Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 5[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 5, 2023.

Yanny\ or\ Laurel[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 17#Yanny\ or\ Laurel

Shah Pahlavi[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13#Shah Pahlavi

Chichan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to be an alternative name for Chechnya; internet and Google Scholar searches did not return anything relevant. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 21:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I assume this is an implausible typo of Chechen (which is a dab, so retarget there if not deletion)? {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 00:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete google search says that this is a vulgat Spanish word for sex so unlikely synonym. --Lenticel (talk) 12:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. This does appear to be an alternate transliteration, see for example [1] (bottom of page 6) and the tweet embedded in [2], but it is uncommon. More common in search results are people's names and a musical artist, none of whom seem to be notable. Thryduulf (talk) 14:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Singa Penne[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target or List of programmes broadcast by Zee Tamil (India); is mentioned at a number of different actor biographies, but in the absence of a clear primary target among them, deletion seems like the best option unless a due mention can be added to List of programmes broadcast by Zee Tamil (India). signed, Rosguill talk 21:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Missing Zee Kannada programmes[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13#Missing Zee Kannada programmes

Thanthu Vitten Ennai ( Tamil TV Series)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target or List of programmes broadcast by Zee Tamil (India), delete unless a duly-sourced mention can be added somewhere. N.b. the disambiguator includes two typos, but these are minor and can be resolved if there's a consensus other than deletion for the unerlying concept. signed, Rosguill talk 21:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jorge Medina Estévez[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Jorge Medina (cardinal). Jay 💬 15:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The target is not known by this name. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Each of these should be retargeted to Jorge Medina (cardinal). Randi Moth TalkContribs 21:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Christian Cxatria[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep. Per WP:SK#1, withdrawn by nom. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This redirects to Roman Catholic Kshatriya. I searched for this expression on Google and found nothing except in text originating from Wikipedia itself. So I strongly supposed this phrase was made up by the user who created the page, and has no real use elsewhere. 176.159.12.72 (talk) 17:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As I said at the Teahouse, I did a Google Books search for Cxatria and learned that it is the Portuguese word for the Indian varna (caste related) Kshatriya, and that it is used in Portuguese books about India. There are 20 million Catholics in India and their history for the past 500 years is intertwined with Portuguese colonialism in India, which continued until 1961. The former Portuguese colony of Goa, now the most prosperous state in India, is 25% Roman Catholic. This is not a made up phrase, although admittedly obscure. Cullen328 (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep My mistake. It quite makes sense indeed. 176.159.12.72 (talk) 18:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

SDNY[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay 💬 15:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My experience researching and writing about "SDNY" indicates it (far) more commonly refers to United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, that is, the Manhattan federal prosecutor's office, and I recommend re-targeting there. soibangla (talk) 16:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

UEFA Euro 2032 qualifying[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FUTURE and WP:TOOSOON, same reason we don't have 2044 Summer Olympics as a redirect. Also not mentioned at target. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Raat Ka Khel Saara[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 13#Raat Ka Khel Saara

2050 Formula One World Championship[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL. Same reason we don't have 2044 Summer Olympics as a redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Billy Jones (1970s singer)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 16#Billy Jones (1970s singer)

Windermere (town), Westmorland and Furness[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 16:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was created in error Devokewater 09:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Even though malformed, it's harmless and may even prevent some future misguided and careless editor from creating a duplicate at that plausible (well, an experienced editor used it) title. PamD 09:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Westmorland and Furness is the name of the local council not the name of the county. Cumbria has not been abolished. --Devokewater 09:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well yes the ceremonial county of Cumbria still exists but the administrative county doesn't. Westmorland and Furness is a non-metropolitan county but not a ceremonial county which is why we use "Cumbria" if sufficient. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's doing its job of redirecting from a plausible but out-of-policy name to an in-policy name. -- Dr Greg  talk  12:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pam and Greg. We don't require readers to be intimately familiar with our naming schemes in order to find the article they are looking for. This unambiguously identifies the subject and is plausible based on a superficial understanding of how we title articles so there is benefit to it existing and no benefit to deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 14:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Windermere, Westmorland and Furness (town)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 16:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was created in error Devokewater 09:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's harmless and may even prevent some future misguided and careless editor from creating a duplicate at that plausible title. PamD 09:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Westmorland and Furness is the name of the local council not the name of the county. Cumbria has not been abolished. --Devokewater 09:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's doing its job of redirecting from a plausible but out-of-policy name to an in-policy name. -- Dr Greg  talk  12:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pam and Doug. This is an unambiguous, plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 15:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alston, Westmorland and Furness[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 16:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was created in error Devokewater 08:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's harmless and may even prevent some future misguided and careless editor from creating a duplicate at that plausible title. PamD 09:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Westmorland and Furness is the name of the local council not the name of the county. Cumbria has not been abolished. --Devokewater 09:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's doing its job of redirecting from a plausible but out-of-policy name to an in-policy name. -- Dr Greg  talk  12:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pam and Doug. This is an unambiguous, plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 15:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ronald you idiot[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy Deleted as a G10 by PhilKnight (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 16:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on a Google search, I can't find any relation between this redirect to Apple, Inc. I can find some use of it in fan stories related to Harry Potter, but nothing about Apple. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

redirect creator here: it is in fact a very funny jab at Mr. Roland Wayne Georgemoody 12:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Doesn't appear to have been an appropriate redirect creation based on the above comment by the redirect creator... Hey man im josh (talk) 13:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete: WP:G10 the entire purpose of this redirect, as admitted by the creator is a jab at Mr. Ronald Wayne. TartarTorte 02:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 13:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per G10: This is a blatant attack redirect created on April Fools' Day. Even aside from that, any redirect with a mere 8 search results would be deleted if it was brought to RfD. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 13:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per G10. Clearly an attack redirect, I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Poorest Countries List[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 16:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move without redirect to the sentence case form; it will look better in Search, as it won't appear to be a title or other proper noun. An anonymous username, not my real name 00:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Creating a new redirect in sentence case is a cleaner solution than what the nom proposes. Although I don't think it will look better in Search applies any longer, with Vector 2022? J947 † edits 01:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I suppose that is a problem mainly unique to me, as I still find legacy quite useful for browsing redirects and I prefer its general appearance. A new redirect would be fine. An anonymous username, not my real name 03:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Redirect created at sentence case title Poorest countries list. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is a plausible search term for the target in any plausible capitalisation. Thryduulf (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Plausible search term. Even if it isn't in the case used by Wikipedia article titles, people will still search for this (on average, 48 people a month have done in the last year). Joseph2302 (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Love Gov[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 08:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I propose the deletion of this redirect. A Google search for "The Love Gov" requires going through pages of results to find Sanford (Andrew Cuomo is the most common reference, followed by Robert J. Bentley). This redirect has been viewed only 10 times in the past 365 days and is not linked from any article. The redirect has no edit history other than its creation in 2009. The term is not even mentioned in the target article. OCNative (talk) 00:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fox Noggin Channel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 08:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The name that this redirect implies has never existed, and I find it odd as it combines the names of two completely different networks. Not to mention that this redirect was created by a sockpuppet who was indefinitely banned, over a decade ago, which makes me surprised that this redirect is still up. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete this reeks of children's TV spam and probably could/should be speedied. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unlikely synonym at best. --Lenticel (talk) 12:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above: the redirect has no use and is not plausible. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_April_5&oldid=1150687155"