User talk:Robby.is.on

Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Robby.is.on. Thank you for your work on Renārs Uščins. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Honesty-United Right

When reverting my edits please do not provide disingenuous arguments. The British Labour Party is not described as minority far left just because John McDonnell and Rebecca Long-Bailey are members. The Proffesor (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

You referred to "weasel words" in your edit summary. Your removal had nothing to do with "weasel words" and I stated as much in my edit summary. There is nothing disingenuous about that. If you want discuss content relating to United Right (Poland), the article's Talk page is the appropriate venue. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Two things

Firstly, the category cannot be created for just one person, and there have to be a minimum of five people to file in it before its creation is justified.

Secondly, reverting is not to be used in a situation like that. Reverting is not for "the right thing was done under the circumstances but I'm now revising the circumstances after the fact", and is only for "this was actually an incorrect edit in the first place and the person who did it needs a tap on the nose for making a bad edit" — so this was not an appropriate use of reversion. Bearcat (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Bearcat. Firstly, the category cannot be created for just one person, and there have to be a minimum of five people to file in it before its creation is justified. Where does it say that? We have countless "Fooian expatriate sportspeople in Bar cat" categories. Why shouldn't we have "Jamaican expatriate sportspeople in Denmark"?

Secondly, reverting is not to be used in a situation like that. […] Where does it say that? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

A page that might deserve an AfD

Hey Robbie.is.on, I have been dealing with the Ricardo George page for a while now. A few months ago, I became a new article patroller, and it has made me more aware of standards like WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:SPORTBASIC. As I've been dealing with this page, I've come to realize that it doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. Indeed, the sources that arise when I search for "Ricardo George" are databases and a very few loose references in match reports and such—nothing resembling SIGCOV. Because I can only nominate new articles, I would appreciate it if you took a look at the page and nominated it for deletion if you see fit to do so. Thanks. Anwegmann (talk) 21:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Anwegmann, nice to hear from you. has made me more aware of standards like WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:SPORTBASIC I also feel like I've become more familiar with these topics recently. I would appreciate it if you took a look at the page and nominated it for deletion if you see fit to do so. Done: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo George. :-) Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much. Hope you're well. Anwegmann (talk) 22:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome. I am well – enjoying some music from Brasileiro right now. I hope you are, too. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

I was actually just listening to Funkadelic's Maggot Brain. It's a journey of a record! Anwegmann (talk) 23:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

I should check that out, thanks. :-) The Chili Peppers used to be my favourite band and they have frequently referred to Funkadelic as a major influence. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)