Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Montenegrin throne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Montenegrin throne[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This throne has been defunct since 1918. WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the monarchy doesn't exist anymore. See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. There are also WP:BLP concerns about the people who are listed here.

So basically, the same reasons as the previous 32 lines of succession to defunct thrones that have been deleted recently (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32).

A unique thing about this line of succession is that there is a legally recognised line of succession today with the former royal house having an official role in Montenegro. However, that line of succession is to the headship of the house, not to the throne (because the throne does not exist anymore). That information properly belongs at Petrović-Njegoš dynasty, and is in fact already presented there. TompaDompa (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. TompaDompa (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. TompaDompa (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. TompaDompa (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Petrović-Njegoš_dynasty#Line_of_Succession_post-monarchy_(1918–Present) which presents the same information. No reason given for deletion. Hut 8.5 16:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is time for us to stop giving undue voice to royalist restorationist pretenderism.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Smeat75 (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Montenegro or to another article like: Petrović-Njegoš_dynasty#Line_of_Succession_post-monarchy_(1918–Present) which Hut 8.5 presented Wm335td (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 19:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no monarchy to succeed to, and the headship of the family is sufficiently covered already on the appropriate page so no productive merge. Agricolae (talk) 23:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Petrović-Njegoš_dynasty#Line_of_Succession_post-monarchy_(1918–Present) Altanner1991 (talk) 01:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as there's no throne to be in of succession for. GoodDay (talk) 16:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
REdirect to Petrović-Njegoš_dynasty#Line_of_Succession_post-monarchy_(1918–Present). Peterkingiron (talk) 17:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.