Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 2, 2023.

Small intestine (better dab)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bot-generated leftover of a seemingly WP:POINTy page move of Small intestine (fu) to Small intestine (better dab, which got deleted in a later RfD. Implausible and confusing search term. Randi Moth TalkContribs 20:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Islams[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Islam (disambiguation). ✗plicit 01:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is occasionally used to collectively refer to various forms of Islam, but as an unlikely search term to which no articles link, deletion seems best. At the very least, it absolutely must be retargeted. An anonymous username, not my real name 20:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dolunay (dab)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. wbm1058 (talk) 21:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be the leftover of a move of Dolunay (disambiguation) to Dolunay. Implausible search term, confusing to an average reader. Randi Moth TalkContribs 20:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Russian mystery deaths[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 16#Russian mystery deaths

Killer![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Evidence of the redirect's relevance has been found. signed, Rosguill talk 23:48, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, nor does it appear to be a translation of the French title; delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I can't find good alternative targets in the wiki. --Lenticel (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to these sites, Killer! is mentioned as the alternative title for British release.
    • "QUE LA BÊTE MEURE (1969)". British Film Institute.
    • "Que La Bete Meure (Killer!) | Film | The Guardian". The Guardian.
    • "Chabrol, Claude, 1930-2010. Que La Bete Meure, also known as This Man Must Die, also known as Killer!. France, Italy, 1969., 1969. | HOLLIS for". Harvard Film Archive. Harvard University.
    • "Premieres – This Man Must Die". Kinorium.
  • --Namoroka (talk) 13:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and tag as {{R from alternative name}} per Namoroka's findings. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and tag per above. Skynxnex (talk) 22:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Namoroka's findings. --Lenticel (talk) 23:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Spectator Club[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Harvard Classics#Vol. 21–30. Jay 💬 18:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is apparently an essay by Richard Steele and should redirect there. An anonymous username, not my real name 16:01, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There are multiple target suggestions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Library database[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Library catalog. (non-admin closure) Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned in passing, but not really discussed at the target. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Facial plethora[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Plethora (medicine). Jay 💬 18:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a redirect to a soft redirect that (obviously) doesn't explain what this means. An anonymous username, not my real name 15:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Facial plethora is the earliest sign of Cushing's disease - shall place there with possibility of expansion there, and redirect to that page.[1]--Iztwoz (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Have included item in new page Plethora (medicine).--Iztwoz (talk) 09:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Afshari, A; Ardeshirpour, Y; Lodish, MB (October 2015). "Facial Plethora: Modern Technology for Quantifying an Ancient Clinical Sign and Its Use in Cushing Syndrome". The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 100 (10): 3928–33. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-2497. PMID 26301943.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gruppo Finelco[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedurally closed. With no apparent reason for deletion, and the nominator globally locked, there's nothing for us to do here. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 15:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

not in use, wrong redirect Telco4 (talk) 08:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Noam Chomsky/Colorless green ideas sleep furiously[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 9#Noam Chomsky/Colorless green ideas sleep furiously

Domovideo[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 11#Domovideo

I took the wok to poland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus on account of the incorrect capitalisation. There is consensus that the correctly capitalised I took the wok to Poland is an appropriate redirect despite the absence of a mention at the target. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 15:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how this relates to the song. Perhaps it's a lyric? But if so, it's not mentioned in the article. Onel5969 TT me 18:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep – Fine {{R from lyric}}. Per Genius' lyrics, the chorus consists of "I took the Wock' to Poland" being repeated 3 times, so it's very plausible that someone might search for the lyrics (misspelling "Wock" as "Wok" is plausible as well) without knowing the name of the song, such as if they overheard it somewhere such as on radio or in a club. Song lyrics are also not acceptable to paste into Wikipedia articles due to copyright concerns, so "not mentioned in the article" isn't something that can be fixed. Randi Moth (talk) 18:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Neutral – The wrong capitalisation of "Poland" makes it much less plausible as a search term, since I took the wok to Poland already exists. I'm not entirely certain whether it's implausible enough to delete, however. Randi Moth (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Not mentioned" isn't a valid reason to delete a {{R from lyric}} since they still serve as aiding the search of someone that might not know the song name without giving an unexpected target, while including the lyrics themselves into the page is commonly not an option due to copyright. Still, implausible to have multiple errors, and I took the wok to Poland's existence means that searching won't be hampered by deletion of this. Randi Moth TalkContribs 21:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

SHABIR AHMED[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Salvio giuliano 20:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Without justification as to why the subject of this redirect might have a special affinity toward ALL CAPS, this is ambiguous with the many other Shabir Ahmeds of the en.wp world. J947 † edits 05:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Leopord from Tarzan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a pretty contrived vague phrase marred by a typo. Leopard from Tarzan already exists. Page view statistics show negligible reader interest. Originally created by what was apparently an abuser. --Joy (talk) 08:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2022–23 Schleswig-Holstein-Liga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. But retarget to 2022–23 Oberliga as a double-redirect fix. Jay 💬 14:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this redirect as anachronistic because the erstwhile Schleswig-Holstein-Liga is now the Oberliga Schleswig-Holstein since the 2017–18 season. Santiago Claudio (talk) 14:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep but fix the double redirect - the league was known as Schleswig-Holstein-Liga until 2017, it's plausible a reader may look for the article under the former name. However, page views provide little evidence for this actually happening. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:27, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep per Ivanvector, clearly a plausible search term. CycloneYoris talk! 10:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Giant wombat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay 💬 14:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diprotodon is not a wombat. There are genuine giant wombats like Ramsayia and Phascolonus, meaning that this is not an unambiguous redirect. I would say either delete this or make a disambig page. I am neutral as to which option would be best. Hemiauchenia (talk) 03:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate – "Giant wombat" is a real alternate name for the genus[1], even if it's incorrect, which isn't that uncommon among vernacular animal names, e.g. Velvet ant or Laos brown butterfly. Ramsayia, Phascolonus, and also Sedophascolomys have been discovered after the redirect's creation and are all the three true giant wombat genera as of yet known.[2]. Searching for the giant wombat, it doesn't appear as if there's a primary topic among the four targets now, and the search term is very plausible. Randi Moth TalkContribs 10:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • There was a mistake in the reply: though all coverage I've found of Ramsayia and Phascolonus has been very recent, these genera aren't that recently discovered (though Sedophascolomys was classified in 2015). This doesn't change anything in the substance of the reply, however: the cited source says these three are the only true giant wombat genera, and there doesn't appear to be a primary topic. Randi Moth TalkContribs 23:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per Randi Moth. --Lenticel (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate - this is the term I would search for if I forgot the name, and I doubt I am alone in this. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kiwifarms.net[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. No policy-based reason for deletion has been advanced, and it seems unlikely that any exists. If someone wants to make an IAR argument to delete this redirect on moral grounds, they can do so in a subsequent nomination, but they should keep in mind that a redirect simply being unpleasant will usually not merit IAR deletion; rather, they would have to show that its presence harms the encyclopedia. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 02:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a far-right redirect and I don't like it. It should not be on here because it is a redirect to a bad website that is an overall bad place. I have citations for this claim: [1] [2] [3], the sources are reliable so you cannot refute my claim at all. It is a horrible redirect and should be removed because it is far-right in nature. Mizutani The Pokemon (talk) 00:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Recommend a speedy Keep as per WP:BEANS. If someone knows the URL already, then sending them to the page is appropriate, but publicising the URL via this RfD and talk page notifications etc is the opposite of the RfC around not linking. Additionally, the cited deletion reason is WP:IDONTLIKEIT which is not a legitimate reason. Closer: please mind my declared COI. Lizthegrey (talk) 01:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep on the merits of the redirect but probably speedy keep on procedural grounds. While everything Mizutani says about this disgusting website is true, we have an article about it because it is notably disgusting, as the links provided show. Nobody is suggesting deleting the article and I'm not sure what the objection is specifically to the redirect. I'm not sure that the redirect is particularly helpful or necessary but it also does not seem incorrect for it to exist. It might serve to guide somebody to knowledge of how awful the site is. Anyway, we have redirects to many other articles about awful subjects and that is quite normal. We have 43 redirects pointing at Nazi Party and none of them can be considered endorsements. DanielRigal (talk) 01:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_April_2&oldid=1150144894"