Jump to content

User talk:Hawkeye7/Archive 2019

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024


Your GA nomination of Scott Carpenter

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scott Carpenter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 10:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Scott Carpenter

The article Scott Carpenter you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Scott Carpenter for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 10:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Scott Carpenter

The article Scott Carpenter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Scott Carpenter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 04:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

2018 Year in Review

The WikiChevrons
For your work on British hydrogen bomb programme, K-25, Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign, Trident (UK nuclear programme), British logistics in the Falklands War, Neil Armstrong, and Project E during 2018 you are hereby awarded these WikiChevrons. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
The Nuclear Barnstar
For your work on British hydrogen bomb programme, K-25, Trident (UK nuclear programme), and Project E during 2018 you are hereby awarded the Nuclear Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
The Featured Article Medal
For your work on British hydrogen bomb programme, K-25, Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign, British logistics in the Falklands War, Neil Armstrong, and Project E during 2018 you are hereby awarded The Featured Article Medal. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)


The Wikiproject Aircraft Wiki-Wings
For your work with aviators Neil Armstrong and John Glenn you are hereby awarded these WikiWings. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Ships Barnstar
For your work on Trident (UK nuclear programme) you are hereby awarded the WIkiProject Ships Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
The Biography Barnstar
For your work on the articles Neil Armstrong and John Glenn, you are hereby awarded this Biography Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
The Half Barnstar
For your work on the articles Neil Armstrong and John Glenn, you are hereby awarded The Left Half of the Half Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
The Epic Barnstar
For your contributions to the area of History in General, you are hereby awarded this Epic Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
For your work on Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign you are hereby awarded The Australian Barnstar of National Merit. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
this WikiAward was given to TomStar81/2018 by TomStar81 (Talk) on 20:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar
In recognition of the decision by the Wikipedia Signpost to feature the K25 building as the lead image for its "Feature Content" section in the 20 February 2018 edition you are hereby presented with the Special Barnstar. Admittedly, this was a "luck of the draw" matter, but its still worthy on noting :) TomStar81 (Talk) 18:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Quarterly reviewing stats etc

G'day Hawkeye, and Happy New Year! Is Milhistbot up to running the quarterly reviewing task yet? Otherwise we might need to get on with it manually. Let me know? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

The Bot had a problem: "Unable to find 'Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Marcus Aurelius/archive2'". It had been moved or deleted. I told the Bot to Keep Calm and Carry On. The tallies are posted now. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:44, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Don Z. Zimmerman

On 5 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Don Z. Zimmerman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in planning the capture of the Marshall Islands during World War II, Don Z. Zimmerman disputed Charles Darwin's theory about the evolution of the coral reefs—and was proven correct? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Don Z. Zimmerman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Don Z. Zimmerman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

@Hawkeye7: It's a terrific article, kudos! – Athaenara 02:25, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. For every article I bring to Featured Article quality (in this case Buzz Aldrin, I create two more short articles (in this case, Don Z. Zimmerman and Edwin Eugene Aldrin Sr.). Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
You are welcome, and thanks for the Aldrin Sr. link. You are very good at this. – Athaenara 04:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Quebec Agreement scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Quebec Agreement article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 7, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 7, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:32, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the article on the merge of the "British (Tube Alloys) and Canadian (Montreal Laboratory) nuclear weapons projects with the American one (Manhattan Project)"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history)
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for October to December 2018 reviews. MilHistBot (talk) 01:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
I'm following up some stuff I did long ago and just saw that you took up my bot proposal. Thanks a lot! Far better than I thought a bot could do. Huon (talk) 18:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
This Bot run is on the seventh of each month (to allow the page stats to be updated beforehand.) So last month is now available. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:17, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
I saw the TFA wait for Apollo 8 was 13 years, which is technically not true since it was run as TFA between its original FAC and this TFA. Just an oddity to point out if you feel like addressing it, not a big deal. Neat tool! Kees08 (Talk) 21:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
I had to decide how to handle those, and decided to take it from the most recent FAC to the current TFA. So, for example, J. Robert Oppenheimer was promoted on 1 February 2005 and ran as TFA on 22 April 2005 (80 days later) but was demoted on 5 April 2007, and restored to featured status on 19 March 2011. If it was TFA again on 22 April 2019, the table would say 8 years, 34 days. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, you always have to decide what to care about for the edge cases. The TFA case column does not sort correctly though, and that should be an easy fix. Also, was a little sad that Apollo 8 was not the number one viewed article for the month! Kees08 (Talk) 03:07, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Carrying the Fire

The reason I asked about your version is because in the book, In his biography he said he felt at that moment like a Roman god riding the skies in his chariot. is definitely not on page 78. It is also not on 178, 278, etc. I will try to find where it is mentioned in the book and fix the page number. Kees08 (Talk) 00:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

It's on page 221. I have corrected the reference. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Perfect, thank you. Would you be opposed to me rephrasing it from In his biography he said he felt at that moment like a Roman god riding the skies in his chariot. to In his biography he said he felt at that moment like a God riding the skies in his chariot. He did not mention Roman, and the G is capitalized. Also wouldn't this be considered an autobiography? Kees08 (Talk) 03:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Nevermind, read page 475. Thanks, that was the missing page I was looking for. Kees08 (Talk) 03:11, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gordon Cooper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conrad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #026, 20 Jan 2019

Well, here's the first issue of the new year. Enjoy...

New participants

A hearty welcome to new arrivals to the portals department:

Harvesting categories tool prototype

DannyS712 has created a user script prototype, User:DannyS712/Cat links, that can pull members from a category, a functionality we've been after since the project's revamp last Spring. Now, it's a matter of applying this technique to scripts that will place the items where needed, such as with a section starter script and/or portal builder script.

New portals since last issue

  1. Academic publishing
  2. Accounting
  3. Adam and Eve
  4. African Great Lakes
  5. Al Green
  6. Alternative views
  7. America's Next Top Model
  8. Andaman and Nicobar Islands
  9. Angles
  10. Applied mathematics
  11. Arabic
  12. Areas of mathematics
  13. Atlanta metropolitan area
  14. Atlantic Ocean
  15. Big Bash League
  16. Bijelo Dugme
  17. Bill Cosby
  18. Boats
  19. Bombardier Aerospace
  20. Bruce Willis
  21. Canadian law
  22. Cannons
  23. Caribbean American
  24. Chinese American
  25. Chinese Canadians
  26. Chinese gardens
  27. Chris Brown
  28. City
  29. Common law
  30. Criminal law
  31. Czechoslovakia
  32. Data
  33. Data warehouses
  34. DC Comics
  35. Deities
  36. DeKalb County
  37. Destiny's Child
  38. Differential equations
  39. Discrete geometry
  40. East Asia
  41. Economy of China
  42. Economy of India
  43. Economy of Malaysia
  44. Economy of the United Kingdom
  45. Ellen DeGeneres
  46. Email clients
  47. E
  48. Equations
  49. European Americans
  50. Filipino Americans
  51. Football in Algeria
  52. Fox Corporation
  53. Fractions and ratios
  54. Functional analysis
  55. Game theory
  56. Girlguiding
  57. Gloucestershire
  58. Grazhdanskaya Oborona
  59. Greek diaspora
  60. Habsburg Monarchy
  61. Hilbert's problems
  62. Hoodoo Gurus
  63. Hyundai Motor Company
  64. Iggy Azalea
  65. Indian Ocean
  66. Infinity
  67. Information theory
  68. Integrals
  69. Irish diaspora
  70. Irrational numbers
  71. Italian diaspora
  72. Japanese diaspora
  73. J. Cole
  74. Jennifer Lopez
  75. Jessica Lange
  76. John Fogerty
  77. Kehlani
  78. Kiev
  79. K. Michelle
  80. Knot theory
  81. Kool & the Gang
  82. Lakes in China
  83. Lake Van
  84. Leonardo DiCaprio
  85. Limerick
  86. Literary composition
  87. Long Island Rail Road
  88. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
  89. Lukas Graham
  90. Mathematical optimization
  91. Matt Damon
  92. Merchant ships
  93. Metallic means
  94. Metro-North Railroad
  95. Microsoft Windows
  96. Military of India
  97. Miss America
  98. Modulation
  99. Moon landing
  100. Mozilla
  101. Music of Ireland
  102. Narratives
  103. Nashville
  104. Nassau County
  105. Norfolk
  106. Nottinghamshire
  107. One Life to Live
  108. Overseas Chinese
  109. Percentages
  110. Probability distributions
  111. Public Broadcasting Service
  112. Quezon City
  113. Raven-Symoné
  114. R. Kelly
  115. Rodeo
  116. RuneScape
  117. Sarah Silverman
  118. Saturn rockets
  119. Science and technology
  120. Sesame Street
  121. Seth MacFarlane
  122. Ships
  123. Shipwrecks
  124. Shropshire
  125. Spaceports
  126. Space suits
  127. Spanish diaspora
  128. Steam locomotives
  129. Suffolk
  130. Suzuki
  131. Tanks
  132. Tensors
  133. The CW
  134. Thomas Aquinas
  135. T.I.
  136. TISM
  137. Tom Cruise
  138. Toni Braxton
  139. Toyota
  140. Transportation in the Philippines
  141. True Blood
  142. Violin
  143. Virgin Group
  144. Vladimir Putin
  145. Volkswagen
  146. Volume
  147. Warner Bros.
  148. Warships
  149. Warwickshire
  150. Washington D.C.
  151. [[Portal:Watercraft|
  152. Web syndication
  153. Wikis
  154. Witchcraft
  155. Women's sports
  156. World of Warcraft

What else is going on

There have been some discussions at Wikipedia talk:Portal guidelines.

DreamyJazz is working on a bot to place links to portals on root articles, category pages, and navigation footer templates.

Portal bugs are getting dealt with soon after they are reported.

Lots of wikignome activity (using Hotcat, etc.).

Keep up the good work.    — The Transhumanist   09:27, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.

Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  • United States L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
  • Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
  • Denmark MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.
  • United States Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
  • Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
  • Ohio Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).

20:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for James Lawton Collins Jr.

On 22 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Lawton Collins Jr., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lieutenant Colonel James Lawton Collins Jr. (pictured) was wounded when his battalion was accidentally hit by American bombers during Operation Cobra? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Lawton Collins Jr.. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, James Lawton Collins Jr.), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:01, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gordon Cooper

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gordon Cooper you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 08:20, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Douglas MacArthur GCB

Hi, I hear what you say about reverting my edit concerning the nationality of the honorary GCB awarded to MacArthur. It would be interesting to know the background of his award. You say British government objected but the objection could not have been unanimous and strong enough for them to veto the award which was a British state honour, of British manufacture (could they have been minted in Australia?). Somebody somewhere had the last word. The British sovereign (in his day George VI) I understand is usually advised by the Prime Minister (Winston Churchill until summer 1945, Clement Attlee at time of Allied-Japanese armistice) before conferring the Bath order. It may be interesting to note that Churchill, as UK PM, did turn down an offer by Stalin to award a Soviet campaign medal to all British troops in PAIFORCE in Iran (of which my grandfather was one) and only allowed a token number of senior officers to receive Soviet honours - a decision which did annoy many rank and file in the theatre when it was announced.Cloptonson (talk) 11:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

The insignia were minted in the UK and shipped to Australia. The sovereign (George VI in this case) by convention acts only on the advice of his ministers; but in the case of Australia, this is the advice of his Australian ministers, and the Australian Prime Minister was John Curtin at the time. The UK government could not veto the award. This was a consequence of the Statute of Westminster 1931. The Australian government communicated directly with the Royal staff at Buckingham Palace through the office of the Governor General of Australia (Lord Gowrie at the time), who acts on the advice of his Australian ministers. Australia continued to award Imperial honours until 1989, although their use was bot formally discontinued until 1992. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #027, 28 Jan 2019

Portal styles

For a visually intensive portal, see Portal:Hummingbirds.

If you find any other portals that stand out, please send me the links so I can include them in the next issue. Thank you.

Conversion continues

There are about 1100 portals left in the old style, with subpages and static excerpts. As those are very labor intensive to maintain (because their maintenance is manual), all those except the ones with active maintainers (about 100) are slated for upgrade = approximately 1000. We started with 1500, and so over a quarter of them have been processed so far. That's good, but at this rate, conversion will take another 3 years. So, some automation (AWB?) is in order. We just need to keep at it, and push down on the gas pedal a bit harder.

You can find the old-style portals with an insource search of "box portal skeleton".

Flagship portals: the portals on the Main Page

Speaking of upgrades...

The following portals are listed in the header at the top of Wikipedia's Main Page, and get far more traffic than all other portals:

  1. Portal:Arts
  2. Portal:Biography
  3. Portal:Geography
  4. Portal:History
  5. Portal:Mathematics
  6. Portal:Science
  7. Portal:Society
  8. Portal:Technology

Of those, all but one have been revamped to an automated self-updating single-page design.

The remaining one, Portal:Mathematics has manual maintainers, and has been partially upgraded.

As these are our flagship fleet, they need to be kept in top-notch condition.

Check 'em out, and improve them if you can.

And be sure they are on your watchlist.

New portals since last issue

Keep 'em coming!

Deorphanizing the new portals

As you know, thousands of the new portals are orphans, that is, having no links to them from article space. For all practical purposes, that means they are not part of the encyclopedia yet, and readers will be unlikely to find them.

What is needed are links to these portals from the See also sections of the corresponding root articles.

Dreamy Jazz to the rescue...

Dreamy Jazz has created a bot to place the corresponding category link to the end of each portal (if it is missing), and place a link to each portal in the See also section of the corresponding root articles.

That bot, named User:Dreamy Jazz Bot, is currently in its trial period performing the above described edits!

To take a look at the edits it has made so far, see Special:Contributions/Dreamy_Jazz_Bot.

It shouldn't be long before the bot is processing the entire set of new portals.

Good news indeed.

Way to go, Dreamy Jazz!

And, that's a wrap

That's all I have to report this time around.

No doubt there will be more to tell soon.

Until then,    — The Transhumanist   13:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Mars cycler

On 30 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mars cycler, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that astronaut Buzz Aldrin discovered the Aldrin cycler, a means of repeatedly traveling between Earth and Mars? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mars cycler. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mars cycler), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Great job on this fascinating page, Hawk! Thanks for your consistently high editing standard and your devotion to the project! BusterD (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

Your GA nomination of Gordon Cooper

The article Gordon Cooper you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gordon Cooper for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #028, 04 Feb 2019

Here's a quicky status report:

Old-style portals: 1,018
Single-page portals: 4,367
Total portals: 5,385

But of course, there has been more going on than just that...

Dreamy Jazz Bot is up and running!

Dreamy Jazz Bot has been approved and is now up and running.

What it does is places missing links to orphaned portals. It places a link in the See also section of the corresponding root article, and it puts one at the top of the corresponding category page.

We have thousands of new portals that have yet to be added to the encyclopedia proper, just waiting to go live.

When they do go live, over the coming days or weeks, due to Dreamy Jazz Bot, it will be like an explosion of new portals on the scene. We should expect an increase in awareness and interest in the portals project. Perhaps even new participants.

Get ready...

Get set...

Go!

Another sockpuppet infiltrator has been discovered

User:Emoteplump, a recent contributor to the portals project, was discovered to be a sockpuppet account of an indefinitely blocked user.

When that happens, admins endeavor to eradicate everything the editor contributed. This aftermath has left a wake of destruction throughout the portals department, again.

The following portals which have been speedy deleted, are in the process of being re-created. Please feel free to help to turn these blue again:

And the corresponding talk pages:

New portals since the last issue

Keep up the great work

Until next time,    — The Transhumanist   09:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

17:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Charles J. Donlan

On 5 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles J. Donlan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Charles J. Donlan was responsible for selecting the Mercury Seven astronauts and the Mercury spacecraft they flew? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles J. Donlan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Charles J. Donlan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gordon Cooper

The article Gordon Cooper you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gordon Cooper for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 11:01, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercury Seven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Conrad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #029, 13 Feb 2019

Where we are at:

Single-page portals: 4,704
Total portals: 5,705

The Ref desks survived the proposal to shut them down

You might be familiar with the Ref desks, by their link on every new portal. They are a place you can go to ask volunteers almost any knowledge-related question, and have been a feature of Wikipedia since August of 2005 (or perhaps earlier). They were linked to from portals in an effort to improve their visibility, and to provide a bridge from the encyclopedia proper to project space (the Wikipedia community).

Well, somebody proposed that we get rid of them, and the community decided that that was not going to happen. Thank you for defending the Ref desks!

Here's a link to the dramatic discussion:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Indefinitely_semiprotecting_the_refdesk#Proposal_II:_Shut_down_the_Ref_Desks

The cleanup after sockpuppet Emoteplump continues...

The wake of disruption left by Emoteplump and the admins who reverted many (but not all) of his/her edits is still undergoing cleanup. We could use all the help we can get on this task...

Almost all of the speedy deleted portals have been rebuilt from scratch.

For the portals he/she restarted (many of which were done mistakenly, overwriting restarts and further development that had already been done), and/or tagged as the maintainer, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Emoteplump&oldid=881568794#Additional_Portals_under_my_watch

10,000 portals, here we come...

We're at 5,705 portals and counting.

New portals since issue #28

  1. Portal:Abitibi-Témiscamingue
  2. Portal:Ahold Delhaize
  3. Portal:AKB48
  4. Portal:Åland Islands
  5. Portal:Alaska Airlines
  6. Portal:Albanian Civil War
  7. Portal:Albertsons
  8. Portal:Alevism
  9. Portal:All in the Family
  10. Portal:Alternative metal
  11. Portal:Ambient music
  12. Portal:Ancient Near East mythology
  13. Portal:Ancient Roman religion
  14. Portal:Andrew Cuomo
  15. Portal:Anti-consumerism
  16. Portal:Antimatter
  17. Portal:Arameans
  18. Portal:Arianism
  19. Portal:Australian Crawl
  20. Portal:Bali
  21. Portal:Banten
  22. Portal:Bengkulu
  23. Portal:Black Lives Matter
  24. Portal:Bluegrass music
  25. Portal:Bonnie Tyler
  26. Portal:Breakbeat
  27. Portal:Calypso music
  28. Portal:Cambridgeshire
  29. Portal:Camila Cabello
  30. Portal:Capcom
  31. Portal:Capsicum
  32. Portal:Celtic music
  33. Portal:Central American music
  34. Portal:Central Java
  35. Portal:Central Kalimantan
  36. Portal:Central Sulawesi
  37. Portal:Chanel
  38. Portal:Cinema of Australia
  39. Portal:Cognitive psychology
  40. Portal:Communication studies
  41. Portal:Conservatism in the United States
  42. Portal:Cortina d'Ampezzo
  43. Portal:Cross-Strait relations
  44. Portal:Cryptozoology
  45. Portal:Danish folk music
  46. Portal:Disco
  47. Portal:Dyslexia
  48. Portal:East Java
  49. Portal:East Kalimantan
  50. Portal:East Nusa Tenggara
  51. Portal:Easy listening
  52. Portal:Ed Sheeran
  53. Portal:Ehime
  54. Portal:Electricity
  55. Portal:Electronica
  56. Portal:Electronic rock
  57. Portal:English folk music
  58. Portal:Environmental technology
  59. Portal:Experimental music
  60. Portal:Extreme metal
  61. Portal:Fall Out Boy
  62. Portal:Finnish Defence Forces
  63. Portal:Finnish folk music
  64. Portal:Football in Croatia
  65. Portal:Football in Jordan
  66. Portal:Funk
  67. Portal:Gamelan
  68. Portal:General Mills
  69. Portal:Germanic languages
  70. Portal:German language
  71. Portal:Government of Canada
  72. Portal:Government of Hong Kong
  73. Portal:Government of Indonesia
  74. Portal:Government of Ireland
  75. Portal:Government of Malaysia
  76. Portal:Government of Russia
  77. Portal:Government of Singapore
  78. Portal:Government of Spain
  79. Portal:Government of Thailand
  80. Portal:Grapes
  81. Portal:Green Party of the United States
  82. Portal:Grinspoon
  83. Portal:Gwen Stefani
  84. Portal:Hardcore punk
  85. Portal:Hardcore techno
  86. Portal:Haskell (programming language)
  87. Portal:History of art
  88. Portal:History of North America
  89. Portal:History of Thailand
  90. Portal:Hollywood
  91. Portal:Hotels
  92. Portal:House music
  93. Portal:Hungarian folk music
  94. Portal:Hunters & Collectors
  95. Portal:Hydrogen
  96. Portal:Icelandic folk music
  97. Portal:Indigenous music of North America
  98. Portal:Insomniac Games
  99. Portal:International field hockey
  100. Portal:International trade
  101. Portal:Iranian music
  102. Portal:Islamophobia
  103. Portal:Jambi
  104. Portal:Jet engines
  105. Portal:Jordin Sparks
  106. Portal:Julius Caesar
  107. Portal:Kannur
  108. Portal:Kansas City Spurs
  109. Portal:Kelly Rowland
  110. Portal:Kirby
  111. Portal:Kraft Heinz
  112. Portal:Krasnoyarsk Krai
  113. Portal:Kroger
  114. Portal:Kuala Lumpur
  115. Portal:Lampung
  116. Portal:Larry Kramer
  117. Portal:LeBron James
  118. Portal:Lehigh Valley
  119. Portal:Leicestershire
  120. Portal:Liège
  121. Portal:Liguria
  122. Portal:Los Angeles Aztecs
  123. Portal:Los Angeles Wolves
  124. Portal:Macedonian language
  125. Portal:Magnetism
  126. Portal:Maithripala Sirisena
  127. Portal:Maluku (province)
  128. Portal:Mangoes
  129. Portal:Marco Pierre White
  130. Portal:McLaren
  131. Portal:Menstrual cycle
  132. Portal:Metalcore
  133. Portal:Miami FC
  134. Portal:Microblogging
  135. Portal:Microtonal music
  136. Portal:Midnight Oil
  137. Portal:Minnesota Kicks
  138. Portal:Mission: Impossible
  139. Portal:Modernism (music)
  140. Portal:Moheener Ghoraguli
  141. Portal:Mondelez International
  142. Portal:Music genres
  143. Portal:Music of Bangladesh
  144. Portal:Music of India
  145. Portal:Music of Italy
  146. Portal:Music of Japan
  147. Portal:Music of Korea
  148. Portal:Music of Latin America
  149. Portal:Music of Micronesia
  150. Portal:Music of North Africa
  151. Portal:Music of Pakistan
  152. Portal:Music of Serbia
  153. Portal:Music of the Philippines
  154. Portal:Music of the United States
  155. Portal:Mutations
  156. Portal:National Rugby League
  157. Portal:Neoclassicism (music)
  158. Portal:Netball
  159. Portal:New York City Fire Department
  160. Portal:Nick Jr.
  161. Portal:Nobility
  162. Portal:Nordic countries
  163. Portal:North Africa
  164. Portal:North Kalimantan
  165. Portal:North Maluku
  166. Portal:North Pole
  167. Portal:North Queensland
  168. Portal:North Sulawesi
  169. Portal:North Sumatra
  170. Portal:Norwegian folk music
  171. Portal:Papua (province)
  172. Portal:Peaches
  173. Portal:Politics of Abkhazia
  174. Portal:Politics of Afghanistan
  175. Portal:Politics of Albania
  176. Portal:Politics of Algeria
  177. Portal:Politics of Andorra
  178. Portal:Politics of Angola
  179. Portal:Politics of Antigua and Barbuda
  180. Portal:Politics of Argentina
  181. Portal:Politics of Artsakh
  182. Portal:Politics of Bahrain
  183. Portal:Politics of Bangladesh
  184. Portal:Politics of Bavaria
  185. Portal:Politics of Belarus
  186. Portal:Politics of Belgium
  187. Portal:Politics of Belize
  188. Portal:Politics of Benin
  189. Portal:Politics of Bhutan
  190. Portal:Politics of Bosnia and Herzegovina
  191. Portal:Politics of Botswana
  192. Portal:Politics of Brazil
  193. Portal:Politics of Brunei
  194. Portal:Politics of Bulgaria
  195. Portal:Politics of Burkina Faso
  196. Portal:Politics of Burundi
  197. Portal:Politics of Cambodia
  198. Portal:Politics of Cameroon
  199. Portal:Politics of China
  200. Portal:Politics of São Tomé and Príncipe
  201. Portal:Politics of South Sudan
  202. Portal:Politics of Sudan
  203. Portal:Politics of Tanzania
  204. Portal:Politics of the Republic of the Congo
  205. Portal:Politics of Togo
  206. Portal:Politics of Tunisia
  207. Portal:Politics of Uganda
  208. Portal:Pop rock
  209. Portal:Rap rock
  210. Portal:Ras Al Khaimah
  211. Portal:Riau
  212. Portal:Riau Islands
  213. Portal:Ricky Martin
  214. Portal:Royal Canadian Air Force
  215. Portal:Rutland
  216. Portal:Saxophones
  217. Portal:Semiotics
  218. Portal:Ska
  219. Portal:Soca music
  220. Portal:Soul music
  221. Portal:Sound sculptures
  222. Portal:Southeast Sulawesi
  223. Portal:South Kalimantan
  224. Portal:South Sulawesi
  225. Portal:South Sumatra
  226. Portal:Space: 1999
  227. Portal:Special Region of Yogyakarta
  228. Portal:Swedish folk music
  229. Portal:Tamil language
  230. Portal:Techno
  231. Portal:Terry Brooks
  232. Portal:The Living End
  233. Portal:Thrissur
  234. Portal:Trance music
  235. Portal:Tyrant flycatchers
  236. Portal:Veterinary medicine
  237. Portal:Wayanad
  238. Portal:Welsh folk music
  239. Portal:West Champaran district
  240. Portal:Western dress codes
  241. Portal:West Flanders
  242. Portal:West Java
  243. Portal:West Kalimantan
  244. Portal:West Nusa Tenggara
  245. Portal:West Papua (province)
  246. Portal:West Sulawesi
  247. Portal:West Sumatra
  248. Portal:Wildlife of India
  249. Portal:Wildlife of Nepal
  250. Portal:Windows 10
  251. Portal:Winter War
  252. Portal:Woodpeckers
  253. Portal:Worcestershire
  254. Portal:World economy
  255. Portal:World Ocean
  256. Portal:World Rally Championship
  257. Portal:World views
  258. Portal:XTC
  259. Portal:Yahoo!
  260. Portal:Yoruba people
  261. Portal:You Am I
  262. Portal:Young Wizards
  263. Portal:Yugoslavs

Prior to 2018, for the previous 14 years, portal creation was at about 80 portals per year on average. We did over 3 times that in just the past 9 days. At this rate, we'll hit the 10,000 portal mark in 5 months. But, I'm sure we can do it sooner than that.

What's next for portal pages?

There are 5 drives for portal development:

  1. Create new portals
  2. Expand existing portals, such as with new sections like Recognized content
  3. Convert or restart old-style portals into automated single-page portals
  4. Link to new portals from the encyclopedia
  5. Pageless portals

Let's take a closer look at these...

1: Creating new portals

Portal creation, for subjects that happen to have the necessary support structures already in place, is down to about a minute per portal. The creation part, which is automated, takes about 10 seconds. The other 50 seconds is taken up by manual activities, such as finding candidate subjects, inspecting generated portals, and selecting the portal creation template to be used according to the resources available. Tools are under development to automate these activities as much as possible, to pare portal creation time down even more. Ten seconds each is the goal.

Eventually, we are going to run out of navigation templates to base portals off of. Though there are still thousands to go. But, when they do run out, we'll need an easy way to create more. A nav footer creation script.

Meanwhile, other resources are being explored and developed, such as categories, and methods to harvest the links they contain.

2: Expanding existing portals

The portal collection is growing, not only by the addition of new portals, but by further developing the ones we already have, by...

  • Improving and/or adding search parameters to better power the Did you know and In the news sections.
  • Adding more selected content sections, like Selected biographies.
  • Adding and maintaining Recognized content sections, via JL-Bot.
  • Adding pictures to the image slideshow.
  • Adding panoramic pics.
  • Categorizing portals.

More features will be added as we dream them up and design them. So, don't be shy, make a wish.

3: Converting old portals

By far the hardest and most time-consuming task we have been working on is updating the old portals, the very reason we revamped this WikiProject in the first place.

There are two approaches here:

A) Restart a portal from scratch, using our automated tools. For basic no-frills portals, that works find. But, for more elaborate portals, as that tends to lose content and features, the following approach is being tried...
B) Upgrade a portal section by section, so little to nothing is lost in the process.

4: Linking to new portals

Or "portal deorphanization"...

Dreamy Jazz Bot is purring along.

And a tool in the form of a script is under development for linking to portals at the time they are created, or shortly thereafter.

5...

See below...

New WikiProject for the post-saved-portal phase of operations...

Saved portals, are portals with a saved page.

What is the next stage in the evolutionary progression?

Quantum portals.

What are quantum portals?

Portals that come into existence when you click on the portal button, and which disappear when you leave the page.

Or, as Pbsouthwood put it:

...portals that exist only as a probability function (algorithm) until you collapse the wave form by observing through the portal button (run the script), and disappear again after use...

Introducing...

Wikipedia:WikiProject Quantum portals (see it's talk page).

Keep on keepin' on

...'til next time,    — The Transhumanist   10:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, this is to let you know that the above article will appear as Today's Featured Article on March 25, 2019. The blurb to be used can be found here. You are free to edit the blurb, and may want to watchlist that page, as well as WP:ERRORS in case there are queries about it on the day it runs, as well as the previous day. If you have questions or concerns, feel free to post on my talk. Thanks for building quality content!--Wehwalt (talk) 18:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

I have trimmed the blurb down to ~1,000 characters. Warning: Project E weapons were phased out under a treaty the US and UK have now decided to break. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm sharing my concerns about the exchange at Talk:Albert Kesselring#Feb 2019 edit. For example:

  • "Tweaking the wording is not acceptable. The wording has been carefully reviewed..." & "Your proposed changes are rejected. Seek consensus for any changes you propose." -- article content does not need to be preemptively cleared with a page owner. Even FA articles are not set in stone, especially when the "careful review" took place 10 years ago.
  • "We'll have another look"; "But we can source easily enough"; "the only source we can have..." -- "we" who?
  • "a sensitive issue in your country"; "This is another part that could be sensitive in your country"; "Yet another issue that could be sensitive in your country." --My country? What does this even mean?
  • "... reverted. This was because of multiple problems, including grammar, reference formatting and the use of an abbreviation that is not commonly known..." -- you well know these are not valid reasons to revert an addition, but thank you for getting "reference formatting corrected".

I know that this was an FA that you nominated and you are proud of the page as evidenced by your 2011 MILHIST Op-Ed. However, you seem to have assumed ownership of the page and are acting as a gatekeeper, shutting down or ignoring dissent. The examples of the condescension above are really offputting and can have a stifling effect. While this comment, in particular, comes uncomfortably close to war crimes apologia: The final figure was higher than most previous estimates, bur still only a fraction of the number of civilians killed by Allied bombing. Perhaps it's time for you to step back from the article and let other perspectives be heard. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

This actually comes from the report itself. It also appears in the German official history. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
  • I would like to continue working on the article with a goal of improving due weight of certain aspects. My first attempt did not go so well; perhaps I was too bold with my changes by making them in one single edit. I can adjust this going forward. For example, I can implement the changes section-by-section and provide more specific edit summaries and / or more justification for the edits. For example, the 1954 source I referred to on the Talk page was "Smiling Al". Time. 19 April 1954. Retrieved 4 April 2009.; it is used to claim that the Kesselring's "memoirs formed a valuable resource...".
My initial impression was that you felt that the current text was fine and any changes would be unwelcome. If this is the case, the other option is to ask for community input via FA reassessment. Not sure if your thinking on this matter has changed. I'd be happy to proceed with either option. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Before archives began being declassified in the 1980s, memoirs of senior leaders were a major resource for historians for many years. Many sources consulted Kesselring's memoirs for the reasons for the invasion of the Soviet Union being delayed from May until June. They refuted the claim that the campaign in Greece was the cause. Today a better source might be the German official history on the Invasion of the Soviet Union; I haven't read that volume, so I don't know what it says. But in the context, a 1954 source is precisely what we need for how the book was received. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
While I feel the current text is fine, changes should be considered. Community input via the FAR process would be good, but the article only gets about 200,000 page views per annum, so it is not a high traffic one, and I don't think very many editors would be much interested besides the two of us. Have you read through the memoirs and von Lingen's book? It is available in English now, so you don't have to read it in the original German. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I have Lingen's book and it has confirmed my impression that the article lacks neutrality in certain areas, through uncritical use of primary sources and a one-sided presentation. Some sources are dated; see WP:RS AGE, especially in regards to bias.
It's a bit unclear to me what you feel should be done. There's seemingly support for both editing the article ("changes should be considered") and a FAR ("Community input via the FAR process would be good"). If you plan to continue reverting my changes wholesale, then I feel that FAR is the way to go. My preferred option would be to implement and work through the changes since the goal is not to have the article delisted but instead to improve it. Please let me know what you think. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Do you have an opinion one way or the other? K.e.coffman (talk) 00:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
It seems that other editors are interested, so a FAR is the best way to go. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:40, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

23:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for John L. Whitehead Jr.

On 19 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John L. Whitehead Jr., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John L. Whitehead Jr. (pictured) was the first African American to graduate from the U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John L. Whitehead Jr.. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John L. Whitehead Jr.), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bec Goddard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WNBL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Would you have time to do a FAC review? Much obliged.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

I'll do it on the weekend. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk to us about talking

Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

21:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

FACBot

Hi Hawkeye, I think your bot went a bit doolally earlier - it started removing FAC notices from nominated talk pages, stating "Removing unfinished candidacy from talk page". It looks like it's done that to a stack of pages, all of which seem OK to me. Cheers. - SchroCat (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

My fault. The problem has been resolved. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:18, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

16:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Gordon Cooper

On 9 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gordon Cooper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after astronaut Gordon Cooper (pictured) died, his ashes were launched into space three times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gordon Cooper. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gordon Cooper), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17

Hello Hawkeye7,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #030, 17 Mar 2019

Previous issue:

Single-page portals: 4,704
Total portals: 5,705

This issue:

Single-page portals: 4,562
Total portals: 5,578

The collection of portals has shrunk

All Portals closed at WP:MfD during 2019

Grouped Nominations total 127 Portals:

  1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/US County Portals Deleted 64 portals
  2. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Districts of India Portals Deleted 30 Portals
  3. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portals for Portland, Oregon neighborhoods Deleted 23 Portals
  4. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Allen Park, Michigan Deleted 6 Portals
  5. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Cryptocurrency Deleted 2 Portals
  6. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:North Pole Deleted 2 Portals

Individual Nominations:

  1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Circles Deleted
  2. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Fruits Deleted
  3. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:E (mathematical constant) Deleted
  4. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Burger King Deleted
  5. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Cotingas Deleted
  6. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Prostitution in Canada Deleted
  7. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Agoura Hills, California Deleted
  8. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Urinary system Deleted
  9. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:You Am I Deleted
  10. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Cannabis (2nd nomination) Reverted to non-Automated version
  11. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Intermodal containers Deleted
  12. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Adventure travel Deleted
  13. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Adam Ant Deleted
  14. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Benito Juárez, Mexico City Deleted
  15. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Spaghetti Deleted
  16. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Wikiatlas Deleted
  17. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Greek alphabet Deleted
  18. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Deleted
  19. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Accounting Deleted G7
  20. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Lents, Portland, Oregon Deleted P2
  21. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ankaran Deleted
  22. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Jiu-jitsu Deleted G8
  23. Portal:University of Nebraska Speedy Deleted P1/A10 exactly the same as Portal:University of Nebraska–Lincoln also created by the TTH

Related WikiProject:

  1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Quantum portals Demoted

(Attribution: Copied from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Portal MfD Results)

WikiProject Quantum portals

This was a spin-off from WikiProject Portals, for the purpose of developing zero-page portals (portals generated on-the-screen at the push of a button, with no stored pages).

It has been merged back into WikiProject Portals. In the MfD the vote was "demote". See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Quantum portals.

Hiatus on mass creation of Portals

At WP:VPR, mass creation of Portals using semi-automated tools has been put on hold until clearer community consensus is established.

See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Hiatus on mass creation of Portals.

The Transhumanist banned from creating new portals for 3 months

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Proposal 1: Interim Topic-Ban on New Portals.

Until next issue...

Keep on keepin' on.    — The Transhumanist   10:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Collins

What would you like to do with Collins? Ask for an exemption on the two weeks, or just wait it out? Kees08 (Talk) 18:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

I'd like to wait until Buzz Aldrin makes it through. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:56, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Actually if you check my closing comment, I did give you guys leave to ignore the 2-week wait since only one person commented. OTOH Aldrin shouldn't take too long to close, last I looked... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Much appreciated. I may still exercise it. I thought that it would be best of there was only one astronaut at FAC. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
I believe Aldrin's article is ready for promotion, in case you want to nominate Collins now. Otherwise we can wait until it is official. Kees08 (Talk) 04:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

19:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Policy refresher

Hi,

You may want to read up on Wikipedia's policy on original research before you incorrectly label someone's good-faith edit as a "blockable offence"; doesn't mention that anywhere. Secondly, you've probably been around here long enough to know that citations don't belong in the lead of an article. Granted, the body of the article should mention the bit about being the second longest -- but everything else is there. Thanks, —MelbourneStartalk 11:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

You're right. That was uncalled for. It seems to contradict the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy, which says: All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution... Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
It's mentioned elsewhere on Wikipedia that only Whitlam served longer as Federal leader of the ALP. I thought it was important to include, because a person wouldn't last that long in the modern era. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
I'll dig up a source, and I'll add it to the article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

TFA

March
... with thanks from QAI

Thank you for Project E, "about the US supplying nuclear weapons to the UK forces during the Cold War. It was the first of a series of nuclear sharing agreements; subsequently weapons were supplied on similar terms to Belgium, Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:25, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

18:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Abby Cubillo

On 27 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abby Cubillo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Abby Cubillo is the first woman born and raised in the Northern Territory to play in the Women's National Basketball League? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abby Cubillo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Abby Cubillo), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

ITN recognition for Ed Westcott

On 1 April 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ed Westcott, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

16:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NAB AFLW 2019 logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NAB AFLW 2019 logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final

Hello! Your submission of 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Teratix 10:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history)
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for January to March 2019 reviews. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:35, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

18:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Comment on Kim Clijsters FAC?

Hi Hawkeye7, I nominated Kim Clijsters as an FAC a few weeks ago, but I've been struggling to attract reviewers. Seeing that you have worked on a lot of other women's sport articles, I was wondering if you could help me out and leave comments. Thank you, Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Sure. I'll have a look. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

23:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Finger on the button WP

https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Finger-on-the-Nuclear-Button.pdf

FYI. Interesting the paer posits UK PM doesn't really need CDS approval to launch nuclear strike.

BlueD954 (talk) 03:37, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Barnstar for you

The ISSstar
For the amazing work getting Apollo 11, Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins to FA prior to the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11 (with time to spare!). Kees08 (Talk) 05:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


FACBot FL closures

Hi Hawkeye, just wondered if you knew if there was a reason that several closed FLCs have remained unarchived by FACBot? Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

The coordinator marked two of them as "unsuccessful", and the FACBot did not know what that meant. I've instructed the FACBot that this is a failure so it will know from now on, and started a manual run at 1917K. The two were processed. I think everything is okay now. Let me know if there are any more problems. It is a public holiday here so I am on a laptop. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Good topic

It looks like with your 1966 NASA T-38 crash, along with my Elliot See and Charles Bassett, we have a good topic. Would you be interested in proposing it? Kees08 (Talk) 06:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Sure. I can do that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final

Hello! Your submission of 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mercury Seven

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mercury Seven you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:20, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mercury Seven

The article Mercury Seven you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mercury Seven for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 00:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final

Hello! Your submission of 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:31, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
  • Wales Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
  • Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
  • Kingdom of Prussia Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by Chicago Barkeep49 with six GAs, United States Ceranthor, England Lee Vilenski, and Saskatchewan Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and Denmark MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Child prodigies

Fermi is included in List of child prodigies. You might be interested in this discussion about the proposal to abolish the Category:Child prodigies‎. Rathfelder (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals update #031, 01 May 2019

Back to the drawing board

Implementation of the new portal design has been culled back almost completely, and the cull is still ongoing. The cull has also affected portals that existed before the development of the automated design.

Some of the reasons for the purge are:

  • Portals receive insufficient traffic, making it a waste of editor resources to maintain them, especially for narrow-scope or "micro" portals
  • The default {{bpsp}} portals are redundant with the corresponding articles, being based primarily on the corresponding navigation footer displayed on each of those articles, and therefore not worth separate pages to do so
  • They were mass created

Most of the deletions have been made without prejudice to recreation of curated portals, so that approval does not need to be sought at Deletion Review in those cases.

In addition to new portals being deleted, most of the portals that were converted to an automated design have been reverted.

Which puts us back to portals with manually selected content, that need to be maintained by hand, for the most part, for the time being, and back facing some of the same problems we had when we were at this crossroads before:

  • Manually maintained portals are not scalable (they are labor intensive, and there aren't very many editors available to maintain them)
  • The builders/maintainers tend to eventually abandon them
  • Untended handcrafted portals go stale and fall into disrepair over time

These and other concepts require further discussion. See you at WT:POG.

However, after the purge/reversion is completed, some of the single-page portals might be left, due to having acceptable characteristics (their design varied some). If so, then those could possibly be used as a model to convert and/or build more, after the discussions on portal creation and design guidelines have reached a community consensus on what is and is not acceptable for a portal.

See you at WT:POG.

Curation

A major theme in the deletion discussions was the need for portals to be curated, that is, each one having a dedicated maintainer.

There are currently around 100 curated portals. Based on the predominant reasoning at MfD, it seems likely that all the other portals may be subject to deletion.

See you at WT:POG.

Traffic

An observation and argument that arose again and again during the WP:ENDPORTALS RfC and the ongoing deletion drive of {{bpsp}} default portals, was that portals simply do not get much traffic. Typically, they get a tiny fraction of what the corresponding like-titled articles get.

And while this isn't generally considered a good rationale for creation or deletion of articles, portals are not articles, and portal critics insist that traffic is a key factor in the utility of portals.

The implication is that portals won't be seen much, so wouldn't it be better to develop pages that are?

And since such development isn't limited to editing, almost anything is possible. If we can't bring readers to portals, we could bring portal features, or even better features, to the readers (i.e., to articles)...

Some potential future directions of development

Quantum portals?

An approach that has received some brainstorming is "quantum portals", meaning portals generated on-the-fly and presented directly on the view screen without any saved portal pages. This could be done by script or as a MediaWiki program feature, but would initially be done by script. The main benefits of this is that it would be opt-in (only those who wanted it would install it), and the resultant generated pages wouldn't be saved, so that there wouldn't be anything to maintain except the script itself.

Non-portal integrated components

Another approach would be to focus on implementing specific features independently, and provide them somewhere highly visible in a non-portal presentation context (that is, on a page that wasn't a portal that has lots of traffic, i.e., articles). Such as inserted directly into an article's HTML, as a pop-up there, or as a temporary page. There are scripts that use these approaches (providing unrelated features), and so these approaches have been proven to be feasible.

What kind of features could this be done with?

The various components of the automated portal design are transcluded excerpts, news, did you know, image slideshows, excerpt slideshows, and so on.

Some of the features, such as navigation footers and links to sister projects are already included on article pages. And some already have interface counterparts (such as image slideshows). Some of the rest may be able to be integrated directly via script, but may need further development before they are perfected. Fortunately, scripts are used on an opt-in basis, and therefore wouldn't affect readers-in-general and editors-at-large during the development process (except for those who wanted to be beta testers and installed the scripts).

The development of such scripts falls under the scope of the Javascript-WikiProject/Userscript-department, and will likely be listed on Wikipedia:User scripts/List when completed enough for beta-testing. Be sure to watchlist that page.

Where would that leave curated portals?

Being curated. At least for the time being.

New encyclopedia program features will likely eventually render most portals obsolete. For example, the pop-up feature of MediaWiki provides much the same functionality as excerpts in portals already, and there is also a slideshow feature to view all the images on the current page (just click on any image, and that activates the slideshow). Future features could also overlap portal features, until there is nothing that portals provide that isn't provided elsewhere or as part of Wikipedia's interface.

But, that may be a ways off. Perhaps months or years. It depends on how rapidly programmers develop them.

Keep on keepin' on

The features of Wikipedia and its articles will continue to evolve, even if Portals go by the wayside. Most, if not all of portals' functionality, or functions very similar, will likely be made available in some form or other.

And who knows what else?

No worries.

Until next issue...    — The Transhumanist   01:17, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

16:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final

On 8 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 53,034 people watched the 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final, a record attendance for a standalone women's sporting event in Australia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2019 AFL Women's Grand Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 AFL Women's Grand Final), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NASA Astronaut Group 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Command module (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

FACBot

Hello. First of all, thank you for promoting many articles and topics. Actually, I have a question about FACBot: Is there anything manual/semi-auto about it? I mean, is it completely automated? And also, is it easy to port bot's source to another wiki? We have some difficulty adding {{Article History}} in fawiki and I think your code is a perfect tool to make it easier. Thanks in advance. AhmadTalk 05:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

The FACBot is fully automated and runs as cron jobs on Phabricator. I can run it manually from the command line when required. I never wrote it with any other wiki in mind, so it cannot run unmodified anywhere else. In particular, the name of the wiki (and Bot operator) is hard coded in the Bot.pm module. I should perhaps move this out to the config file. If the templates have different names, then that would have to be changed too. I suggest asking at WP:BOTREQ where they may be able to help you more. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:07, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for fast response. I have downloaded Perl and some other things; also checked MediaWiki::Bot; now I have a question that may seem too silly to ask: What command do you run in order to manually run the bot?! AhmadTalk 07:53, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
perl -I <library> <script> If you take your request to WP:BOTREQ, I can create a Bot run for you. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

I think FACBot is still ignoring a lot of closed FL candidates, any ideas? The Rambling Man (talk) 10:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

No errors have been reported by the FACBot, and I cannot see any either. The Featured List run occurs daily, at around 0025Z, so nothing you've done today will be processed yet. I will check again after the next run. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
There are five listings waiting, more than one of which has been there several days. I wouldn't ask about things I've done today, I'm aware of how the bot should work, cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:18, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
So what I can do is (a) inform the bot that "successful" is a "promoted" status (b) upgrade this from a remark to a warning, so the Bot will email me if it finds a status it does not recognise (I'm calling that a bug). The fixes will be in the next run. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:04, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Sounds good, thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Change made in Phabricator [63] - Bot run manually to test. All five nominations processed. [64] Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

00:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Featured article review: Albert Kesselring

I have nominated Albert Kesselring for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18

Hello Hawkeye7,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Clive Disher

On 18 May 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clive Disher, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Disher Challenge Cup, an annual rowing race, is named after Clive Disher, who rowed for the winning Australian eight in the 1919 Henley Royal Peace Regatta? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clive Disher. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Clive Disher), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NASA Astronaut Group 3, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Neptune, New Jersey, Richard Gordon and Hypoxia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

13:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

British logistics in the Normandy Campaign

Hi, To avoid cluttering Eastfarthingan's talk page, I'm replying here to note that I'll review this article, most likely over the weekend. I'm looking forward to seeing how its developed since the GAN. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

MilHistBot

Hey Hawkeye, I noticed that the bot is tracking Sturmvogel incorrectly in the ACM tracking page - see here, there are two different Sturmvogels, one with an underscore and one without. I haven't looked to see if any other editors are affected, but I figured I should pass it along in case there's something in the code that needs to be fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 11:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 4

Hello! Your submission of NASA Astronaut Group 4 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NASA Astronaut Group 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apollo 18 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

15:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

To photo? Or not to photo? That is the question.
Whether to spiff up the main page, or to maximize page views.
And is that a false choice?
What is best for Wikipedia in the long term?
Your counsel would be welcome.
Thanks for the timely review. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen () 21:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Believe it or not, I nearly added the photo to the nom, but decided to defer to you. I presumed that you wanted readers to click to see the photo, but you will get more page views with a lead image. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:15, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
I was conflicted when I drafted it. I added ALT1. Please take a look. Needs to have the picture placed in the nomination and get a new ping. It's a fabulous photo. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen () 02:06, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the B class rating. It is now a fairly comprehensive article. I'm pleased with it. If we could get it to GA, there is an award for raising it from the depths. 7&6=thirteen () 02:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

15:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Notice

The file File:Army Ground Forces patch.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 4

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NASA Astronaut Group 4 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rose Hollermann

Hello! Your submission of Rose Hollermann at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 10:45, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Astronaut portraits

I use the astronaut portrait guide to get the ID numbers, then plug them into the NASA Image and Video Library to get the highest resolution photos available. Not sure if you knew about the portrait guide, I only found it recently myself. Kees08 (Talk) 07:19, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Four Award

Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on British logistics in the Normandy Campaign. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NASA Astronaut Group 5, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dickinson County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frank Borman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frank Borman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frank Borman

The article Frank Borman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frank Borman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 14:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

20:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 4

The article NASA Astronaut Group 4 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 4 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations!!

Hey, Hawkeye7. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Mjs1991 (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Oh wow. It's been 14 years. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:30, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Frank Borman DYK

I have requested July 1 date for Frank Borman with the hope of getting him a photo spot. It is the date he entered West Point and also the anniversary of his retirement from NASA. He will be the tip of the spear for July. Of course, you can request any other date. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 07:35, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Neil Armstrong scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Neil Armstrong article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 21, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 21, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors up to the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

@Jimfbleak: Disappointed. A lot of effort went into getting Apollo 11 ready for this date. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:12, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry to read that. This article was nominated by your co-editor, Kees8, at WP:TFAR and well supported there, so I would be a bit high-handed to ignore that, especially as there was no request for Apollo 11 either there or at WP:TFARP Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
That's funny..I thought Hawkeye7 was the one that wanted Armstrong as TFA, I just looked for that discussion and either I cannot find it or it does not exist (I'll just assume the latter). I actually preferred to have Apollo 11 at TFA on that date... The RfC seems to prefer Apollo 11 over Armstrong as the TFA as well. I have no issue with that, and would prefer it. Sorry for the confusion, perhaps we can make the switch. Kees08 (Talk) 07:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
It was my understanding that Neil Armstrong was the first choice for July 21. I am real sad to hear that you are disappointed. I pinged you so many times to join the discussion at WP:S2019 that I started to feel that I was pestering you. But we made several plans based on the assumption that Neil would be the TFA. I also fought hard to get an FP of the famous photo of Aldrin on the moon and nominated it for TFP for July 21. See Template:POTD/2019-07-21 where the Apollo 11 article is the focus. If this worked against your wishes, I am really really sorry. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 07:50, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 4

Hello! Your submission of NASA Astronaut Group 4 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NASA Astronaut Group 5, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

17:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for NASA Astronaut Group 4

On 28 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article NASA Astronaut Group 4, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that NASA Astronaut Group 4, selected in 1965 for the Apollo program, was the first recruited primarily on the basis of scientific experience? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NASA Astronaut Group 4. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, NASA Astronaut Group 4), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Frank Borman

On 30 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frank Borman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after retirement from NASA, astronaut Frank Borman (pictured) became a special advisor to Eastern Air Lines, and helped rescue survivors of the Eastern Air Lines Flight 401 crash near Florida's Everglades? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frank Borman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Frank Borman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

Hello Hawkeye7,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

For repair and maintenence work.

The Featured Article Medal
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the sterling work you are doing on maintaining the Featured Article status of Albert Kesselring. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:37, 30 June 2019 (UTC)


The June 2019 Signpost is out!

Hi

Re. [90]. Why not try again, if you still want to do admin? Alanscottwalker (talk) 22:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

I still want to admin, and intend to try again. I was waiting for the current drama to die down. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:23, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi Hawkeye I was just thinking the same thing! Koala-gate being a long time ago now. Also I've been meaning to thank/congratulate you on all your moonshot related work - lots of good/featured articles are now ready for the big anniversary on July 20. Way to embiggen the wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

21:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter

The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • Norfolk Island Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
  • South Carolina Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
  • United States Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia, the free encylcopedia anyone can edit

Wikipedia is written collaboratively by largely anonymous volunteers who write without pay. Anyone with Internet access can write and make changes to Wikipedia articles, except in limited cases where editing is restricted to prevent disruption or vandalism. Users can contribute anonymously, under a pseudonym, or, if they choose to, with their real identity. The fundamental principles by which Wikipedia operates are the five pillars. The Wikipedia community has developed many policies and guidelines to improve the encyclopedia; however, it is not a formal requirement to be familiar with them before contributing. from Wikipedia:About 5Ept5xW (talk) 02:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 6 reviews between April and June 2019 Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 02:48, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space


DYK for Teisha Shadwell

On 6 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Teisha Shadwell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that wheelchair basketball player Teisha Shadwell raised money for a custom-built chair on GoFundMe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Teisha Shadwell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Teisha Shadwell), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Wow. Has it been that long already? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Do you think seven years is long? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Yes indeed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 12:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

20:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

For some reason I've always thought that Cernan flew the Apollo 10 Lunar Module alone, so thanks for the correction and the change to my incorrect mental map of the Apollo missions. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:14, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Half-Million Award for Michael Collins

The Half Million Award
For your contributions to bring Michael Collins (astronaut) (estimated annual readership: 561,574) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

In recognition of your work as a major contributor to Michael Collins (astronaut), a level-5 vital article, and seeing this article through a review to become a Physics and astronomy biography featured article. Thanks for your work on this high-readership article! – Reidgreg (talk) 14:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

I noticed that you and Kees08 already have the MA userboxes and are on the Hall of Fame list for Neil Armstrong, John Glenn, Apollo 11 and Buzz Aldrin. Would you like me to verify and award those as well? – Reidgreg (talk) 14:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Sure. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

I thought for a few minutes that there was a problem with John Glenn; that article's readership went down significantly in 2018 but it more than qualifies for the year before it made FA, which is the metric used for MA.

The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Neil Armstrong (estimated annual readership: 1,920,938) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The Million Award
For your contributions to bring John Glenn (estimated annual readership: 2,003,876) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Apollo 11 (estimated annual readership: 2,021,546) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Buzz Aldrin (estimated annual readership: 1,491,903) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Awarded to Hawkeye7 and Kees08, who are leading authors (1234) of all four articles and saw them through their featured article reviews. These four featured articles are each listed as a level-5 or better vital article and they have had a total of 65 main page appearances, attesting to their importance to the Wikipedia community. Congratulations, and thank-you for this service to the Wikipedia readership! – Reidgreg (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Abby Dunkin

On 13 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abby Dunkin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Abby Dunkin was one of three University of Texas at Arlington players selected as members of the All Star Five at the 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abby Dunkin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Abby Dunkin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 3

Hello! Your submission of NASA Astronaut Group 3 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

EngvarB Q

What's the matter with EngvarB? I haven't heard of any problems with it before. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Per template:EngvarB: An article tagged with one of the specific language templates must never be changed to {{EngvarB}}. There is no legitimate reason to do so. {{EngvarB}} is a cleanup template applied by bots to articles where the national variety of English cannot be automatically determined from the text. It signals to bots that the variety is unknown, and they will add according to their own defaults. The idea is that the article maintainers should go through the article, remove the anomalous spellings, and tag it with the correct variety of English. Per WP:ENGVAR, once this is done, the bots and human editors must respect the specified variety of English. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Wish I'd found out about this sooner, I've used it as a tidy-up device. I thought that it was a newer version of the BritEng tag. ah well, you live and you learn. Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Isabel Martin (wheelchair basketball)

On 17 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Isabel Martin (wheelchair basketball), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Isabel Martin was one of the Australian Devils who won silver at the 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship in Suphan Buri, Thailand? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Isabel Martin (wheelchair basketball). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Isabel Martin (wheelchair basketball)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship

On 17 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Isabel Martin was one of the Australian Devils who won silver at the 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship in Suphan Buri, Thailand? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 Women's U25 Wheelchair Basketball World Championship), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for NASA Astronaut Group 2

On 18 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article NASA Astronaut Group 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that six of the Next Nine astronauts flew to the Moon, and three walked on it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NASA Astronaut Group 2. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, NASA Astronaut Group 2), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for NASA Astronaut Group 3

On 20 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article NASA Astronaut Group 3, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that four of the fourteen astronauts in NASA Astronaut Group 3 were killed in training accidents before they had a chance to fly in space? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NASA Astronaut Group 3. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, NASA Astronaut Group 3), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Michael Collins (astronaut)

On 21 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Michael Collins (astronaut), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Michael Collins (pictured), the command module pilot for Apollo 11, was the first person to perform two spacewalks in a single mission? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michael Collins (astronaut). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Michael Collins (astronaut)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, you have to wait another day to record the July 21 page views for this page, since that formula which deducts the pageviews on the days before and after needs to be implemented. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kerstin von Lingen

Hello! Your submission of Kerstin von Lingen at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kim Post (talk) 18:22, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Project Rover

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Project Rover you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:21, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Project Rover

The article Project Rover you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Project Rover for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Neil Davey

On 27 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Neil Davey, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Stephen 22:28, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice

The file File:Volunteers Decoration ribbon.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

Your GA nomination of NERVA

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NERVA you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NASA Astronaut Group 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 5

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NASA Astronaut Group 5 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 3

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NASA Astronaut Group 3 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Might a hatting be in order?

Hi Hawkeye7,

I was surprised at the tone of this response to you. My thought is that we were informative, but that you were not reciprocated by the asker. I am prepared to hat this whole thing, but I suspect that you are easygoing about it. Probably we could let this all pass, in silence.

But I could act. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 23:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Will you run for administrator?

Hi Hawkeye I've kept an eye on you (as you know) for a while and I think you'd make a fine admin. Would you consider running? Any talk-page stalkers who are interested in co-nominating, please speak up. I'm always happy to share. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I would very much like to run. I appreciate your confidence in me. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:56, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Great. I'll start working on an RfA page over the next few days. It won't be done in a hurry. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:15, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
There's no rush. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I would be very happy to co-nom, Dweller, but would happily step aside if someone with greater credibility was to offer. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Happy to have you and anyone else. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:46, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

The RfA is beginning to take shape at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hawkeye7 3. Anyone wishing to co-nom can add their nominations. Please don't participate in any other way yet. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:00, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

13:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 2

The article NASA Astronaut Group 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 08:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 3

The article NASA Astronaut Group 3 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 3 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 02:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Rose Hollermann

On 12 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rose Hollermann, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rose Hollermann (pictured) was the youngest player on the Team USA women's wheelchair basketball team at the 2016 Summer Paralympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rose Hollermann. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rose Hollermann), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Nominating you for admin

--Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Nope nope nope

I don't agree one bit with your last revert : not only are you deleting valuable information, that was correctly accompanied with a citation needed tag, but your reasons are shady.

Editors are forbidden from adding unsourced material.

I didn't see the forbidden part anywhere in the guidelines, especially when it was clearly written that a citation was needed. And ultimately, since information is lost by your revert and the article linked was very explanatory of the subject, that falls for me in IAR.

Unsourced material in not allowed at all in A-classd articles. 

Wikipedia:Content assessment: "It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources." Don't see the not allowed either.

Last thing : I already corrected a non negligeable amount of information in this article just by looking in the official decrees. That is strange for a good article. So, I revert back.

CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 21:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

WP:V: Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. How about just finding a source?
I was going to ask you if you would be interested in co-nominating the article for FAC?
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Just thanks for all the great work you do around here. Among others, I happened to read/enjoy the Buzz Aldrin article recently, after seeing First Man (not the most flattering portrayal, I imagine, but oh well). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Timing is everything?

I don't usually look at RFA, so missed the start. I'm not going to post at this point, but would like you to know that what I said in 2016 still holds. Risker (talk) 16:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Risker I think having an Arb who voted for the desysop to add their voice to NYB who opposed it, would be valuable. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Albert Kesselring featured article review

Hi, I note that you've notified MILHIST about the FARC: [115]. Could you please notify the rest of the projects listed at the top of the nomination: WP History; WP Germany; etc: Wikipedia:Featured article review/Albert Kesselring/archive1? --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

I have notified WP Biography, Germany, MilHist and Aviation, the four projects that have declared that the article is in their scope. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

RfA and edit summaries

I am not sure what's going on but the Xtools edit summaries report does give you the mainspace edit summary usage of 46.7% for all mainspace edits, and 45.6% for major mainspace edits. Nsk92 (talk) 23:03, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Looking at your article space edits from today, I do see quite a few edits that in the edit history appear as not having edit summaries. E.g. [116] [117][118] [119][120] [121] [122][123][124][125][126]. All of these edits have a notation "Tag: PHP7". I am not sure if the tag has any significance, as plenty of your other edits, with edit summaries, have the same tag. Still, it is possible that something related PHP7 to is not working right. Nsk92 (talk) 00:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
They all have edit summaries. The first one is "Safety tests", the second is "Biography". I don't know what the tag means. My preferences have "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" set. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Those aren't edit summaries. They are pre-existing section headers. If an edit is made without an edit summary, it is shown in the edit history by a greyed-out section header. E.g. this edit that I just made here on my own user page [127]. The same is true for all of your edits whose diffs I listed above. ""Biography", "Safesty tests", etc are section headers that were already there before, prior to your edits. When a new section is created by an edit, it is shown in the edit history by its new greyed-out name followed by bright black phrase "new section", e.g. here [128]. Nsk92 (talk) 10:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
The sections have been added by my edits. The editor preferences setting regards them as edit summaries. If we want to regard them as otherwise, then the editor preferences will need to be changed first. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
It does not matter who created the section originally. When you made the edits linked in the diffs in my original post above, all the sections that you mention already existed in these articles. The "Safety tests" section in the "Project Rover" article, for example, was created by you on August 8 in this edit [129]. But in this edit of yours of August 12[130] the section had already existed for several days, and your edit did not include an edit summary. Note that if a section had already existed in an article prior to a particular edit, the greyed-out name of that section is always shown by the system in the edit history log, regardless of whether the edit was manual or automatic. An actual edit summary, if it is included at all, is always shown in bright black. Nsk92 (talk) 11:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Note that this point is explicitly explained in Help:Edit summary#Section editing and Help:Edit summary#Automatic summaries. Nsk92 (talk) 11:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Pedantic note: the section name is not "always shown", even if you click the "edit section" button. It's just inserted into the edit summary as a default. It can be added, removed or altered (as I'm doing in this edit). It's no less a part of the "actual edit summary" then any other code which the system automatically formats (e.g. blue links). — Bilorv (talk) 23:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Yes, the edit summary counters don't count the automated summaries, while the preference does. It is a bit inconsistent (and maybe there should be a feature request for extended preferences). The auto summaries that state which section you are editing are better than nothing, but of course not as good as really describing what you do by hand. —Kusma (t·c) 11:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Harold Finger

Hello! Your submission of Harold Finger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thincat (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm probably being a bit fussy and it may not strictly be a DYK matter anyway. I'll keep watching and give a tick asap. Best wishes. Thincat (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NASA Astronaut Group 5

The article NASA Astronaut Group 5 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:NASA Astronaut Group 5 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 07:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


This is to let you know that Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 19 August 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 19, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 15:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Oh. It's the only Paralympic featured article, and I was hoping that it could be run during the 2020 Paralympics in Tokyo. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the article, with "drama and controversy, triumph and heartbreak" - and for that steady flow of GAs below, amazing! I have a peer review open btw. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

15:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Re: Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics

Hello.

Instead of repeatedly making the same change, maybe you should propose changing the article names – especially since you think there's a grammatical error.

Cheers.

HandsomeFella (talk) 08:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

The Military history A-Class cross
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class cross for Apollo 11, Buzz Aldrin, Michael Collins (astronaut), Elliot See, and 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Harold Finger

On 22 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harold Finger, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1960s, Harold Finger was in charge of the development of NASA's nuclear rocket and nuclear power systems, including generators left on the Moon by Apollo missions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harold Finger. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Harold Finger), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of NERVA

The article NERVA you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:NERVA for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 07:41, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Relax!

Congratulations on getting so far on the RFA. But you just did not make it. So to relax, here is a cup of tea!

Here is a cup of tea!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyatt2049 (talkcontribs) 10:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Tim Fischer

On 22 August 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tim Fischer, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Ad Orientem (talk) 21:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Project Rover

On 23 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project Rover, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the 1960s and 1970s, Project Rover tested nuclear-powered rocket engines (example pictured) at the Nuclear Rocket Development Station at Jackass Flats? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Rover. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Project Rover), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Trinity nuclear test.

I'm not really clear on why I have to convince you of anything... Have you ever even been there? I have and have worked @ Los Alamos. did you check my source ? It was a test... it was a proof-of-concept... it wasn't a weapon, it wasn't weaponized, it wasn't deliverable as a weapon. The main header of the page calls it a test... The rest of this overly simplistic page repeatedly refers to trinity as a test...They had to test it to see if it would work as a weapon.... The first paragraph of this page is incorrect, wrong, just plain bullshit. Instead, I'd like to see you provide a single source that claims that it was a deliverable weapon in the form used at Trinity. Schreddley (talk) 06:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Trinity was the first large scale test of fissionable material...Hiroshima was the first test of a nuclear weapon...get your facts straight. Schreddley (talk) 07:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

All that was required to weaponise it was to add the ballistic casing... What if we change "nuclear weapon" to "nuclear device"? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:23, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Hawkeye, I still have to disagree... due to the sheer size, shape, and especially weight, the Trinity device was not deliverable as a weapon. Not withstanding that it was hard wired and had to be detonated via hardwiring... Not until the plutonium impact device configuration, using altimeter activated detonators and being in a shape and at a weight that could be dropped from a B-29, was it a weapon. And I also apologize for getting cheated in my prior response... I was at a loss to understand why my corrections on a Wikipedia page keep getting deleted. Schreddley (talk) 07:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Heated, not cheated...sorry. Schreddley (talk) 07:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

And the verbiage correction is fine, IMO. Schreddley (talk) 07:12, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

And if you ever make it to Las Vegas, I'll take you out to the Nevada test site.  ;-) Schreddley (talk) 07:20, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I may take you up on that. :) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for making yourself available. These ordeals are not for the faint of heart. Being desysopped was a major hurdle but not an insurmountable one. Reflect upon the comments (some are helpful some are not) and remember that the majority supported your RFA. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

I second that. Deb (talk) 13:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
I would vote for you again tomorrow, but I don't know how long it will take before you can get consensus. As you well know, 98% of most admin's contributions do not require the bit. --rogerd (talk) 17:13, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Sad to see the outcome, Hawkeye. You would make a great admin (again). Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
  • Supported you, and not a very wise result from the community. Yet to be honest I was hoping you'd even decline to run, because as we go even further into the Apollo missions 50th anniversaries it's been a pleasure seeing your large body of work on spaceflight pages, your continuing fine edits, and your courteous use of your knowledge in answering questions and shepherding articles as they become even better. Nice work, and thanks. The admins staff loss is spaceflight articles gain, and not a better time than now to be a part of that. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • I was sorry to see the outcome. We haven't always agreed but you've always been civil, and civility is an important trait in an administrator. Figureofnine (talkcontribs) 17:11, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
  • I feel you've demonstrated reliability and good judgement over and over. I'm tickled to support you. I often disagree with folks I respect here, but this outcome was just sad for the project IMHO. Please keep on. We all need you. You have my trust. BusterD (talk) 20:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Do not revert my edits without explaining why you are doing that. See WP:REVEXP. Your behaviour is rude and highly disruptive. Doktor Rotkod (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Do not remove sourced material from an article and then tag it with a {{fact}} asking for the source you just removed to be provided. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Appreciation

Good day, I just wanted to drop a note to say that your contributions are appreciated. I always enjoy reading your FAC submissions. Oh, and the bot obviously makes my job a lot easier. I'm planning a trip to Melbourne, Canberra, and Sydney this (my winter, your summer). --Laser brain (talk) 17:42, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

It would be great to see you. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Allen F. Donovan

On 30 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Allen F. Donovan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Allen F. Donovan worked for the Manhattan Project on the design of the shape of the Fat Man atomic bomb? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Allen F. Donovan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Allen F. Donovan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

DYK for NASA Astronaut Group 5

On 31 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article NASA Astronaut Group 5, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bruce McCandless II (pictured) flew in space for the first time in February 1984, nearly eighteen years after being chosen as a member of NASA Astronaut Group 5? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NASA Astronaut Group 5. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, NASA Astronaut Group 5), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Well done, sir. Well done.

A very provocative and well narrated tale, proving itself worthy of authentic, earnest discussion by editors with skin in the game. Good job, my friend. Proud of you. BusterD (talk) 03:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bernard Adolph Schriever

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bernard Adolph Schriever you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

b dam

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/73712/is-there-some-difference-between-north-east-and-northeast

You win, 15-4, south-west notwithstanding.--Brogo13 (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Well you had me reaching for the style guide over further vs farther. The British hyphenated form of "south west" was officially eliminated from Australian English many decades ago. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution

The Signpost Barnstar
For being the Op-Ed contributor for the August, 2019 edition of The Signpost. Thanks for making the effort to share your thoughts and analysis. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kerstin von Lingen

Hello! Your submission of Kerstin von Lingen at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

09:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bernard Adolph Schriever

The article Bernard Adolph Schriever you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bernard Adolph Schriever for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Toby Graham

On 9 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Toby Graham, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that military historian Dominick Graham was a prisoner of war in Italy during World War II, and later returned as a member of the British Olympic skiing team? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Toby Graham. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Toby Graham), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 01:37, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2019





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

Hello Hawkeye7,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Kesselring

I plan to add some information about Kesselring's detrimental influence on the German air campaign during the Battle of Britain. It will shed some light on the mysterious decision—decisions often portrayed as Hitler's—to shift strategy to London. The article is a little thin there. Any objections? Dapi89 (talk) 20:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Sure. Go for it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
I've tried to do as little rewriting as possible. Most of the memoir info can be attributed to other sources. Have a look. Any issues letme know. Dapi89 (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Have

you been paid in any form or manner, (including but not limited to monetary reimbursements), by the Australian Paralympic Committee or allies thereof, for contributing to the domain of Paralympics related articles (broadly construed), within the last 3 years? Regards, WBGconverse 19:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Winged Blades of Godric, you will need an extremely good reason for asking such a question, otherwise it is blatant harassment and casting aspersions. Hawkeye is of course perfectly entitled to ignore it altogether. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
@Kudpung: there is, in my very strong opinion, good and sufficient reason to ask this of him and many others. The evidence is buried in the FRAMGATE materials. I, personally, would not have asked just yet and would have asked for 2011 on (the year of the first tender). Winged Blades of Godric is certainly not out of line to ask or even, in my opinion, to go to Arbcom. Jbh Talk 22:51, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Allow me to second what Jbhunley has said. A major investigation needs to be undertaken. I anticipate strong opposition from the WMF, but I hope (probably unrealistically) that our own community will recognize the severity of the situation. Lepricavark (talk) 23:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm not suggesting for a moment that the issue is not serious, and it does indeed require mature investigation, but without providing a rationale for asking the question on a user's talk page, together with the attempted misleading thread title, I find the post disingenuous. I will remind Hawkeye again, in case he feels he is being intimidated, that he is under no obligation to answer and is perfectly entitled to ignore it or even remove it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hawkeye7 has never edited the Paralympics Australia page nor ever edited the Paralympics Australia awards page, or the main Paralympics page, so there's that and I just want to let page lookers know before rumors fly further afield. If there is something then WBG has in good faith let the cat run out of the bag, but the main articles and the awards article have nothing by Hawkeye7. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Rumors?! I wanted to know of something, pursuant to our local policies, and Hawkeye has appropriately responded below. That's it. WBGconverse 03:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
A random admin's inability to see evidence does not hinder my right to ask questions. Also, the next time you are slapping a COI/UPE template on anyone's t/p without explicitly detailing your investigation, expect me to claim that you are harassing newbies. And, yeah, I have a perennial (bad) habit of putring the first word of my query in the section header; a cursory glance at my u/t/p edits will lead you to conclude that I am not dishing out some special treatment to Hawkeye. Ta, WBGconverse 03:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
I haven't gotten anything from the Australian Paralympic Committee (APC) since 2016. My trip to the World Wheelchair Basketball Championships in Hamburg in 2018 was paid for by myself and WMF. The APC issued me media accrediation for the Pyeong Chang Winter Paralympic Games in South Korea in 2018 but I did not attend due to work committments.
Going back to 2011, I had media accrediation for the London Paralympic Games in 2012 and Rio Paralympic Games in 2016 through the APC and Wikimedia Australia. For London I got a backpack, baseball cap and polo shirt from the APC, which we had to wear, and some items from the IPC media kit issued to all media reps. For Rio I only got the latter, so I wore my 2012 gear. HOPAU held regular meet-ups around Australia between 2011 and 2018. APC and UQ paid for transportation and accomodation to the HOPAU meet-ups in Brisbane in 2014, Adelaide in 2015 and Perth in 2016. The last was in Sydney in 2018, which I paid for myself. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much for such an open and detailed answer. Jbh Talk 01:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you and I highly appreciate your reply. WBGconverse 03:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Hawkeye7 addressed some of this during their recent RfA:
  • My second area in the articles on the Paralympics. I was asked to join the History of the Paralympics in Australia (HOPAU) project by John Vandenberg (talk · contribs) in 2011. Nearly a thousand articles have been created and hundreds of images uploaded in collaboration with the Australian Paralympic Committee. I attended the 2012 Paralympic Games in London and the 2016 Paralympic Games in Rio as an accredited media representative, and have been involved in workshops and training courses all over Australia. (The admin toolkit would have been very useful here.) My work on the warranted Wikipedia a rare mention in Hansard. I am most proud of the article I wrote on the Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics. It is one of a kind: the only Paralympic article with FA status.
  • Disclosures
I have never edited for pay. I have two bot accounts, User:FACBot and User:MilHistBot.
-- ToE 16:13, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
This was part of the GLAM program. John Vandenberg, Tony Naar, Tara MacPhail and I discussed the HOPAU project with Sue Gartner in 2013. I wrote about iyt on the Wikimedia blog. [143] Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Birthday coming up 18 November ... would you like to see him on TFAP? - Dank (push to talk) 16:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

It will be his 97th birthday; his 100th won't be until 2023. The 50th anniversary of his moonwalk is in February 2021, and the 60th anniversary of his first trip into space is in July 2021. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
I don't have a preference, just wanted to mention the birthday. We've got Collins late in October. Any of those dates sound good. - Dank (push to talk) 20:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to stop by and say great work on the Toby Graham article! I went on vacation and was very surprised to see the development on the article when I was gone! Any plans to bring it to GA? Canadian Paul 19:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

I didn't have any plans to do so since it has already run at DYK. We can nominate it if you like. To improve the article further, I would need to locate a copy of his autobiography. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Interesting. I'll see if I can get access to a copy. Canadian Paul 22:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Albert Kesselring

Hi Hawkeye, could you please respond at Talk:Albert_Kesselring#Reverts? Thanks, Sunrise (talk) 14:59, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Michael Collins (astronaut) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Michael Collins (astronaut) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 31, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 31, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted on or after October 1, 2018, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Bernard Adolph Schriever

On 22 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bernard Adolph Schriever, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Bernard Schriever (pictured) was promoted to general in 1961, General Curtis LeMay looked at his four stars and said that had it been up to him, Schriever would not be wearing them? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bernard Adolph Schriever. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bernard Adolph Schriever), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

A Favor

When you get a moment can you check the post election section at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Academy/Becoming a coordinator? I know we update the ping system to account for new coordinators so when you drop the @-MILHIST tab everyone get a ping, but I was less sure about how exactly MilHistBot tells the coordinators from the non-coordinators and I don't want to be accused of misleading anyone reading the essay by not checking with the actual bot operator to gets his two cents on the matter, so if its right its cool and if not you can adjust accordingly - or remove the whole thing if need be. TomStar81 (Talk) 13:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Originally it looked in Category:WikiProject Military history coordinators, but I have recently changed it to obtain the information from Template:@MILHIST so we only have toi update one place. I have updated your documentation. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations!

The Coordinator stars
On behalf of the members of WikiProject Military history, in recognition of your election to the position of Coordinator, I take great pleasure in presenting you with the Coordinator's stars, and wish you the best luck in the coming year! Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Welcome Back! TomStar81 (Talk) 07:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

16:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between July and September 2019. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space


15:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi... Could you please so kind to participate in request for comment on Template talk:Infobox military unit. Thanks.(Ckfasdf (talk) 01:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC))

This Month in GLAM: September 2019





Headlines
  • Colombia report: The GLAM team from Wikimedia Colombia in OpenConLatAm
  • Finland report: Photographs and events
  • France report: European Heritage Days
  • Indonesia report: Image donation by Indonesian Air Force
  • Italy report: Wikimedia Italia Summer School
  • Sweden report: Open cultural heritage; More libraries in Africa on Wikidata; Global MIL Week 2019 Feature Conference; Kulturhistoria som gymnasiearbete; Wiki Loves Monuments
  • UK report: Oxford, Khalili Collections and Endangered Archives
  • USA report: Hispanic Heritage and Disability Awareness Month
  • Special story: Help the Movement Learn about Content Campaigns & Supporting newcomers in Wikidata training courses!
  • Wikidata report: Tie a knot in your handkerchief
  • WMF GLAM report: GLAM Manager Role Announced!
  • Calendar: October's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Japanese monographs

G'day, Hawkeye, I have been doing a bit of work on the Borneo campaign (1945) article and a couple of the associated battles (Beaufort and Balikpapan). I have been trying to get my hands on a copy of Japanese Monograph Number 26: Borneo Operations 1941–1945, but haven't had much luck online or in my local library. Just wondering if you either have a copy, or know whether it is online, or accessible in some other way? Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

I have a copy of that one. Email me and I will send it to you. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, Hawkeye, I've sent you an email now. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Could you please also send me a copy? I'll ping you an email. The copy I relied on was destroyed when the Chifley Library at the ANU flooded last year. Nick-D (talk) 00:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
@AustralianRupert: I didn't get your email, although Nick-D's came through. You can try downloading it from here Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, not sure what's happened to the email - I used the "Email this user" link on your talk page. Anyway, the download worked; thanks for setting this up. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Pine Gap book review

Hi mate, I might be having a bad day but not certain what you mean by (For some value of "jointly")... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:00, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Mathematician talk. We often say "for some sufficiently large/small/unknown value of epsilon". In computer programming it is often abbreviated to "FSVO". cf wikt:FSVO. If we say, "the upgrade went well FSVO 'well'", then it means not very well at all. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:26, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Works for me -- tks. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

23:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Book review

Hi there. I am not a member of Wikiproject Military History, however, I read a military history book and I would like to review this book in the next edition of the Bugle. I don't know anything about this process, or whether I would be allowed to write this book review, but I was just asking because I found the book to be very interesting. I look forward to hearing a response. Thanks, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

@Willbb234: Sure. No problem. Write up your review in a user page and leave a note for the editor on the newsroom page. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Archiving of awarded ACCs

G'day Hawkeye, thought I'd let you know I've created an archive page for the awarded ACCs, it is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Awards/ACC/Archive 1. I expect some tweaking of Milhistbot is required, so I've left a couple of awards on the awards page for now so it doesn't get confused in the interim. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes, the Bot needs to know about this. I have informed it. It should work as expected now. Hawkeye7 (discuss)
Thanks Hawkeye. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

14:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hawkeye, does FACbot rely on Template:TFAFULL in any way? Based on the current discussion at WT:TFA, it looks like I'll be adding a second parameter to it, on those days when we have a Featured Topic. - Dank (push to talk) 02:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

No, it doesn't use it. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Great, thanks. - Dank (push to talk) 02:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

16:13, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

provenance

some may well be very confused by the various naming events over about almost 200 years along the coastline - a bit of dutch here, a bit of french there, (god only knows maybe other rumsfieldian unknown nationalities in various locations - dont let me start on that one there is a particularly bizarre claim of chinese settlement in a valley east of perth pre european era (gasp), I would have to offer how that happens over a beer sometime in this lifetime) and the effect is possibly a slippage of 'sense' of provenance of any of the land masses on the continent or adjacent. I had the very good fortune to have a former map librarian then phd in indian ocean maritime borders as an acquaintance in the 1990s but probably I am over-reacting. It had names, from various, but only one provenance, unless someone can contradict my understanding of the coast, they are welcome... JarrahTree 10:26, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you today for Michael Collins (astronaut), "the third man on the crew of the Apollo 11 mission. He orbited the moon in his spacecraft, Columbia. As he passed around the far side of the Moon, he became the loneliest man alive, with the nearest two people thousands of miles away, and out of radio contact with both them and mission control back on Earth. Later he built the National Air and Space Museum, one of the world's great museums." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

WikiCup 2019 November newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:

  1. Better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly Adam Cuerden (submissions) with 964 points
  2. England Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 899 points
  3. Norfolk Island Casliber (submissions) with 817 points
  4. Wales Kosack (submissions) with 691 points
  5. Washington (state) SounderBruce (submissions) with 388 points
  6. Antarctica Enwebb (submissions) with 146 points
  7. United States Usernameunique (submissions) with 145 points
  8. Indonesia HaEr48 (submissions) with 74 points

All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth 14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Ernest Graves Jr.

On 3 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ernest Graves Jr., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ernest Graves Jr. was one of four generations of his family to go to West Point, all of whom graduated first or second in their class? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ernest Graves Jr.. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ernest Graves Jr.), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

Hello Hawkeye7,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 804 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools
  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes
  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.


To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

16:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

I'll say that I am supportive of this bold turn of events. It takes a lot of guts to offer yourself up like this, and win/lose I appreciate you giving voters the option. I look forward to seeing this play out! MJLTalk 05:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of INTERFET logistics

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article INTERFET logistics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of INTERFET logistics

The article INTERFET logistics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:INTERFET logistics for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 03:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of INTERFET logistics

The article INTERFET logistics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:INTERFET logistics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:41, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2019





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Peer review of Apollo 13

A peer review for Apollo 13 has been opened at Wikipedia:Peer_review/Apollo_13/archive1, any comments you can provide would be very appreciated if you can find the time. Thanks either way. Kees08 (Talk) 16:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

20:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

MilHistBot

Hi, how do I prevent your bot from assessing a page? I tried to revert it, but it checks the page again. See here for example. This article is barely a start, but the bot thinks it's "C".

The Bot will only attempt to assess the article if it does not have a complete assessment checklist. To override its assessment, all you need to do is alter the checklist. In this case, since you feel that the article is not comprehensive enough, change the b2 assessment to "no" and the class to "Start". (I would have given it a C myself.) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Einstein's letter to Roosevelt on atomic bomb

Hi, I saw your old edition, do you know if 1939 Einstein's letter to Roosevelt was known to the great public in the 50's ? I don't find any mention in french newspapers and I wondered if Einstein contribution to the launch of atomic era was stated clearly in the newsweek 1946's paper you mention, or in that 1947 time magazine edition. Einstein is often mentioned in french newspapers of 45-55 in relation to atomic bomb but as some sort of moralist asking for regulation and trying to avoid the destruction of human kind. Reuns (talk) 20:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

You mean the 1946 Time magazine with the cover showing a portrait of Einstein with a mushroom cloud from the Operation Crossroads test bearing the legend "E = mc2"? It says:

Albert Einstein did not work directly on the atom bomb. When the serpent of necessity hissed, the men and the woman who bit into the apple of scientific good & evil bore different names: Dr. Arthur Holly Compton, Dr. Enrico Fermi, Dr. Leo Szilard, Dr. H. C. Urey, Dr. Niels Bohr, Dr. J. R. Oppenheimer, et al. The woman was Dr. Lise Meitner, a German refugee. But Einstein was the father of the bomb in two important ways: 1) it was his initiative which started U.S. bomb research; 2) it was his equation (E = mc2) which made the atomic bomb theoretically possible. Late in 1939, after the German Panzers had driven through Poland, and the citizens of Hiroshima were still going quietly about their daily tasks, the little man who hates to write letters wrote a letter to Franklin Roosevelt. In it he stated his conviction that a controlled chain reaction of atomic fission (and hence the atom bomb) was now feasible, that the German Government was working on an atomic bomb, that the U.S. must begin research on the bomb at once or civilization would perish. Einstein enclosed a report by his friend, Dr. Leo Szilard, describing in more technical language how & why the bomb was possible. Franklin Roosevelt acted. Result: the Manhattan Project (TIME, Aug. 15), the bomb, the 125,000 dead of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the biggest boost humanity has yet been given toward terminating its brief history of misery and grandeur.

Einstein and Szilard re-enacted the drafting of the Einstein-Szilard letter for the documentary, Atomic Power (1946) and it was dramatised in the movie The Beginning or the End (1947). I think it was fairly well known, at least in the United States. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

16:51, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

Hawkeye7,

After seeing them play in person earlier in the month, I've started working on an article on the Great Britain women's national wheelchair basketball team. However, it is still in its very early stages, and I'm struggling to find enough quality sources for it. I'm curious if you might be able to help...this is my first wheelchair basketball-related article, but certainly not my last! I'm hoping to get it up to DYK standards within the week and then nominate it for DYK.

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide, and all the best! Michael Barera (talk) 06:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Sure. I remember the British team from Beijing 2015, Rio 2016 and Hamburg 2018. They're fabulous. Why did you user the 2012 roster instead of the 2016 one? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I was copying elements from the Canadian team article. I just updated the GB article. Michael Barera (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

16:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Revisit

Hey, when you get the chance, please revisit your ivote entry at [ Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Newton_Earp_(2nd_nomination) ] and verify it is what you meant. Regards, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Duke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Great War Horse (Australian WWI documentary)

I have just finished watching (on the BBC) a repeat of the Australian documentary Great War Horse, which was really excellent. Maybe you are aware of it already (it was released in 2015), but if not, there is a blog about it here that gives a good flavour of it. I sometimes make notes afterwards to see where we have Wikipedia articles on the more obscure aspects, and how good our coverage is on the major topics in the documentary, and if we have articles on any of the 'talking heads'. Am dropping you a note in case you have an interest in this area. Certainly a mention of the documentary could be added to Waler horse. Carcharoth (talk) 23:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I haven't seen it; I will seek it out. I was once reading a newspaper in a cafe on a Saturday morning, and an article about an obscure artist said: "You won't read about this on his Wikipedia page but..." So I thought, "Well, I can fix that." I pulled out the laptop and added it, with a reference to the newspaper article. So that anyone coming from the newspaper would find that it was indeed there, while someone verifying from the article would find a source that says that it is not. Alas, I was soon pulled up by someone from WikiProject Obscure Artists (or something like that) who indignantly pointed out that while the factoid in question was not on the artist's page, it was in Wikipedia on the page on the artwork itself. My newspaper reference was then replaced with one from a more authoritative source. Sigh. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
The 'talking heads' (not including the horse people and the descendants of soldiers) were: Brad Manera (from the ANZAC Memorial, blog and news article), Roland Perry (his website), Jill Mather, Michael Tyquin, Jean Bou (Strategic and Defence Studies Centre), Mesut Uyar (Turkish Military Academy and associate professor of Ottoman military history at the University of New South Wales, Canberra). I'd not heard of Roland Perry before. He has an impressive Wikipedia article and output. I used to just watch such documentaries. Now I find myself reading up on the people in them, to get a feel for the context in which they are presenting their views and the history they are talking about. Carcharoth (talk) 13:08, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Project Rover

Thank you today for Project Rover, or "The people that build the atomic bombs decide to become rocket scientists."! - I confess that I thought "Kiwi" in the ibox header was some vandalism. Could perhaps the article title also appear there? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Possibly. The infobox is about the engine. What I'd like to be able to do is include {{Infobox nuclear reactor}} inside {{Infobox rocket engine}}. Some discussion and technical work would be required first. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

16:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2019





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

DYK nomination of INTERFET logistics

Hello! Your submission of INTERFET logistics at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Kesselring

So the minority rules now? I understood consensus to mean majority agreement. Last I checked, the majority favoured keeping it. Unbelievable. Dapi89 (talk) 13:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

It was the case that no consensus meant that it would be kept. Now WP:Randy in Boise can demand that skeletons be added to the article, or it will not be kept. A huge win for the WP:FRINGE dwellers. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Buzz Aldrin scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Buzz Aldrin article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 20, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 20, 2020, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted on or after October 1, 2018, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

It’s that time of year!

Christmas tree worm, (Spirobranchus gigantic)

Atsme Talk 📧 18:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Time To Spread A Little
Happy Holiday Cheer!!
I decorated a special kind of Christmas tree
in the spirit of the season.

What's especially nice about
this digitized version:
*it doesn't need water
*won't catch fire
*and batteries aren't required.
Have a very Merry Christmas - Happy Hanukkah‼️

and a prosperous New Year!!

🍸🎁 🎉

Magnus Stenbock

Hello! You recently reviewed my updated version of the Magnus Stenbock article for GA status. You say on the talk page that it has passed but in a separate message to me sent by a bot it says that the nomination has "failed", despite your comments saying the opposite. Can you fix that? Thanks! Alexander Alejandro (talk) 08:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

 Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:59, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Many thanks! Alexander Alejandro (talk) 13:41, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Walter Krueger scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Walter Krueger article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 26, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 26, 2020, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted on or after October 1, 2018, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:03, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles Duke

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charles Duke you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

00:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for INTERFET logistics

On 19 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article INTERFET logistics, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that to assist the Australians with INTERFET logistics, the U.S. Army brought in helicopters from Russia and Bulgaria? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/INTERFET logistics. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, INTERFET logistics), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!


May 2020 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from Krampus!

All the best

Gavin / SchroCat (talk) 07:49, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Io Saturnalia!

Io, Saturnalia!
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Help

I've notified other editors that are part of MilHistory project. There is a discussion on the Easter Rising talk page about whether or not it should be included as part of WW1 in the infobox because it was significantly influenced by it. Can you please contribute? 98.221.136.220 (talk) 20:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!
⛄ 🎅 🎄
Hope you enjoy the Christmas eve with the ones you love and step into the new year with lots of happiness and good health. Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:50, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst (talk) 03:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

20:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

On 24 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Cain (41st Premier of Victoria), which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 21:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck

Season's Greetings

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

A barnstar for you!

The Citation Barnstar
For your work on the UK's nuclear deterrent and corresponding articles. BlueD954 (talk) 12:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Feliz Navidad!

Merry Christmas! Hope yours is joyful. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:01, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles Duke

The article Charles Duke you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Charles Duke for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Belated holiday greetings

Belated holiday greetings. Merry Christmas and happy new year.
↠Pine () 06:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

Happy New Year, Hawkeye7!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.