Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 23

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 23[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 23, 2024.

Buyer's market & Seller's market[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 2#Buyer's market & Seller's market

Quorom Broadcasting[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There has never been a company by this name. There was a Quorum Broadcasting (with a second "u", not "o") that merged into (what is now) Nexstar Media Group, but not sure this is a plausible misspelling to merit a retarget (Quorum, under any spelling, is not mentioned in the article for Mission Broadcasting). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

British Listed Buildings[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Listed building#Other. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The capitalized term refers to the website, see WP:DIFFCAPS, British castles redirects to Castles in Great Britain and Ireland but note that British Castles doesn't exist. Most similar redirects doesn't appear to exist such as Turkish Villages>Villages of Turkey so such redirects may violate WP:PANDORA. All 17 incoming links are for the website not the buildings themselves. It should probably redirect to Listed building#Other which discusses the website and similar records. It was originally a redirect to Listed buildings in England but was changed to the current target by User:Rosguill probably because there are listed buildings in Britain and the UK outside England. I'm wandering if it would qualify as notable enough for an article but otherwise it should probably be retargeted as suggested. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Listed_building#Other seems like a good target. If sources are found to establish notability editors can go ahead and start an article, but the target is informative so I don't know that we need to WP:REDYES here. signed, Rosguill talk 21:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Piemonte Calcio[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 1#Piemonte Calcio

.Feast of Herod[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. It's snowing. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unambiguously created in error. Delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trenkwalder[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. SIA is restored. (non-admin closure) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a good target. There too many other mentions of "Trenkwalder" in enwiki for this target to be sufficient. Delete to enable uninhibited Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring this version might be an alternative. The Banner talk 13:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bad weather[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Severe weather with a hatnote to the song. Closing a few hours early per WP:SNOW, and since consensus is overwhelmingly clear. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect that causes confusion with Bad Weather. I believe the 1st criterion in WP:RDEL applies. Konstantina07 (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Western Times[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Dab is restored after the stub created. (non-admin closure) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I converted this redirect to a disambiguation page but my edit was reverted by @NmWTfs85lXusaybq:. I asked for an independent review at ANI Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1149#Disruptive editing of disambiguation pages but the incident was archived without action. In my opinion a disambiguation page is more helpful to readers than this redirect and my edit should be restored. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wabern railway station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Dab is restored after the stub created. (non-admin closure) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I converted this redirect to a disambiguation page but my edit was reverted by @NmWTfs85lXusaybq:. I asked for an independent review at ANI Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1149#Disruptive editing of disambiguation pages but the incident was archived without action. In my opinion a disambiguation page is more helpful to readers than this redirect and my edit should be restored. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • It should be reverted to its dab page form and a stub article created for Wabern station (Hesse). The convert to a redir was done without any significant comment, other than Primary topic, which it isn't as there is no hat note on the Wabern bei Bern railway station article. Nor can I see any good justification for saying that a two platform suburban station deserves primary topic over a three platform junction station with ICE service. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Horse (car)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Horse (company). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Renault will not make its cars with the Horse or Ampere brands, it will continue using Renault and Dacia. 95.70.138.236 (talk) 10:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Carlisle Bulilding[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Maile66 (talk · contribs) as WP:G6. -- Tavix (talk) 14:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless redirect – just misspelling, no inbound links (sorry – should have nominated it just after the page move) — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 08:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

European hosptial[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete due to the word "Hospital" being misspelled. 176.33.245.231 (talk) 08:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have tagged European hosptial as R3, as having been created 3 days back. Whereas Hosptial was created in 2018. Jay 💬 08:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Deb (talk) 08:55, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • European hosptial was deleted by Maile66 as WP:R3 and Lenticel subsequently closed this discussion. However, Hosptial has not been deleted so I have reopened to allow discussion on that redirect to continue. -- Tavix (talk) 14:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No more likely than any other misspelling. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unlikely to be spelled this way. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

HBBS[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting "weak delete" nominations from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 29#ILYM. Still not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore and send to AfD per my comment on the previous nomination and Duckmather's comment above: Weak delete HBBS. This has a surprisingly long history, but apart from 3 days in 2008 it has always been a redirect. The single revision as an article, ostensibly about a company but about half the text is about one of its products. It would not be speedily deletable under A7 as there are clear claims of singificance about the product. There are two external links, neither of which work today. Looking on archive.org, the Ohio Secretary of State site would, at best, verify existence of the company (but probably not the product) but not speak to notability. The hbbs.us domain was replaced by hoeningbigboresouth.com, which verifies the existence of the product but obviously can't speak to notability. This was the author's sole contribution to Wikipedia. I wouldn't delete it as G11 myself as it's borderline (and therefore the criterion does not apply) but would let someone else speedying it under that criterion slide, especially since this was 15 years ago and was not a BLAR (the redirect is the stable state for this title). If anyone does want to restore the content for AfD purposes though then I will support that. Thryduulf (talk) 19:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just delete and do *not* restore. There is nothing salvageable about that unsourced and poorly written stub which was only visible for three days back in 2008. The link is dead and there's no sourcing available to verify its content. It could even be a hoax, for all we know; since the creator vanished without a trace and their only edit was creating the stub, which is highly suspicious. CycloneYoris talk! 21:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It was not unsourced - there were two sources in the article; that they aren't still working 15 years later does not change that. It's not a hoax - I was able to verify the existence of both company and product with less than 5 minutes research (and an editor making only a single edit is not evidence of anything suspicious). Whether something is or is not notable is a question for AfD to decide, based on the availability of sources not what sources are presently in the article. Thryduulf (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Even so, it wouldn't be suitable to restore if those sources are no longer available; and the fact that the stub was only visible for three days makes it even more pointless in my opinion (not to mention that it would be a complete waste of time at AfD). CycloneYoris talk! 04:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per CycloneYoris and apart from 3 days in 2008 it has always been a redirect. If there are arguments for keeping the article, I'm open to hearing them. However, all I've read are arguments against A7 and G11, which are irrelevant as this has not been proposed for speedy deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 01:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The footage[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 1#The footage

Licking people's faces[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article does not establish that 'licking people's faces' was a cause of COVID-19. This is a much wider topic than COVID-19. For example, a prominent result in my research is as a facet of dog communication. -- Tavix (talk) 03:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Johnc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

implausible? would this be like "jimmyw" for jimbo wales? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The only connection I can find between the two is that "johnc" forms part of Carmack's email address. Googling "Johnc" brings up hits for a (likely) non-notable musician. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as vague --Lenticel (talk) 00:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As this would be an extremely rare if not unused redirect to many people. StaleGuy22 (talk) 18:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is not an implausible search term, and it's not just part of an email address. Carmack made extensive use of his .plan file to communicate with the software and game development communities, similar to blogging. This was very well known at the time, and his username at id Software was used as an example in Slackware Linux Essentials, 1st Edition, a book that I liked to read in print again and again. I have added the username to the article (citing a different book that is more likely to be acceptable, given that the article is a BLP). PleaseStand (talk) 07:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to allow time to respond to the late keep
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 02:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seems a very unlikely redirect to me, and more importantly could cause confusion. Deb (talk) 08:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Presidentman and Deb. Just a part of an email ID. Jay 💬 06:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

文化[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a two-character word that means 'culture' in both Chinese and Japanese. It should not redirect to a specific Japanese era—I would probably delete it. Remsense诉 01:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2030 FIFA World Cup Argentina-Morocco-Paraguay-Portugal-Spain-Uruguay[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason that FIFA World Cup Argentina–Morocco–Paraguay–Portugal–Spain–Uruguay 2030 was deleted: unlikely search term that does not aid in navigation. -- Tavix (talk) 01:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

كنيسة[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORRED. The target subject does not have affinity with any particular language. Steel1943 (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_23&oldid=1211743929"