Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 8[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 8, 2022.

Magical Congress of the United States of America[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film). Jay (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. However, the subject does seem to be connected to Wizarding World on some way, but apparently primarily with subjects associated with the "Fantastic Beasts" subjects. I'm not sure if deletion is the best move here, but I'm also not finding a specific title to retarget this which would best benefit readers. Steel1943 (talk) 18:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is related to the Fantastic Beasts series, as it is the "magical government" of the USA. This organization has a specific role in the first film, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) (which takes place in New York City), so I would propose a retarget to there. Natg 19 (talk) 17:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's mentioned in the article that Natg 19 points to. So I concur. The target of MACUSA should of course match. Uncle G (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Magical objects in Stardust[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 16#Magical objects in Stardust

Hittite Empir[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 14:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted as a typo, unlikely to be searched on. There exists a redirect at "Hittite Empire" to direct searchers. signed, Willondon (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Turko-Iranian (disambiguation)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 16#Turko-Iranian (disambiguation)

Traditional Sunni–Salafi relations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is torturous. Despite this redirect making absolutely no sense, apparently speedy deletion is off the cards. (I thought misnomer was the perfect description, but anywho!) For everyone with two eyes in their head, Sunni-Salafi is not the same thing as Sufi-Salafi. Sunnism and Sufism are completely different things, and the confusion that led to this redirect being created is beyond me. "Traditional Sunni" is meanwhile a neologism plucked out of thin air. This redirect is pure error/incorrect nonsense/however you'd like to phrase it. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nodal tissue[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Google Scholar results suggest that "nodal tissue" comes up in a variety of medical contexts, not exclusively related to cardiac pacemakers. As the phrase is briefly mentioned but not discussed in depth at various Wikipedia articles, deletion to allow for search results seems appropriate. signed, Rosguill talk 15:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Inbound marketing[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Inbound marketing

Leto atreides ii[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deletion. Redirect has no obvious benefit, only drawbacks. There's already the redirect Leto Atreides II so a search for "Leto atreides ii" could be handled by the properly capitalized redirect. Keeping this however has downsides, one is that Cirrus search shows "Leto atreides ii" with higher priority than "Leto Atreides II" so users are presented with an incorrect capitalization while typing. Secondly, without a raison d'être, this just clutters up the rcats. Jason Quinn (talk) 14:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

War in Iraq[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of wars involving Iraq. ✗plicit 23:57, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of wars involving Iraq. This title is not specific to any war. Balkovec (talk) 12:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Homestar Runner Wiki[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As suggested, I have listed the contributors on the talk page. -- Tavix (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target apart from a reference and an external link; someone searching for a fandom wiki will not be helped by the article about its topic. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, seems to be an external wiki so doesn't make sense to have a redirect within Wikipedia. Bonoahx (talk) 21:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This came up at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 10 § Hrwiki, coincidentally mentioned in the April Fools section below. Part of the reason that was retargeted is that there's no relevant content at the target, so I agree that there should not be a redirect from this title. However, there was encyclopedic content at this title until Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homestar Runner Wiki (2) in July 2006, which resolved to merge it to the current target. The merged content seems to have then been removed in February 2009. That means three years' worth of revisions that would no longer meet the license requirements of CC-BY-SA (You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor) and would thus be copyright violations. So either this should be moved without redirect to something like Talk:Homestar Runner/attribution/Homestar Runner Wiki with a relevant note added to the talkpage and/or article history, or deleted, with the 98 names at [1] added into the article's history by dummy edit (if desired, discounting bots and those whose only contributions were below the threshold of originality). -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 23:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: the wiki is this and is not mentioned at the target. Admins can do what must be done to make it so that the the content which was added stays compliant with WP's copyleft, if need be. Veverve (talk) 12:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trick Williams[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. ✗plicit 12:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

deletion. The article has no information about the subject besides he works in WWE. If he is released, the redirect will become useless. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

British common law[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#British common law

Arthur Harley[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Arthur Harley

Giovanni Bonati (gymnast)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Giovanni Bonati (gymnast)

Superman films on television[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Superman films on television

San Francisco Bus Rapid Transit[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#San Francisco Bus Rapid Transit

Magical Britain[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 08:15, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, and doesn't seem to be the correct name for the subject of the redirect either. Most third party sources which refer to this subject name it "Wizarding Britain". In addition, third party search engines looking up the term "Magical Britain" seem to instead return results regarding fictional maps of Britain where locations and creature from folklore, such as the Loch Ness Monster, can be located. Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominator comment/update: Seems as though the redirect has a connection to Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality; the subject is fanfiction though, so I don't believe it would be helpful to retarget the nominated redirect to any article that is canon, but I'm also not sure if it's worth not deleting the redirect per my original nomination rationale. Steel1943 (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Creator comment: delete. I would have thought it was called that in the original books - apparently I did - but yeah, the fanfic isn't a worthwhile redirect - David Gerard (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Creator is fine with deletion as well. --Lenticel (talk) 00:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Creator is fine with deletion, but nominator is unsure about deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 05:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Jay: Based on the discussion thus far, I'm okay with deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 15:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's used here and there in commentaries on Harry Potter works, usually with "magical" in lowercase, but Steel1943 is right that it's also used for stuff that isn't related to Harry Potter at all, and that isn't really an encyclopaedic name for anything. Uncle G (talk) 16:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

50 Greatest Harry Potter Moments[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#50 Greatest Harry Potter Moments

Harry, Ron and Hermione[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17#Harry, Ron and Hermione

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_8&oldid=1084472191"