Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 14, 2024.

Gunahon Ka Devta(1990 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 00:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Gunahon Ka Devta (1990 film), is the target of the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bell Bottom(2021 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 00:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Bell Bottom (2021 film), is the target of the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kurt Villani[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete without prejudice against recreation if a mention is restored. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 00:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Following this edit by Magnolia677, Kurt and Monica Villani are no longer mentioned in the article. I don't know whether or not they should be, but so long as they are not mentioned these redirects should be deleted. -- Tavix (talk) 23:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ant-Man (2010)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 00:12, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no information regarding any "Ant-Man" subjects which are connected or tied to the year 2010, leaving it unclear what these redirects are meant to refer to. (Also, Ant-Man (2010) had content for 5 days in 2008 before being subject to a WP:BLAR, and Ant-Man(2010) has an WP:RDAB failure due to no space between the title and the disambiguator.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete 2nd as it was there for a few hours in 2008, no comment on 1st. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Ant-Man(2010) due to malformed modifier. Delete Ant-Man (2010) since there are no works with that title in the 2010. There was an Ant Man and the Wasp comics in 2010 but that's a partial title match. --Lenticel (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both: per WP:RDAB for the second and as an implausible search term for the first. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hoot Gipson[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 00:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in text, can't find any evidence that he was called this, search is finding a mix of other Hoot Gpisons. Rusalkii (talk) 19:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Confucius Says[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 21#Confucius Says

Something of Samoa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is this, a scent that Margaret Mead sold or something? I see no evidence that "Something of Samoa" is a thing: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22something+of+samoa%22+%22Margaret+mead%22&ia=web ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:10, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Project South (Italy)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 13:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is unclear why this redirects here: there's no mention in the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Maximum Football (2023 video game)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jay 💬 05:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This game appears to still be an upcoming title, and has not released in 2023 according to the sources that I could find. Thus, this redirect is factually inaccurate and I would recommend its deletion. The redirect Maximum Football (2024 video game) is also not supported by sources as a windowed release per a recent RM, and I would recommend its deletion as well (though the page can be moved to the 2024 title if it is indeed released this year) The Night Watch (talk) 18:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This isn't like Legend of Zelda which is notable for even preannouncement and being a sure thing. Somebody's WP:CRYSTALBALL was wrong about the year. How much more wrong can anything get? This should never have been created, but rather "(upcoming)".— Smuckola(talk) 19:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I don't see the need to delete it. {{R from move}}s are generally kept unless problematic. Does it cause confusion? Nobody has to see it unless they search for this, and if they do they'd unambiguously be looking for this game, which the article's references show being mentioned as Maximum Football 2023 and Maximum Football 23. Just add {{R from incorrect disambiguation}}. SilverLocust 💬 20:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It would be one thing if when the game will come out is a total mystery, with the product being totally obscure, but a 2024 release appears at least somewhat set in stone (that date being mentioned on websites such as this one). I'm inclined to leave the redirect be given the lack of harm. I'll mention that redirects don't have to be strictly accurate to be of use in some cases. — CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 12:26, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Xerox PARC (Palo Alto Research Center)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 05:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is nonsensically redundant to the Xerox PARC redirect, as is this new user's compulsion, and other such redirects have already been deleted as misuse of a redirect. The rationale in the rejecting edit summary makes no sense at all either. Both misunderstand the purpose of redirects. You don't test them by dumping an arbitrary text into Google and mindlessly reading the fallacious number of alleged results. This redirect does not aid the Wikipedia search engine or any user in any way. Nobody would ever type this string of text into a computer. — Smuckola(talk) 12:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Respublik (talk) 17:19, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per the declination edit summary. This exact string turns up over 10,000 times when I search online (to my surprise, admittedly). More specific forms of article titles are allowed. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sdrqaz: That's exactly what I said, which I debunked. You just repeated the problem. Both "Xerox PARC" and "Palo Alto Research Center" are two of the most famous and unique terms in history. That's not a valid way to even test the keyword sets within a search; you don't put *two* sets of keywords in. This is not how redirects or search engines work. There is no such thing as a wikilink to this whole mess of a fake name, and the search engine would find it anyway. Also, you wrongly citedWP:RPURPOSE because this situation does not appear there at all, and I don't know how you thought it was relevant. Again, not that it matters at all because the search engine works anyway. — Smuckola(talk) 07:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Μa[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 21#Μa

Doctor Impossible[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 21#Doctor Impossible

Michael Vogt[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was replace with Michael Vogt (bobsledder) as presumptive primary topic. A skim of Special:Search/~"Michael Vogt" suggests there is not currently enough material about other Michaels Vogt for a DAB, but per WP:PRIMARYRED The existing article is not automatically the primary topic, so if someone does find room for a DAB, feel free to BOLDly move this back and create a DAB page. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 00:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recommending deletion, as many potentially notable people share this particular name, but none have their own Wikipedia article, and there is currently a Swiss bobsledder in Wikidata and other parts of Wikipedia who is often erroneously linked to a software page they most likely have nothing to do with (per past commenters as well as a quick "What links here" check, which also turns up a tuba player with this name). Cielquiparle (talk) 05:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, you'll see that this Redirect page is currently linked to six other non-English Wikipedia articles about people named "Michael Vogt" (primarily the Swiss bobsledder), and German Wikipedia has a disambiguation page listing several potentially notable people with the same name (including two who currently have articles who are not the software developer): de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Vogt Cielquiparle (talk) 05:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As the bobsledder has now got an article on the English Wikipedia he should be moved here. Inwind (talk) 06:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work @Marcinho1911. Great that redirecting to Michael Vogt (bobsledder) is now an option...but why not simply move Michael Vogt (bobsledder) to Michael Vogt instead? In any case, it may be worth keeping this discussion open for a full week or so to see if any Michael Vogt articles pop up in the meantime, which might further change the outcome of this discussion. Cielquiparle (talk) 11:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_14&oldid=1197800325"