Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 14, 2017.

Earthseed (2014 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both. Thryduulf (talk) 11:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects have misleading disambiguation as the target is a novel, not a film. -- Tavix (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per failed crystal and no information concerning any adaptations. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Almost Heroes 3D[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. Thryduulf (talk) 11:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The film is also not mentioned at the target article. -- Tavix (talk) 22:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete failed crystal, and not so notable film, also it's not his pet project. He just stars in it. Writer and director do not have articles. Was renamed Bling in 2016. Even the primary production company DigiArt does not have an article. If someone thinks this animated feature is notable, they can create Bling (film) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2019 Pro Bowl[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. 11:26, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Delete. There's nothing about the 2019 Pro Bowl at the target article, and it's WP:TOOSOON for there to be any significant information about it. I don't even think this game has been confirmed yet. -- Tavix (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super Bowl LVI[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 31#Super Bowl LVI

New DNAs are Coming[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what this means. -- Tavix (talk) 16:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as nonsense. The target translates as "Good days are coming" which makes me wonder if these are mishearings or poor machine translations that became a meme or something, but google returns exactly 0 results other than these redirects for the exact phrases. Thryduulf (talk) 22:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete nothing to do with DNA. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both - The closest I can get to seeing "new DNAs are coming out" or the like make sense is assuming that somebody is talking about the sporting shoes known as 'DNAs'. That's still too tenuous for these redirects to be helpful in any way. We should just get rid of them. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per those above. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

West–Central Canadian English[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 31#West–Central Canadian English

Microsoft's proprietary code page extensions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 14:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft's extensions to code pages, if any, are not and cannot be proprietary. The word "proprietary" is actually used in derogatory sense as was common in Linux community a while ago. Google search for exact phrase brings no results but related to this redirect. For the same reason it is not used outside talk pages on Wikipedia. In my opinion, this redirect falls under WP:RFD#DELETE criterion § 8 and should be deleted. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 10:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kongonya[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close: this is not a redirect, the fact that the article starts with #REDIRECT [[Kongonya]] is clearly an error. The article is also nominated for speedy deletion, and should that get turned down, deletion can be further pursued via either WP:PROD or WP:AFD. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 05:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely no idea what is going on with the redirect however, this article does not appear to pass basic notability or give any indication of how this song is notable. Bizarre so many things about this one completely weird (not the article or its subject but the fact its a redirect and I cannot get my head around why or how.) →ὦiki-Coffee(talk to me!) (contributions) 04:36, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Virginia State Route 696 (Lee County)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 22#Virginia State Route 696 (Lee County)

The Fearless of the Furious[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is almost certainly WP:MADEUP by the creator. I didn't even hit on any rumors that this could be the title. -- Tavix (talk) 00:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fast and Furiosa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not an official title of the film by any means. The connection I came up with is that Charlize Theron, who plays Imperator Furiosa in Mad Max: Fury Road, is also in in this film, and a couple people thought they were being punny by saying the film should be called "Fast and Furiosa". Interestingly enough, the (scant) search results are also filled with people saying that Mad Max: Fury Road should be called "Fast and Furiosa" for those same reasons. If it's an error for The Fate of the Furious, I think it could (at least) equally be an error for Max Max: Fury Road, leading to an WP:XY problem. Of course, WP:R3 is an option as well since it's recent, but I thought I'd bring it up for discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 00:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Deleta per noma and possible WP:FORRED AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Might be a good trivia for people that are familiar with the connection of both movies but are otherwise confusing for our readers --Lenticel (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lore (future film based on comic)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was ;Keep Lore (future film based on comic), Delete Lore (2014 film). Thryduulf (talk) 11:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As far as I can tell, this film hasn't entered production yet. It certainly wasn't released in 2014, and it can still be cancelled, which would no longer make it a "future" film. I can't know for sure, since I don't have a WP:CRYSTALBALL. -- Tavix (talk) 00:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Lore (future film based on comic). Director Dave Green is still in charge. No press release indicates the film has been cancelled. The reference used in the wiki article about director Green reads "Green has closed a deal to helm Lore, an adaptation of an IDW book/graphic novel written by Wood and T.P. Louise that has Dwayne Johnson attached to star, pending scheduling.". So, it is clear it has not been scheduled but, it has not been cancelled either. This redirect page will help people get information about what has been planned by taking them to another article such as that about Green. It might lead to the article about Wood, instead. As long as people can eventually get the information. Without this, how are people going to know who the director and leading actor are? Besides, some people are mistakenly led to the article about the film from 2012 (I was one of those). So, a disambiguation note there might come in handy.

Delete Lore (2014 film). I did not find any evidence there was any intent to release it at that time or, that a release year was ever set. Maybe someone else could. But, it is 2017 now and it is obvious it did not happen and, this specific redirect page must be deleted because it is misleading. (People might think it was already released at that year).

It looks like there is a line about Lore in Green's article that describes the adaptation, so this may be okay. The 2014 one should still go away though. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_14&oldid=1088106748"