Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 2, 2023.

Hamas militants[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10#Hamas militants

Worn (instrument)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:G6. The history at Worm (instrument) clearly shows this was created in error. Thryduulf (talk) 20:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a worm at Serpent (instrument)#Worm but not a Worn. It's a bit of an implausible typo with the disambiguator there. TartarTorte 19:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

미국[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Names of the United States#미국. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 08:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obvious WP:RFFL; no clear connection between the Korean language and the United States. Anonymous 19:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

D Trump[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Keep !voters did so due to the 45th US president being the primary topic, which was not addressed by the other identified, yet non-primary topics. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 06:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous per Dorothy Trump, Donald L. Trump, and David H. Trump. Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as the 45th US president is without a doubt the primary topic for this search term.
Anonymous 19:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Donakd Trump[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per author request. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a misspelling, it seems like completely missing the "L" is too unlikely to be helpful. Steel1943 (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This is clearly a typo rather than a misspelling (K being one key left of L on a QWERTY keyboard), but it doesn't seem to be an especially common one. Thryduulf (talk) 19:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 22:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. I'm not quite sure why I created this redirect but it can go. Noah 💬 23:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trumpesque[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10#Trumpesque

Harpo Winfrey[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10#Harpo Winfrey

Oprah's Last Chapter[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 10#Oprah's Last Chapter

Workspace/Dark Harvest (2016 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is an implausible title, because "Workspace/Dark Harvest" is not an alternative name of the film. It's rather a reference to MichaelQSchmidt's space for drafts (see this index and the initial edit summary). I considered speedying this under G6 before, but I thought the error was not immediately obvious. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2023 Ghazi Amanullah Khan Regional One Day Tournament[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Redirect has been turned into an article, as such, RfD is no longer appropriate. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The current target provides no information on this tournament. This redirect was created from a redlink on Ghazi Amanullah Khan Regional One Day Tournament, so retargeting back to there, which does not have information on the 2023 touranment either, is probably not helpful. This should best be deleted, so it can be created as a proper article per WP:REDYES and because there is no appropriate target on Wikipedia. TartarTorte 16:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

10 steps behind[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as confusing and possibly Islamophobic. I could not find any mention of this term online besides an obscure and non-notable song, and nothing related to women in Islam. Anonymous 14:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete no notable connection found, unlikely to be used in connection to the two Yoblyblob (talk) 15:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete surprised no one noticed this undue redirect earlier itself. Delete as nom suggests. Bookku (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: It seems there is a myth, for which I could find no substantiation for, that Muslim women are to walk 10 steps behind their husbands. It's not a particularly pervasive myth as it took a fair amount of googling to even find. There would be absolutely no way to put that into the article, nor should there be as it doesn't seem to be supported by anything that's close to reliable. With all of that stated, this should be deleted as inaccurate and WP:SURPRISE. TartarTorte 16:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There is a myth about women being required to walk behind men, but the distance varies (e.g. 10 steps, 3 steps, 5 paces, 10 yards, etc). There are a couple of sources I've found that mention it which are not obviously unreliable [1][2] (but I've not looked to see if they actually are reliable). But I don't see enough to merit adding content anywhere here, and without such content this redirect is not useful. Thryduulf (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

서사하라[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any particulary affinity for the Korean language in Western Sahara, making this an unlikely redirect under WP:RLOTE. TartarTorte 12:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

괌[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:RLOTE. The country's name in Korean is not a useful redirect. --211.197.54.36 (talk) 12:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. While there are connections between (South) Korea and Guam, our articles do not suggest that these extend to the Korean language in any significant way or are otherwise significant enough to make this a useful redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 22:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above and WP:RLOTE. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Thomas Dickey[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 9#Thomas Dickey

Army of Aragon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading, so it should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 08:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, ambiguous (Napoleonic army or Army of the Crown of Aragon) and we don't really have separate articles on either of the two concepts. Better to have a red link. —Kusma (talk) 07:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate could refer to the Napoleonic army or the military of Aragon. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've drafted a DAB for consideration at the target page. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 06:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      Still support deletion, we don't actually have sufficient content on any of the dab entries. —Kusma (talk) 09:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow • talk 13:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete DAB is pointless if we don't have articles for the armies of each Aragonese state. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 14:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Per MOS:DABMENTION, having an article of its own is not a requirement for a dab entry. The land-based military activities of the political entities are all described in their articles, admittedly to varying degrees, and the French army's activities in the Peninsular War are described in the linked section. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pinging Presidentman and Darker Dreams for their opinion on the drafted disambig page since they had also favoured disambiguation. Jay 💬 15:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I support this draft. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 12:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist — move forward with drafted disambiguation page or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as ambiguous. Do not support the drafted dab per Kusma and Super. Disambig pages of the format "<something> of Aragon" are useful if there are multiple articles with content covering the title subject, not multiple articles disambiguating Aragon. Jay 💬 07:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Jay. We're reaching and asking readers to assemble their own articles from pieces here. Much better to be honest that we don't have what they're looking for. --BDD (talk) 21:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • To help an administrator assess the consensus, I would delete per the comments above. A disambiguation page should focus specifically on the armies of Aragon, not Aragon itself. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Graphix[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 9#Graphix

Public Appointments Service[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are not the same body. CPSA is an oversight body over the PAS. The redirect should either be deleted to restore this to a redlink, indicating the need for this article, or redirected to Civil Service of the Republic of Ireland. The latter isn't ideal, as there is already a link on Civil Service of the Republic of Ireland to Public Appointments Service. The ideal solution, of course, is for one of us to create the page for PAS soon! Iveagh Gardens (talk) 16:15, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No comments so far...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom's first preference. Jay 💬 07:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of libertarian socialist communities[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 01:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Libertarian" and "Socialist" not listed in the body of the article, and the two concepts of libertarian socialism and anarchism are not 1:1 synonyms to my knowledge, so this title appears to be inaccurate in part. Spot-checking the list entries to see if the "libertarian socialist" identifiers were accurate, 5/5 entries I checked defined themselves as neither libertarian, nor socialist. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Definition of anarchism and libertarianism#Overview states (with a source) that "Libertarian socialism" has been a synonym for "anarchism" since 1890 and Category:Anarchist organizations is a subcategory of Category:Libertarian socialist organizations. Thryduulf (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Thryduulf: It can be used as a synonym, and it often has been. But there's been movement away from that recently and towards using "libertarian socialism" as a broader umbrella term that includes anarchism, along with other things. Main issue with this redirect is that the term "libertarian socialist communities" isn't a thing that pops up in any sources,[3] whereas "anarchist communities" is well-established terminology.[4] Grnrchst (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 23:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The creator of this redirect was attempting to use it as a prospective target for a move request, which failed, as there weren't sufficient sources on "libertarian socialist communities". There's not enough sources for a redirect either, nor does it appear as though there's particularly demanding need for such a redirect. --Grnrchst (talk) 18:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist — the comment on whether "libertarian socialism" is synonymous with "anarchism" needs some discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per Grnrchst that "libertarian socialist communities" isn't a thing. Jay 💬 06:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'm not sure why the comment on whether "libertarian socialism" is synonymous with "anarchism" (it is) has any bearing here, since as Grnrchst has pointed out, "libertarian socialist communities" isn't in any sources. -- asilvering (talk) 10:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Danbooru[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Section about Danbooru-style image boards not mentioned on target page anymore. Also looking at the edit history for the target page shows what looks like an edit war about that subject. 1033Forest (talk) 20:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No comments since the last one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Booru-style imageboards seem popular as social media sites (whether "-booru" is part of the name or not). They seem to show up for results in various (safe-search-off) image searches (If safe-search is one, they seem to be filtered out, but then so do alot of social media sites in general). Danbooru itself seems a topic of scholarly research [5] -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 04:31, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there is no information at the target, and there is no better target than Imageboard. Once the target article stabilizes and we have well-sourced information, the redirects may be recreated. Jay 💬 06:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Albanian genocide[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 9#Albanian genocide

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_2&oldid=1186970452"