Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former throne of Vadodara (Baroda)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Vadodara (Baroda)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This kingdom has been defunct since 1949. This completely unsourced article looks like unverifiable original research, including about the supposed royal status of living persons (WP:BLP). See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne for a similar case. Norden1990 (talk) 22:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Norden1990 (talk) 22:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Norden1990 (talk) 22:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to this throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the princely state itself doesn't even exist anymore. TompaDompa (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and TompaDompa. The article does not cite RS and I don't believe this could be verifiably sourced and not contain substantial WP:OR | WP:SYNTH. // Timothy :: talk 07:18, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing to suggest any of these people even exist. JoelleJay (talk) 23:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the other comment above. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the reasons and comments above. Futurist110 (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 11:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, WP:SNOW, and WP:OUTCOMES. The consensus developed has been that heirs of defunct states, especially non-sovereign one, are not notable. It's ultra-unlikely that this will ever become independent, re-create its monarchy, and find the missing heirs. Bearian (talk) 19:34, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.