Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 26[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 26, 2021.

Parity Amendment[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 03:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both an internal search and a Scholar search suggest that this term has been used to describe various pieces of legislation; I would suggest deletion to allow for uninhibited search results, as most of Wikipedia's coverage of such concepts is spread across various biographical and historical articles, rather than at the pages for laws that could be easily disambiguated. signed, Rosguill talk 19:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep unless nominator provides more details of the searches. When I searched within Wikipedia, I did not find any relevant non-Philippines non-Bell Trade Act results. Jay (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I see Sylviane_Agacinski#Parité_amendment internally, and various references to healthcare-related parity amendments on Google Scholar [1], [2], [3]. signed, Rosguill talk 21:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I had seen Sylviane_Agacinski#Parité_amendment too, but didn't consider it significant. Other search results are for "Parity Amendment" only, not "Parity Rights Amendment". The only matching Wikipedia article is Mental Health Parity Act which should not be redirected from either of two listed Rfds. Jay (talk) 10:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 23:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Textbook[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Notability (books)#Academic and technical books. ✗plicit 00:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a confusing redirect. Compare with WP:TEXTBOOKS, which redirects to a different page entirely. Both need to link to the same place, and I'd like further discussion on which one exactly, as I'm unsure myself. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 23:36, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to the notability criterion. NOT guidelines are largely limited to "WP:NOTX" style shortcuts, with only a few core ideas like WP:CRYSTALBALL deviating from that formulation. VanIsaac, MPLL contWpWS 18:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Str repc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:07, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete redirect with a non-obvious name. (Obsolete as in it used to be a real template but now isn’t.) I have removed it from two templates and it is now only used in sandboxes and a userpage. User:GKFXtalk 22:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (after gentle replacements in non-mainspace, why not). Dates from pre-Lua module, now useless and confusing. -DePiep (talk) 14:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fucking Backstabber[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 00:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. The second one was created in 2005 with the content "Fucking Backstabber and Biterphobia are the songs included on the rare single Soul Intent by the group Soul Intent." and soon redirected to Eminem. The closest I could find anywhere else is a track "Backstabber" at Infinite (Eminem album), though that mentions neither "Fucking" nor "Biterphobia". 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lapointe, Wisconain[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling. "Wisconain" itself isn't a redirect to "Wisconsin", so i don't see why it should be in this case. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 19:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete -- Agreed. Unlikely redirect. -- Dolotta (talk) 00:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unlikely misspelling Meters (talk) 05:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Two separate errors in spelling (the missing space/lowercase p in La Pointe and the typo in Wisconsin) make this an implausible search term. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:49, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete an implausible combination of typos. Less Unless (talk) 18:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Temporary structure[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find a single place where we discuss the idea of a temporary building or structure. There are some related ideas, like Portable building and Temporary use, but I don't think they're suitable for retargeting. I suggest WP:REDLINK deletion unless we can identify something. BDD (talk) 19:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not all structures are buildings, a temporary bridge would be a temporary structure that is not a building. -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK per above. This is something we probably ought to have content on but currently don't that I've been able to find. Thryduulf (talk) 02:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Craft City[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The nominator's rationale no longer applies, as the search term is now mentioned at the target. Although WP:FANCRUFT is raised as an argument for deletion, it has been sufficiently rebutted by other commenters here. (non-admin closure) feminist (+) 17:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Fictitious city, in Bitz and bob episodes. Episode setting. ACQ322Acuity (answer me) 10:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Not mentioned at target. Anyone who knows what Craft City is would know the programme- this isn't a TV fandom website. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:FANCRUFT. SCP-053 (talk) 02:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Since 14 April it is now briefly mentioned in the article. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep very reasonable search term for someone who half-remembers the TV series, etc. One redirect isn't FANCRUFT all by itself, if there were twenty for this show then that might apply. User:GKFXtalk 18:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Adumbrativus. Jay (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Filename[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing, since the target template does not concern Wikipedia files. One of many questionable pages created by this user. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete completely unexpected target for a redirect, you would think that this was something like {{PAGENAME}} not a formatting template. User:GKFXtalk 18:12, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Makes no sense to me to have this redirect. Meters (talk) 05:29, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Tc:[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially ambiguous abbreviation, and has a stray colon. One of many questionable pages created by this user. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unclear redirect with potential for confusion with {{uc:}} and {{lc:}}. User:GKFXtalk 18:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the potential confusion is with {{Tc}}. (note the colon-diff only). -DePiep (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Biunnillium[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 6#Biunnillium

LGBT fascism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gay Nazis. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:53, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I propose retargetting to the disambiguation page Gay Nazis, as I think most people searching for "LGBT fascism" are looking either for gay fascism (the bogus theory that homosexuality caused Nazism) or for National Socialist League (United States) (an actual gay neo-Nazi group). gnu57 15:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget. The current redirects make no sense to me. I am no expert on the topics involved though. --Luminoxius (talk) 19:16, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget. The Gay Nazis page makes more sense since not all conservatives are fascists.--65.92.163.98 (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Gay Nazis per nom. Current target is clearly inappropriate, and the broader list of meanings on the dab page seems a more likely target than the specific conspiracy theory at gay fascism. Hog Farm Talk 02:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong retarget to Gay Nazis per nom and possibly G10 Dudhhr (talk) 23:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iwant to fuck you like an animal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed redirect. The properly formatted I want to fuck you like an animal already exists. Dominicmgm (talk) 14:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Jay (talk) 04:14, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Substr quick[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 4#Template:Substr quick

Template:Strnumber[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 5#Template:Strnumber

Template:Str sub old/any[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 4#Template:Str sub old/any

Vehicle Fac. Jabalpur[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment this doesn't look like a typo; it looks like some form of abbreviation. -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 14:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment It seems to be used as a village name [4]; an old revision of the other page [5] indicates census data. The page "Vehicle_Fac.tory_Jabalpur" contains an article on the village "Vehicle_Fac._Jabalpur" because in 2012, someone rewrote the article from a village article to a factory article [6]; that person moved the article from this page name to the weird Fac.tory name [7] -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I agree this looks to be an intentional abbreviation rather than a typo, but I can't find any uses of it other than clearly automated creations based Wikipedia page titles (or a similarly scraped source). Happy to change my mind though if somoene can point to anything independent and human-created. Thryduulf (talk) 02:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment due to the overwritten article, I suggest a history split of the village to this page name from the "Fac.tory" pagename, before deletion, to clean up history if anyone wants to undelete; or if it needs to go to AfD instead because of the overwrite with a different topic with a different name. -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 21:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vehicle Fac.tory Jabalpur[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete after merging the page history into Jabalpur Vehicle Factory. -- Tavix (talk) 02:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:12, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • The page history of this redirect should be kept. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 01:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment an old revision of this page contains census data for a village called "Vehicle_Fac._Jabalpur" [8]. In 2012, someone rewrote the article from a village article to a factory article [9]; that person moved this page from "Fac." to "Fac.tory" [10]; so there are two articles in the history of this redirect, one of them, the village, should be residing at the "Fac." redirect location. The factory edit history should reside at this page name; the dividing point is 2012, before 2012, it is a village article, in 2012 the village article was overwritten with the factory article. -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment due to the overwritten article, I suggest a history split of the village to the "Fac." page name, before deletion, to clean up history if anyone wants to undelete; or if it needs to go to AfD instead because of the overwrite with a different topic with a different name. -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 21:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Str rt[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 3#Template:Str rt

Template:Str right subst[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and confusingly named redirect - you’d expect subst to mean substitute not substring. User:GKFXtalk 07:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template creator's note: I have absolutely no idea what use case I could have possibly needed this for at the time, but it obviously is no longer useful. Speedy delete. VanIsaac, MPLL contWpWS 14:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Str rep all[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 3#Template:Str rep all

Template:Str = len[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template redirect. User:GKFXtalk 07:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a QWERTY typeable redirect of a template with a non-QWERTY name. So this needs to be a keep unless the underlying template is deleted as a simple matter of accessibility. VanIsaac, MPLL contWpWS 14:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep it does what it says, it points to a function that tests equality (in its opposite form) Further the non-equality sign is not typable on a standard keyboard, so the destination should definitely have a typable redirect to reach it. -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 14:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Frozen Carbonated Beverage[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect capitalization, "Frozen Carbonated Beverage" is not a proper noun and is unlikely to be ever used, as seen by the fact it has zero incoming links from the main namespace. – BrandonXLF (talk) 06:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

COVID-19 Hospital[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 11#COVID-19 Hospital

Tony Starks[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ghostface Killah#Aliases. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell "Tony Starks" with an S is not used to refer to the comic character, while it is used to refer to Ghostface Killah. I've added a hatnote to Iron Man, but I think the term should probably redirect to Ghostface Killah with a hatnote there. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 02:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per nom. All uses of the phrase on Wikipedia refer to Ghostface Killah, except one at Iron Man that involves multiple realities, and hence multiple Tony Starks. I don't think we need to worry about that sort of corner case. --BDD (talk) 16:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per BDD. MB 15:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_April_26&oldid=1022544542"