Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 16, 2021.

Gueejar Sierra, Granada[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish, not Germanic.

Can't tell: gueinzia, gueipperim, gueipperim noir. HotdogPi 23:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy close and selectively renominate per WP:TRAINWRECK. No further comment per same. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 00:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Didn't realize these were Eubot, I also thought those had been dealt with. Speedy delete all per consensus established in the discussions Tavix refers to (I thought WP:X2 covered this). The three "can't tell" redirects were all created by humans well after Eubot was deactivated and should be evaluated on their own merits. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 15:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete all. Having been subjected to all the Eubot cleanup that spammed RfD several years ago, I had thought we had gotten all the Spanish ones. I guess not... -- Tavix (talk) 00:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WNTC-FM[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 24#WNTC-FM

Kalseru[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 24#Kalseru

Mainchi Cultural prizes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion suggested as the original article (now a redirect) contained a typo in its title – Mainchi instead of the correct Mainichi – and users searching for the incorrect term is rather unlikely. Robert Kerber (talk) 07:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Grazier[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) feminist (+) 05:49, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this should be deleted, but I have just noticed that while Grazier (multiple incoming links) redirects to Pastoral farming, the plural Graziers (one incoming link) redirects to Pastoralism. (I also suspect that the incoming links to Pastoralism and Pastoral farming may be inconsistent, but that's a separate issue, and think may have been discussed before.) Should both Grazier and Graziers target Pastoral (disambiguation)? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EurekaLott, wouldn't this be a DAB, to include both the pastoralism links and the people? (And also, that way, people are less likely to link to the page in error, as it will be picked up). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This could become a set index with information about the term and a list of people, or a disambiguation page with a surname-holder list. A set index could provide more flexibility and detail, but it would work either way. - Eureka Lott 22:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see what you mean, EurekaLott. I think that a DAB may be more useful here though on the grounds that the common usage as a noun is more well-known than its usage as a surname, and therefore more likely to be searched for or used a wikilink? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per nom and Eureka Lott. CycloneYoris talk! 01:05, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate I've drafted one. The distinction between disambiguation and SIA won't be meaningful to most readers, and this doesn't preclude a separate Grazier (surname), though I'd forgo that unless we had much to say about the surname. --BDD (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anti-white racism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Reverse racism. Without prejudice to the creation of an article at the base title. But in the meantime, retargeting is the most convenient solution. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No discussion of the term or concept of "anti-white racism" at current target article. Should be retargeted to Reverse racism, which directly addresses the concept, per WP:RPURPOSE. This was the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti white racism, with no alternative target being proposed (other than deletion). Compare to Anti-white sentiment and Racism against whites. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support retargeting. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support retargeting to Reverse racism. Till it has its own page. Dushan Jugum (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support retargeting to Reverse racism. Please note that Anti-White Racism should also be retargeted. --Rsk6400 (talk) 04:57, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget both as a more relevant target. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 13:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Create as an article. Reverse racism is a relevant concept, but is only applicable in countries where white people are in power, usually as the majority. When white people, for example, visited Japan early on in the interaction between European nations and Japan, some experienced racism that could not really be defined as "reverse racism". BD2412 T 05:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to make room for an article. Robert Mugabe was known for an anti-White political agenda. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2029 Indian general election[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 02:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The next Indian general election is scheduled to be contested by 2024, the article makes no mention of 2029. -- Tavix (talk) 01:44, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fox Kids (around the world)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 02:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible terms; "around the world" is not used with regards to international channels. -- Tavix (talk) 01:18, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Para, Bangladesh[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 02:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think this needs looking at again. This redirect has history, but given the content of Para (Bengali) ("Para is a Bengali word (পাড়া) which means a neighbourhood or locality"), and noting that "Para" is not mentioned at the current target, I think it's misleading. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The usatoday reference that the article was pointing to before being redirected says that "Punji and Para are the names for tribal villages located within the tea plantations of the Srimangal region of Bangladesh." But then, this may be a traveller's POV. Punji too is not a place name but a place suffix, it is a word in the Khasi language to refer to a cluster of homesteads. Jay (Talk) 09:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Misleading and not mentioned at target. CycloneYoris talk! 01:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled Ant-Man and the Wasp sequel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as misleading now that these titles have a name. These are the rest of the redirects from Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 6#Unnamed/Untitled that were not individually objected to. -- Tavix (talk) 00:02, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_August_16&oldid=1041375511"