Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 7

January 7[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 7, 2022.

Resurrection from the dead[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 15#Resurrection from the dead

Draft:Unnamed Lucknow IPL Team[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. I deleted this as a CSD G8 broken redirect. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC) Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Unnamed Lucknow IPL Team → Unnamed Lucknow IPL Team (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I have become involved in a bit of a mess of redirects to and from Draft space that could do with clearing up. Seems this page has been at various of Lucknow Scorchers, Unnamed Lucknow IPL Team, Lucknow IPL Team, Draft:Unnamed Lucknow IPL Team, Draft:Lucknow IPL Team 2 and possibly more. There is an existing Draft:Lucknow IPL Team that was moved from Lucknow IPL Team as a result of an AfD. I'm guessing all the mainspace redirects should be deleted, and the 2 drafts left merged, but I don't know what the best way to do this is. I'm sorry for my part in this unholy mess. Spike 'em (talk) 16:55, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've CSDed some of the mainspace to draft redirects, which have now been deleted so hopefully this will all be a lot less messy soon!Spike 'em (talk) 16:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Guangzhou İkiz Kuleler[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guangzhou İkiz Kuleler → Guangzhou Twin Towers (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete per WP:RLOTE, no special association between this topic and Turkish _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 20:31, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

English Churc, Balestrand[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 18:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

English Churc, Balestrand → English Church, Balestrand (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Was redirect created with a typo, now replaced by redirect from correct version English Church, Balestrand. No incoming links to the typo version. PamD 15:33, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Typo no more likely than any number of others. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 05:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Decimal chess[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#Decimal chess

Well Effect[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Aervanath (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well Effect → Barnum effect (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The target article doesn't mention the well effect, and it's not clear from the content of the article that was replaced with a redirect why it would point there. Based on looking at the website it linked to, it's just an organisation and isn't clearly relevant to the barnum effect. The only feasible link I can think of is defamatory (barnum effect is associated with gullibility, trickery, etc). Xurizuri (talk) 10:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment looking at the edit history of the redirect, it was originally about the website, a health website, and not the Barnum effect. There is a different topic at Wells effect that this could be a typo for. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 10:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Revert and CSD WP:BLAR -- revert to the 2005 advert article and {{db-advert}} it -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 10:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - This was created as a redirect in 2005 to Forer effect (the old name of the current target). The advert wasn't added for another decade, in 2015. Since the advert article is undesired it would be unwise to revert to that version, and because a page is eligible for speedy deletion only if all of its history is also eligible, WP:G11 does not apply. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:57, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - Agree with Tavix, clearly not G11 both because of the older redirect and because it was changed back to a redirect. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:01, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since reversion to the article is undesirable and an AfD would certainly result in deletion or redirection, but there does not seem to be a useful/appropriate redirect target. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 14:57, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this is a former promotional article which should have been deleted a long time ago. Veverve (talk) 15:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Slovakia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 15#Slovakia in the Eurovision Song Contest 2013

French ship Saint Pierre[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#French ship Saint Pierre

Template:Currency/new[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Currency/new → Template:Currency (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Unnecessary old relic redirect. Gonnym (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 15:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.