Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocket Streaming Audio Server

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket Streaming Audio Server[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. No coverage in reliable sources that I can see, and most of the citations go to the official website. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why this specific article, and why now? Should we also consider proposing Icecast and SHOUTcast for deletion as part of this cleanup, as they also have the same notability issues? GameGod (talk) 20:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to nominate those pages if you believe they have notability issues. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW Shoutcast does seem to have better sourcing than this one. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not this article, if it has poor sourcing, we can't keep it. Oaktree b (talk) 00:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom. Not finding independent reliable sources that discuss the software, nor does there appear to be anything particularly notable about the software. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I didn't see much of anything in the way of sources after a Google search. If this were a niche topic maybe there would be print sources, but I would expect a streaming service to be mentioned in online publications if it was mentioned anywhere. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no RS found. Also note that article submitted the day after that software released its 1.0.0 version, suggesting a bit of WP:RECENT —siro χ o 23:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per others. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 00:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails notability guidelines. Maliner (talk) 14:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. per nom and @Siroxo. Can't find RS either. 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 16:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hardly any mentions of this software, most hits are on SpaceX and rockets. Oaktree b (talk) 00:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.