Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 31

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 31, 2022.

White v. Samsung[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was resolved. An article on the topic has been created and this redirect has been retargeted there. -- Tavix (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect does not make sense. White v. Samsung is an American legal case about rights of publicity. The redirect target is Alex Kozinski, who was simply one of the judges who sat on the same court as the panel of judges actually that decided this case. He may have offered some remarks about it in his dissent from denial of enbanc, but there is, IMHO, no reason to send readers looking for this case to Kozinski's page. He did not even author the principal opinion or preside over the initial proceedings. So, I think this would be better off as a red link than a strange redirect. DocFreeman24 (talk) 23:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sabji[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Sabji

James Bond films on television[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restored article without prejudice to AfD. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not clear what it should lead to, doesn't seem to make sense as page title Indagate (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore and send to AfD. Looks like this was PRODed, dePRODed, and then BLARed. Send to AfD to properly consider it's best disposition. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore and AfD per Mdewman6. Not a suitable redirect but can't be deleted here. A7V2 (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore and send to WP:AFD per Mdewman6's findings. --Lenticel (talk) 01:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

De Gebroeders Ko[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect name of band. No links from "De Gebroeders Ko". Eurohunter (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, commonly used with "De" (i.e. "the") in front of the name, e.g. [1]. Fram (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 19:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Fram. "de" is the definite article in Dutch (analogous to "the"), so my understanding is that this is analogous to English "Brothers Grimm" vs "The Brothers Grimm" (the latter of which is a redirect to the former). Indeed, nl:Gebroeders Ko starts with "De Gebroeders Ko zijn..." eviolite (talk) 23:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per Fram and Jay. Especially as they have a non-English name it's not at all unlikely someone might think "De" is part of their name if they saw it written somewhere like that. A lack of links is never a reason to delete a redirect. A7V2 (talk) 03:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Just clarifying that A7V2 may have meant Eviolite. I am uninvolved. Jay (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as {{R from move}}, target was at this name for years until the nom's bold move. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Magical Britain[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#Magical Britain

Harry Potter mysteries[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The target is unclear what "mysteries" is meant to refer, meaning readers searching this term will not find what they are looking to find. Steel1943 (talk) 19:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as vague. Closest match that I got is Harry Potter: Hogwarts Mystery which is a partial title match at best --Lenticel (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There was some content at this page that was blanked and redirected. Normally I would advocate for sending to AfD, but in this case I will invoke WP:SNOWBALL in that it has no chance at being kept or merged elsewhere after an AfD, and if there is no appropriate redirect target given its vagueness, then deletion is the only remaining option. I could see an article being developed at this title, but if that were ever to occur, WP:TNT would apply to the existing content. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Harry Potter trivia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no trivia section in the article, and there shouldn't be per WP:TRIVIA. Steel1943 (talk) 18:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, seemingly refers to nonexistent section of article. eviolite (talk) 23:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment there was a trivia section in the article that was WP:SPLIT back in 2005 with the split page later blanked and redirected. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Harry Potter Further Reading[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 7#Harry Potter Further Reading

Harry Potter : movies[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 7#Harry Potter : movies

50 Greatest Harry Potter Moments[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#50 Greatest Harry Potter Moments

Potter films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 19:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous title. Could also be reasonably user for other searches, such as films about the pottery profession or a list of films with an actor/actress with the surname such as the actress Monica Potter. In addition, Potter is a disambiguation page. Best to delete. Steel1943 (talk) 18:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Harry potter subjects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 19:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is unclear what the term "subjects" is meant to refer. Steel1943 (talk) 18:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Harry, Ron and Hermione[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#Harry, Ron and Hermione

Dot and Dash[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 10#Dot and Dash

Yog sothoth (geometry)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

These are redirects from the names of Cthulhu Mythos deities to star polyhedra. These names were given (apparently arbitrarily) to these polyhedra the amateur polyhedron enthusiast George Olshevsky, who himself had a Wikipedia page that was deleted: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Olshevsky. I can't find any evidence that anyone except George ever used these names. These qualify as "a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name", and probably as confusing and/or nonsensical as well. They should be deleted. Apocheir (talk) 18:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I have tagged all of these redirects and notified their targets and the redirects' creator. Also, Shub-niggurath (geometry) has been nominated in the past: See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 22#Shub-niggurath (geometry). Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, I got pulled away in the middle of making this RfD. The RfD from 2013 is confusing and/or confused: the names aren't "outdated", they were never in common use to start with.
    Another point is that only one of these names actually appears on the linked page: Great retrosnub icosidodecahedron mentions the name "Azathoth". It's not referenced, though. Apocheir (talk) 21:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. I was brought here by request of the nominator on my talk page, for what it's worth. These fail WP:NOTNEO: "Articles on neologisms that have little or no usage in reliable sources are commonly deleted". I couldn't find anything in Google Scholar (a pretty wide net for scholarly work) mentioning this nomenclature. In addition, except for "Azathoth", these fail WP:R#PLA in that they are unmentioned in their articles (and including Azathoth, should be unmentioned as apparently they cannot be reliably sourced). —David Eppstein (talk) 21:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Joseph Stalins's religious views[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 7#Joseph Stalins's religious views

Vijay(actor)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 7#Vijay(actor)

Naveen Shekharappa Gyanagoudar[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 16:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a due mention is readded. signed, Rosguill talk 14:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete seems to be an Indian student that died during the shelling of Kharkiv. While tragic, I don't think his death requires inclusion in the wiki per WP:BIO1E. Outside of Wiki rules, I think keeping this redirect without context is a disservice to his grieving family. --Lenticel (talk) 07:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

British Soap Awards won by Eastenders[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 7#British Soap Awards won by Eastenders

Kristin J. Tremba[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No indication of notability. Not mentioned in redirect target. Very problematic unsourced category inclusion Unbh (talk) 13:25, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • As far as I can tell, this person is not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia. Therefore delete. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:42, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Lenticel (talk) 00:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Monobook[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 7#Wikipedia:Monobook

Tarocchi Marvel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This appears to be a brand of divination tarot deck that it not mentioned anywhere at the target article which, in any case, is mainly about the primary use of Tarot cards for playing games. There are hundreds of such divination decks on the market and it makes no sense to create redirects for them to a generic article. If they are notable, they should have articles created in their own right as has been done for others. Bermicourt (talk) 08:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Seems to be a Marvel themed Tarot deck that might have a potential article in the future. I also can't find a good target here in en.wiki as several Marvel themed card games have their own standalone article. --Lenticel (talk) 00:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Our Revolution (book)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Our Revolution (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The title is ambiguous with Our Revolution (Trotsky book). There are currently no direct links to the redirect in mainspace. As there is no disambiguation page to redirect to (nor is there a need for one, given that these are the only two books by that title and this is not a likely search term), the redirect should be deleted. Graham (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an R from move, so really shouldn't be deleted, to keep external links intact. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have created the dab page as indicated above. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Greenlandic Dannebrog[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 09:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't make sense. Dannebrog is specifically the word for the red-white-Nordic-cross flag of Denmark (not flags in general), so "Greenlandic Dannebrog" is meaningless ("Greenlandic [Danish flag]"?). It's almost like an WP:XY situation. In any case, there are no results of this phrase anywhere on the Internet so delete. eviolite (talk) 00:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you say it, yea delete it Kxeon (talk) 00:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_31&oldid=1081913564"