Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 22[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 22, 2017.

Wikipedia:CONTEXT[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 5#Wikipedia:CONTEXT

Frankie D[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nickname not widely used, it seems. There are results referring to the target, but they don't make it worth keeping because (a). it seems like individuals invented the nickname themselves, unaware of others using it, (b). it is being used very informally in non RS sources and (c). the nickname seems have been created relatively recently (21st Century, maybe?) and certainly not while Roosevelt was alive or recently dead. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not only do I not find any significant use of this nickname for FDR, I find some use for it referring to other persons or businesses entirely. Seems like a hoax or something to me. ETA: Also, I just noticed the creator of this redirect Parable1991 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was indef blocked for socking over 9 years ago. --Krelnik (talk) 13:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - WP:NOT for something made up in school one day, and humanizes a war criminal--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Twilight hack[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target after the redirection of the Wii homebrew article almost a year ago. Pppery 20:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I was the one who originally redirected it 3 years ago, because there was simply no way it'd meet our notability requirements. It's not a particularly helpful search term either, so I fully agree with getting rid of it entirely. Sergecross73 msg me 20:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sargent, Missouri[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was refine to Sargent#Places. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 09:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found this redirect very confusing, so much so that it almost put me off fixing the link that took me to it. There are dozens and dozens of links on the page, most having nothing to do with Missouri. Isn't it usually the practice to have a city/state name combination with their own page? have seen dozens, if not more, like that. The "section" function doesn't work in the dab solving tool by the way. That just took me to the top of the page. Hyperbolick (talk) 20:04, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I don't think there's a "best practice" on what to do in a situation when a state has multiple places with the same name. Some editors consider it incomplete disambiguation and redirect it to the parent disambiguation (which is the set-up with Sargent, Missouri. There's Sargent, Scott County, Missouri and Sargent, Texas County, Missouri, both listed at Sargent#Places). Other editors create a separate disambiguation page at that name, an example of which is Baisden, West Virginia. Personally, I prefer having less disambiguation pages to maintain, so I usually prefer redirecting to the parent disambiguation (the current set-up). A big exception is when there's a lot of entries on a disambiguation page, and someone might get confused by the amount of entries. In that case, I'll usually just leave/create the disambiguation at "City, State". In this case, I think the best solution would be to just leave it alone, and split the people out to a separate surname index. There'll be a lot less links on that page, and hopefully be a lot less confusing as well. -- Tavix (talk) 20:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine target to Sargent#Places the dab page has two entries pertaining to places in Missouri. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine target per above. No need to create a second disambiguation page. Smartyllama (talk) 15:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Power Rangers 3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect with no incoming links, that currently redirects to what may not be considered the primary topic. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I accept that it does likely indicate it is the third movie, but even still that would not establish it being the primary topic. The topic could be the third season of the show or the third issue of the comic book. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What would you think about bundling Power Rangers 2 with the nomination? -- Tavix (talk) 19:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would support the bundling with a similar rationale as above. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done. -- Tavix (talk) 02:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a working title, not a sequel. Given the 2017 film is a reboot, this has no context. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:44, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iliana Incandela (Iliana)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. RickinBaltimore deleted it as G8, the target being deleted as G7. -- Tavix (talk) 18:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. Very unlikely that someone will type artist's name + dab. Sjö (talk) 16:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Virginia State Route 696 (Lee County)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. The old article has been restored and the redirect has been retargeted to reflect that. Whether that article should remain or not would be an argument for WP:AFD to solve should there be disagreement moving forward. -- Tavix (talk) 13:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The target list's scope is literally all local roads in most of Virginia (see Byrd Road Act; every Lee County road, except perhaps a few streets in towns, is a state highway), so (1) it's not useful to redirect titles there (we have no need to provide information about average roads; we're not a directory of average, little country roads), and (2) this is a 200-foot-long spur of a typical minor road appearing on this list (I've removed it, per reasons given in (1)); if this one warrants mention, literally every road in most of the state warrants mention. See map; would it be reasonable to have a "List of roads in Tennessee" that mentions Maness Road, a significantly longer route a few hundred feet away, and would it be reasonable to have a redirect for Maness Road (Hancock County) to that list? If not, no reason to have this one. Nyttend (talk) 02:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The redirect's creator had not been notified. I'm doing so now and relisting to allow time for a response if one is desired.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 14:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I restored the old target which had been redirected to the list without a merge. The route was formerly primary, hence its importance. --NE2 15:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep with new target - former primary roads are notable and this is a plausible search term. Smartyllama (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete—Although former primary state highways are barely on the notable side of the spectrum, they should be discussed in the context, such as a list of former primary state highways, rather than redirecting to a secondary highway article or a list of secondary highways. Virginia State Route 696 (Lee County) is not a plausible redirect because very few people even know about it. By comparison, Route 600 is plausible because it appears on official maps.  VC  06:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Just About The Game EXperience[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was refine. -- Tavix (talk) 13:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Implausible search term, "Jagex" etymology debated, and Wikipedia is not an ad where you can search for slogans. Lordtobi (✉) 10:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Refine as above. This is more of a backronym, but was used in their press releases in 2010. [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 14:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Just About The Gaming EXperience[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 13:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Implausible search term, "Jagex" etymology debated, and Wikipedia is not an ad where you can search for slogans. Lordtobi (✉) 10:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 14:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_22&oldid=1138581833"