Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 22[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 22, 2021.

Future Science Institute[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 30#Future Science Institute

Sonic Adventure 3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This does not appear to be an alternative name for the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Just fan thinking, not a plausible search term for this article. Popcornfud (talk) 20:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - created by a misguided/misinformed fan when the subject's real name wasn't known yet. Even back then no one was calling it by this name except them. Sergecross73 msg me 20:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I had no idea people were thinking it was Adventure 3. But it is definitely not Adventure 3--CreecregofLife (talk) 22:51, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • They generally weren't. If I'm remembering right, it was a singular editor off of a shady, absolutely not-an-RS website. Sergecross73 msg me 17:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete there’s no evidence that Frontiers is known by this name.--65.92.163.44 (talk) 03:26, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a third Adventures entry does not exist. Haleth (talk) 02:39, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and salt indefinitely (again) It was creation protected for a reason. TarkusABtalk/contrib 18:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Harold the Simple[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this misspelled alternate name does not appear in the target article, even in correctly spelled form. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Anglicization of names was fairly common before mid-century -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Getting wet[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 29#Getting wet

Lawrence Cunningham (Shortland Street)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 29#Lawrence Cunningham (Shortland Street)

Kurdish–Turkish conflict[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Nominator blocked as sockpuppet, no support for changes from editors in good standing was expressed in this discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

During Talk:Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present)#Requested move 30 November 2021 it was proposed that the title should better redirect to Kurdish rebellions in Turkey as a broad-concept article that cover all Kurdish–Turkish conflicts. Northumber (talk) 13:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Shadow4dark, Paradise Chronicle, Jr8825, Buidhe, and Andrewa: --Northumber (talk) 13:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suggest a speedy close of this request. There is no need to delete the redirect. Just retarget it. Andrewa (talk) 14:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Andrewa, I'm not proposing a deletion of the redirect. I'm proposing a retarget to Kurdish rebellions in Turkey. Do you support or oppose my proposal? --Northumber (talk) 14:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I did say Just retarget it. But the reason I do not support your proposal is that the discussion to which you linked, as you said, suggested a different course of action... the creation of a BCA. If it is clearly understood that your proposal here is to create a temporary redirect, no problem. But a far simpler solution is not to reach any decision here. There is no need for one. I note that you were the proposer of the RM in question, which was closed as no consensus without the move you wanted. So do you perhaps oppose the idea of a BCA? Is that why you have now come here? Andrewa (talk) 16:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • Andrew, maybe I do not understand something, but I thought that Kurdish rebellions in Turkey is that broad-concept article which you (and others) were talking about. The name is not perfect, but in future it can possible be changed. That article already covers the conflicts from 1920s to present. Northumber (talk) 17:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • Andrew, Is that why you have now come here? I have no personal opinion about the issue (Kurdish–Turkish conflict). I have no relation to Turkey or Kurdish people, or even the region. The only thing which I know, that it is not a normal situation when bla-bla redirect to bla-bla (something). First I thought that maybe Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present) is the main meaning. Now I see that it is not. Then I think that Kurdish rebellions in Turkey should be moved to Kurdish–Turkish conflict. But this should be done in two steps. First this discussion, whether Kurdish–Turkish conflict should has a target Kurdish rebellions in Turkey. And if this request will find a consensus for support, then we can discuss should we move Kurdish rebellions in Turkey to Kurdish–Turkish conflict or not. Just explaining why I have now come here? --Northumber (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
          • Then I still think that you appear to have come here in error, and that a speedy close without prejudice to other discussions is a reasonable outcome. Discuss rescoping and renaming of the article on its talk page, noting of course the outcome of your previous RM. Andrewa (talk) 08:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 14:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yoke FM Hilongos[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 29#Yoke FM Hilongos

Orthodox civilization[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn--Heanor (talk) 18:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete. It is used in one Template:User Orthodox civilization which is in turn not used. I will list it for a deletion too. Heanor (talk) 13:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thejournal.com[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No article exists for the subject of this website. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 02:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, as there is no article or suitable redirect for the Edtech magazine or website. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_22&oldid=1062703131"