Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 21[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 21, 2018.

Psalms 113-118[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 09:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect, unlikely to be used. Ibadibam (talk) 20:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Please keep. Psalms 113-118 and Hallel are one in the same. --Omer Toledano (talk) 04:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: someone may search for Psalms 113-118, useful redirect. --Danski454 (talk) 11:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 22:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Omer Toledano. This term unambiguously refers to the target and appears in its lead. There are a few dozen GBooks hits which use "Psalms 113-118" without using the term "Hallel". 59.149.124.29 (talk) 03:16, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep has a cited entry within the article which explains that these two terms are synonymous --Lenticel (talk) 00:43, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as the hatnote already explains options for those looking for the relevant chapters and don't want the Hallel ones. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per above - Hatnote provided so not really seeing a valid reason to delete. –Davey2010Talk 22:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mark Hausknecht[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. With no prejudice towards re-creation as an article, or as a redirect if the subject is mentioned in another article, provided that the necessary reliable sources exist. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect appearing on Recent Deaths. Main name was a cardiologist whose chief claim to fame was apparently treating former U.S. president George H. W. Bush, and who apparently was gunned down in a drive by shooting. Page currently redirects to the president's page, which says nothing about this doctor. Redirect should be deleted and redlink restored; if he's notable enough to have an article. we shouldn't fool others into thinking he's already been covered. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:45, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support deletion was confused when I saw it was a redirection in the first place. As the target I fixed the redirect has no mention of him as nominator said, it’s not a warranted redirect. Rusted AutoParts 18:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Non-notable physician with no room to be mentioned in the target. Nohomersryan (talk) 19:36, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Nohomersryan --Danski454 (talk) 21:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Fails WP:GNG at the moment. Inter&anthro (talk) 05:56, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A tragedy, but he's only notable because he treated a former President and that can easily be placed into GHWB's biography. Zerbey (talk) 15:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above, and because the whole point of temporarily allowing redlinks on Recent deaths is so that people will see that they're red and start an article, per Talk:Deaths in 2018/FAQ. A redirect (particularly one pointing to a location which isn't appropriate for extensive coverage of the deceased) defeats the whole purpose. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete He was not a significant part of GHW Bush's life, as evidenced by the lack of mention in the former president's bio article. His manner of death does not change that; within the context of GHW Bush's life it's not a notable (impactful) event. Drdpw (talk) 19:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Create New Article "who apparently was gunned down in a drive by shooting".?? I would not describe it as a drive by shooting. Surveillance video shows the gunman following Mark Hausknecht on another bicycle before the killing. Not a common modus operandi. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/23/surveillance-images-show-gunman-behind-george-h-w-bushs-former-doctor-moments-before-murder.html StreetSign (talk) 20:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete tragic, but WP:NOTNEWS. Kleuske (talk) 21:19, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There's a lot of speculation about his death given the identity of the killer is unknown. In the meantime, though, deletion seems like the right call. We can write an article in the future if some kind of new, notable information comes into being due to the circumstances (although, then it will probably be titled 'Killing of Mark Hausknecht' akin to similar articles). CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:19, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update -- Houston Police Department Chief Art Acevedo said he doesn't believe it was a random attack. In a tweet from the Houston police account, Acevedo said, "There's a high probability the doctor was targeted." StreetSign (talk) 20:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Davidson (Software Company)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 30#Davidson (Software Company)