User talk:Bbb23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Blocked user Kingcutie under new sockpuppet HDClear

It appears that user Kingcutie is once again vandalizing his brother's wikipedia page under sockpuppet HDClear, for which he was previously banned by you.

It's not entirely clear to me how to proceed with bringing attention to this.

WIKI PAGE: Har Mar Superstar

OLD USER: User:Kingcutie

NEW USER: User talk:HDClear

User:Кронас

Hello. I was over at this user's talk page and I saw that you posted there in February regarding their page moves [1]. Just now, I became aware of a very odd page that they created [2]. It is a table laid out in columns that tracks page moves. The page has: the user who moved a particular page, what space the page originated from, the page itself in main space, and the rationale behind the move. Also, the column titles are not in English. I am wondering what is up with this? I asked for an explanation on their talk page before coming here. Also, they do not have the move page permission and not very many edits on the English Wikipedia. Although a block may be in order, I suggest taking a look to see (somehow) if he has any other history on this Wikipedia under a different user name. Very strange. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I became aware of this odd page because I just moved a page to the main space from my user space and there is a link to this ridiculous page in the "What links here" section after clicking on that. Here is the page that I moved to the main space: The 272. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, will you be responding to or acknowledging this post? ---Steve Quinn (talk) 15:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. I just noticed they responded on their talk page. I'll take it from here. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 16:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi, I trust you are doing well. I wanted to know what the clear course of action should be for a dispute I have been involved in. Quite some time ago, I have reverted the insertion of an unreferenced statement to Aleppo: [3] I was surprised to find that the editor reverted with a lengthy personal attack [4]. They have their own interpreation of WP:VERIFY, that unreferenced statements are okay. My activity on Wikipedia has momentarily stalled, and so I appear to have failed to notice that the article is under a WP:1RR restriction. I lacked the time to start a thread on WP:ANI, and reverted once more as if it was WP:3RR. It has been four days since then, so it doesn't make sense to focus on the personal attacks. Setting aside the 1RR violation on both parties, which I was unaware of at the time, the unreferenced addition continues to stay in the article. I can't say the addition is completely supported by the article linked, and I would not like to add references for an addition I didn't make and faced a very vulgar response. Obviously, I shouldn't revert, but what would be a sensible action for this violation of WP:VERIFY? Aintabli (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno, try discussing the issue on the article Talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. Sorry for bothering. Aintabli (talk) 16:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The IP you banned is being extremely disruptive in CFD

So the IP from Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:185.104.63.112_reported_by_User:Smasongarrison_(Result:_Blocked) is still bouncing around and being disruptive on CFD, making multiple votes etc. I've been keeping track of the IPs on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/185.104.63.112 Any suggestions on what to do to handle it? Mason (talk) 19:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked one IP at the SPI as a proxy.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open ANI case

As you recently helped out with a similar problem (disruptive editor ignoring warnings) I was hoping you could do us a favor and have a look at a case I raised a couple of days ago.[5] Given the user has responded to a subsequent 3RR warning [6] they have presumably read both the final warning notice and the ANI notice, but have failed to respond to either. Barry Wom (talk) 10:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help..

Hello, currently on the visa policy pages for countries around the world.. an editor is editing using multiple accounts.

He is [User:DENOSIO] and his puppets, who have already been blocked several times.

When looked at their history, he wrote a lot of inaccurate information, which caused friction with other editors.

First of all, I ask you to block the accounts that appear to be his puppets.

1. Stars678

2. JapanNipponTokyo19

3. 2401:7400:c806:5aa7:6062:6ccd:6241:a643

4. 2401:7400:c806:5aa7:287a:c99e:499d:e34e

5. 203.168.xx

6. 203.81.xx

7. 46.166.xx

8. Enjoy1999

Their speaking style and editing style are similar to the puppets that have already been blocked several times.

If the above measures are difficult, please set the 'VISA POLICY' pages of all countries in the world (198 countries) to allow only long-term certified users to post.

At least I think there will be less writing done by DENOSIO's puppets.

Since I also violated WIKIPEDIA while 'defending' DENOSIO, I am 'prepared' to be punished for it and am posting a message to the administrator.

Thank you. Lades2222 (talk) 12:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't read the above, and I don't know what you want from me, but WP:SPI is that-a-way.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Raymarcbadz

Hi,

I am just wondering if Raymarcbadz is now considered as site banned per WP:THREESTRIKES? Also with socks appearing almost everyday, what can be done to prevent this? Thank you in advance. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure it matters as they were banned last July at a discussion at ANI.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I had sat on a response on my talk page trying to think of the appropriate level of response and actually wrote out a reply highlighting numerous issues I had. Once I hit send, my plan was to hit all the talk pages with the {{uw-agf-sock}}. Only then did I find that sometimes the simplest solution to those that aren't here in good faith is... well... you've taken care of it! My only frustration is that I didn't check for an open SPI before writing out my response. Sigh. Anyways, just popping by to thank you for the diligent work and slight talk page stalking. Cheers, microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 15:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Um, what are you referring to?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fellow22. :) microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 15:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah - you're welcome.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Report of R2dra

Hello. Could you please check the recent report I made at Wikipedia: Sockpuppet investigations/R2dra. Thanks. Imperial[AFCND] 11:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]