Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 30

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 30[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 30, 2021.

Americium oxide[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was chemindexify. 1% because there's a clear consensus, 99% because it's a fun word. /j (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 22:42, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like disambiguating with Americium(III) oxide would be helpful. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Metropopolis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, this appears to be the name of a genre coined by Spotify [1] [2] that seems to be on the borderline of meeting notability itself. In the absence of a DUE description anywhere on Wikipedia, however, the redirect should probably be deleted for now. signed, Rosguill talk 21:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cho Jun-young[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 9#Cho Jun-young

C6F5[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Phenyl group#Nomenclature. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:19, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The pentafluorophenyl group is better described at Phenyl group#Nomenclature. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't mind if you change the redirect to that target. In the longer term I think it should have an article written on the group. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Phenyl group#Nomenclature per the above. The phenol is too specific an example. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The proposed target mentions C6H5, but not C6F5. If there is a mention of C6F5, then retarget. The average reader will not know that C6F5 is related to the pentafluorophenyl group. Jay (talk) 04:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have revised Phenyl group#Nomenclature to include C6F5. It was previously written as F5C6, which is an uncommon way to write it. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Slovakia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 7#Slovakia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013

Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As unopposed deletion nomination. Jay (talk) 04:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This journal isn't mentioned in the target or discussed in any other article (articles in the journal are cited in a few articles, but none of those would make a useful target). Discussion at the target talk page hasn't indicated any interest in adding a mention to the target. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sengkang Punggol[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have not seen "Sengkang Pungool" refer to Hougang United FC. No results for that either on Google too Nigos (talk | contribs) 06:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note there is a hyphenated Sengkang-Punggol redirect too.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 10:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Feminist. Same would apply to the other one, if someone chooses to bundle it. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 22:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Carbon gas[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural keep. Nominator appears to have socked to skew discussion and/or simply disrupt, to a sufficient extent that I don't think it would be a fair reading of consensus just to count those left over. After all, people may choose not to participate in a discussion where it appears consensus is already forming. As evidence, note the three !votes here by Thai IPs: the nominator and the two 2405:9800s. The 2405:9800s did a similar thing at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 31 § Armenians and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 13 § Cyclon. While it's possible that the nominator is innocently caught up in abuse perpetrated by a fellow-countryperson (given that they don't geolocate perfectly together), I see that as an unlikely coincidence given their !vote after three(!) 2405:9800 !votes at the Cyclon RfD. @65.92 and @Mdewman6: Feel free to re-nominate this. (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 23:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Carbon, as there are many forms of carbon that are gaseous, or maybe Carbon cycle. 223.207.113.226 (talk) 07:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But all of those are gases in their elemental state (except for iodine). There is no allotrope of carbon that is a gas. The term "carbon gas" more likely would refer to a gas containing carbon, of which there are many possibilities (see List of gases). Mdewman6 (talk) 22:18, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is plenty of gaseous carbon in the universe. Stellar spectrums show that stars have it is plasma state of gas -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 10:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Zombie Jesus Day[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the previous discussion, Benjamin Mako Hill added Zombie Jesus and Zombie Jesus Day to the List of Internet phenomena page. As long as that portion of the page survives, retargetting there seems like the best option. It has not survived – Master Deusoma removed it less than a year later, rendering the redirect useless. Given that nothing links to the page, and the meme is by now rather outdated as far as I’m aware, i think it should be okay to delete the redirect. (Ping A. Parrot, who also participated in the previous discussion and is still active.) Galaktos (talk) 10:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I don't remember making the original nomination, even after reading the discussion, but as long as there's no redirect target, there's no point in having a redirect. A. Parrot (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Reyhan (Bulgarian singer)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. No clear reason stated for deletion. (non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 23:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All links have been adjusted Arved (talk) 10:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a perfectly normal and perfectly harmless {{R from move}} and {{R from other disambiguation}}. Thryduulf (talk) 16:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Arved: the nomination is not clear, what do you want to be done with the redirect? Jay (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete it. There is no need for the lemma with the () Arved (talk) 09:27, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - "no need" is not a valid reason to delete a redirect, and the redirect is four year old. A reason could be that she is not known by her first name. Christian75 (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Barny The Humor Boatman[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. ––FormalDude talk 09:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "The Humour" is his nickname, I've added a sourced mention to the target article. Thryduulf (talk) 16:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf, even if it's spelled with the wrong Var of Eng. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 23:39, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Future Science Institute[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 9#Future Science Institute

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_30&oldid=1064610376"