User talk:Hawkeye7/Archive 2024

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024


Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Hawkeye7!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Congratulations from the Military History Project

Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 6 reviews between October and December 2023. Donner60 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Request for a peer review

Hi, belated new year's greetings to you. I have nominated the article Sam Manekshaw for peer review because I have expanded it and want to take it to FAR. I have incorporated the suggestions from the last 2 FARs in 2018. You were a part of a GAR for the article in 2015 and your comments were noteworthy. I would be much obliged if you would take part in this PR, given your skills in and understanding of military history. Thanks in advance. Matarisvan (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-02

MediaWiki message delivery 01:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

This Month in GLAM: December 2023





Headlines
  • Albania report: Wiki Loves EuroPride in Albania 2023
  • Bosnia & Herzegovina report: A year in review ...
  • Croatia report: 2023 in review
  • Czech Republic report: Wiki-residents establishing meeting took place in December
  • Germany report: Go-ahead for Wikidata Project of GLAM institutions from Baden-Württemberg
  • Italy report: WLM Local winners and funds for 2024 GLAM projects
  • New Zealand report: Auckland Museum summer updates
  • Poland report: Intense end to a year of GLAM-Wiki activities in Poland
  • Sweden report: Photo memories project concludes; Sörmlands museum passes 1000 uploads to Wikimedia Commons; Wikimedian in Residence supports an upload of music content; Subject terms from Queerlit; Wikidata for authority control: 3 years of work
  • Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Program
  • UK report: 2023 in Review
  • USA report: WikiConference North America 2023; TSU and USF; Philadelphia WikiSalon; Wikimedia DC Annual Membership Meeting; Wikipedia Editing 101 for All; NYC Hacking Night; Upstate NY workshop; Wikiquote She Said Project
  • Wiki Loves Living Heritage report: Thank you for making Wiki Loves Living Heritage happen!
  • WMF GLAM report: Updates and invitation to test the Commons Impact Metrics prototype
  • Calendar: January's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Roscoe B. Woodruff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 33rd Infantry Regiment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

"And concluded with the opening of the German Ardennes counteroffensive, better known as the Battle of the Bulge" -> I have an issue with this statement. Battle of the Bulge started on 16 December 1944, and Siegfried Line campaign ended on 7 March 1945. Saying the Siegfried Line campaign concluded with the opening of the Battle of the Bulge does not make any sense (again, that's on 16 December 1944). Siegfried Line campaign ended with the Allied forces crossing the Rhine river. Western Allied invasion of Germany started after the campaign. Am I missing something here? Thanks! 172.220.8.65 (talk) 21:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

We follow the organisation in the official history, which has the Siegfried Line campaign ending with the Ardennes-Alsace offensive. Are you intending to work on some of the articles? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm just passing by reader who happened to find an inconsistency and decided to fix it. If the history book says so, then I have no problem with it. However, we should be consistent. As of right now, the dates are inconsistent as I've mentioned earlier. Perhaps, "25 August 1944 – 7 March 1945" can be changed to reflect the official history? 172.220.8.65 (talk) 22:03, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 Done Corrected the date in the infobox Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Great, that looks perfect! Have a good day, bye. 172.220.8.65 (talk) 22:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

"The German losses in the battle were especially critical: their last reserves were now gone, the Luftwaffe had been shattered, and remaining forces throughout the West were being pushed back to defend the Siegfried Line" (quoted from the Battle of the Bulge article) -> this clearly indicates that the Siegfried Line campaign did not end after the Battle of the Bulge. 172.220.8.65 (talk) 21:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

We are calling the campaign that follows "Rhineland". Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Roscoe B. Woodruff

I have made an edit to this article with the following edit summary: "add back generals.dk ref, has appointment 1950-10-01 –1950-10-31 Acting Commanding General 1st Army, no reference to predecessor, possibly could be same as October-November 1950; added as temporary reference; perhaps is in the NY Times article cited at start of next sentence but is behind paywall; Taafe does not have Woodruff in Biographical afterword, https://alchetron.com/Roscoe-B-Woodruff has the info but seems likely it is copied from Wikipedia." You may wish to delete it, change it or otherwise revise it. Donner60 (talk) 06:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

I've added another source. I have full access to the New York Times archive. The funny date format was really annoying me on this one. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. 00:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Donner60 (talk) 00:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

I am... very sorry for this. I get... detailed. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.7% of all FPs. 08:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-03

MediaWiki message delivery 00:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

The MANIAC

hey, just saw your review of the book I've started an article about. it would be great if you can expand a bit Background and Synopsis - I must admit that I haven't read the book yet :) Happy New Year! Artem.G (talk) 12:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

@Artem.G:  Done Added a synopsis. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Nice, thanks a lot! I've added a bit to synopsis as well. I didn't read Labatut's previous books, but the Maniac was a good one for the holidays. Artem.G (talk) 21:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-04

MediaWiki message delivery 01:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Verify talk pages before revert editions

Dear,@Hawkeye7

Regarding to the removing the tag claiming are dubious, I strongly recommend that you restore it. It is not about the Wikipedia policies ---it is about a topic not resolved in the talk page. Please use the same analytic criteria than in the "GA Review" to realize the importance of the wrong statement and source where the claim was originated. Furthermore, before to undo my editing, response to my claims in the talk page.A small reminder of a superior being: "remain neutral, don't be a dick, ignore all rules" Mycoandres (talk) 03:26, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-05

MediaWiki message delivery 19:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Teratix -- Teratix (talk) 13:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Cowans, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Daily News and The Herald.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Thought you might want to know that the high-resolution Council of Clermont image I found for Crusading movement is now a featured picture. Not exactly one of mine: it's not restored, but still. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 01:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final

The article 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2023 AFL Women's Grand Final and Talk:2023 AFL Women's Grand Final/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Teratix -- Teratix (talk) 09:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-06

MediaWiki message delivery 19:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final

On 6 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Brisbane Lions player said the sight of a jerrycan motivated her team during the 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2023 AFL Women's Grand Final. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neil Ritchie

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Neil Ritchie you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2024





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Mercury Seven at TFA

For the 65th anniversary of the announcement, I've got this listed as the April 9 TFA. No need to do anything. Let me know if there's anything I can do. - Dank (push to talk) 00:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

Tech News: 2024-07

MediaWiki message delivery 05:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request AussieBot 1

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AussieBot 1 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT 20:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

Tech News: 2024-08

MediaWiki message delivery 15:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final

The article 2023 AFL Women's Grand Final you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2023 AFL Women's Grand Final for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Teratix -- Teratix (talk) 02:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus

Hello, Hawkeye7. You have new messages at Template talk:Convert.
Message added 12:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for John Cowans

On 1 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Cowans, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British prime minister H. H. Asquith described John Cowans (pictured) as "the best Quartermaster since Moses"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Cowans. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Cowans), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PMC(talk) 00:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Hanford Engineer Works

I have completed a review of the article. As I suspected given the number and thoroughness of previous reviews, I had only a few comments. Donner60 (talk) 08:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I have noted a consensus to promote on the assessment page. I have changed the talk page banner shell and project template to A=pass. This is the first A class consensus note and talk page change that I have done. Please let me know if I have missed anything or made any mistake. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 00:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

ITN recognition for Richard H. Truly

On 2 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard H. Truly, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 18:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-10

MediaWiki message delivery 19:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Template:@MILHIST

Does Template:@MILHIST include the emeritus coordinators? Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2024





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2024-11

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

FAC source review?

Hello, sorry to bother you. I saw that you did a source review on this FAC and was wondering if you'd be interested in also doing a source review on my FAC as I think that's all that I need for it to pass. Spotchecks were already done. -- ZooBlazer 03:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

JoJo has done one for you. Best of luck with the article passing! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

New message from Jo-Jo Eumerus

Hello, Hawkeye7. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ojos del Salado/archive1.
Message added 08:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Greetings, since you did review Guallatiri at FAC I was wondering if you may be interested in Ojos del Salado too. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Always glad to help. I see it has now been promoted. Well done! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Tinian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Truk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

  • Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
  • Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
  • Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
  • Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
  • Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
  • Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
  • Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
  • Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
  • Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
  • Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
  • Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
  • Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
  • Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
  • Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
  • Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
  • Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
  • Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neil Ritchie

The article Neil Ritchie you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Neil Ritchie for comments about the article, and Talk:Neil Ritchie/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of La Haye-du-Puits

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of La Haye-du-Puits you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-12

MediaWiki message delivery 17:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Natural

Science 41.122.65.166 (talk) 08:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of La Haye-du-Puits

The article Battle of La Haye-du-Puits you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of La Haye-du-Puits for comments about the article, and Talk:Battle of La Haye-du-Puits/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 17:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-13

MediaWiki message delivery 18:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

Congratulations, Hawkeye7! The article you nominated, Hanford Engineer Works, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Tinian

Sorry I missed a step. You may have seen by now that Zawed supplied the missing change to the assessment on the article talk page. Great article, sure to go higher. Donner60 (talk) 01:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-14

MediaWiki message delivery 03:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Hawkeye7,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

FACbot missed one?

Hi Hawkeye7, just spotted this -- looks like FACbot didn't process it? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Resolved
Caused by this edit. Removing the template causes the article to leave the category, and the Bot cannot see it any more. I restored the template, and the bot has processed the nomination. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)