Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 2, 2022.

Running Wild (1992 film)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 10#Running Wild (1992 film)

Southern Cross 9[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to 10 (Southern Cross Austereo)#2016–2021: Nine affiliation. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

After the previous discussion of this redirect, I think I’ve found a way better target, it’s 10 (Southern Cross Austereo)#2016–2021: Nine affiliation, which talks about Southern Cross Austereo’s stations during their affiliation with the Nine Network. The Adelaide station NWS (the current target) was never referred to as Southern Cross Nine under its previous Southern Cross Broadcasting ownership, redirecting to NWS would be confusing and inaccurate. This redirect is not mentioned in the target article except in a hatnote. Bassie f (talk) 21:24, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone may add Southern Cross Nine into this discussion. Bassie f (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. A7V2 (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Seems like the best target, certainly better than the current one. Pinging @Nick Mitchell 98: who was the other participant in the previous discussion, and looks to have advocated for this target anyway. A7V2 (talk) 22:19, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bytesex[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 9#Bytesex

24 (televisionseries)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 17:19, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect created back in 2006 (not as the result of a move) lacks a space between the disambiguator's words, so I'm not sure this is really plausible. The correctly spaced 24 (television series), though it's the result of a move in the same year, is worth keeping as "television series" is a plausible alternative term, plus it gets tons more pageviews per year than the nominated redirect. Delete the nominated one unless someone can provide a justification or alternative course of action. Regards, SONIC678 16:15, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vampire Academy (fil,)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:17, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I get it, the , key is next to the M key on a QWERTY keyboard, and this is a leftover from a move in 2014 to Vampire Academy (movie) (which was then moved to the target's present title over 23 hours later), but I'm not entirely sure this redirect is plausible because of the typo in the disambiguator. I thought I'd bring it over to RfD to discuss. Regards, SONIC678 16:08, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I can understand how the typo happened, but it's not a common typo. Is arguably a WP:G6 per {{db-error}}, but no need to speedy where it's only marginally a WP:G6. TartarTorte 20:42, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

King of Germany[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 9#King of Germany

Chanderpaul[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 9#Chanderpaul

Killed myself[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 9#Killed myself

Sara Fisher Ellison[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep since a mention was added at the target, addressing the initial concerns of the nom; and there was no further discussion for finding a new target. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 09:33, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point-fixed now. Blythwood (talk) 10:47, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping to see if Mx. Granger wants to withdraw. Jay 💬 14:51, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I think this could be kept open as a discussion. I don't think that Glenn Ellison is an inherently more of an appropriate target for her as an {{R from spouse}} vs. {{R from relative}} than Caroline Ellison, especially if a similar mention is added to about being her mother is added Caroline's article as was added to Glenn's with regards to being his wife. TartarTorte 15:51, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think redirecting to Glenn Ellison's article makes more sense. There's going to be more overlap in content between two academic economists of the same generation who've collaborated than between an academic economist and a cryptocurrency trader. Blythwood (talk) 23:30, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Blythwood, thank you for adding the mention to the article. I'm not sure which of these targets makes sense, if either. Do we usually redirect non-notable, low-profile family members of an article's subject? It seems most of the pages that use Template:R from spouse are for higher-profile spouses. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 10:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget to husband or daughter?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trump riots[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 9#Trump riots

Cristyne Lategano[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:41, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While it's possible that she was mentioned in Rudy_Giuliani#Personal_life when this redirect was created (2009) and subsequently revised (2012), that's no longer the case. While there is sourcing that could make a case for this redirect, it's the Daily Mail and other sources entirely inappropriate for a BLP who (may) be otherwise notable. Red link would encourage source assessment and possible article creation. Star Mississippi 03:23, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not mentioned at Rudy Giuliani nor does she necessarily need to be. I see a little sourcing out there, but if there is a page to write, it can be drafted from a red link. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:47, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mocchi[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 11#Mocchi

Sakkiliyar[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 15#Sakkiliyar

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_2&oldid=1127539726"