This is an archive of past discussions with User:LaundryPizza03. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.
Reason: Inaccurate molecular model: The individual molecule is linear and exists only under extreme conditions. There are 2 valence electrons too many.
Reason: This topic was brought up at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#Spacedrives along with their project about an antimatter rocket, the latter of which was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vacuum to Antimatter-Rocket. It was noticed that this article is written like a PR and has flimsy, WP:PROFRINGE sources. Upon analysis of the sources, there was at most one usable item for notability. List of sources:# [1]: Primary source.# [2]: Dead link to and Alaska government website, possibly with regards to its registration status as a nonprofit.# [3]: Primarily an interview.# [4]: Primary source.# [5]: Dead link, presumably a primary source.# Duplicate of 1# [6]: Paywalled, can't tell.# Duplicate of 3# [7]: Primarily about their Project Persephone, not Icarus; almost entirely based on the members' own comments.# [8]: Dead link# [9]: Primarily about Project Persephone; seems rather pro-fringe.# [10]: Dead link?# [11]: Passing mention; primarily about Eric Davies.# [12]: Scheduale for a conference organized by Icarus.# [13]: PR-like article describing the the conference; I don't think this is encyclopedic.# [14]: PR.# [15]: Dead link.# [16]: Primary source.The previous nomination in 2014 did not adequately scrutinize the sources found, and may have been held to lower standards than current WP:FRINGE guidelines. The article claims that no updates on their projects have been published since 2015, suggesting that the project went inactive not long after the last AfD; thus, I have not attempted WP:BEFORE. It may also be worth investigating the articles about their specific projects.
Reason: This is the only misspelling redirect that botches -cal-, as well as one of only two (out of 45) where f is not followed by r. It has the third largest edit distance from the correct spelling (8).
Reason': At an edit distance of 12, this is the absolute least accurate spelling. It is also one of only 2 where f is not followed by r; and the only one containing either k or two js.
Reason: User Neutrality (talk·contribs) recently redirected this article, which had serious sourcing, WP:POV, WP:UNDUE, and WP:SYNTH issues. But I don't think that "mass media production, distribution, ownership, and funding dominated by corporations and their CEOs" is something that should have been redirected to an article about "a process whereby progressively fewer individuals or organizations control increasing shares of the mass media". Given the severity of the issue at hand, I think the article should have been brought to AfD instead of being uilaterally redirected. The precise term is not mentioned in the article text at target. More background at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#"Corporate_media"_has_glaring_bias_issue.
Reason: The quantity is mentioned only in passing in the target, and is also mentioned in a totally different context in Space elevator. The original article was an unsourced, 2-sentence stub that fails WP:DICDEF and lacked context.
Reason: Per Talk:Event symmetry, this is an incoherent WP:SYNTH of unrelated topics that is overwhelmingly background information and does not clearly or accurately explain what this topic is. Summary:* Nonsense that is mostly background information and gives a nonsensical conclusion that the equations governing the laws of physics must be unchanged when transformed by any permutation of spacetime events — which means that all scalar fields are uniform. Uses a soap bubble analogy in an unencyclopedic manner and ends by making an OR connection between the article topic and John Stachel's proposed principle of maximal permutability that equivalent objects of the same kind are exchangeable.* A non-notable fringe theory of quantum gravity, which is cited entirely to primary sources, along with similarly non-notable theories absed on random graphs.* A poorly explained notion of diffeomorphism invariance applied to a matrix model of M-theory. This section incorrectly juxtaposes D0-branes, instantons, and events.* A misinterpretation of something in a sci-fi novel Permutation City.
Reason: Non-neutral redirect. Pseudoscience is not discussed at the target, and frustrates users looking for, say, Pervez Hoodbhoy. This is the only redirect beginning with Pseudoscience in.
Reason: Article was redirected to Pseudoscience in December 2020 following discussion on the talk page, arguing that this is a redundant case study with no notability on its own — in other words, this is just the concept of pseudoscience as applied to physics. It was previously called Pseudophysics, but was unilaterally renamed in October 2020 as an apparently made-up neologism. The new title is not a plausible redirect.
Reason: {{priorxfd|Quantum evolution (alternative)}}It was noted during the current RM that this pseudoscientific hypothesis fails WP:GNG, with the only source not by proponents Johnjoe McFadden and Jim Al-Khalili being a rebuttal that is an arXiv preprint. The article subject is unrelated to the theory more commonly known as quantum evolution, which does not involve quantum mechanics.
Reason: Moved without discussion by a user Julius503 (talk·contribs) who has made 3 other contested moves at other titles. The new title is more concise, but is it the most common name for the topic?
Reason: There is no article about the base compound. Should this redirect be deleted per WP:REDLINK, or should the target be moved over this redirect or to another title?
Reason: Fails WP:NASTRO, no significant coverage outside of comprehensive databases like the such as the Open Exoplanet Catalogue. One of many non-notable exoplanet articles created by Jtadesse (talk·contribs). Article deprodded by creator without improvement, who did not understand why comprhensive databases do not count toward notability per WP:ROUTINE. The host star Kepler 155 is also nominated at AfD.
Reason: Fails WP:NASTRO, no significant coverage outside of comprehensive databases like the such as the Open Exoplanet Catalogue. One of many non-notable exoplanet articles created by Jtadesse (talk·contribs). Article deprodded by creator without improvement, who did not understand why comprhensive databases do not count toward notability per WP:ROUTINE.
Reason: Fails WP:NASTRO, no significant coverage outside of comprehensive databases like the such as the Open Exoplanet Catalogue. One of many non-notable exoplanet articles created by Jtadesse (talk·contribs). Article deprodded by creator without improvement, who did not understand why comprhensive databases do not count toward notability per WP:ROUTINE.
Reason: I'm not sure if this software is notable. The article has been an unreferenced stub since creation in 2005, there are no comments on the talk page, and the onlydefinitive secondary WP:SIGCOV result was [17].
Reason: Lead claims that this article is about three slightly different, but overlapping, topics, with topics defined by the International Commission on Illumination.
Reason: This category contained two articles, but is now empty. The tag on Colorfulness seems to be based on an issue that the lead had in 2011, which may already have been resolved. The tag on HCL color space lacked a reason or talk parameter, but has been replaced by {{Unfocused}} based on the talk page.
Reason: Already overly specific, the tag on the sole article BD+ was removed for being unclear and likely having been resolved since its addition in 2008.
Reason: I can't make any sense of this article, not least because the countries are indexed in a confusing manner; it looks like the article is poorly titled as well as it seems instead to be a list of countries by current regime — in 2008! The article is based entirely on a comparison of the Democracy-Dictatorship Index, Polity data series, and MaxRange index in 2008, already well out of date at time of creation in 2014. The two indices with their own articles already include the full list of countries there.
Reason: Abandoned talk-space WP:FAKEARTICLE of a user whose only edit ever was creating this page. Probably redundant to Dubbaka, with out of date information; Telangana was split from Andhra Pradesh in 2014.
Reason: AN IP user 24.64.238.121(talk·contribs·WHOIS) PRODded this article for being extremely outdated with references dating to 2011 or earlier, which is not a valid reason for deletion. However, the references are few, and I'd like to ask if this list of bus routes is encyclopedic per WP:NOTTRAVEL.
Reason: The article about the structure and titular mineral is Sphalerite. Also, this is mainly about materials, so the title should clearly state this.
Reason: The article contains no sources showing that the topic itself is notable, only passing statements that most Sylheti-speaking people are bilingual, failing WP:SYNTH; not sure yet if content can be merged to Sylheti language. One of several problematic articles created by Slake000 (talk·contribs) in this topic area; more details at ANI.
Reason: I PRODded this article because it was immediately obvious from search that there are no non-mirror references from anyone except the creator of this script. It was deprodded by the creator, who demanded "further review" and pulled up a reference in their edit summary ([18] from The Hindu) that does not mention the Sylheti language. That user, Slake000 (talk·contribs), has a history of problematic edits in this topic area; see ANI for details.
Reason: There is consensus against using a screenshot to illustrate an episode infobox unless something in the screenshot is the subject of sourced critical commentary. I.e., fails WP:NFCC#8.
Reason: I considered AfD, but this term seems to be in use for molding and extrusion processes. However, the title needs to clearly disambiguate from the unrelated 2.5D, which concerns video game graphics. Not sure how the fraction in the title should be represented per MOS:FRAC.
Reason: "Comedy" is not a standard disambiguator for media. If this radio and TV programme should be classified as a series, then the correct disambiguator is Dead Ringers (radio and TV series). Or should "TV" be listed first?
Reason: There are finitely many knots for any given hyperbolic volume, so this category possibly fails WP:SMALLCAT. This is the only category of its kind, despite the existence of a parent category.
Reason: There is no sourced commentary on the fictional film Cards in the "Mommie Beerest" article. You are welcome to improve the coverage if you wish.
Reason: Most results I'm seeing in Google Scholar are about the 3-dimensional torus T3, not the orientable surface with genus 3. The search term "3-torus" gives 8,350 results, vs. 2,730 for "three-torus".
Reason: Fails WP:NEO: While there may be a notable topic being described here (possibly the same as Dark-energy star), there is no significant usage of the term independent of K. S. Croker (Kcroker (talk·contribs)) aside from churnalism-type coverage. Possible WP:SYNTH issues as well.
Reason: Apparent WP:SHAREDNAME — this category includes everything from Dark chocolate to Category:Dark web. Its subcategory is a bit more coherent, but it may fail SHAREDNAME as well.
Reason: This category contains some coherent clumps of related topics, such as negative number-related topics, but has largely become a WP:SHAREDNAME of various things called "negative X" — for example, Negative space is an artistic technique. About one-third of the contents are redirects that specifically contain the word (e.g. Negative proton → Antiproton).
Reason: Previously deleted by PROD due to lack of evidence of existence, but was then recreated as a redirect after it had been scrubbed from the host star's article.
Reason: The title of this article does not accurately reflect the article scope, which focuses entirely on grids with squares of varying height. After removing some WP:SPS-based magic square fancruft putting undue emphasis on a highly specific problem from a single programming contest, the only remaining content is entirely on a model consisting of a grid with squares of random height.
Reason: Very few Mega-Earths are known, and the category is also defined in the negative for habitability. Both members are already in the sole parent, Category:Mega-Earths.
Reason: This is the only member of Category:Hydroxides that uses a prefix in front of hydroxide, and rare oxidation state variants such as aluminium(I) oxide are typically disambiguated using stock nomenclature.
Reason: The majority of items on this list are acronyms, hence the title fails MOS:DABNAME. Moved unilaterally by Grant65 (talk·contribs) in December 2018.
Reason: I just blanked almost the entire article because it couldn't tell fact from fiction and contained a a substantial amount of content that was about the folktale Sorath Rai Diyach instead of this ruler. Everything else was entirely based on WP:SPS. It is unclear if this is actually the same person as Rai Diyach in Sorath Rai Diyach, but I think this guy (who allegedly founded the Ror Dynasty, according to the only remaining source) fails WP:GNG.
Reason: The title is missing an article the, but I'm not familiar enough with this topic area to decide on what the title should be. The timeframe in this article coincides with the Burma Office.
Reason: The article has zero references and only the barest of real-world information, and is written in an entirely in-universe style, to the point that I had to move it from Grant County, Georgia. The novel series named under this title is likely notable from GScholar search, but the fictional location is not, and the article would need to be rewritten from scratch to be encyclopedic.
Reason: No longer mentioned in article. This was an unreferenced stub that was redirected in 2012 as an unattributed copy of content added to the target, then the content at the target was removed in 2016 for the same reason.
Reason: Yet another article unilaterally redirected by TrangaBellam (talk·contribs) to a target that no longer mentioned this subject, allegedly the founder of the Soomra dynasty.
Reason: As with several similar categories, to ensure that entries have this subject matter as a defining trait_ which, from the titles alone, most of them do.
Reason: The acronym (for spontaneous human combustion) is undesirable, especially since this is an alleged SHC victim rather than an SHC, but I'm not sure what else to replace it with.
Reason: New quantum programming language that likely fails WP:GNG. Based entirely on primary and PR-like sources. WP:BEFORE mostly shows the same, plus unrelated topics with the same name.
Reason: Most English-language search results for this name seem to be about a South African English name for millipedes, or something else entirely. The spelling variant Shongololo already redirects to Millipede.
Reason: Appears to be a dictionary definition with few sources and a good chunk of original research; not much evidence of discussion as a general, standalone topic, as opposed to methods such as the Born–Haber cycle for predicting compounds. The only sources are one about a claimed observation of ethylene dione, and a book that discusses a lot of theoretical chemistry in the context of crystallography, but also does not discuss hypothetical compounds by themselves. Not every category needs a main article.
Reason: We don't conventionally segregate maintenance into "this is a known or likely problem" and "we think there may be a problem, but we're not sure" because we cannot trust other Wikipedians to check the article for claimed issues. I discussed this in 2019 at Template_talk:POV_check/Archive_1#RfC:_Regarding_usefulness_and_effectiveness, and what little discussion it achieved indicated that people consider this category to be redundant. Here's an updated graph of the number of articles in the respective maintenance categories, Category:Articles needing POV-check and Category:NPOV disputes, broken down by month.:
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.
Despite being populated by other templates, it is clear that these two templates are used in essentially the same manner, and the backlog for Template:POV check is more poorly maintained, perhaps due to its relative obscurity. As per SMcCandlish (talk·contribs), "The tide has shifted [since the previous merge proposal in 2005], and [Template:POV check] no longer seems to serve a distinct purpose."
Reason: PRODded per WP:DICDEF, then deprodded by recently topic-banned Andrew Davidson (talk·contribs) without explanation. Just a dictionary definition without any encyclopedic information.
Reason: Prodded by IronGargoyle (talk·contribs) with concern Almost completely unreferenced list of non-notable individuals, but deprodded without explanation by Andrew Davidson (talk·contribs). The article is grossly incomplete, the only bluelink is William Commanda, and the only source is a primary reference about one of the listed First Nations.
Reason: No reason why this stub could be any more notable than Bill French (footballer), both having played a long time ago. Bill French is also the real name of Bill Warner (writer).
Reason: Unnecessary disambiguation, possibly, but definitely matches an outdated naming convention for elections; suggest Solar storm of 2003 as an alternative.
