Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 30

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 30[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 30, 2023.

Untitled Batman film[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 19:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No longer applies: has a title. Steel1943 (talk) 18:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I'm indifferent, but this could potentially go to The Batman (film)#Future to capture content for which the draft @Draft:Untitled third The Batman film exists, but some additional verbiage would need to be added to the section beyond the first sequel in order to be valid. -2pou (talk) 19:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The subject has a title. Any future untitled Batman films would use sequel terminology such as the third film draft in correlation to this film. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: As the film has a title, this redirect does not apply anymore, and in the future it will likely apply to other Batman films. —El Millo (talk) 21:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the above two comments: the film has a title so the redirect does not apply anymore. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 14:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per reasons given above. There is also two different Batman films in the work as of now, one for the DCU and one as a sequel to the 2022 film, so having a single "Untitled Batman film" redirect anywhere is non-optimal.★Trekker (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:UFILM. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bail out[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bailout (disambiguation). The process of the merge of Bailing out may be handled independently. Jay 💬 10:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As verbs, these terms have a much stronger likelihood than they do as nouns of referring to one of the other meanings listed at Bailout (disambiguation). I encountered this when writing that someone had posted bail for someone else, and was surprised to be taken to the current target. Retarget to DAB. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 18:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, an odd wrinkle: Bailing out is a separate DAB, created by the same user (Z''L) as these redirects. I'm not sure which would be the better approach here: a) merge Bailing out to Bailout (disambiguation) or b) move Bailing out to Bail out over the redirect, add a mention of posting bail, retarget Bailed out there, and link to that from Bailout (disambiguation). A third option would be to simply retarget both of these to Bailing out and add that mention, but I don't think that's a very logical navigation structure. Right now I lean toward (a). -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 18:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support nom's target proposals and (a), for the reasons they give. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:11, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom --Lenticel (talk) 02:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 19:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(deletion) Reason-This film is not announced yet and if announced why it has a redirect if the first film of this franchise is not relesed yet. Tousif.15 (talk) 11:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, WP:REDLINK, and the fact that it makes absolutely no sense to redirect a title from a media project to one of potentially multiple notable subjects which are or may be attached to the project. Steel1943 (talk) 20:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Also, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 3#Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 2 (film). Steel1943 (talk) 20:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Douglass Mackey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 08:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm uncomfortable with redirecting the name of a (currently) non-notable person to the biography of the man who "outed" his online identity. This redirect's creator also created the Stephen French (troll) redirect which was deleted per "If he's not notable on his own I don't see good reason to have any sort of redirect at all."

Wikipedia briefly had an article about him in April 2018 which was deleted by Bbb23 per (G10: Biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced) despite its citations to HuffPost, New York Daily News, Southern Poverty Law Center and Daily Dot.

Arguably he has become notable since January 2021 when he was charged with disseminating misinformation designed to deprive individuals of their constitutional right to vote. This was not mentioned in the previously deleted version of his bio, but has been covered by reliable sources:

– wbm1058 (talk) 17:01, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Richest american guy ever[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 08:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a joke redirect that originally redirected to a joke article that has since been deleted. This is not a serious or encyclopedic search term, and it is also not specifically addressed in the current target. As such, I propose deletion. TNstingray (talk) 14:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Multiple target suggestions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bishnupuriya Utsab[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 11#Bishnupuriya Utsab

Beaney[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 05:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate. I tried to do that but it was reverted. I don't see a great predominance of results for this museum in Google search, so it doesn't appear greater than the surname that the museum derives its name from in the first 100 results. Most results are just people with this surname. The museum shows a greater affinity for "The Beaney" instead. -- 65.92.244.249 (talk) 04:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate as in revision of 24 March, as the most helpful to the reader. PamD 06:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate Can't see it being a primary topic with single-digits views per day for the target.[1] Only three people with the name, so make it a dab page, as opposed to a namelist with hatnote.—Bagumba (talk) 09:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move redirect name to The Beaney. It has been called The Beaney by the locals for many decades - certainly when I was there in the 1960s, and probably long before. I originally named this redirect, Beaney, because I was aware that WP didn't like the use of "The". I did not know then, that WP can make exceptions. Most Canterbury residents and tourists (of which there are many thousands in summer) will search for The Beaney, and never for whatever long name the Council chooses for it this year or next. Storye book (talk) 11:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate as proposed by nom and Bagumba. The Beaney already exists as a redirect to the museum. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate. I had not realised that there was already a The Beaney redirect, sorry. In that case, I agree with the disambiguate policy. Storye book (talk) 18:08, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per above --Lenticel (talk) 02:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Turkish invasion[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 17#Turkish invasion

Opposite of mass incarceration[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 06:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the cusp of being, but probably not quite, a deleted article with a freaky title. Delete as a silly, unlikely search term. An anonymous username, not my real name 01:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_March_30&oldid=1150350626"