User talk:Blaze Wolf/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

→

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
48	Epoch Co. (talk)	Add sources
20	PC Accelerator (talk)	Add sources
182	Spelunky (talk)	Add sources
265	Minecraft modding (talk)	Add sources
86	The Bard's Tale (talk)	Add sources
673	Light pollution (talk)	Add sources
470	World of Tanks (talk)	Cleanup
205	Sonic & All-Stars Racing Transformed (talk)	Cleanup
33	Darwinia (video game) (talk)	Cleanup
260	Jens Bergensten (talk)	Expand
3,519	Jamal Khashoggi (talk)	Expand
15	Cube Life: Island Survival (talk)	Expand
63	Educational video game (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
239	Cheating in online games (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
578	Noon (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
328	Xbox network (talk)	Merge
279	Xbox system software (talk)	Merge
413	Microsoft Dynamics (talk)	Merge
18	Date and time notation in Hungary (talk)	Wikify
345	Dexcom (talk)	Wikify
62	Video game censorship (talk)	Wikify
1	Brooks Hollow (talk)	Orphan
3	Beijing High People's Court (talk)	Orphan
2	Arch-Bishop Okoth Ojolla Girls School (talk)	Orphan
15	Games and Culture (talk)	Stub
37	Eric Nylund (talk)	Stub
42	Date and time notation in South Korea (talk)	Stub
13	Tap! (talk)	Stub
10	PC Answers (talk)	Stub
28	Sambass (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Oh thank goodness it's just you bot. I was worried I was getting harrassed again. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Christ, what is with the harassment you've been getting lately? Has someone become an LTA? SWinxy (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure. Might be an LTA that I battled with over on meta. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

??

Um, Blaze Wolf? What are you doing? I just added the missing sig. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Sorry. I thought you were the IP who just added the "Heyyyy!!!". Feel free to revert. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

It wasn't an IP; it was someone who's had an account for over two years and seems to be goofing around (purposely not signing and removing their signature when signed by others!) 199.208.172.35 (talk) 14:27, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Yep I saw that when you added the sig. Also I won't be making this same mistake again since you're now whitelisted in SWViewer for me. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hi Blaze

Im trying to add factual info

Please assist me in formatting and not deleting?

Thanks and regards Gavin Gazd90 (talk) 16:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Start it as a draft and if it's determined to be notable enough to have it's own article, it'll be moved over the redirect. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

sans

with him being accused of killing the queen i have a source for his assassination i have on the 18th i have none EuanPC (talk) 18:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@EuanPC: Huh? What you just said made no sense at all. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

I said I have a source for part of the edit but not the section labeled death EuanPC (talk) 18:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@EuanPC: If the source is reliable propose the change on the talk page. If you don't have a source or reliable source then don't add it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You have your well deserved barnstar after removing vandalism for a year! TurtleAqua (talk) 19:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for coming to my defense on my talk page, I appreciate it. I chose not to engage with them as it felt pretty clear they were a sock of a previous editor and were going to be banned soon enough (which they now have been). I try not to feed the trolls when I can help myself, which means not engaging when it would be very satisfying to do so =P Hey man im josh (talk) 19:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: No problem! I didn't know they were a sock until I checked the history of the article they removed stuff from. As soon as I replied I immediately thought, "I probably shouldn't have engaged with this troll". ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:08, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Ahhh no worries, sometimes it's honest users, and your intentions were good in trying to help them it seemed. I only figured it out because I had history with that specific article. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: Ah makes sense. I tend to avoid articles like that as the arguments can get very... political which is something I try to avoid. I usually only edit them if it's undoing vandalism (which was the case for this). I've also been a little fed up with vandals lately due to how much I've been harassed by them (just check my talk pages history). ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:12, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

it can be a bit exhausting fighting vandalism sometimes. In that case it was pretty clear to me since they removed 83 references in their removal, most of which were reliable sources. Though, I do also try to stay away from politics.

Ahhh, you haven't learned to embrace the hate. Don't go seeking it out, but learn to enjoy when people are mad enough to spit venom because you've limited their ability to troll. It's pretty sad, but also pretty funny sometimes what sets people off. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

I see what you did there. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

King Charles III

His Majesty is still being Called as Sir just like before he was the prince.Look at the video that he sign the guest list. Him9 (talk) 16:01, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Alright, but I don't think we add that to the infobox, just like we didn't add "Ma'am" or whatever the term would be for a female to Queen Elizabeth II's infobox. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

42.190.135.177

Let's lay off on reverting 42.190.135.177 for now and see if we can get an admin to deal with the "retard" issue and edit warring. I'm already at the point where I can't really edit the page any more lest I risk some kind of 3RR myself. I asked[1] Drmies to look into it, if not and it continues to be a problem I have both a 3RR and ANI report ready to go. —DIYeditor (talk) 20:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@DIYeditor: I reported them to AIV before I reverted them. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

It's unfortunate they are so belligerent and unable to collaborate because they seem to have some knowledge about the topic. I guess we can see why this person has no account. —DIYeditor (talk) 20:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@DIYeditor: That's a bit rude imo. Yes they were editing unconstructively (and used personal attacks), but that's no reason to say stuff like "I guess that's why they have no account". ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:59, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Not sure I understand what you mean by rude or how someone not having an account or meeting behavior standards needed for an account is insulting but we can leave it at that. Take care. —DIYeditor (talk) 21:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

You've reverted a possible valid edit

Blaze Wolf, You have reverted my edit to EuroTrip without explanation. I've made what I thought was a valid update in-good-faith. Could you please review and let me know what I did wrong? rottentomatoes.com changed how they report audience scores and now use 1-100 percent scores. Thank you. Crazyloop NY (talk) 22:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@Crazyloop NY: My bad, I thought you had added the audience score which I don't think is allowed per WP:UGC but I could be wrong. Feel free to revert. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

The audience score was already there, I was only updating how it's dispayed. Specifically, what part of WP:UGC are you talking about? The general audience reception seems apt for a movie article. In fact I would bet that there are many movie pages that are using rottentomatoes as a reference like this one is. Crazyloop NY (talk) 22:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@Crazyloop NY: WP:UGC says this: "Although review aggregators (such as Rotten Tomatoes) may be reliable when summarizing experts; otherwise, their ratings based on the opinions of their users are not." (emphasis added). LIke I said I could be wrong. Regardless you can revert my edit. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#654mpvie crutics 5} 22:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Crazyloop NY, Blaze Wolf is correct. Wikipedia articles about films should summarize how professional movie critics assess the film. User generated polls of random ticket buyers are not acceptable. Cullen328 (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Oh good I was interpreting that correctly. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

@Blaze Wolf Mea culpa, twice actually. First, the article states “Rotten Tomatoes gives EuroTrip a 47% rating based on 120 reviews, and an average of 5.1/10.” I mistakenly thought the second figure was an outdated audience score. Actually, it is another way they report critical reviews. BTW, it’s actually 5.4/10. So there is a minor error that could be fixed.

Second, you are absolutely right to follow the content guideline, and you were correct to revert my changes. I’ve looked and compared this page with other more current movie articles and they seem to report the critical response in much the same way.

And so, in the future, if you need to revert one of my changes, do so, then next fill out the edit summary explaining why. Or you could send me a Talk. I’m new and still learning and I crave feedback. Thanks for your Help! Crazyloop NY (talk) 17:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Alright sounds good. ALso, usually the edit summary will be automated so if I see the need to provide more detail, I will add it to the warning. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

@Blaze Wolf That would be helpful because in this example (Reverted edits by Crazyloop NY (talk) to last revision by 2601:CB:427F:817D:F11A:7C9A:3381:26E5: WP:UGC) does not tell me why. Crazyloop NY (talk) 17:58, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Ah. In that case I provided a link to the relevant policy that I applied in that edit, which was WP:UGC. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

@Blaze Wolf No, I disagree, You provided an acronym of a link to the relevant policy. Now that you point it out, I see it plain as day but how is a new user supposed to understand? Especially when it follows a string of what seems to be nonsensical alphanumerics. It’s practically camouflaged. Anyway, if I see something like that again I’ll examine it more closely. Crazyloop NY (talk) 18:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Oh did I not link it? That was a mistake on my part. It's meant to be a link and not just the shortcut. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: The Fulton School

Hello Blaze Wolf. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of The Fulton School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. BangJan1999 16:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Ah alright. Thanks for letting me know. I was not aware it didn't apply to schools. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Excellent work with anti-vandalism! I know you've gotten this before, but wanted you to know that you're work is appreciated! See you around! SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 19:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

I don't know why this is happening this way... ugh, I'm TRYING to give you a barnstar! SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 19:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Go to source editor and remove the tags surrounding it that say "nowiki". That's what's breaking it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Got it! Sorry about that! SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 19:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

It's alright. THat usually happens if it asks you to convert it to wikitext formatting and you tell it to do that. Also it appears you accidentally gave me the old version of the barnstar but it still works. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:36, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I see your name on more blocks for vandalism than anyone else, good jobs The Shamming Man has appeared. 20:31, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Sivakarthikeyan

Excuse me @Blaze Wolf: sir. Thanks for the message regarding to this edit to Sivakarthikeyan . But then it is obvious that he is also called by the name SK by his fans. Actually that is his common name. His films are also tentatively titled as SK21, SK22 which was later retitled as Prince and Maaveeran. In the page Sivakarthikeyan it is also mentioned that "Sivakarthikeyan (born 17 February 1985), also referred to as SK, is an Indian actor, singer, film producer, lyricist, and television presenter, who works predominantly in Tamil films." That clearly indicates from the line itself that his other name is SK too! Cheers. 2001:8F8:1825:9FBB:9157:F164:4616:47CC (talk) 08:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

If it's his common name you should have no problem finding a source for it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 10:53, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Dispute over purported Roy Orbison master tape sources

Greetings, Blaze Wolf, I am new to the Wiki editing process, but have 37 years (as of August 2022) employment in the audiophile reissue market.

The DCC/Steve Hoffman claim of using the Roy Orbison's Greatest Hits original two-track analog tape sources has been disproven, per the two Sony mastering engineers (who would have made the analog tape copies for DCC) and Sony vault services technicians who supplied the original two-track analog sources to Battery Studios at 321 W 44th St. If you wish I can supply the names of the aforementioned individuals in an anonymous format of your choice. Apologies in advance for any delays in responding as I hold full-time employment plus multiple audio engineering related commitments.

Thank you,

2milgroove 2milgroove (talk) 15:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

I replied there already. Please don't add a pointless comment to my talk page. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Apologies. As I stated, I am new to this process. Do I move this to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents page instead? I am unaware of the proper protocol but am trying to follow them. Blindly, as it turns out. -2milgroove 2milgroove (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

@2milgroove: What? No! Please do not take this to ANI. This isn't an issue that needs an administrator. Please keep this to the relevant talk page of the article. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Copy that. Moving to the relevant talk page of the article. -2milgroove 2milgroove (talk) 16:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Edit treated like possible vandalism

I've noticed that when you reverted one of my edits on the Minecraft page(Explanation was reasonable), you labeled it as a minor edit and used WP:RW, a counter vandalism tool, as if it was vandalism when it did not appear to be. Can you offer an explanation? Quinnerwinner12 (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

@Quinnerwinner12: Hello! I usually use RW for reverting edits in general since I find it much easier to use than simply pressing undo. IN fact, under WP:ROLLBACKUSE it states this: "If a tool or manual method is used to add an appropriate explanatory edit summary (as described in the Additional tools section below), then rollback may be freely used as with any other method of reverting." It's never intended as vandalism (since usually if it is I just press a different button that's one of many common rollback reasons, including one that is used if the edit is vandalism). All edits I perform using I think either rollback or RW are marked as minor by default and I have no control over that to my knowledge. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:55, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Oh ok, thanks for answering! Quinnerwinner12 (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Yep no problem! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Jamaica Bay | Ecology Section

I noticed that you rolled back a recent edit to the Jamaica Bay page in the Ecology section, which had previously been flagged as "This section does not cite any sources". While attempting to flesh out the sources for this section as part of one of my courses, I came across a section from a government report from 1996 - https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/archive/arc0034/0071981/1.1/data/1-data/disc_contents/document/wp/jb_form.pdf". While the content included in the Wikipedia article is valuable, it has been provided without a citation, and quotes almost directly from the original source. While I'm new to Wikipedia, my understanding is that large tracts of copied text are frowned upon and should be paraphrased and cited appropriately. Do you disagree?

The original source:

"The location of Jamaica Bay and Breezy Point and the rich food resources found there make it a regionally important fish, wildlife, and plant habitat complex. Jamaica Bay is located adjacent to the confluence of the New York Bight and New York Bay, and is at the turning point of the primarily east-west oriented coastline of New England and Long Island and the north-south oriented coastline of the mid-Atlantic coast. This geographic location acts to concentrate marine and estuarine species migrating between the New York Bight portion of the North Atlantic and the Hudson-Raritan Estuary. Shorebirds, raptors, waterfowl, landbirds, and various migratory insects are concentrated by the coastlines in both directions. These migratory species are further concentrated by the surrounding urban developed land into the remaining open space and open water of Jamaica Bay. Jamaica Bay and Breezy Point support seasonal or year-round populations of 214 species of special emphasis and listed species, incorporating 48 species of fish and 120 species of birds, and including the following federally listed and state-listed species.".

Wikipedia section:

The location of Jamaica Bay combined with the rich food resources found there make it a regionally important fish, wildlife, and plant habitat complex. This geographic location acts to concentrate marine and estuarine species migrating between the New York Bight portion of the North Atlantic, and the Hudson River and Raritan River estuary. Shorebirds, raptors, waterfowl, land birds, and various migratory insects are concentrated by the coastlines in both directions. These migratory species are further concentrated by the surrounding urban development into the remaining open space and open water of Jamaica Bay. Jamaica Bay and nearby Breezy Point support seasonal or year-round populations of over 330 species of special emphasis and listed species, incorporating 48 species of fish and 120 species of birds^{[citation needed]}. Brooklynbiology (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

@Brooklynbiology: I reverted it because you had said it was copied from the source which, while it's similar, they aren't the exact same. I'd ask an admin about this to see if it would classify as a copy vio. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:17, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Will do - Thanks for your reply. There should at the very least be a citation for this section, and some paraphrasing would be appropriate IMHO. Brooklynbiology (talk) 19:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Sorry, seems someone used my user account to edit (delete) in an article (psychology), I must to have forgotten to unlog from a computer. I saw you reverted the 'edit' by this person. Thanks for your help. (you can try adding some notice like "maybe some have used your account" as in other websites?) -- Bgeditor12234234 (talk) 14:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Bgeditor12234234: That's alright, but remember that actions by another person on your account can still lead to you getting blocked since you are responsible for actions made on your account. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Prophetic.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For always helping those in need, like me. Faithful15 (talk) 16:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Userpage

Moved from Talk:United Kingdom § Monarch or Museum

– ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

The one that it leads you to after clicking on your name, @Blaze Wolf Faithful15 (talk) 16:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Faithful15: (let's continue this convo here) What color is it? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Dark blue and black. Faithful15 (talk) 16:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Faithful15: Ah! That would be User:Levi OP/Discord Profile. Follow that link to see how you can add it to your own userpage. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

OK. Thank you so much! I will make sure to give credit to you. Faithful15 (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Faithful15: I'm not the one you should be crediting. That would be Levi OP who created the template. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:45, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Ah. Well, hats off to him. BTW I am autistic as well so I can feel your pain. Faithful15 (talk) 16:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Faithful15: Eh, it's not necessarily pain. Just makes it difficult to collaborate with other editors sometimes. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Thomas Russell Middle School

I saw you undid some talk page vandalism just now. I've done the same with an ip. As I'm new here, can I ask if its ok to undotalk page comments if it's obvious vandalism? It's not something I've come across so far. Thanks. Knitsey (talk) 20:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Knitsey: Yep. If the talk page comment contributes absolutely nothing to an existing conversation (or isn't relating ot contributing to the article at all) you can remove it. You can also remove talk comments if they violate WP:NOTAFORUM ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Another reason would be if the talk comment isn't in English (unless another user has already responded to them in the other language, possibly communicating with them or telling them to please speak English but in another language). ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Great, thanks for the quick reply. Knitsey (talk) 20:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

No problem! I always get a notification when someone edits my talk page (usually mean they add a message to my talk page or are reply but that's not always the case) so I know when someone is looking for a response here. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:27, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

King Marz Artist page

Hello Blaze Wolf,

Is it possible to have a wiki page created from me as an music artist? SuperSaiyanM (talk) 13:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

@SuperSaiyanM: Not unless you're notable. Also, I advise you read WP:PROUD which explains why an article about you isn't necessarily a good thing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Hercules Mulligan

Hi, I attached a link to Hercules Mulligan within the Census records for New York. How come this was rejected?

I also attached a link to the Manumission Records which show Hercules wasn`t a founder member of the New York Manumission, as per the previous comment. How come this was also rejected. I`m only trying to put correct printed fake news.

All the best Stephen Stephenmccracken40 (talk) 14:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

@Stephenmccracken40: The information you added was written in a very non-encyclopedic way and didn't even seem to be related to the subject. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Blaze I'll try to re-do it at a later date. The information is direct from the original papers and links attached. Stephenmccracken40 (talk) 14:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

About not adding a source in ESC 23 regarding kosovo

It was literally a logical thing, like they say that if they are planning to get membership till the end of the year and I just said that it's possible that they will participate, like that is a logical sentence, what kind of source would you need 💀 2A02:1388:E1:CFCB:0:0:5AB2:F97D (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

If you are MICKEYSTAMATIOU‎ please log in to your account and reply here. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Reverting Viola

You reverted my Viola post even though there was a hyperlink to where I got information. Could you clarify more on why you removed it? 132.147.145.202 (talk) 18:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

On your talk page I Told you that the source you're using, Blogspot, is not reliable at all. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

You reverted a completely legitimate edit

You reverted a completely legitimate edit. Jungkook IS the main vocalist, lead dancer, sub-rapper and center of the South Korean boy group BTS. The information on the current Wikipedia page is wrong. Please do not revert edits that you might not know about. Thank you. CherrypieJK (talk) 18:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

@CherrypieJK: You are incorrect. You changed an edit request that was answered to not be answered. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

I changed it to NOT ANSWERED because it should be included in the Wikipedia page. It's correct information, completely legitimate edit request. So it should be shown on the page. How else can you pass that edit request? Thank you for your help. CherrypieJK (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

@CherrypieJK: I don't think you understand. In this diff you changed the parameter answered= from "y" to "n" which was inappropriate as the edit request had already been answered a few months ago. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

I reopened it so that it can be added to the article, to revise the first decision. Please help me. What should I do to add the correct information to the article? Should I write another edit request with the same information? Thank you for your help. CherrypieJK (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

@CherrypieJK: Yes. You should add a new one making sure it has relaible sources. If it's declined again then you could ask the person who declined it why it was declined. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Always so helpful. I know you are a wolf, so here is a goat for you to eat.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 22:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

lol thank you. Regarding that link to your meta username change, I've dealt with linking to other Wikis before (called a Interwiki link, details as to how to use them are on that linked page) so I know how to do it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Leo astrology

Can you please write about the Leo personalities(bad and Good), traits and their type of reactions to certain situations. Thank youuuu. 41.116.203.60 (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

No. I have no interest in astrology nor do I want to ahve any interest in it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 12:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Heck I think astrology is complete BS and that people are just associating them with stars because they want to be relatable. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 12:10, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Just a quick note

If someone is edit warring to put vandalism back on their user talk (or elsewhere), don't revert-war with them; bring it up at AIV and get them blocked (and get their TPA pulled). Problematic text being on the page for a short while is much easier to deal with than 25 reverts that then need hiding. Primefac (talk) 19:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Also, it's generally better to request a CU through SPI rather than emailing CUs directly - there is more transparency and allows for more eyes on the situation (which is incidentally why I'm the one posting here, because of a 2O request). Primefac (talk) 20:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

While I'm here, less for Blaze and more for anyone else who reads this: Please also don't edit war when vandals / LTAs / etc blank their warnings or even block templates. That's allowed under WP:BLANKING and I see so many cases where patrollers escalate things by warring over it, then demand TPA be revoked for something that was allowed all along. -- ferret (talk) 20:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

@Primefac: Hello Primefac, to address your first thing, I usually don't try and edit war with user talk vandalism. If the user is harassing me I would prefer to revert it since it's harassment. Second, the reason I emailed a CU was because I didn't think it was a matter that would be appropriate for SPI due to the situation. Also, ferret I thought removing block templates wasn't allowed under WP:BLANKING? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Also, with the situation I encountered, AIV would've been useless since the users were already blocked and so the bot would just remove the reports instantly. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:39, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Fair enough, I forgot the bot operates that way; still plenty of on-wiki venues that will probably be faster than an email, for what it's worth. Hell, half the time people post at ANI 2.0 because there are so many tps that it gets handled pretty quickly. Primefac (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Removing declined appeals, while the block is still active, is off limits. You can remove block notices all day long if you want. You can also remove declined appeals once the block expires. -- ferret (talk) 20:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

@Ferret: Ah alright that makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up for me. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

You reverted my edit on "Sherlock: the game is now"

I made those edits because the brand name has changed and as the marketing team working with them we are attempting to realign their brand name across the internet. The company now goes by "Sherlock: the official live game" as seen on their homepage on their website https://www.thegameisnow.com/ (domain to be changed soon).

My edit was the first line on Sherlock the game is now I changed it to: "Sherlock: The Official Live Game (formerly known as Sherlock: The Game is Now) is an escape room based on the television program Sherlock." which i don't believe breaks any of the content policies.

We also need the name of the Wikipedia page changed to Sherlock: The Official Live Game 77.107.154.122 (talk) 16:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Propose it on the talk page. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

i thought this was the talk page? Where do i go to do that? 77.107.154.122 (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Sherlock: The Game Is Now ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:09, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

You reverted the vandalism (sorry for bad english)

Sorry for my bad english here: You reverted a vandalism on the page! I fixed it now! Kingen Erik (talk) 18:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Peter Sklar Niles Gerster (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Question from Niles Gerster (18:10, 29 September 2022)

Hi, I just signed up, though I am a long time visitor and supporter. there is just one additional word I seek to add, specifically to the article concerning Mr. Peter Sklar(full name Peter Seidman Sklar). This is because I encountered some difficulty following up after reading your article, as there are numerous Peter Sklars out there, some of whom with similar interests. My thought was that this might confuse individuals attempting to get in touch with or find out more about him. Lo and behold, I have discovered that--most likely for this reason--his. full name now appears all his websites and other digital preserves. (I also found out, via a chat with him, that he had dropped the middle as perhaps being too ethnic for the diversified audience he seeks to reach and teach. But he has apparently come around to changing this view.) So, for clarity's sake, I want to add the middle name "Seidman" to a) the top title "Peter Sklar"_b) the opening paragraph, and c) the photo caption. Please advise. Thank you. --Niles Gerster (talk) 18:10, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

@Niles Gerster: Hello Niles! In order to add the middle name you'll need to show that it is his middle name via reliable sources. I'll leave a welcome message on your talk page with information that can help you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:13, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, Blaze, I had already read all the guidelines and so forth before posting my question. My hope was that you would visit the article in question, click on the links it contains--which would demonstrate that Peter Himself verifies that it is his name--and. if that is not enough "proof," that you would advise me on the kinds of things acceptable as verification. Instead, you directed me to policy. I'm just attempting to clarify things, not undertake a major project. It is not as if I have an investigator on call, or anything. Could you take a look? Could you check out the links? Could you advise me, please, as to what things you would require or accept as verification? I'd be most grateful if you could. Niles Gerster (talk) 21:06, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

@Niles Gerster: Could you possibly link what article you're referring to? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:08, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

@Niles Gerster: Thanks for the link. What refs are you referring to? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

At the bottom of the page there are TWO LINKS. One for his personal website "The Sklar Principal," and the other for the workshop he runs, called "Beginnings." On each of them he now employs his full name. So these are refsfrom the ultimate source. Niles Gerster (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

@Niles Gerster: Alright. I'm not able to view the refs myself at the moment for reasons I will not elaborate on. Maybe one of my talk page watchers/stalkers could look for me? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do ask them. It would be most helpful.

From where will I receive their reply> Niles Gerster (talk) 21:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

@Niles Gerster: You'll most likely receive a reply from them here. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Olay. Thank you Niles Gerster (talk) 21:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Niles Gerster, I have added his middle name to the first sentence of the article because we give complete names there. But I will not add it to the article title because Wikipedia:Article titles says Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources) and pretty much all of the independent reliable sources call him Peter Sklar. Cullen328 (talk) 21:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Pokémon

Hello! I see you a lot on the recent changes to Pokémon articles, and I'm currently working on an attempted revival of WikiProject Pokémon, in part because of how many recent changes are made with basically zero coordination, and this is my informal formal invitation because I need help if you have any spare time. Thanks! DecafPotato (talk) 23:37, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

@DecafPotato: Hello Decaf! I can definitely help out. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:50, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

A Little Lion for you!

i really love your username its very cute sounding, here is a wild little lion.

Lolkikmoddi (talk) 18:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Aww thank you! :) IT's the name of my fursona and also my online persona that I"ve adopted ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

welcome! :D finally someone that is in the same fandom lol Lolkikmoddi (talk) 14:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Oh? what do you mean? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:25, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

News and notes: Board vote results, bot's big GET, crat chat gives new mop, WMF seeks "sound logo" and "organizer lab"

In focus: NPP: Still heaven or hell for new users – and for the reviewers

In the media: A few complaints and mild disagreements

Special report: Decentralized Fundraising, Centralized Distribution

Discussion report: Much ado about Fox News

Interview: ScottishFinnishRadish's Request for Adminship

Opinion: Are we ever going to reach consensus?

Serendipity: Removing watermarks, copyright signs and cigarettes from photos

Recent research: How readers assess Wikipedia's trustworthiness, and how they could in the future

Traffic report: Kings and queens and VIPs

Featured content: Farm-fresh content

Gallery: A Festival Descends on the City: The Edinburgh Fringe, Pt. 2

CommonsComix: CommonsComix 2: Paulus Moreelse

From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 Years ago: September 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Your bot reverted my legitimate edit on Johan van Stratum

It's a small CORRECT update on a page clearly not kept up-to-date for many years.

You don't even know who this guy is, but auto-revert any edit without citation?? Call it vandalism? The nerve.. "Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Johan van Stratum. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted." Now that's just plain rude, who the hell does this bot think it is?

The whole section I made a slight CORRECT update to has no citation, so why would I have to? 217.103.10.138 (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

If you're referring to ClueBot NG it's not my bot. Also, your edits had no source at all. You having the knowledge of them is just WP:OR ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

So having the right information on a page is apparently irrelevant?

Your revert misinforms people, maybe take a step back and remember the purpose of this site.

This whole section has no sources, and is factually INCORRECT, but it can stay and my edit cannot.

Absolutely genius. 217.103.10.138 (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS I'm not going to continue arguing with you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

I will delete the entire section then, as it's unsourced and factually incorrect 217.103.10.138 (talk) 19:10, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Alright then. If you were just deleting it because it was "factually incorrect" even if it was sourced then I would object because Wikipedia doesn't care if something is "factually incorrect" according to one person. Wikipedia covers what is supported by reliable, secondary sources. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

I deleted only the part of the section that misinforms, though my initial edit made things much more clear for any future readers.

You're in too deep bro. 217.103.10.138 (talk) 19:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

3O Response: This page was mentioned as being part of the Talk:Johan van Stratum dispute so I am just acknowledging that I am aware of and have read this part of the dispute, and letting you know that I have responded on the article's talk page and I think further discussion should continue there instead of being split amongst several talk pages. - Aoidh (talk) 02:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Question from Jack50nD4u3y (07:54, 2 October 2022)

Hello, how do I use Wikipedia constructively? --Jack50nD4u3y (talk) 07:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

@Jack50nD4u3y: Hello Jackson! YOu can edit Wikipedia constructively by making helpful edits to articles like minor copyedits for things like spelling or grammar. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

NOSM Univ Change Oct 3, 2022

Hi there - I actually work at NOSM Universty and the reason I made that change is because no one at the instituion calls it Northern Ontario School of Medicine University. None of the branding, none of the communications and in fact we have been instructed to only refer to ourselves as NOSM University.

If it could be changed that would be great. In addition, if the title of the article could be moved to NOSM University that would be an even bigger help. I tried to submit a technical request but I think I flubbed it.

Happy to provide whatever proof you require that I work there. Mmcarthu (talk) 15:19, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mmcarthu: Hello carthu! Since you work at the university that means you are being WP:PAID to make your edits (if I'm misunderstanding what this policy is please tell me talk page watchers) and that you have a conflict of interest. You must declare that you are being paid according to Wikipedia's TOS. Also, the correct place to submit a technical request would be at WP:RMT and not on the actual article. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Phew! The barrier to entry here is pretty high. I have no issue declaring a conflict since it clearly exists but since I have no idea how to do any of what you mentioned I guess I'll just leave the incorrect information where it stands.

Is there a "Beginner course" on how to engage in the manner you describe? Mmcarthu (talk) 15:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mmcarthu: Actually, most of it is simply done through templates, and the RMT page has instructions on how to request a move. On WP:RMT it says this: "To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the top of the list, filling in pages and reason: {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new page title|reason=reason for move}} This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page." Also, to declare that yo uare being paid simply add {{paid|employer=ACME|article=Example}}, with the "Employer" being your company (in this case NOSM University) and the article being a link to the University article. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

About my sandbox page.

I wasn't done with it, but I couldn't just save it. I was going to put some other things on it. Just wanted to clear it up. The R 1.0 AUCCC (talk) 23:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

@The R 1.0 AUCCC: Doesn't matter. You cannot create a page that's just copyrighted song lyrics. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Question from Sheikh Nasrullah (08:12, 4 October 2022)

Hello I published an article is it really published --Sheikh Nasrullah (talk) 08:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Amphiblestronophobia

This is a neologism and needs to be added to circulate around. Although it is a new word, there is no existing word for fear of nets and the only way there will be one is if someone uses their initiative and creativity to research the Greek derivations, not 'made up' - and take a two year ancient Greek course - in order to coin a new word. Mea Cathedra (talk) 17:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mea Cathedra: No. Read WP:MADEUP ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Loreta Lynn

Webb is an English surname, it comes originally from the occupation of a weaver 2A00:23C7:6003:F801:3290:5DD0:F308:AA05 (talk) 18:43, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

And? That has nothing to do with your edit. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Question from William gamer e (19:44, 4 October 2022)

hi --William gamer e (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

@William gamer e: Hello William! Did you have a question? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

sorry just wanted to say hi William gamer e (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

@William gamer e: That's fine. However please know that not a place for general chit-chat like this. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

ok i will keep it in mind William gamer e (talk) 19:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Your user page

Hi Blaze Wolf! I just wanted to give you a heads up that I added indefinite semi protection to your user page for both editing and moving. I saw in the edit filter log that someone attempted to vandalize your user page; luckily, an edit filter put a stop to it. I realized from the log that your user page was completely unprotected, so I went ahead and fixed that for you. If you have any questions or concerns, or would like that protection removed from your user page, please let me know. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Ah thanks Oshwah! I would've protected it sooner but usually my userpage isn't vandalized enough to warrant semi. But thanks anyways. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 10:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

You bet! Always happy to keep an eye out for my fellow Wikipedians. ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:02, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Imposter

Why don't you buy the DVD for yourself and listen to the audio? I don't see why I'd make up such a simple thing. Not every little itty biddy detail needs a direct source. 84.68.152.58 (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

I have no desire to do that. See WP:BURDEN, and something like that needs a source. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Spiderwrap

https://www.catalyst-direct.com/uk/products/eas/security-tags/spider/ 198.58.160.177 (talk) 18:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

That doesn't support your claim. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy nomination of User:Rsummers9/Pattie Gonia

Hi @Blaze Wolf. I'm curious about your speedy nom of User:Rsummers9/Pattie Gonia, which was being used by User:Rsummers9 to draft a bio about Pattie Gonia. I'm not sure why the content they had - basically a list of links - was promotional

Interview/Project
https://www.audubon.org/pattiegonia
Interview
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2021/07/a-conversation-with-environmentalist-drag-queen-pattie-gonia/
https://www.vogue.com/article/pattie-gonia-tiktok-drag-queen-environmentalism
Background/Rise to Fame
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/pattie-gonia-drag-queen-climate-environmentalist_n_62cdca45e4b06e3d9bbbc466

https://www.outtraveler.com/exclusives/2022/2/25/climate-activist-pattie-gonia-taking-drag-outdoors

Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@Ian (Wiki Ed): It wasn't because it was promotional specifically but because it was a list of links that seemed to serve no purpose other than to be a list of links. If I had known it was for an article they were drafting for Wiki Ed I would've left it alone (in fact, usually I've noticed it's in a bibliography subpage). I'm sure you could ask Explicit to undelete it for that purpose. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@Blaze Wolf Thanks. And you're right - it should have been on their bibliography subpage. If it's ok with you, I'll undelete it. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@Ian (Wiki Ed): (no need to ping me on my talk page, I'm automatically notified of any edit to it) Go ahead, I have no really issues with it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Force of habit. I'm too used to talking to Wikipedians on student pages! :) Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Question from Darren Blog (03:27, 6 October 2022)

Hi Blaze Wolf,

I am new to Wikipedia.

Recently, I keep edit an article of Cast urethane. Since I have use Cast urethane for tens of years in my work. I know it very well.

If I made mistake when I edit it, Please let me know.

I am pretty confused should I add cite when I edit it. --Darren Blog (talk) 03:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Question from Darren Blog (06:47, 6 October 2022)

Hi Blaze Wolf,

I am new to Wikipedia.

I am trying to edit a article for a few times, but all of them have been delete buy administrator. I am confused what is the right way.

Please instruct me, Thank you. --Darren Blog (talk) 06:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

@Darren Blog: I agree with the concerns raised on your talk page. Your english may not be good enough to contribute here. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 11:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Important Update

Hello all. First, I'd like to thank everyone who has complemented me on my anti-vandal work, I really appreciate all the support. Second, I will be temporarily quitting anti-vandal work because of all the harassment I've received on my talk page from vandals. It's not going to be a permanent thing, just until things calm down a little. I'm going to try and focus mainly on content creation and maintenance for the time being (however if I come across vandalism in my watchlist I'll still revert it) since I'd say that probably the majority of my edits are simply just anti-vandal work. Thanks for understanding all. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 12:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi

The Nintendo Direct was released and ended a while ago. Mr. Doggy Dog (talk) 20:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

I'm already aware of that. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:03, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi there

About Tekken 5, I played both PS2 and PSP ports but not the PS3 one. If you think Dark Resurrection should stay, I agree. Still, after Tekken 6 became GA, I wonder if 5 is also lacking something to become GA too. I kinda edited 5 recently since it was my first game of the series but I think it has prose issues. Feel free to revise anything. Cheers Tintor2 (talk) 23:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I think you're asking the wrong person. I never had anything to do with this. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Blaze Wolf. Thank you for creating Need for Speed Unbound. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 21:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Yep no problem. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Autoblocked

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Blaze Wolf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Brandonisstupid4545". The reason given for Brandonisstupid4545's block is: "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia".

Blocking administrator: ‪Primefac‬ (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Resolved now. If this comes up again, you may request another, longer IPBE. 331dot (talk) 15:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Could I please be made exempt from the autoblock? If necessary I'm willing to provide more details via email. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@Primefac: Pinging since you added the autoblock (apologies if you were already notified via the template) ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Seriously, can I please get some help here? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@331dot: (apologies for pinging multiple admins, I just have no clue what to do here) ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Are you at some form of public internet access?(I don't need details) 331dot (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

In a way, yes. Can't really give too much more details without accidentally revealing OSable info. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

You edited successfully four minutes before your first unblock request. 331dot (talk) 15:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@331dot: The autoblock probably got applied shortly after that. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

If you would like a CU to be performed on me I am open to that. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure that's necessary. For the record, I assume that you are not Brandonisstupid4545? 331dot (talk) 15:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@331dot: You are indeed correct. As I have disclosed on my user page (and my alt's userpage) that my only alt is User:Blaze Fire Wolf. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the IPBE. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but I've tried giving you a 24 hour IP block exemption. Can you test it(maybe edit your sandbox) 331dot (talk) 15:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@331dot: I attempted to edit my userpage and it worked. Previously I would get a notice on the side saying that I've been affected by an autoblock but I don't anymore. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

That's because I lifted the autoblock. Primefac (talk) 20:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Caught in the crossfire. The other account should have their contrib revdel'd in addition. SWinxy (talk) 21:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

OCTOBER 2022

I want that reliable source you were talking about on my user talk page. PsychicTechnologies (talk) 02:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

@PsychicTechnologies: https://gadgets360.com/telecom/news/airtel-volte-services-2017-launch-rivalling-reliance-jio-1722991 there's your source. IF you don't think it's reliable bother someone else. I'm not in a good mood atm. Your username also heavily implies you work for some sort of company anyways. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I hope you are feeling better today, Please have a good day today! Lolkikmoddi (talk) 14:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Lolkik. These past few weeks have been rather... difficult for me for a multitude of reasons (most of them personal) but I've been trying to push through. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Invite for WikiProject: Apple Inc.

Please accept this invite to join the Apple Inc. WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed set of articles related to Apple.
Simply click here to accept!

SMBMovieFan (talk) 18:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

@SMBMovieFan: Thank you for the invite however I'm not interested in the Apple Inc. WikiProject. Any edit I make to an area concerning the WikiProject is simply anti-vandalism as I have no real interest in Apple products (I use either Windows or Android) ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Clarification for 16th of September

You may have been confused by me on the 16th of September when I went against consensus on the Minecraft page. If you looked at the edit, it still said that it was "Virtually infinite", just with some extra info. Truth was, I forgot to state what the consensus was and on my talk page when I said "Didn't know that was part of the consensus" I meant that I didn't know that the edit was against the consensus. Me not stating the consensus confused us both. The consensus will remain in your favor because you stated that it was unsourced on my talk page. Just thought you needed clarification Quinnerwinner12 (talk) 16:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Question from SikiWtideI (15:57, 15 October 2022)

I’m working on my stubsensor, and I’m almost done. What do I do now? And, how was the idea of wiki markup made? Couldn’t they make it so it’s just HTML, and there’s no need to translate it into HTML? --SikiWtideI (talk) 15:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

@SikiWtideI: I recommend you ask someone else as this is far out of my area of expertise. Sorry for the inconvenience. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
18,490	California (talk)	Add sources
671	Kaadhal Kondein (talk)	Add sources
38	NASCAR 09 (talk)	Add sources
7	Dorton House (talk)	Add sources
18	The Norton Knatchbull School (talk)	Add sources
82	Alumni association (talk)	Add sources
16	Joe Ybarra (talk)	Cleanup
27	Borden Grammar School (talk)	Cleanup
466	Comoro Islands (talk)	Cleanup
2,063	Hurricane Ida (talk)	Expand
1,735	Nawaz Sharif (talk)	Expand
2,061	Gretchen Whitmer (talk)	Expand
264	Need for Speed: Porsche Unleashed (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
273	Need for Speed II (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
993	Richard Petty (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
404	Mike Dunleavy (politician) (talk)	Merge
2,083	Messiah complex (talk)	Merge
147	Danger Hiptop (talk)	Merge
126	Emi Sakura (talk)	Wikify
414	David Ige (talk)	Wikify
193	2022–23 European windstorm season (talk)	Wikify
2	Zaltair (talk)	Orphan
2	Aleksei Foroponov (talk)	Orphan
2	Ayun Hạ Lake (talk)	Orphan
78	Hina Pervaiz Butt (talk)	Stub
5	Melanie Clewlow (talk)	Stub
12	Greg Treat (talk)	Stub
9	Quest for Saddam (talk)	Stub
119	Muhammad Baligh Ur Rehman (talk)	Stub
60	Peter Oppenheimer (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

How do I participate in this study then? You say it's voluntary but you don't provide a way to participate. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 12:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Best Known For IP

We both have a problem with the same IP-user 195.224.241.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) ,though I am their main target so far.

Here are some of their reverts:

"almost" -> "all but" [2]
"ease" -> "assuage", "courage" -> "fortitude [3] (Thank you for your rightful edit war)
"bad" -> "desultory" [4]
"of them" -> "thereof" [5]
"limited" -> "hamstrung" [6]

This user wants me to believe that I am just unable to understand some nuances in language because I am not a native English speaker. In psychology this is known as gaslighting. For example in this revert they instruct me: "don't change meanings that you don't understand". Is "all but dissappeared" a stronger or weaker version of "almost disappeared"? If last year I saw 100 pigeons in the park, and now I see only 5, then I can say "They almost disappeared", but what if if their number reduced to 2? Should I say: "They all but disappeared"? The IP claims that I might as well replace "fifteen" with "fiveteen". [7]. No, I would never do it. "fiveteen" may sound more logical for non-native speakers but it is ungrammatical, though in fact it is an obsolete form of fifteen. Any discussion with that user makes no sense. I have always taken Wikipedia seriously and, after 15 years of editing, I feel disappointed. There are too many narcissists and psychopaths here, and they prey on people like you and me. 85.193.215.210 (talk) 14:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

IP if BKFIP pops up then immediately report them to WP:AIV. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:50, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

I reported the IP to the talk page of WP:BKFIP, and I thought that it was enough. 85.193.215.210 (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

I didn't know I was supposed to report IPs connected to this guy there. Interesting. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Yes, and it proved to be effective - the IP is blocked. But that vandal has at least 11 years of experience and will keep reverting my copy edits forever. So I am considering to quit Wikipedia or switch to Simple English Wikipedia. I feel so tired. 85.193.215.210 (talk) 20:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

I get it. You could probably ask other editors to help you out or request the articles be protected due to persistent socking. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Of course, the vandal got active again, now as 86.187.165.112. I reported the new IP to WP:BKFIP (see the talk). Cheers :-) 85.193.215.210 (talk) 14:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Bro, I just added Voot Kids to OTT platforms list, pls reverse it.

Bro, I just added Voot Kids to OTT platforms list, pls reverse it. Aditya Khanna Wiki Editorrr (talk) 05:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

No. You're just duplicating the link above it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 12:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

You!

Hello. Based on your first archived talk page, you have only been here for a couple of years. From stalking the help desks, I had guessed that you were much more experienced than that. In WP, that is! Your advice and answers always come across as thoughtful, reasonable, etc.

I'm sorry to see that you are currently feeling stressed. Hang in there. And I think furries are cool! David10244 (talk) 07:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

~~Me!~~ Hey David! Thank you so much for this comment. It really means a lot to me. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome. Let me know if you want to talk about anything. David10244 (talk) 10:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Penny Mordaunt

Hi, I saw the message regarding my unsourced (yet true) edit. I do not know how to add sources, hence why I added it unsourced 82.45.169.15 (talk) 13:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

See WP:Referencing for beginners for how to add sources. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

for your own good (I guess)

how did it go from "This user is feeling stressed and may choose to do less stressful tasks" (or something along those lines) to "This user is feeling depressed, stress, and mental breakdowns". I think you should take a short wikibreak or at least decrease the amount of editing you do because it is A LOT. Abdullah raji (talk) 14:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

@Abdullah raji: It's not necessarily relating to Wikipedia but stuff going on outside of Wikipedia. It's mostly passed now so I should probably remove the template. Also while I appreciate the suggestion of taking a Wikibreak or decreasing the amount of editing I do, I will not take the suggestion. Just because I edit a lot doesn't mean I should take a Wikibreak or decrease the amount of editing I do. I took a semi-Wikibreak a while back from anti-vandalism work due to the amount of harassment I received here on my talk page (I only undid vandalism I saw in my watchlist). ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

ok :) Abdullah raji (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for continuing to defend my good name and work to revert vandalism on the encyclopedia. Sometimes it does attract the worst types of people, so it is good to have "friends" on here. TY — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 19:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Moops! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello.

Why am I getting warnings with the least sandpiper talk page? I wanted to add information about males and females, but if I edit it, even if its constructive, I get a warning. DlDNT (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@DIDNT: You receive the warnings because your edits are completely unsourced and unconstructive. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

So what "constructive" edits you want me to make DlDNT (talk) 15:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

WP:BKFIP

BKFIP edits from England. It's highly unlikely that the IP you suspected as BKFIP was BKFIP, not only because they edited from a standard ISP in the US, but also because their style was not at all characteristic of BKFIP.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Yes. I know that they tend to edit from England, however I wasn't going to deny the fact they the could use a VPN (that wouldn't be detected as a proxy somehow), however I did still have doubts that it was BKFIP. As I stated it was similar, but not similar enough, however I'm not experienced enough with recognizing LTAs to know for sure, so I just mentioned it as a possibility, unlikely but a possibility. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Keep moving

Hey Blaze Wolf, Being targeted, bullied, or harassed on wikipedia is never a fun experience. I hope this doesnt discourage you from editing. You have always been a great editor that I look up to. I just wanted to comment this because I noticed that recently you were attacked a bit. That is all. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 16:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Adding to this, Don't listen to the trolls, trolls = bad, this sounds like a troll comment my self but please don't listen to the trolls, they are mad because they got blocked Lolkikmoddi-h3t3 :D (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

I usually ignore trolls, mainly cause they just want attention per WP:DENY. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the help with my talk page! I greatly appreciate it! SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Helping Hand Barnstar
		I can't thank you and Hey man im josh enough for the help with my talk page! I consider both of you Wikifriends and it's good to know that I have fellow editors who will lend a hand with a thankless task. Thank you again!! SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 14:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

NO problem! Honestly I kinda enjoy figuring out how to get it to work properly with your Cluebot archives. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I often check on Recent Changes for vandals, and half the time you get to a problem before I do. Good job! Coolman2917 (talk) 15:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Pages labelled by yourself as explicit when not explicit - why?

Why was Julie Dawn Dennis, emerging UK artist and photographer, taken down as soon as she had created her page please? She has an MA at Falmouth University in the UK and a first class honours degree also in Photography (both Fine Art) an dis trying to build her online profile as a professional. There was no reason to remove this and we are wondering if this was a malicious act. 92.27.248.222 (talk) 18:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

[and is] trying to build her online profile as a professional is exactly why the link was removed. Wikipedia is not the place for promotion or advertising. – dudhhr (1 enby in a trenchcoat)^talk _contribs (he/they) 18:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for answering dudhhr, I thought they were referring to an article that was deleted. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) – dudhhr (1 enby in a trenchcoat)^talk _contribs (he/they) 18:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Dustbins of history

Sorry, it was just a joke (blame it on boredom !) ; the rest is serious : may someone go ahead on this, as we need some epistemology - I'm not expert but I think it's sounds like it's a good way. I dig only in one (serious and very interesting) paper : Christian Godin, "La figure et le moment du scepticisme chez Hegel" (2004, in French) ; I don't know if he would agree that I quote him on this (he is still alive, about 70 or more), because the paper is not precisely on this subject, but not so far ; if you know anyone that could read this (easy to find and free on the net) it would be a serious improvement to this page (but could fall out of the question too) : I know that WP may not be the Bible or too technical but I'm convinced that it's possible to do some good non vulgar vulgarisation (I facts, I think we need or we shall do this, but I'm not the pope or god in the sky) ; best regards and apologies, JPJ.2A01:CB1C:8A0:CE00:B802:13BA:9754:6F6C (talk) 19:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Link for Boston University updates

https://www.collegekickstart.com/blog/item/u-s-news-world-report-posts-2018-college-rankings 141.166.130.226 (talk) 19:26, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Chase Claypool

Hi there!

I see that you have reverted the last few edits of Chase Claypool, I clearly stated in my edit that BOTH steelers.com and chicagobears.com confirmed the trade happened, which was needed to stop the shenanigans. 45BearsFan (talk) 23:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

For now, I have added the official teams' Twitter sources for the trade. Blaze Wolf, don't retire... � Sarrail (talk) 23:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

To 45BearsFan: You stated that and yet added neither source. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Going back to Sarrail, Blaze, I added both websites to the "He was traded to the chicago bears on November 1st" or whatever that is, Espn isn't reliable in these sort of situations, then I added both websites to the trade, seen [8] 45BearsFan (talk) 23:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

I saw. I really don't think we should be using primary sources here however they are official sources so I dunno. I don't really know how stuff like this works because I don't really like football. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

The official team's website or Twitter source would be fine. Otherwise, ESPN is junkmail at reporting official trades, picks or drafts, it has to come an announcement made by the official football team. Sarrail (talk) 23:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

According to wikipedias policy, sources like ESPN, CBS, and even the NFL website isn't reliable, It's only the trading teams social medias, or their websites. Sorry 'bout that. 45BearsFan (talk) 23:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Alright fair enough. As i said I have no clue how stuff like this works but if that's what it has to be then that's what it is. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Great, sorry abour all the confusion and glad we aren't in a edit war, hopefully I can see you on wiki some time around! 45BearsFan (talk) 23:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Unless if Blaze Wolf retires...as stated at the top of the talk page, and I hope it doesn't happen anytime soon. � Sarrail (talk) 23:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop with the emojis. Normally I'm not too much of a stickler on professionalism here but the emojis are just really childish imo. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Ah, I see. We'll see how it goes then, with the considering retirement... Sarrail (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @45BearsFan You may use a WP:PRIMARY or WP:SELFPUB source if the fact it cites is non controversial and the deployment of such sources is minimal. You should seek to replace those questionable sources as soon as a better one comes along. It would be worth documenting intent on the talk page if you use a poor source 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Ah alright. Although apparently any other source besides the official one is not appropriate in this case? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:24, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

That is a matter of judgement. The more questionable the source the less wise it is to use it. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

so not the team's website, but like espn is reliable? 45BearsFan (talk) 23:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

ESPN would probably be not notable, the team's Twitter page/source might be an example for announcements and a possible draft, or trade, or whatsoever. Sarrail (talk) 23:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Not reliable* ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 23:28, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

I'd love to give you a definitive answer. That sport and its sources are not my field, so all I can d is to give generic guidance and trust your interpretation of that guidance, 45BearsFan. - 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:28, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

The fundamental question is "Is this fact susceptible to challenge?"

If it is, you should not use a questionable source, and the fact cannot (yet) be stated

Remember, we are not a news outlet. We do not have to get in first with current events. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Archiving

Good news, Spf121188's archiving worked as intended.

Bad news, it removed the comments from the template at Spf's talk page and at my talk page after I added them as well. Sooo I guess we can't add comments to that template. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Hm, alright then. We could probably either add them before or after the template. I would assume the bot automatically looks to see if the template is correct and will fix it if it detects something that shouldn't be there. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Planet Crafter

Hello, Blaze Wolf. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Planet Crafter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

@Liz: Wasn't I supposed to be notified of it being 5 months since I Last edited it? Because I wasn't to my knowledge. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Yandere Simulator

I made a post on the Yandere Simulator's talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yandere_Simulator regarding an issue which may require your attention. A troll link may have avoided detection and is still present on the page. 2A02:1810:4F0B:500:190E:351E:6374:3DFD (talk) 00:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention IP. I've removed it as it's a completely pointless ref that backs up nothing and is just there to be there. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

could you please explain what the exact problem of my edits.SonoCat (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

You removed {{lead too long}} without addressing the issue and instead you appear ot have made the issue worse by making the lead even longer. I suggest you propose the changes yo uwant to make on the talk page so other editors can review them since it's difficult to determine how good an edit is when it's all made in 1 giant edit with no edit summary. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

The article's includes a template that said that the lead section was be too long for the length of the article. So I moved some sections from the lead to a new section under the name "Cultural influence" [9], why you consider these edits as nonconstructive edits?. I can return the {{lead too long}}.SonoCat (talk) 17:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Really? Because from what I see you move stuff from other parts of the article into the lead. Either that or I was looking at the diff wrong. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

No; I moved some sections from the lead to a new section under the name "Cultural influence" [10], i added also new sourced materiales under "Cultural influence" section and other sections, but in the leade.SonoCat (talk) 17:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Could you self revert your edit?, I can complete the edit, and move another paragraph from the lead to the inside of the article?SonoCat (talk) 17:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

I get the feeling you're not being truthful with me. According to Special:Diff/1118747493 you added more content to the lead. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Check the new version [11]; is the lead section still too long for the length of the article?SonoCat (talk) 18:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

@SonoCat: Yes that looks better. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

pelosi

do tell me what part isn't verified. 2602:306:BC74:6240:7C92:840B:9E23:7A32 (talk) 20:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Your entire edit. You added no refs. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

oh that kind of verification....I don't have time to find it now. you can help of course..... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:BC74:6240:7C92:840B:9E23:7A32 (talk) 20:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

While I can help, the burden is on you to add the refs with the edit, not me. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	For going through depression/stress whilst receiving uncountable amounts of harassment. No one needs that, no one deserves that, except masochists, maybe. ~~ lol1VNIO⁠👻 (I made a mistake? talk to me) 20:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Amethyst

I'm sorry you are not familiar with the MOS and English grammar, so cannot recognize constructive edits. Thanks, though. 2603:8080:B200:5CDE:9C38:ADF5:39AF:3EA6 (talk) 20:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Well that's a little rude. Your edits were not inline with English grammar. The comma should be there and there is no dash in "high quality". ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Need for Speed Unbound

On 29 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Need for Speed Unbound, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the title for Need for Speed Unbound was accidentally revealed early on Electronic Arts' website? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Need for Speed Unbound. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Need for Speed Unbound), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Wait what. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

From the team: A new goose on the roost

News and notes: Wikipedians question Wikimedia fundraising ethics after "somewhat-viral" tweet

News from the WMF: Governance updates from, and for, the Wikimedia Endowment

In the media: Scribing, searching, soliciting, spying, and systemic bias

Disinformation report: From Russia with WikiLove

Recent research: Disinformatsiya: Much research, but what will actually help Wikipedia editors?

Interview: Isabelle Belato on their Request for Adminship

Featured content: Topics, lists, submarines and Gurl.com

Serendipity: We all make mistakes – don’t we?

Traffic report: Mama, they're in love with a criminal

From the archives: Paid advocacy, a lawsuit over spelling mistakes, deleting Jimbo's article, and the death of Toolserver

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:42, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Learning to review

A number of us track our AFC reviews. It may help you to follow a random selection from mine: User:Timtrent/AfC log. I'm happy to discuss a random half dozen or so if you feel that will help you. I am by no means perfect, but I get a strong proportion right 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Timtrent! I actually tend to come across AFC submissions while patrolling recent changes (and sometimes its tempting to just immediately decline them myself since it's clear that it would not survive an AFD) however I usually don't see reviewed ones. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Finding articles to edit

You sent an edit by a Vandal editor to CSD. For some reason I noticed it. Yampupata was the outcome. I have no idea of the smallest thing about it, but I worked at making it an acceptable start of article based on w:de:Yampupata.

Note the attribution in the edit summary and on the talk page.

You may also enjoy this type of thing. Take a stub and shake it into an article. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

I sent an edit by a vandal editor to CSD? Huh? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Hahahahah. Seems I am in error. Well, someone did, and I thought of you, and finding articles to have a go at 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Ah, No I am not! User talk:Yampupata 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Ah that! I had just noticed them create that talk page wall patrolling recent changes with WP:SWViewer. I was a bit confused by what you meant lol. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)