Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 3[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 3, 2023.

.sex[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Internet top-level domains#S. No consensus for deletion, but there is some agreement for retargeting to one of the targets proposed by the nom. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:55, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:REDYES. The top-level domain .sex does exist,[1] but it is not the same as .xxx, nor is it mentioned at .xxx's article. It is mentioned a bit at .gay. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 23:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Archery at the 2023 Pacific Games[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; WP:SELFRED Yoblyblob (talk) 23:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I don't find the WP:SELFRED argument convincing, but there simply isn't enough substance there to warrant any of these redirects, as the target includes nothing more than a bare list of sports. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. The subjects only get a passing mention. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 00:35, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as not helpful - note that have just added another 15. KylieTastic (talk) 14:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @KylieTastic is there a way to quickly list them instead of individually going through each one? Yoblyblob (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Yoblyblob, the best way to find them that I can think of is a WhatLinksHere search with no transclusions or links - this. I think all but the opening and closing ceremony links are in this group, so 19 in total. KylieTastic (talk) 16:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @KylieTastic I can find them all, just looking for a way to quickly add them to redirects for discussion, this page. Yoblyblob (talk) 16:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Yoblyblob - I've added to the list - is that what you wanted? KylieTastic (talk) 16:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @KylieTastic Yes thank you! How did you do it without category headers? Yoblyblob (talk) 16:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Yoblyblob, I took the search results then used a text editor (Notepad++) to do two simple search-replaces on the prefix and suffix to get them into the format
    {{subst:Rfd2|multi=yes|redirect=Tennis at the 2023 Pacific Games|target=2023 Pacific Games}}
    KylieTastic (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Walk or bike[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given the great ambiguity here, it would probably be best to let the search engine handle this one. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 21:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Note that "walk or bike" is a common phrase and thus a likely search term (see for example the google trends data). Also both walking and biking are mentioned in the current target article - even the lead states The best-known forms of active mobility are walking and cycling, though other modes include running, rowing, skateboarding, kick scooters and roller skates. - so the target is indeed helpful. Duckmather (talk) 15:58, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I do not dispute either of these arguments, but I still think it's awfully vague. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 20:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an ambiguous WP:XY situation. There's multiple targets that this search term could be in reference to, none of which are surefire catch-all options. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a WP:XY issue per Utopes; no good target this could point to. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 17:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and others. Unhelpful and vague. CycloneYoris talk! 09:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I disagree about the assertion of "vague". If I am a reader (and I am : ) - and I would like to know about some information/comparison of to "walk or bike" (especially by country), I think this is a very pausible search term. - jc37 22:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 20:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Given the target isn't exactly a well-known term, I'm all for giving our searchers a bit of leeway. The best-known forms of active mobility are walking and cycling. -- Tavix (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Walking and biking are the two main forms of active mobility. If this targeted walking or cycling it'd be a XY but it doesn't. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 21:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep. This is not an XY situation as the search term is a common phrase and the target is about both elements. Thryduulf (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, if this stays, I would consider creating Walk and bike, Bike or walk, and/or Bike and walk for consistency. The XY comes from referring to walking OR biking, but in this instance the target article does make mention of both, so it could possibly be considered a "compromise" instead of targeting either Walk or Bike. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:27, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not really a "compromise" as the search term is describing the scope of the target, in discussions of this concept (which I have far more than a typical person does) the use of "or" and "and" are pretty interchangeable as it depends whether you're thinking of it from the perspective of a single person who might be doing either but not both at the same time, or multiple people who might be walking, cycling or both. I do support the creation of those other redirects. Thryduulf (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's fairly clear what this means. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Four Golden Princess[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11#Four Golden Princess

Morocz[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31#Morocz

Gluglug[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Glugging. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target page. This is apparently a type of laptop associated with Libreboot, but its relevance as a search term to end up at a page where it is not discussed is questionable. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For more input on the retargeting suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete to facilitate uninhibited Search (2 uses). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Shhh. One of the usages is just made up caveman language, but another says it was the former name of Minifree, which could be a potential future target if we have a page or section on it. Jay 💬 06:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Glugging, which is also known as "the glug-glug process". -- Tavix (talk) 17:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

LancetGate[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 25#LancetGate

The Presidents of the United States of America[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11#The Presidents of the United States of America

A human[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No consensus. There are arguments for all of keeping, deleting and disambiguating, all of them about equally strong and none of them has significantly more support than the others. This has been open over 6 weeks already and has been relisted twice, so the likelihood of a consensus emerging now is very low. Thryduulf (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search aids that make it harder to find articles that begin with "A __", no incoming links, and not a generally accepted pattern for redirects. Skynxnex (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. The nom suggests these are implausible search aids, but the search results for these are not great. Dog doesn't even show on the first page of search results for [3]. (I assume the search index is updated since the template was added a whole week ago). Given Randy Kryn's note about usage, we should probably keep. Any necessary disambiguation is fine. —siroχo 05:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Something odd's happening with your default search preferences, I think (?). If I'm logged out I get this. J947 † edits 05:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • If the search is limited to article namespace it's there, but not when other namespaces are added. Peter James (talk) 12:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    My main reason for suggesting deletion is that we've had past discussions that delete indefinite article redirects and I don't know if any reason these should be treated differently. Skynxnex (talk) 15:47, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The pageviews for "A dog" and the others are unimpressive compared to the target articles [4], so the redirects are probably not that useful. Sjö (talk) 08:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It is absolute numbers not relative numbers that are relevant here. J947 † edits 09:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pasting my !vote from 2019: Keep, unambiguously takes searches where they want to go. For example, if someone searches for "A penguin", the article Penguin would be the correct article for that search. -- Tavix (talk) 21:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • One of them is recently created, and the other two were created few months back, all by the same user. Delete all per the 2019 outcome, we wouldn't want this user or any other to start creating "A"/"An" redirects all over again. Jay 💬 09:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R from related[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 17#Template:R from related

Mixrecord[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10#Mixrecord

Mamu (Nintendo)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. But retagetting to where there is at least a mention (i.e., Super Mario Bros. 2) as it's at least better than the current target. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 00:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Even Super Mario Bros. 2 contains far too little substance to warrant a redirect - all it says is the main villain named Mamu - everyone typing this probably already knows that level of detail. The (Nintendo) disambiguator is of no consequence here - Mamu (character) would be IMO inappropriate for the same reason. There's no actual history here worth holding on to. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - An obscure character's Japanese name with either disambiguation is just exceedingly rare of a search term. Sergecross73 msg me 16:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Super Mario Bros. 2 where explained (don't refine to the plot section, it's actually explained at Super Mario Bros. 2#Doki Doki Panic). I don't see an issue with the disambiguation, and I would otherwise oppose a move per WP:MOVEREDIRECT. -- Tavix (talk) 21:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sperjohn/sandbox[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. This redirect was clearly created by mistake. Thryduulf (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

moved from a user's sandbox, no need for redirect greyzxq talk 21:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Blind (upcoming film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The film has been released, so this redirect is no longer accurate. I'll note that it was created before the films debut. Deauthorized. (talk) 20:08, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now. The redirect is still getting 10-20 hits a day most days and so is very clearly still necessary to get readers to the content they are looking for. Thryduulf (talk) 21:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Thryduulf: To this end, would you (hypothetically) propose this title get re-nominated once the pageviews begin to decline? While the redirect might technically get people to the "right target" in the present time, "upcoming" is no longer an accurate description and is a costly redirect to maintain. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      Once the page views have (all-but) ceased then yes it will be fine to be renominated. WP:COSTLY is an essay that grossly overstates the actual costs of redirects (which are actually WP:CHEAP). In cases like this the cost of maintaining the redirect is essentially zero so the benefit from deletion is also essentially zero, but the costs of making it significantly harder for readers to find the content they are looking for are significant. Depending on the combination how they are searching or browsing for the content, what device/browser they are using, and what type of access level they have (anon, confirmed, administrator) a deleted redirect can result in someone being multiple clicks/taps away from the content instead of being taken directly there. Thryduulf (talk) 22:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

1Ph0n3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a plausible misspelling. Deauthorized. (talk) 19:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Likely to be a CSD R3 candidate as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete, don't speedy. This is the leet respelling of the target and as such gets thousands of hits on Google and is not therefore sufficiently implausible to be a G3 candidate. I'm not sure that it's a useful redirect as there is no particular affinity between leet and iPhones (that I'm aware of, but I'm very much not part of either culture) so the spirit of WP:RFOREIGN probably applies. Thryduulf (talk) 21:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Struckthrough possible CSD candidacy. My rationale behind it was that this subject has no notable affinity about being written in leetspeak, as much as any other topic would be. The only (admittedly very loose) association that exists is that both are "technological", but that's about it. The ghits I did not factor in, but almost all results for "1ph0n3" are just that word being included in paragraphs of leet, mainly stemming from a 2021 song on spotify that happens to include that as one of the words.
Side note, but I would not have considered leet to be treated as a foreign language, as I feel regular foreign-language redirects are probably more valid of spellings and search terms. Nobody actually SPEAKS in leet exclusively (at least, I don't think anyone does), meaning that 1ph0n3 wouldn't be the "resorting search term that was created for those who speak leet language", but the slow deletion is probably preferable here. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • d3lete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment 5am5ung was created cotemporaneously on the same basis, and should be considered for inclusion in this RfD. DefaultFree (talk) 11:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Climber (climbing)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11#Climber (climbing)

Invest 99-L[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The later RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 17#Invest 93L suggests consensus may no longer be in support of having this redirect, plus in this case, the hyphenated usage is extremely uncommon. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: You say that "this 93-L RfD suggests consensus leans towards the removal of this 99-L redirect". Firstly, that particular 93-L RfD is still ongoing and receiving active participation as recently as 10 minutes ago while I'm typing. Alluding that the "consensus is already there" in regards to the outcome of an unfinished RfD does not quite bode well in my opinion, especially when you're directly involved via your deletion vote and your ongoing discussion comments from a few hours ago. These redirect titles could have been easily aired within that discussion as "follow-up redirects to pursue at RfD". There is no WP:RUSH for this discussion to be happening simultaneously to the other one, as the 93-L discussion has been a "hot-topic RfD" up for 3 weeks with multiple relists, and it's still being talked about. Asking editors to juggle this alongside the other RfD that has not yet finished, under the presumption that "consensus has already been decided as delete, so the rest of the similar redirects should get nominated straight-away" is not a great practice and can create confusing contexts, in my opinion. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)As for what to do, I feel this discussion (as well as the other two new RfDs) should probably be closed for the time being to allow the Invest 93-L RfD to finish once everyone says their piece, and allow for an official result to come to pass. If it ultimately closes with a "retarget" verdict, then these extra three nominations won't serve much of a purpose once the precedent has been set (as I presume these will be treated the same way). If 93-L ends up being deleted, THEN I think is a good time to nominate the other three redirects in a bundle, rather than three different discussions. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:51, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • If only one redirect had been nominated, I'd just say to wait, but with 98L and 91-L above I'd recommend bundling the noms. Saves us time later down the line. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • all of these noms should be hasty closed, to prevent confusion/splitting discussion, and bundled with the discussion that has been ongoing. - Darker Dreams (talk) 01:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To bundle Invest 99-L with Invest 91-L and Invest 98L.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Duckmather (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep now that Invest 93L points to Invest (meteorology). The hyphenated forms are awkward, but I don't think there's a real reason to delete them, though I would discourage creation of new hyphenated ones unless they are found to be in a decent bit of use. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

AZK[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 15:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Create a disambiguation page at Draft:AZK (disambiguation). Here, there are kinase AZK and a code for Azalhelikopter. It's not known if there is an .azk file extension, but it's likely Amazon Kindle. If AZK has a relation to Azad Kashmir, please redirect Azk to it. 176.33.244.251 (talk) 17:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambig per nom's draft, to which I've added another entry. Having looked in detail I can say that the search results are significantly inferior to the disambiguation page. Thryduulf (talk) 21:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per the above. No clear primary topic of this three-letter acronym. BD2412 T 23:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate even after removing entries failing WP:DABNOT, there are still a variety of topics which verifiably use the acronym AZK. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 23:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tarāpuku[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelling of Maori-language term Tarāpuka. Does not seem like a plausible typographical error ArcticSeeress (talk) 17:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Not a plausible keyboarding error on a qwerty keyboard, but it is a plausible misspelling, which, I suspect, is how it came about. It is not clear to me that any of the ten reasons for deleting a redirect apply. And it's not obvious to me that it is doing any harm. I also see no reason to retarget it. Ultimately I don't care much whether it is kept or deleted. Nurg (talk) 08:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Francesco Antonio Bertuccio[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling not used in article or in sources ArcticSeeress (talk) 18:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

PartiaTë Gjelbërit e Shqipërisë[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Likely meant to redirect to Green Party of Albania, but the missed space between "Partia" and "të" makes it meaningless; implausible typo. Zero page views in last 90 days ArcticSeeress (talk) 11:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Hey man im josh: Why was this and the below nomination relisted? I would think me having supported and no opposition makes sufficient consensus to delete. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery: This is my first day closing RfDs so I may have been overly cautious by relisting instead of deleting. Sorry if this is out of the norm. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Lenticel (talk) 02:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hey man im josh: usually 2 or 3 editors are enough for a consensus here in RfD. This is due to RfD having less participants than at AfD. --Lenticel (talk) 02:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an implausible typo per nom. (To chime in, it is my understanding per WP:RELIST that relisted discussions don't have to wait another 7 days before being closed. If consensus is found, noms can be re-processed right away, if desired. 😉) Utopes (talk / cont) 02:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per nom. For the record, HMIJ, I'm not an admin but have observed plenty of admin closed and 1 delete is enough for a delete and, as a matter of fact, nominations with no !votes are usually soft deleted without relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 02:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yeni Mersin İdmanyurdu[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Being a phoenix club of the former Mersin İdman Yurdu, it should have its own article as it's a separate legal entity. – anlztrk (talk) 13:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:REDLINK --Lenticel (talk) 02:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above and WP:REDYES. As mentioned in the above discussion for PartiaTë Gjelbërit e Shqipërisë, this is another situation where a discussion would typically be closed as delete rather than relisted. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 11:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Multi-member university[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 14:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This terminology is no longer mentioned at the target; all mentions of "multi-member university" were scrubbed and replaced with "university systems"... although even with that being said, "multi-member university" is still a vague search term and, to my understanding, not necessarily unique to universities in Vietnam. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:45, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gary Meyer[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Better as a search term the can lead readers to the many "Gary Meyer"s mentioned in articles than as a redirect from a misspelling. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:37, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Retarget to Stargate (film), as the same redirect location as Gary Meyers, to which this spelling can be a plausible intended target, if no other person named "Gary Meyer" is notable enough for an article. (The redirect can be expanded whenever someone named Gary Meyer meets the criteria for inclusion). Utopes (talk / cont) 07:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, search output is more useful that redirecting to one specific misspelling. —Kusma (talk) 16:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Attha[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how this is related to soul, probably a misunderstanding for the Pāli word for soul, that is atta, without an h. (Pāli is used in Theravāda Buddhism.) Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 14:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. If OP's assumption is correct, leaving the redirect is still probably better than deleting it for exactly that confusion. If there is something the word is more likely to be reference to, retarget there. Deleting the redirect has no benefit, the redirect existing has no additional cost. - Darker Dreams (talk) 16:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:10, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 18:42, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Nobody has identified the language of this redirect, and wikt:attha does not list any meanings as soul in any language. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gwynfryn and Cefndeuddwr baronet[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 11#Gwynfryn and Cefndeuddwr baronet

Cite article[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Citation. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This WP:XNR was originally created to target {{Cite article}} which was itself deleted at TfD, and this was automatically redirected to {{Cite news}} by User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster as {{Cite article}} was a redirect to {{Cite news}}. As {{Cite article}} was deleted at RfD last year for ambiguity at this RfD Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 3#Template:Cite article, this too should be deleted. TartarTorte 18:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak retarget to Citation, which is a general article about citations for those interested in citing articles. (I thought there could be some exposition about specifically citing articles, but that might violate WP:NOTHOWTO and/or be more suitable for Wikibooks than here.) Duckmather (talk) 20:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Citation. Someone using this search term could be looking for how to add citations to Wikipedia articles or for how to cite Wikipedia in their own work, the hatnotes at Citation provide links to the project space pages where they can find that information without dropping those who are looking for encyclopaedic information into the pipework. Thryduulf (talk) 21:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Citation per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either delete or retarget to Citation. Given its a XNR which isn't Wikipedia specific and the page of the same name was deleted. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Boxing at the 2023 Pacific Games[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SELFRED from 2023 Pacific Games Yoblyblob (talk / cont) 16:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoblyblob: I wanted to note that Archery at the 2023 Pacific Games and Athletics at the 2023 Pacific Games have also been created by the same user. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hey man im josh thank you, will mark those in a bit. Yoblyblob (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't find the WP:SELFRED argument convincing, but there simply isn't enough substance there to warrant any of these redirects, as the target includes nothing more than a bare list of sports. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bullet trains[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bullet train. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:57, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose retarget to Bullet train because "Shinkansen" is the name of the bullet trains in Japan, but other high speed train systems also are called "bullet trains". Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 13:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Skolar[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 15#Skolar

Wikipedia:PYRZQXGL[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 15:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

As a nonsense smashing of letters, this is impossible to be useful moving forward. Was used once, at User talk:Iridescent/Archive 34, as an example of some obscure policy. It was subsequently turned blue, which IMO ruined the effect. -- Tavix (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete is slightly better, but neither keeping or deleting does much. —Kusma (talk) 10:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Acronym has no significance; the fact that it targets the humorous essay in WP space should not open WP:PANDORA's doors to allow next-to-infinite possibilities for made-up terms. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The entire point of that target is that Wikipedia's policies and guidelines appear to the uninitated as a massive smashing of letters. This is perfectly self-descriptive. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Nothing special about this particular permutation of letters. One link, and an average of less than one view per week (including the spikes while this was at RfD), do not suggest that this is useful. Complex/Rational 15:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Coats of arms of the Holy See and Vatican City[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article used to group the two topics together, but I have split the article into two distinct articles. This resulted in an WP:XY situation. I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Trash[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Trash. as an alternative to deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not described as such anywhere on the page. Maybe there's an alternative target but... I wouldn't count on it. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Impeachment of Joe Biden[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing this redirect in the queue, I felt it was worth the discussion. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. As this situation currently stands, there is no impeachment, so this redirect's existence in the first place is possibly misleading. If there is an impeachment, then this redirect should exist (although it would probably be an article instead by that point). In the meantime, I feel this redirect, which claims there is an impeachment, may be out-of-place in the current state of events. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep; I think this is fine. While incorrect, I think that impeachment is often used colloquially, or as a shortening of "proposed impeachment". The lede clarifies quick enough for the confused reader. J947 † edits 10:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. While technically incorrect this is a highly plausible search term, likely used by those who are not familiar with the technicalities of what impeachment actually means and/or who don't know whether he has been impeached or not. The target explains the situation so will clear up any misconceptions, misunderstandings, misrememberings or other confusion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nom comment: If this redirect stays in existence, would the article for the Impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden be the more appropriate target for this title? The article in question (for the impeachment inquiry) was created last month, and seems to speak about the impeachment in a much more tangible manner, rather than hand-wavingly referring to the "efforts to impeach", which is not as firm as the current redirect's title suggests it would be.
As a relevant example, the article for Impeachment of Donald Trump is a disambiguation page that includes Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump as a high ranking target option, while the "efforts to impeach Donald Trump" article is relegated to the See Also section. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Readers searching for this title will be taken to the most relevant topic, which includes reference to the inquiry. BD2412 T 23:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Botanical & Zoological Garden[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Complex/Rational 12:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple locations with this name, among multiple variations of this name. To me, it is not overwhelming clear that this particular garden is what is being sought with this search term; alternatives include Botanical and Zoological Garden of Tsimbazaza, Hong Kong Zoological and Botanical Gardens, and other slight typographical differences. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambig. Multiple plausible targets with no obvious primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 15:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per nom. A draft disambiguation page is now available below the redirect. - Eureka Lott 23:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

National and University Library[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10#National and University Library

Matty (artist)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Matty (name). ✗plicit 06:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is nobody on Wikipedia named Matty who is listed as an "artist". While this likely refers to musical artists, there are multiple people named Matty to whom this description would apply. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Matty (musician)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Matty (name). ✗plicit 06:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple musicians named Matty. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Matty (singer)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Matty (name). ✗plicit 06:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple singers named Matty. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I intentionally didn't combine in case there were occasions where some "Matty"'s were musicians, but not specifically singers. Or, in case an artist named "Matty" pops up which may warrant the primary target for being an artist. You're right, they likely could have been, though. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Matty[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10#Matty

Stephen Hawking CH CBE FRS FRSA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. I am withdrawing this RfD; Hawking appears in numerous sources with these titles which I didn't fully understand the significance of at first. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 06:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While these seem to be a list of companionships and fellowships Hawking has been recognized by, I'm unsure how plausible of a search term it would be to include these recognitions after completing the name of the subject. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Misophaes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Andronikos I Komnenos. signed, Rosguill talk 15:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target article, although the names do sound somewhat similar. I would suggest retargeting this to Andronikos I Komnenos, to which "Misophaes" appears to be one of his epithets. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Osemanverse[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10#Osemanverse

Ken Marschall (disambiguation)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10#Ken Marschall (disambiguation)

List of Taipei Taishin Mars head coaches[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗plicit 06:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Three redirects that were created a month apart from each other, which point to a "list" of head coaches. However, this team was only just created this year, and there is only one head coach. There is no indication as to when in the future the next head coach will be brought in, if there will be. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Upcoming Olivia Rodrigo album[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not upcoming, for one. Will become a WP:COSTLY title to maintain for future albums. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per numerous past cases. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 03:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The page views indicate that this redirect is no longer needed, with over three months of basically zero usage. Thryduulf (talk) 10:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Xi̱taꞌén[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 06:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This name is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. I was unable to find anything online via a cursory search, either. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ohio College Republican Federation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 06:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to have a redirect for this particular chapter, which is not referred to anywhere at the target page. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Xi Mude[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. There is agreement that this is a plausible alternative spelling. signed, Rosguill talk 15:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "Mude" at the target, and the only mention of "Xi" is in reference to the target's sister. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: This is the target's Chinese name in Pinyin (without tones). --ItMarki (talk) 05:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep since pinyin-based romanization is a common/standard method readers can ordinarily expect, even though in this case it's not the person's usual English name. It's in the infobox (admittedly collapsed in desktop mode; with diacritics) and some articles will also put it in the lead sentence or elsewhere too. Adumbrativus (talk) 07:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for pointing this out! I didn't even realize that box was on the page, and was very confused when I stumbled across this redirect referring to someone that was seemingly not mentioned. If this is an accurate romanization then I'd be alright with closing this discussion, as this can be a plausible alternative spelling for the individual's name, then. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Linday[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is nobody named "Linday" at the given page. Possible WP:XY with Lindsay as well. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No Wikipedia articles about any people (or anything else) with this name. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Hits in en.wiki search seems to be misspellings of "Lindsay" --Lenticel (talk) 03:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete within Wikipedia it appeared as a typo for Linda, Lindey, Lindsay, and even Laday. None of the mentions of people correctly called Linday are worth a retarget or a disambiguation. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 07:08, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Redirects with zero width characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects match existing redirects to their targets or the target itself, excepting the addition of zero-width joiners for two and a zero width non-joiner for the other. All are unlikely search terms that do not serve any navigational purpose, but too old for WP:R3. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:8489:A874:5C01:59F3 (talk) 02:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete R3 is really about allowing implausible redirects out. Even though it technically might not apply, the spirit is more important than the letter. In other words, fix all the links to the one without the non-printing character and then delete. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 16:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Baby (Resident Evil)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "Baby" of any variety mentioned at the target article Utopes (talk / cont) 02:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as vague. Off the top of my head there was a giant enemy baby in RE The Village but that was just a relatively obscure monster. --Lenticel (talk) 05:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(I believe that is the character being referred to in this redirect, according to the Resident Evil fan wiki. Nevertheless, it's not here at this target.) Utopes (talk / cont) 06:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_October_3&oldid=1193004258"