Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former throne of Waldeck and Pyrmont

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Waldeck and Pyrmont[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This (semi-independent) principality has been defunct since 1918. This roughly unsourced article looks like unverifiable original research, including about the supposed royal status of living persons (WP:BLP). See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Line of succession is also available in parent article Principality of Waldeck and Pyrmont. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne for a similar case. Norden1990 (talk) 20:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the Principality itself doesn't even exist anymore. TompaDompa (talk) 21:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6 . Nika2020 (talk) 23:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Detailed, unsourced, hypothetical succession lines that are 90% non-notable living people belong on royalty and genealogy forums, not in an encyclopedia. JoelleJay (talk) 23:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and the other comments above. Smeat75 (talk) 16:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 20:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.