listed. Thanks! Historyday01 (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Sorry about that @Historyday01, that was definitely a mistake on my part. I've restored the page and edit history. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that. It is always an issue when a page is created by someone who created Wikipedia rules... Historyday01 (talk) 15:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

deletion

Hi. You deleted User:Allein Hart. That was fine, and I would have done so myself, apart from the fact that it included a paid editing disclosure, so I have restored the earlier revisions of the page, but with all content apart from that disclosure either deleted or revision deleted. Just letting you know. JBW (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Ah crap, sorry about that @JBW! Thanks for catching this and letting me know. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
• voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
• SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
• Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
• Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Undeletion Request

Good day a page I recreated was recently deleted Codest Boi Under speedy deletion. I kindly request it be undeleted and moved to draft where we can improve it as time goes on because the subject meets the notability but most of the articles he had coverage in were deleted because in most cases African/Nigerian sources take down articles over 3 years so instead of it being a stub and deleted kindly give me sometime to make more research and add more to the draft before I submit for review again because I feel I failed after making research and still coming back short hope you consider this and hopefully grant this request. Jellymanpro (talk) 00:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

@Jellymanpro: This was not a speedy deletion, as mentioned when Moboshgu declined your request. What did you find that wasn't presented in the AfD discussion? There was a solid consensus to delete the article. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Help me in creating a Article

Hi Brother help me once in creating a article after that I will follow your steps to add new information on Wikipedia data

It is a brigraphy article about an IPS officer Sarvesh Raj

Here is the details about him

He was selected as an IPS officer in the 2013 batch. He has served as an Assistant Superintendent of Police (DSP) in Ramanathapuram district and acted as a Superintendent of Police (SP) in Ambatur city. He is currently serving as an Undersecretary in Delhi. He has successfully resolved numerous sensitive issues in Ramanathapuram district. Therefore, I believe he is eligible to have a Wikipedia page.

IPS Profile reference: https://cms.tn.gov.in/sites/default/files/go/home_e_17_2015_pn.pdf https://elcot.in/sites/default/file/List%20of%20eligible%20Officers%20under%20AIS%20Scheme_0.pdf https://ips.gov.in/Empanelment/Inter_seSeniority_20012023.pdf

Ambattur case: https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/current-affairs/140218/chennai-rowdy-binu-pleads-for-mercy.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/how-chennai-police-captured-6-dozen-wanted-men-in-1-raid/articleshow/62829064.cms https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/letter-solves-15-murder-for-cops/articleshow/63162837.cms

Ramanathapuram District caste issues: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/promote-communal-harmony/article8634708.ece https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/Sub-Collector-ASP-honoured-for-commendable-services/article17098729.ece https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/shifting-focus-treading-the-path-of-peace-and-growth/article18511170.ece https://thehinduimages.com/details-page.php?id=174723380&highlights=RAJ%20MUDHALVAN https://colombogazette.com/2016/08/22/brown-sugar-to-be-smuggled-to-sri-lanka-seized-in-tamil-nadu/ https://www.dtnext.in/city/2017/07/03/city-police-officers-shifted-out-within-a-month-in-reshuffle Lucygirl03 (talk) 05:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Lucygirl03. Sorry, but I do create pages for others. I encourage you to head over to Help:Your first article and start there. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

User talk:Wolfmediauganda

You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk (talk) 07:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

@Cahk: Thanks for the heads up, but I'll leave it for now. If they make that type of edit again to their talk page without attempting to communicate then I will revoke. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Daegu Transportation Corporation

Hi, thanks for the redirect, but Daegu Metropolitan Transit Corporation was renamed two years ago, so can you please G6 Daegu Transportation Corporation to make way for the page move? Wikishovel (talk) 11:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Hey @Wikishovel: Go ahead, I've G6'd the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)