Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 11[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 11, 2024.

Drew Dixon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 17:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Family member of article subject" for a person not named in the target article at all. Sharon Pratt Kelly does have a daughter named Drew Dixon, but the sum total of her presence in her mother's article amounts to "[Pratt and her husband] have two daughters", without naming either of them. The other problems here are that (a) as a former executive for a record label, Drew Dixon is likely independently notable enough to have her own separate article, rather than just being a redirect, and (b) Drew Dixon is also the nom de porn of a contemporary porn performer who is very much not Sharon Pratt Kelly's daughter -- and while I can't speak with any authority as to whether the porn actor would pass notability criteria for porn actors or not, he's at the very least a plausible enough search term that a reader might think we're saying he's related to Sharon Pratt Kelly (which he's not) if the article fails to contexualize that the topic intended by the redirect is a black female entertainment industry executive rather than a white male porn actor. So because the daughter/executive is almost certainly notable enough for her own article, and the porn guy may or may not be but is absolutely semi-famous enough to create confusion regardless, this probably should be a redlink, an article or a disambiguation page rather than a redirect. Bearcat (talk) 22:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as ambiguous without enough content for a disambig page. Jay 💬 16:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sociocultural[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Wikt:sociocultural#English. Jay 💬 16:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this target really appropriate for such a general word? I am thinking a soft redirect to Wikidata could be better. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 16:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirect to wikt:sociocultural#English is probably most useful to the reader. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 01:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Leaning towards soft redirect, but not yet set on one target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Complex/Rational 21:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dada (Ultra monster) and etc.[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 20#Dada (Ultra monster) and etc.

You Ess Ay[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to U-S-A!. Jay 💬 13:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term and unhelpful phonetically due to ambiguity with USI. Further we don't need redirects from every combination of letters that might potentially phonetically indicate a target, I suggest deletion. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:7D1A:B8FA:44E3:217 (talk) 20:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, this is how to pronounce "USA", since "Ay" is the name of the letter "A". 176.33.241.125 (talk) 01:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Phonetic spelling, perfectly plausible. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above, and based on my good results not ambiguous with anything. Thryduulf (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC) See below the relist. Thryduulf (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete would not be used as a search term to learn about the United States. Typing this in probably would be wanting something about the chant "U S A!" where the phonetics are important but even that is a streeetch, although definitely more reasonable to me than going to the generic United States page, which would warrant a generic search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ope, there is actually an article for that. Updating to a Strong Retarget to U-S-A! (or weak retarget to USA (disambiguation)), as the phonetics are the core of the chant's article and the only reason they'd be typed in full, in my opinion. Maybe hatnote too. Alternatively, hatnote "U S A" instead as its already a redirect there. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Rock-afire exsplosion[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect, so I suggest deletion. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the redirect had been targeted at The Rock-afire Explosion in 2005, but it was changed to Showbiz Pizza when Rock A-Fire redirected to that page before being seperated. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a necessary redirect or an unlikely misspelling. I agree with everyone above. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chucky cheese's[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. WP:SNOW is in the forecast. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. Suggest deletion. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chuck e cheese's[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. WP:SNOW is in the forecast. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. Suggest deletion. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: phonetically correct misspelling. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Cremastra. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep plausible misspelling Meters (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep as it is phonetically incorrect in a minor way and correct in a major way as per Cremastra's suggestion. StaleGuy22 (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chuck E. Cheez[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. WP:SNOW is in the forecast. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect and not common, so I suggest deletion. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

England YYYY (Association football event) redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Participation was limited even after multiple relists. Jay 💬 16:51, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous term which could refer to a number of different events (see Category:2020–21 in English football, Category:2021–22 in English football, and Category:2022–23 in English football). Hey man im josh (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "England 2022" - sports events are known by their country-year shorthand name, and this was the only major football event to take place in England in 2022. Like other redirects of the same format, this should be kept, it's not ambiguous in the sense that nobody will mistake it (especially disambiguated with "association football event", emphasis mine) for any generic match.
Create disambiguation for "England 2021" - even though this event still has the England 2021 branding, it took place in 2022, while the Men's Euro 2020, which held most of its matches in England, in fact took place in 2021. Because of the possibility of confusing these similar events, the redirect should be turned into a disambiguation page. Kingsif (talk) 23:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingsif: "sports events are known by their country-year shorthand name" - I'm quite the sports focused editor and very active at redirect reviewing and this is not standard practice in my experience. You mentioned branding, do you have anything that supports "England 2022" as the branding used? Hey man im josh (talk) 23:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
do you have anything that supports "England 2022" as the branding used? - the logo at the article in question, for one. Kingsif (talk) 23:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's only a portion of the logo, I did find "Euro England 2022" when looking prior to and after this nomination. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, if you go to the UEFA website for the Women's Euro, you will see that "UEFA Women's Euro" (the rest of the logo) is there by itself in the top corner. Hence, the branding for the event is what remains. Just going to also note that Euros also get called "Euro YEAR", which I have to assume is another redirect, but we're talking about this.
Trying to avoid the search results talking about England winning, there's e.g. this headline Will England 2022 be the best Women's Euros ever?. Useful redirect. IMO. Kingsif (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the links, I'll dig into it a bit more when I'm back on PC. The entry for the FA Cup is coming up for me when searching but that doesn't mean you're not correct that it was used as a common name for the event. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite the sports focused editor and very active at redirect reviewing and this is not standard practice in my experience. - that seems... nigh-impossible, unless you only edit sports that do not have international tournaments. I considered maybe North America does not use such names and that's your blind spot (not a reason to delete, just a reason you wouldn't know), but then I typed in the first event I thought of (Qatar 2022) in a private tab, and CNN (North American) was the second non-Wikipedia result (A year on from Qatar 2022, what’s the legacy of a World Cup like no other?). It's how it is. Kingsif (talk) 23:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely not a blind spot for me and I'd prefer you not jump to conclusions about me. On my phone England 2022 actually brought up results for the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't jump to conclusions, and I referred to a continent, not you, with one of the possibilities I considered. Good chat, man. Well, no. If you're trying to suggest that people would search "England 2022" to find out about Qatar 2022, I don't know if you're being facetious or you want to continue trying to deny the shorthand name's existence, but it's past the point of anything needed to be said. Kingsif (talk) 00:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe that England 2022 should refer to the Qatar 2022 World Cup, I was just mentioning that it brought me a lot more results about the World Cup and didn't bring me to the target article. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. As for the RfD, I don't think that excludes it from being a relevant and useful redirect. Keeping the redirect might be helpful, in fact. Kingsif (talk) 00:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep "England 2022" per Kingsif. Delete "England 2021" The event was still called "Euro 2020," so I doubt this is a likely search term. England was also not mentioned on the logo like for the women's event. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Disambiguate or delete for England 2021 (Association football event)?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 23:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: England 2022 (Association football event) was not tagged until after the relist. Steel1943 (talk) 00:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...Because this happened 2 days after the redirect was nominated and originally tagged. Steel1943 (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's frustrating, that's the third RfD notice that they removed. Hey man im josh (talk) 03:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have closed the duplicate listing at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 3#England 2022 (Association football event). Steel1943 and ChrisTheDude may wish to contribute here instead. A7V2 (talk) 10:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A7V2: Thanks again for closing that. I meant to undo that edit/nomination after Twinkle created the nomination while I was trying to fix this nomination, but apparently I totally forgot to undo the duplicate nomination afterwards. (I have no opinion regarding these redirects.) Steel1943 (talk) 14:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Abhiramakella (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

I Wanna Be the Boshy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The nom's concern has been fixed. (non-admin closure) 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 15:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of fan game at all at target following section removal in 2023. (diff) Jalen Folf (talk) 08:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, no mention makes these unhelpful. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to the lack of mentioning, as said in the reason via Utopes and the one above that. StaleGuy22 (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The mention has been restored to the article with a WP:RS mentioning it. It's now a believable search target, therefore it should remain as-is. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep with the mention added by Zxcvbnm. Jay 💬 13:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LINE Bank[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to LY Corporation. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because Z Holdings was merged into LY Corporation, now LINE Bank is a service of LY. As such, LINE Bank should be retargeted to LY Corporation to keep up with the times. 三葉草 San Ye Cao 06:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect (Recorrect) to LY Corporation. The reasoning is said above. If anyone disagrees with me, reply to me as to why. If anyone agrees, thank you. StaleGuy22 (talk) 17:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • For fairness, I have notified of this discussion at the talk pages of the current and proposed targets. Jay 💬 13:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for adding the notifications, which informed me of this discussion. Cunard (talk) 08:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support retarget to LY Corporation only if LINE Bank is mentioned in LY Corporation. Right now, LINE Bank is mentioned in Z Holdings but not LY Corporation. Cunard (talk) 08:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Moreau (artist)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The current target is seen as the primary topic. Jay 💬 13:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected the page to Moreau (surname) but was reverted. There are a number of artists at the target destination but another editor believes it's not ambiguous. Keep target or change? Hey man im josh (talk) 15:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to the surname list per WP:INCDAB. I removed many unsourced redlinks from that list but there are still multiple artists there. There are no article-space incoming links so retargeting does not cause problems. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There are four artists listed on the DAB page: Adrien Moreau, Gustave Moreau (the current target), Jean-Michel Moreau, and Mathurin Moreau. Based on pageviews and my Google searches, the current target is far and away the primary topic in terms of artists with this surname. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:29, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Presidentman. The historically significant Gustave has preeminence among the Moreau artists, and not everyone will type the entire name in when searching for his page. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per above but add a hatnote to the dab page. Thryduulf (talk) 12:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the redirection, but actually redirect it to a disambiguation page. If anyone reverts it, make sure to remember that everyone has a different first name but also a different surname and last name. StaleGuy22 (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @StaleGuy22: Based on your comment, you meant to vote "Retarget" instead of "Keep". Hey man im josh (talk) 16:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Gustave Moreau is the primary topic for artists called Moreau – see the ngram results for the four artists named above – so I don't think WP:INCDAB does apply. Dividing Moreau (surname) into sections, with one for artists, would be a good idea. Ham II (talk) 21:33, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/Years[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 20#Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/Years

Glen Rock (boulder and etc.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another set of redirects for a different letter block, now that 10 February has past. This nomination contains the set of titles starting from G to O. All of which are missing the closing parentheses, have zero pageviews evident from massviews, no substantial history, and can't be easily fixed by a move, due to overlapping titles and/or otherwise. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all. Unplausible search terms, see also the example "Georgia (U.S. state" at WP:RTYPO. --Cyfal (talk) 07:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree that they are implausible and therefore of no use: For myself, when typing a search i often stop when i see something useful come up in the box and then click on that; any of these redirects would in that case be useful. Nevertheless, while they aren't hurting the project, i don't see a lot of benefit from them, so certainly do not object to deletion. Happy days, ~ LindsayHello 09:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all looks like this is when copy and paste goes wrong leaving out the closed bracket really need to read fully before submited.

DanTheMusicMan2Hello 12:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all - Can confirm that my redirect was a typo. Cards84664 14:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - These redirect solve a problem with Markdown on other websites, but that's a problem that should be solved on those websites, not here. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looking at the edit summaries when the name changes were made on 00:52 and 00:56, 29 October 2021 by an editor who has since been blocked (on 01:24, 13 November 2021), I think the motivation was that the editor didn't know how to disambiguate properly, and accidentally forgot the second parenthesis. When I changed NISS to NISS (Sudan) on 21:32, 29 January 2020, I seem to remember that a disambig page was not (yet) justified. Now it is justified, with at least two currently named agencies of that name and one that has been renamed (like the Russian KGB became the FSB, though the Belarusian KGB is still the KGB). I've created National Intelligence and Security Service (disambiguation). I haven't checked policy about redirects with syntax errors. I don't see any loss in navigability if the National Intelligence and Security Service (Ethiopia redirect is deleted. Boud (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Obvious typos. Won't be missed as search terms. Pichpich (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Looking at the edit summary at time of creation, I created Glen Rock (boulder because I kept making that exact typo. I imagine that many of those with an opening parenthesis and not a closing parenthesis were created for similar reasons. Seems reasonable. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per WP:RDAB; the lack of pageviews show that these are unlikely search terms. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per comments above since starting with a parenthesis and ending without one is not rare but very uncommon. StaleGuy22 (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as unhelpful. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pine Mountain (Wells, New York 2)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful redirect due to the subjective number for differentiation. The articles themselves do not identify as "Pine Mountain". Had some linkage that has now been removed. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

29600 Ford Avenue[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensical redirect I made. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 02:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

14701 Rinaldi Street[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Via CSD G7. Thank you BD2412 for taking care of these. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 02:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stupidest redirect I have created, unnecessary and looking to speedydelete. Created numerous address redirects but I can't list all of them GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 02:18, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to list all your stupid redirects. All you need to do is put Template:Db-g7 on each. And then please stop creating more stupid redirects. -- Hoary (talk) 02:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment why have you GabrielPenn4223 (talk · contribs) created 10's of redirects to Kmart from street addresses [1] on 11 February 2024? -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 02:38, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Intitally because of a YT video, but it's stupid to create. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 02:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I've tagged both of these listed here for G7 speedy deletion, but are you saying here that you'd like to delete all of the Kmart addresses that you created today? Utopes (talk / cont) 02:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @GabrielPenn4223: (I've seen your edits at the teahouse, but let me know here if you want me to tag the Kmart addresses and I'll go ahead, unless there are any that you'd like to keep.) Utopes (talk / cont) 02:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Tag all for deletion, but probably research for any notable ones that are plausable search terms. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 02:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    GabrielPenn4223, they are your content creation, you tag them for CSD G7 (use WP:TWINKLE) if you are the only or major contributor. Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I have gone ahead and deleted the lot. BD2412 T 02:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Anti-Christian movement[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 18#Anti-Christian movement

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_11&oldid=1209387231"