Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 20[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 20, 2023.

SearXNG[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 3#SearXNG

The Little Mermaid (upcoming film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Pageviews justify keeping for now. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:11, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:UFILM. Target released 2 months ago; "upcoming" no longer applies. Steel1943 (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep The Little Mermaid (upcoming film) for now, because it's still seeing significant traffic. The page has averaged 76 pageviews per day over the last month, and there were days in May and June where it saw hundreds of views. Deleting it now would throw an unnecessary error message at too many visitors. - Eureka Lott 00:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per EurekaLott. Even (upcoming Disney film) is still getting uses, nowhere near the thousands (upcoming film) is still receiving, but enough that deleting the redirect at this point would harm the encyclopaedia. Thryduulf (talk) 07:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (sigh) per WP:UFILM. Come on, people. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Just because a guideline exists doesn't mean it is correct in every case. In this case following the guideline would make the encyclopaedia worse for hundreds of readers without bringing any benefit at all. Thryduulf (talk) 20:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep for now because they are still getting somepageviews and are therefore useful. However, these redirects will likely be deleted in the near future per WP:UFILM because pageviews are gradually dying down. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2525, 3535, 4545, 6565, 7510, 8510, 9595[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 27#2525, 3535, 4545, 6565, 7510, 8510, 9595

Bard(chatbot)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects without a space between the search term and the disambiguator are typically not useful. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Better by Design[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 27#Better by Design

Template:Use[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There is further support for the creation of a generic template at this title, which is outside the scope of the edits I'm taking on by closing this at RfD signed, Rosguill talk 22:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is far too broad a title to redirect to any single target (e.g. template:Use British English, template:Use mdy dates, etc). Additionally, the templates that begin Use add hidden notices to articles for editors and bots, the template's target is intended for use on talk pages although it was in use at Sunan Kalijaga (an article about an Indonesian that was also marked to use DMY dates but which has no dates more precise than the year and no immediately obvious tie to either US or British English words or spelling). At Talk:Estonian Soviet Socialist Republic#Renewed discussion regarding variant John Maynard Friedman mentioned it in a comment last month in a manner that suggests they were using it in a generic manner. Thryduulf (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: well, it's clearly a misleading target. Is it possible to expand it into a template that acts as a sort of a wild card? I'm not sure how to describe this. For example, {{Use|br-en}} would yield the same as {{Use British English}}, {{Use|mdy}} would do {{Use mdy}}, etc. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd not be opposed to that if people think it would be useful (no real opinion on that), but how to do it is orders of mangnitude above my template coding ability! Thryduulf (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The Use xx templates are tagged by WikiProject Manual of Style, so I've left a message there soliciting opinions on the desirability etc of your idea. Thryduulf (talk) 21:43, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 16:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think I've figured out how to create such a template, if there is support for it. It would use the {{#ifeq}} parser function. (e.g., {{#ifeq: {{{1}}}|mdy|This would return [[Template:mdy]] if {{{1}}} equals mdy.}} Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:47, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - it's not a misleading target, it's United States English Red Slash 19:53, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That explains the logic, but given the existence of the use xx family of templates I still find it misleading. Thryduulf (talk) 21:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete US-E/USE is not use -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 23:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support creation of a generic template as suggested by Edward-Woodrow. If consensus is not reached about this proposal, delete the redirect per the previous comments. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Same as TechnoSquirrel69: "Support creation of a generic template as suggested by Edward-Woodrow. If consensus is not reached about this proposal, delete the redirect per the previous comments."  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  10:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Edward-Woodrow's template proposal, delete redirect if consensus is not reached or template is unable to be created. Happily888 (talk) 12:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support changing per above but otherwise delete as use isn't limited to American use. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Law & Order: New York[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 9#Law & Order: New York

Wikipedia:CONTEST[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 1#Wikipedia:CONTEST

Grace Warrior[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. But, it was actually harder to determine that than you might think from the perfectly 50/50 headcount. Worth noting that even though it wasn't technically bundled, I'm including Grace Warrior Irwin Powell in this, too - anyone is free to WP:BRD or start a new discussion regarding that, if they think it's meaningfully different from Grace Warrior. (non-admin closure) casualdejekyll 18:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Amending to no consensus, retarget to Crikey! It's the Irwins, with thanks to User:Tavix. casualdejekyll 18:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not sure we need a redirect to someone's non-notable child who isn't even discussed in the article. --woodensuperman 08:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Support retarget per Jay. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 20:05, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete name of non-notable child not mentioned in article, blp protection of a minor--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Loriendrew. Her name probably doesn't need to be in the infobox, either, just a number. 〜 Askarion ✉ 13:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Devokewater 20:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Crikey! It's the Irwins where she is listed in the cast. She is the subject of special episode 4 "Crikey! It's A Baby", and Season 4 Episode 4 is called "Grace's Garden", so I wouldn't consider the part about BLP protection of a minor. Jay 💬 08:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the late retarget suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 05:36, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Per Jay, retarget to Crikey! It's the Irwins (and unlink there) along with Grace Warrior Irwin Powell, at least until Irwin family might become an article. Generally I would prefer to target a family member, but there's at least some (pseudo-)encyclopaedic context at another target in this case. Important to note – for this redirect, not the full name one which I am weaker on – that two word terms like such tend to result in navigability failures due to the shortcomings of our search engine. J947 † edits 10:39, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further opinions on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lynyrd scotland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as it appears to have started as a hoax stub article, created as part of a vandalism spree by Hunterhunter. I'm perhaps being overly cautious in not just nominating it for speedy deletion. Nurg (talk) 08:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sándor Bôkônyi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a Hungarian biography, but this Hungarian spelling for his name is made-up. Ô is not even in the Hungarian alphabet. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 07:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete this recent creation which appears to have been an error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Password game[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget the first to Password (disambiguation), keep the second as is. ✗plicit 08:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For password game: it seems that the original creator of the overwritten article (Quadell) and the original creator of the redirect (JB82) intended it to be for the home version of the game (see Password (American game show) § Home games). However, we now have The Password Game (created by ObserveOwl). Curious to see what community consensus is on this redirect – I don't think that the current target is very appropriate, and at the very least should be made more specific to the section on home games. Alternatives include retargeting to The Password Game or to Password (disambiguation), which is where Password (game) points (most recent editor is BOZ). Sdrqaz (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Amara Maple[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Name is not included in article, has apparently been removed after BLPN discussion, so redirect should be deleted. Seems to have been CSDd previously, so needs this venue. Also Amara maple PamD 06:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. No, it was NOT “CSDd” previously. See [1] and [2]. And, if you read the discussion you just mentioned, you’ll see even Amara Maple uses her real name either in YouTube videos [3] [4] [5], or allows it to be disclosed in extremely reputable sources [6]. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:13, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7 So add it back to the article, reliably sourced. Unless it is there, reliably sourced, the redirect should not exist - see the template note: "If this is the name of a living person, then one or more reliable sources must be included in the target article that will support the existence of this personal name, or else this redirect's talk page must be created and the reference(s) added there. PamD 07:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
“or else this redirect's talk page must be created and the reference(s) added there”.
I will add it to the talk page. Regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@RodRabelo7 Why not add it to the article? PamD 08:00, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why should I? RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To show the reader why they've reached the article. PamD 08:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This contradicts what the template you have just quoted states. That’s sufficient for the redirect to be kept. Regards and have a good day, RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Ertrinken 14:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC) (Nota bene Blocked sockpuppet) RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Unless you provide a valid rationale, your “vote” here should be completly ignored. Let’s remember you’ve recently opened a topic on administrators’ noticeboard about what you called my “misconduct”. This is WP:WIKIHOUNDING and if you continue with this behavior I’ll have to report you just as I have done before. Moreover, I have already done what the policy requires (that is, to create a talk page for the redirect in order to show that reliable sources use her WP:BLP name). RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:14, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You seem quite riled up. Stop accusing others, take a deep breath, and have a cup of tea and a nice sit-down. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @RodRabelo7: Please see WP:BLUDGEON ... and please avoid doing it further. Steel1943 (talk) 00:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per nom. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:29, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I'd like to suggest adding Amara maple to this nom. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Got it in right at the buzzer ... 23:59 UTC. Steel1943 (talk) 00:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hey man im josh: I'd say WP:JUSTDOIT next time, provided it is not the next day in UTC. Steel1943 (talk) 00:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks @Steel1943. I figured I probably could have, but there's just something in me that hates editing other people's nominations, so I like to suggest that they do it instead. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete if we must have an article on the fictional character of Lana Rhodes we don't need to maintain a redirect from their real name if it's not notable enough to be provided in the article. Spartaz Humbug! 07:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both. YouTube... really? Wikipedia's posting a porn star's real name needs WP:RELIABLE sources, not just a user-generated vlog. The name was removed from the article as BLP violation. The redirects violate the same policy. • Gene93k (talk) 08:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    You seem to ignore the Playboy source for some reason. “or else this redirect’s talk page must be created and the reference(s) added there”. Policy requires at least one reference. Isn’t the Playboy one sufficient for you? Why? Isn’t it reliable? RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Am I right you created this redirect after the BLPN discussion went against including the name in the article? Spartaz Humbug! 18:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I was involved in the [BLPN] discussion, as well as [removing] the redirect and directing RodRabelo7 to read BLPName, before it was promptly [reinserted].

RodRabelo7 was [notified] on 28th May, 2023 about the BLPN discussion by another user. Although the consensus was seemingly against them at the time, they stated the name should be included on 9 June, 2023 before [creating] their redirect. The history on the redirects pages shows a refusal to acknowledge BLP policy by ignoring the discussion, the policy, and re adding after removal. Also worth noting, the BLPN discussion has already clarified why the YouTube results are not a RS, as well as the Playboy article, and at this point it seems like a unwillingness to listen. And lastly - the original [adding] of the name was done by RodRabelo7 on 5 Feb, 2023 to the main article.

Awshort (talk) 10:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Soma Santoki[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:58, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating this for deletion as the redirect points to the wrong article. Soma Santoki is a Japanese actor [7] who does star in The Boy and the Heron, but has also worked in other films. The destination article contains no prose discussing Santoki. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom without prejudice on the creation of the subject's article should they be considered notable by our guidelines. --Lenticel (talk) 05:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to encourage article creation. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the above (and WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10). A7V2 (talk) 00:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

UncleKenneth/Kenneth turner[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect differs from most others of the same type in that the username appears to have some connection to its target subject. It's still an unlikely and redundant search term, and my Google searches for "UncleKenneth" turn up only unrelated people. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wishlist/MD (Ayurveda)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 12:28, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "Wishlist/" was an error, given that the article was previously located at "User:Netha Hussain/Wishlist/MD (Ayurveda)" (see this index). While I think this redirect would make a borderline case for G6, it is an obvious RFD candidate. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:XY, since the concept of a wishlist has no affinity to the concept of a Doctor of Medicine in Ayurveda (which is the topic of the target article). Duckmather (talk) 01:58, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Lenticel (talk) 05:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This was an erroneous redirect, which I later corrected. Please delete the link. --Netha (talk) 07:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Netha Hussain: I have tagged the redirect with {{db-g7}} ("author requests deletion"). I think this discussion can then be closed. Cheers, Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 12:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

3eni/Rico Tscharntke[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect containing a username, about a person who isn't currently mentioned in the article, resulting from an erroneous page move that lasted for one minute. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Auric/Hyena (Malawi)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another unlikely redirect prefixed with an username. The article in question, Sexual cleansing (see its page history), was at this title for less than one minute. The redirect doesn't cross the threshold into being "speedyable" due to the length of the username, but I don't see how it can be useful in any way. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was created when I moved my draft into mainspace. It was then moved to a more general title.--Auric talk 01:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

"Maypm" redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are two redirects created as a result of editor Maypm accidentally moving their drafts to the wrong title. They don't seem to be at all plausible, considering that the username has no connection to the buildings. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jilfi/Itzhak Druker[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like the RfDs above and below, this redirect is prefixed with the username of the article's creator, which makes it automatically implausible. The only reason I haven't speedied it yet is because the username is short, and as a result it is not prima facie "unambiguously created in error". Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ɱ/171-191 South High Street[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete (G7). — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible title because of the "Ɱ"; it was the result of an accidental move by Ɱ, the article's author, and was soon corrected two minuter later. At the same time, this title is not so egregious as to meet criterion G5 G6. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean G6? Also now meets G7, author requests deletion. ɱ (talk) 00:20, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ɱ: Oops, I have now corrected it (this was a pre-planned nomination). Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 00:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_July_20&oldid=1170875905"