Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 1[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 1, 2022.

Bbc1[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Bbc1 is unambiguously redirecting to the protein. A discussion on the primary target or the proper title for Bbc1 (disambiguation) can be had at that talk page. Jay (talk) 09:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, i think the target article of "Bbc1" (only B in uppercase) as 60S ribosomal protein L13 feels inaccurate due to all internet search typed to "Bbc1" saw nearly all of the results unrelated to the protein. This redirect should be deleted, or retargeted to correct article. 180.254.169.147 (talk) 23:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, the term is disambiguated with a hatnote pointing to bbc1 (disambiguation). Paradoctor (talk) 23:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget, per nom, BBC1 is far more notable, can create Bbc1 (protein) as a redirect to replace it Indagate (talk) 11:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Paradoctor and WP:DIFFCAPS; everything at the dab page is written in capitals, where as this is the sole non-capitalised usage. Correct capitalisation should take priority over miscapitalisation. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 21:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • DABify. I could reasonably see someone typing in "Bbc1" and looking for the channel just as much as I could see them looking for the protein. Rather than having to hatnote the page about the protein to a page on BBC One (or vice-versa, which would be significantly odder), it makes sense to dabify when there is no primary topic. — Mhawk10 (talk) 22:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget unless clearly disambiguated BBC One is clear primary redirect, regardless of miscapitalisation or not. It then can created Bbc1 (protein) as redirect replacement. Another option would be DABify in case of no primary topic. 202.67.42.39 (talk) 12:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:DIFFCAPS: having different targets for bbc1 and BBC1 is perfectly fine. It might be worth discussing the best title for bbc1 (disambiguation), but that's a conversation for another place. - Eureka Lott 13:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Eureka Lott. A WP:RM discussion could consider whether there is no primary topic for the lowercase (i.e., consider moving the Bbc1 (disambiguation) to Bbc1). Mdewman6 (talk) 01:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There's already a hatnote at the current target which solves the ambiguity that this redirect may cause. CycloneYoris talk! 06:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arabic and islamic philosophy[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Arabic and islamic philosophy

No earlier than[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This redirects to a section of a disambiguation page that does not even mention the subject; nor does it explain why it redirects to that section. I would much rather have a separate article about this subject to explain its usage in science, than have a confusing redirect to an abbreviation that explains nothing. Renerpho (talk) 21:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

London Energy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator as incorrect rationale. (non-admin closure) Bonoahx (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect not mentioned on target page, could potentially refer to London Electricity Board which was bought by EDF but unclear. Suggesting either a retarget to North London Waste Authority, which runs a company called LondonEnergy, or London Power, which is a gas and electricity provider. Bonoahx (talk) 21:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, mention at target. Looks like this was an actual entity until being absorbed into EDF in 2006, when the redirect was created. LondonEnergy is something different, and I think we can have both redirects differentiated by WP:SMALLDETAILS as long as the version with the space is mentioned at the target. Retargeting to closely named but different entities is likely to just create confusion. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if kept, {{distinguish}} hatnotes would be helpful on both the EDF and North London Waste Authority pages. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why I didn't check the company name, you're right, there was a London Energy plc that changed it's name to EDF in 2006. Will speedy keep this RfD and edit the article myself. Bonoahx (talk) 00:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Monomer(s)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 9#Monomer(s)

SF author[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#SF author

Ars arcana[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 9#Ars arcana

Magical objects in Stardust[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#Magical objects in Stardust

Wandlore (Harry Potter)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. In addition, the title hints that an article or redirect named Wandlore exists, and it doesn't. Steel1943 (talk) 18:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The redirect is fully-protected; at this moment, there is no RFD tag on the redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (once deprotected and tagged for RfD for the requisite 7 days). This was brought to AfD where the close was to delete the page, but instead there was an attempt at a soft redirect to the harry potter wiki, which at some point became a mainspace redirect. Since the redirect is inappropriate and there was past consensus to delete the page, follow through with past consensus. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or G6 it. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 03:51, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

OBHWF[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I discovered why this redirects here, but am unsure its utility. Apparently, the acronym stands for "One Big Happy Weasley Family", but it seems like non-canon term made-up by fans. Due to this, I'm not certain if this redirect helps in its utility by existing, especially to the lack of the mention of the acronym or the acronym's meaning in the article. Steel1943 (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unlikely search term. Natg 19 (talk) 17:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can't remember why I created this anyway. Marnanel (talk) 17:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Magical Congress of the United States of America[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#Magical Congress of the United States of America

Scarhead[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Third party search results for this term are split between fans of the Harry Potter series and various other subjects completely unrelated to the Harry Potter series. Steel1943 (talk) 17:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, not at all a common search term. —El Millo (talk) 17:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Harry Potter's[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Harry Potter's

Molinos en ritmo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No such term on the target, unable to find more suitable target. Presently no assistance to navigation. Richhoncho (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neodop. If you wish to add that information to the album article I am happy to withdraw the nomination, but to redirect a reader to a page where there is no relevant information, is not assistance to navigation, but a blind alley. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neodop was not pinged properly above. @Neodop: doing it now. Jay (talk) 07:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 17:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Three Powers Agreement[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 13#Three Powers Agreement

SHSEE[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. OP withdraws nomination.(non-admin closure) Mdewman6 (talk) 23:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of Shortcut is not being used anywhere, I'm quite sure it doesn't have enough notability. Pavlov2 (talk) 14:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Furious Love[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Furious Love

Mersenne safe prime[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to 7#Mersenne safe prime. Refined current target. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:35, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know why Mersenne safe prime needs to be redirected to 7 instead of Mersenne prime. Pavlov2 (talk) 13:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Luca Schreiner[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page was first redirected to Only Love (Shaggy song) initially, then changed to Saturday Sun (Vance Joy song). Neither of these pages offer any information about the target Luca Schreiner. At this point, as none of those pages offer any further information about the subject substantial information other than a mention of a remix he produced, the redirect does not serve a proper purpose especially as there are multiple targets where the page could be redirected to. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 12:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as impeding search. There are about two dozen mentions of various remixes by German DJ Luca Schreiner on Wikipedia. There may be a bio article in the future, but not yet.
Neither of these pages offer any information about the target That is false. Both articles mention a remix version of their subject by Schreiner. Paradoctor (talk) 12:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Paradoctor allow me to rephrase that, neither target offered substantial information other than a mention of a remix he produced this no obvious target for the redirect. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 13:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Contratista[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish for "contractor". Not relevant to any of the entries at the current target. There is a 2018 Mexican film El Contratista, but it is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Paradoctor (talk) 11:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:RLOTE. Bonoahx (talk) 21:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:RDELETE #8: In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created.—Bagumba (talk) 07:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 01:39, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

TDEE[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 11#TDEE

Homestar Runner Wiki[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#Homestar Runner Wiki

Urectum[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 9#Urectum

Special military operation[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Special military operation

Superman films on television[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#Superman films on television

Harry Potter censorship[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Religious debates over the Harry Potter series. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The word "censorship" is nowhere in the target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is supposed to refer. Steel1943 (talk) 06:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was an article from 2003 to 2006 (final version). Religious debates over the Harry Potter series discusses the same topic, mentioning at least four events from the list, and most if not all censorship of Harry Potter has been on religious grounds, so I support a retarget there. If there's no consensus for a new target, this should be restored and sent to AfD, as its content pre-redirection was neither speedyable nor SNOWable. (Sidenote, I've un-redirected the talkpage, which contains some discussion and a note from the BLARing editor.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 07:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Religious debates over the Harry Potter series per Tamzin. Otherwise, restore article and send to AfD if desired. Mdewman6 (talk) 17:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

San Francisco Bus Rapid Transit[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#San Francisco Bus Rapid Transit

Wikipedia:CBU[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 9#Wikipedia:CBU

April Fools' Day nominations[edit]


Template:Condom[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy keep per WP:FOOLS. (non-admin closure) — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 01:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Template:Pp-sock, which is also singular at least. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, this may be the best idea I have read on this website. BD2412 T 16:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Uranus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy keep per WP:FOOLS. (non-admin closure) — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 01:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:Futurama and WP:Common name MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 03:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close. Send this to WP:RM if you want it renamed. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hoax (song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete G3. Obvious hoaxes, people. (non-admin closure) — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 01:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both redirects per WP:HOAX. To whomever created these redirects, go stand in the corner and think about what you did.[April Fools!] ‍ ‍ elias. 🧣 ‍ ‍ 💬reach out to me
📝see my work 03:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WP:AN/I[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. April Fools is over. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The outcome of my one previous proposal at RfD — in which I proposed to retarget hrwiki to Croatian Wikipedia to match the pattern of enwiki, dewiki, etc. — showed me that the community values and supports suggestions to retarget redirects from abbreviations to fit established practice. Furthermore, I learned in January that a page named User talk:Keeper76, which has fallen out of use, has a redirect WP:AN/K, and that the modern successor of this page is said to be the page User talk:Iridescent. Unfortunately, Special:WhatLinksHere shows that this modern page has no such conveniently short shortcut as WP:AN/K.

While I am too inexperienced an editor to understand exactly what the proper uses of these "User talk:" pages are, I trust the community will know how best they could be put to use if they were made more easily and memorably accessible by being given short and consistent shortcuts. Accordingly, I propose that User talk:Iridescent be assigned the redirect WP:AN/I. While this redirect does appear to be in use already, it is only for Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, so changing it should not inconvenience many editors; the small number of editors who want to visit that page will still be able to use the shortcut WP:ANI, which is shorter than WP:AN/I anyway.[4-1]

—2d37 (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Recursion[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was {{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|...}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}. (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 00:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not a sufficient example of recursion. This should be corrected immediately. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Buzz Lightyear since the character stated "To infinity and beyond!" Steel1943 (talk) 19:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Recursion (disambiguation), because 1) disambiguation pages that have "disambiguation" in the title are fun, 2) we shouldn't assume what the user is looking for, and 3) there is a nice example of actual recursion already in the "see also" section of that article. Renerpho (talk) 21:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Declaration of war on CfD[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was for us to start a Wikipedians' cat association. (non-admin closure) — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 01:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A much better target than something about categories or whatever

Categories are boring. Redirects are cool. Kittens are cute. I propose we declare war on CfD by retargeting WP:SMALLCAT to File:A cute golden cat.jpg. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 00:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am concerned that it difficult to tell from the proposed target whether that cat is indeed small. BD2412 T 16:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @BD2412: You're welcome to find a smaller cat, but I suspect category-editor sabotage. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 23:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WP:TNT[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was TNT this whole entire RfD about TNT, and ping TNT for some added TNT. (non-admin closure) — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 01:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very confusing redirect. Someone mentioned this shortcut at AfD and I thought "What's TheresNoTime got to do anything? Did she !vote here or something?" Apparently it's also the name of an essay or something. Weird. User:TheresNoTime's userpage gets 17 times the pageviews as the current target, and has almost as many backlinks, so clearly she's the primary topic and we should retarget. (Note: WP:TNTTNT will then have to be speedily deleted G10 as a death threat.) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 00:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. @TheresNoTime is not even notable enough for Wikidata smh. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Angeles Lakers is relying on WP:TNT in its current form. HotdogPi 12:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hammer time[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was stop. (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 00:09, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Filing on behalf of a third party, to stop hammer time. DMacks (talk) 14:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_1&oldid=1082467760"