Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 3[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 3, 2022.

Ɡ[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:02, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The character itself is a script G. It's a capital script G, but the page has a lowercase tag on it. The page Script g redirects to G#Typographic_variants, but the character itself redirects to a phonetic sound represented by that character. Would redirecting this character to typographic variants of G be a better target, or should this one be kept? Colgatepony234 (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is better to keep it as it is. If a user searches for the lowercase ɡ, which is an IPA symbol, it resolves to this capital Ɡ. It is more useful for a character that is only used as a phonetic symbol to redirect to an article about the phoneme it represents than to an article with a brief mention of the symbol’s typographical design. Also, the capital ⟨Ɡ⟩ itself is only used as a phonetic symbol, in contexts where the IPA is modified to include capitalization. Gorobay (talk) 15:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also, notified of this discussion at the current and proposed target talk pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:44, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I don't know of any uses for this symbol other than in phonetics, so redirecting it to a list of letters seems unnecessarily convoluted. Glades12 (talk) 08:57, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mögsex[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 11#Mögsex

Little Bukaria[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Disruptive nomination. Last RfD on this redirect was closed barely a few hours ago. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:07, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 22:39, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Malformed MOS: redirects[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 11#Malformed MOS: redirects

Czech -[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 02:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not really understanding the purpose of these redirects. In theory, these are meant to refer to a sort of prefix of the subject of the target article, they could equally refer to the Czech Republic. Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all if anything; why should these be any different than Earth- or human~? They're extremely unlikely typos, and anyone who makes them will soon find what they're looking for anyway. An anonymous username, not my real name 02:02, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as confusing --Lenticel (talk) 04:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as confusing and not helpful when searching anyway. Glades12 (talk) 08:59, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not helpful. There are no reason for them to exist RoostTC(please ping me when replying) 06:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all useless – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Land of the Lost (1991TV series)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 02:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These two were the results of moves to modify their target's titles to the correctly spaced format in their disambiguators. They don't seem to be getting very many pageviews nowadays, so I'm not sure why we still need them here. Regards, SONIC678 21:52, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. Also, neither one of these nominated redirects have any incoming links in the article space. Steel1943 (talk) 22:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per above --Lenticel (talk) 05:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Very unlikely typos. It is very rare that a person would type the full title of the page but make a typo. RoostTC(please ping me when replying) 07:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:RDAB, both were at the title for around a minute or less in 2006 and 2010. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

اسبانيا[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FORRED. The target does not have affinity to the Arabic language. Steel1943 (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: With the Umayyad Caliphate and later Caliphates in Al-Andalus as well as the cities of Ceuta and Melilla's being Spanish adminstered cities claimed by Morocco whose only land borders are Morocco, I would argue there's an affinity between Spain and the Arabic language. TartarTorte 22:17, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per TartarTorte. I think especially for names of countries the bar should be set quite low for FORRED affinity (since there is no harm in keeping and potential loss of usefulness by deleting). A7V2 (talk) 00:21, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per TartarTorth. I agree with the Arabic affinity for this redirect for geographical reasons. 49.228.139.154 (talk) 05:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Frqnce[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:52, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem like a plausible misspelling. Also, third-party search engines do not return any results of any webpages that use the spelling specifically. (In theory, the existence of this redirect could rationalize the need to create additional redirects using a lowercase Q instead of a lowercase A ... but that's WP:PANDORA.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:36, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: While it's a typo one could make, so is Frznce but that doesn't (and shouldn't) exist. TartarTorte 22:18, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, it is not a typo in the sense of hitting the wrong key, or not knowing how to spell it; it's what happens if you hit the right key but are using the wrong keyboard. I switch back and forth from the QWERTY and the AZERTY keyboards all the time, and this is a very common happenstance with me. "Frqnce" is exactly what you get if you forget to switch; I do it all the time. A very natural misspelling, and very helpful if we don't force the user to type a second time, just to get to the article they obviously wish to see. Frznce is no more likely to occur than many other unlikely misfires (from two rows away) that do not need a redirect here. Mathglot (talk) 00:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I completely forgot about AZERTY keyboards. Striking my delete and changing to keep based on AZERTY. TartarTorte 15:49, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per Mathglot and the AZERTY/QWERTY A→Q mapping. TartarTorte 15:50, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Mathglot and TartarTorte, due to the keyboard mapping. I agree with the nice statement mentioned. 49.228.139.154 (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Mathglot, makes sense. Backed up by views and the redirect's creation request. J947 † edits 22:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Belle France[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#Belle France

Moo (Monster Rancher)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 11#Moo (Monster Rancher)

Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Indo-Aryan migrations#"Aryan invasion". (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking an opinion this section is a better target:
Indo-Aryan migrations#"Aryan invasion"
Senator2029 【talk】 21:08, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support refinement - seems like an improvement. A7V2 (talk) 00:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yūka Morishima[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 15#Yūka Morishima

Mocchi ball[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 11#Mocchi ball

Duluoz Legend[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#Duluoz Legend

Ahmadiyya in Bosnia and Herzegovina[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 11#Ahmadiyya in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Jamie Peacock (actress)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#Jamie Peacock (actress)

Captain Kinger[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 02:58, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article, and not mentioned anywhere else on Wikipedia, leaving readers looking for information about the subject of this redirect unsatisfied due to finding nothing. Steel1943 (talk) 18:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 02:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the unsourced one-liner in the page history can also be deleted. Jay 💬 20:16, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Molotov Cocktail (shot)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 20:10, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the context unclear. Also, for what it's worth (in the event of retargeting suggestions), a Molotov cocktail is not called a "shot" in any context I can find. Also, this redirect is a {{R with history}} due to being an article created in 2004 that was WP:BLARed in 2006. Steel1943 (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lizzie Line[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#Lizzie Line

Amenability[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#Amenability

ᵮ[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#ᵮ

World War I crimes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to World War I#War crimes. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:41, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Germany was not the only country that committed war crimes in WWI, so I think retargeting to World War I § War crimes would be appropriate. CJ-Moki (talk) 07:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lack of skin pigment[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#Lack of skin pigment

Mark Stenwyck[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:41, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. Article is about a book. There is a brief mention of a Lifetime movie based on the book. Redirect is a character in the movie. MB 04:09, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, since both characters are not mentioned at the target. A brief mention about the movie is insufficient, therefore deletion seems best. CycloneYoris talk! 09:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

ToyTalk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of mergers and acquisitions by Apple#Acquisitions. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:16, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how it is related to Apple [1] - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears as though Apple has acquired them in 2019 according to this TechCrunch article. Skipple ☎ 02:23, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Invertible element[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#Invertible element

List of highest mountains of Australasia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There were multiple retarget suggestions, however there is no conclusion after two relists. As there was no support for the current target, retargeting to one of the suggested targets List of Ultras of Oceania, since the a target with mountains listed by country was not considered ideal. As the discussion was leaning towards creation of a List of highest mountains in Oceania, a subsequent retargeting should not be ruled out because of this close. Jay 💬 15:23, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. See this recent RfD. Australasia is an ambiguous topic; moreover, the list of highest mountains would under no definition of Australasia be confined to just New Guinea. Therefore this redirect is misleading. J947 † edits 04:24, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There are multiple retarget suggestions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:05, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Luminator[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:54, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems kind of counterintuitive to pigeonhole readers to visit this section of an article when search results on Wikipedia for "Luminator" mention other subjects called "Luminator" that are not the subject which this redirect represents: A company that makes light-up signs. Steel1943 (talk) 22:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep - I don't see a better target than this; most mentions seem to be related to the bus tech company and their displays - the company doesn't have its own article. If it is not notable enough to get one in the future, then I say keep this pointing here rather than the alternative, which would be DABifying with other, non-bus-related uses such as the video game clone and the sci-fi helmet element, neither of which seem particularly notable. That said if the company can support its own article then that would make more sense, as while the flip-dot display is its most prominent mention they also appear to manufacture various other display types. 193.37.240.169 (talk) 13:31, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clyde!Franklin! 00:24, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DABify I see multiple targets this redirect can lead to so it should be disambiguated RoostTC(please ping me when replying) 09:35, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:32, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

WP:PRESS[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#WP:PRESS

Larry Mackey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Appears to be an otherwise non-notable prosecutor. Only other mention on enwiki is at The Chessmen. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as we have no info within en.wiki about him --Lenticel (talk) 00:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The Chessmen mention is too minor, as co-writer of a song that doesn't have an article, or a listing in a discography. Jay 💬 07:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_3&oldid=1127539176"