Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 17, 2020.

Rated R&B[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 01:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another case of an example of an online magazine being redirected to Online magazine. I would suggest deletion unless a duly sourced mention can be added to the target. signed, Rosguill talk 22:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete, not a hugely notable publication and we don't redirect names of publications to general wikipedia pages. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 08:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Regrowing vegetable[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 01:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can see what the initial editor was getting at here, but I don't think this is a helpful redirect. "Regrowing vegetable" makes me think more of Vegetative reproduction or Cutting (plant). Given that the redirect term is also ungrammatical, I think that deletion is preferable to disambiguation. signed, Rosguill talk 21:58, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, the topic is very important today for a lot of people. I prefer disambiguation to deletion. In the future, perhaps a full article (there is more than a book about it). Hope you can help. Best wishes.BoldLuis (talk) 23:06, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BoldLuis, what exactly do you think the phrase regrowing vegetable means? signed, Rosguill talk 23:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can you say it?. BoldLuis (talk) 20:29, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think that it's an ungrammatical phrase with no single clear meaning. You're the one who thinks that this is a meaningful search term that could be a useful redirect. signed, Rosguill talk 21:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draconius Wright[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 21:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. While a search on the Ace Attorney wiki showed me Ryūnosuke Naruhodō's name in the search field, but neither of these names are mentioned on his article, or any of the articles that appear in the search. Regards, SONIC678 01:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, these are fan terms that have not caught on for a "what if Dai Gyakuten Saiban, a Japanese-only game set in the Meiji period, were localized to be set in the US with American characters like the other Ace Attorney games were" scenario.--AlexandraIDV 15:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fan name which is not covered in the target article and likely never will be.--69.157.254.64 (talk) 03:34, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Comunión Tradicionalista Carlista[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only mentioned in external links. Would be more helpful as a redlink. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 21:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

/r/The Schulz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The topic was covered in a "similar subreddits" section that was removed by @BLDM in November. See diff. - Eureka Lott 22:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A redirect about a subreddit really does need a mention in the target article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Multi-classing[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Multiclass. signed, Rosguill talk 22:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overly vague gaming term. I'd surmise this is the case in many games, including a number of prominent RPGs. But not being mentioned in Character class, it should probably be deleted to allow the search engine to do its job. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Purple wedge[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, a Google Scholar search doesn't suggest that this term primarily refers to Ukrainian settlement in Kuban. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 20:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, I also couldn't find anything about it on Wikipedia other than a reference over at Green Ukraine (other than which no articles link to this title). It is apparently a region, like the yellow and gray wedges, but we don't have Purple Ukraine. Regards, SONIC678 16:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lolbert[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 01:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to have any use in reliable sources. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 20:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - According to lolberts.com, "A lolbert is a derogatory and bigoted word used to demean and belittle market libertarians." However, this can't be verified in reliable sources. The only usages for this word in reliable sources I could find were as a surname and parts of names of organizations. Hog Farm (talk) 00:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Five Rivers of Lebennin[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While Lebennin is mention in the target article, it is not in a context of any rivers. WP has content about Lebennin, but not the Five Rivers of Lebennin. Hog Farm (talk) 23:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. No mention of these rivers at target article. CycloneYoris talk! 01:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 21:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

It's Ma'am[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G5/WP:G7 as all editors involved with the article that have not been violating blocks are in agreement that deletion is appropriate. signed, Rosguill talk 22:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this unambiguously refers to misgendering, as it could also refer to Miss vs. Mrs. vs. Ma'am. Before being converted to a redirect, this was an article created by a now-blocked sockpuppet and converted to a redirect by Þjarkur, so I don't have any qualms about discussing deletion here as opposed to restoring the prior article and taking it to AfD. signed, Rosguill talk 21:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The phrase does unambiguously refer to a particular meme (I can't imagine those looking for "Ma'am" writing this title), but having this redirect isn't really helpful since the target doesn't discuss that which a reader would be looking for. I had reinstated the redirect the original author had first created, but it's not a good one. (Could possibly be WP:G5'd?). – Thjarkur (talk) 22:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

路面電車[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RLOTE, no special association between the Spanish or Chinese language and streetcars. signed, Rosguill talk 21:06, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bach Ma Nationa Park[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These pages don't seem to get very many pageviews compared to their targets, possibly because of the questionably plausible misspelling of "national" (some of them being the results of pagemoves years ago)...not sure how useful they are now. Regards, SONIC678 20:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all. In the case of the Vijayaba redirect, it was probably a courtesy to the page's creator/most recent editor so that they could find the page and not re-create it on the bad title. Enough time has passed that we don't need it for that purpose. —C.Fred (talk) 22:48, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all for the usual reason: what is to be gained by deleting these redirects? — J947 [cont] 02:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all The Nationa Register one was a move after a misspelling also. So maybe dropping an 'l' is not so unlikely? At any rate, I dont see how WP:RFD#DELETE is met, and these types of discussions take up more time than the benefit, if any, they provide.—Bagumba (talk) 08:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Unambiguously created in error, useless clutter. Narky Blert (talk) 10:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all, obvious misspellings - no need to perpetuate. Dan arndt (talk) 01:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Wikipedia has about 6 mio articles, with an average of 20 characters (estimated from a few random articles) per title. If we had a redirect for every forgotten character in every title, this makes 120 mio redirects. Avoiding them is clearly a gain. So if there is no other reason than that a user could accidentally forget the 'l', the redirects should clearly be deleted. Presumably the wikipedia search engine already is smart enough to come up with the corrected title anyway, when given the title without 'l'. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Lion King (movie)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to The Lion King (franchise)#Films. signed, Rosguill talk 06:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With the release of The Lion King (2019 film), this redirect isn't useful, as now there are two movies with that title. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will also note this redirect has existed since 2003, so careful consideration should definitely be taken before changing this redirect. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Justice League (2017 movi)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been made in error. Is this useful? TheAwesomeHwyh 17:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ballymacoda village[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary WP:EASTEREGG redirect. Meets WP:RfD#D10 as a redirect which could "plausibly be expanded into an article, where the target article contains virtually no information on the subject". The target article, in fact, contains zero information about the subject. None at all. While the titular article could, perhaps, be expanded with more information about the subject (the village), the correct title for such an article would simply be "Ballymacoda". Without the "village" suffix. It is possibly best to leave that as a red link. For now. Per WP:REDYES. To "encourage" someone to create the article. Right now, the redirect serves no purpose. Other than, perhaps, to obscure the fact that the intended article/content is "missing". Anyway, whatever the case about what might occur later, WP:RfD#D10 applies to the current redirect.... Guliolopez (talk) 17:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC) Guliolopez (talk) 17:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lust of The Beatles Songs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is a clear typo, but it is no more or less plausible than for any other articles or redirects starting "List of..." (there are more than quarter of a million), yet this is the only one with a "Lust of" redirect. It got 11 hits last year which suggests it is being used, but not sufficiently significantly for such an obvious typo to be justified in my opinion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Unambiguously created in error; or, if RS can be found, to encourage article creation. Narky Blert (talk) 16:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Based on the history, the creation appears to have been intentional rather than in error. Thryduulf (talk) 16:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • The non-standard capitalisation suggests as much. Narky Blert (talk) 10:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Coronababy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See the RfD of COVIDemic. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 15:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unlikely search term. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Already in use by the media and likely to become an article in 9 months. See here and other search results. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. While the word might already be in use, it's still a neologism, bordering on protologism, and doesn't appear anywhere on Wikipedia (other than this redirect and user:Coronababy13 whose only edit was to create their unrelated userpage, which I'm about to send to MfD, in 2014). We also don't currently have any content, that I've found, about the topic where it would make sense - unsurprising as we're at least 7-9 months away from any reliable information about any demographic trends. Deletion should though be without prejudice to recreation when we do have content if the term takes hold. Thryduulf (talk) 22:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not mentioned either at the target or anywhere else in WP. A reader following this redirect will find precisely zero information, useful or otherwise. Narky Blert (talk) 10:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Would need an article on the subject. We have a number of invented words like Covidiot aswell. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Sir, unlike the newly coined terms like 'Coronababy', 'Covidiot' has become very popular in a short time (known as hot word). --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Happineſs[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 26#Happineſs

Chinazi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Art of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. signed, Rosguill talk 06:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Art of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests: Double redirect / Target was moved WT79 The Engineer (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anime and Manga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Glossary of anime and manga. signed, Rosguill talk 06:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a article on Manga as well 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 16:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Flag of New Swabia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target Purplneon486 (talk) 10:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Doesn't serve any purpose.  3125A Talk! Edits!  14:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK. As far as I have been able to find, we do not have any content about this topic, although such content would likely be encyclopaedic. Thryduulf (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, not about the flag, but we have New Swabia (never heard of it before!). There's no specific flag content there, aside from the flag itself. A REDLINK is reasonable, but I'd actually support keeping this and redirecting it to New Swabia since, if someone is searching for the flag of New Swabia, that's the only place it exists on the wiki, and they can at least see what it looks like. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • The lack of flag content is why I'm opposed to retargetting. If someone is looking for information about the flag of New Swabia they'll almost certainly have heard of and know a little about New Swabia (and if not they can easily search for it), they will be looking for information specifically about the flag. They will not though find what they are looking for on Wikipedia and we should not mislead them into thinking they will. Thryduulf (talk) 20:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to New Swabia per Amory, having it redirect there rather than to flags of Nazi Germany would be more helpful to readers looking for information about it. Regards, SONIC678 19:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tom and Angela (musical group)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tom and Angela are two characters, who are not officially a music group. Besides, the Redirect Views Tool shows that there have been zero views of the redirect since God-knows-when. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 09:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

M_(HDL)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be an error: 'M' is not an HDL, and the target is the name of a commercial company. That company is in the appropriate industry, but does not develop HDLs EML101 (talk) 08:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment On the one hand, there does not appear to be anything called "M" that is associated with HDL or Mentor Graphics (doing a web search on "M" is problematic, so I make have missed something.) The only "M" language I know of is MUMPS.
On the other hand, the claim that Mentor Graphics does not develop HDLs appears to be untrue. See [1]
I am leaning towards delete. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Mentor is well-known and respected, but doesn't develop HDLs (not publicly, anyway). It simply implements compilers (and infrastructure) for existing (IEEE) HDLs (VHDL, Verilog, etc). It is possible they had an in-house 'M' at some stage, but I'm not aware of it. I think this was just a simple mistake. EML101 (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Futbol[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Futébol, keep the rest. signed, Rosguill talk 06:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFOREIGN. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 15:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Tavix. GiantSnowman 15:22, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Futébol as it appears to be incorrect, but keep the others. The sport is very popular in countries where those languages are spoken, providing the strong connection that WP:RFFL looks for. Hog Farm (talk) 21:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Some are clearly WP:RFOREIGN while the rest are logical typos or search terms. Redirects are cheap. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:46, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Futébol as implausible. Keep Fútbol and Futbol as the large impact of Latinos in U.S. soccer means that these words have crossed over to English. Neutral on Voetbal, the Dutch have had a large impact on football but the word itself hasn't crossed into English more than any other foreign name of the game. I don't suggest redirecting it to "Football in the Netherlands" as that would ignore the fact that Belgium is a very relevant football country too. Wallachia Wallonia (talk) 14:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Futébol: Gotta nuke 'em all! But keep the correctly spelled terms per WP:RFOREIGN, association football is of great cultural significance to many countries around the world. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete futébol, keep others as they are often used to refer to association football. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fist of the North Star: La Película[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This movie doesn't seem to have a connection to Spanish (not helping matters is the first part is in English), and this title doesn't seem to get very many pageviews per year since July 2015...not sure how useful it is. Regards, SONIC678 01:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Pointless redirect. CycloneYoris talk! 06:18, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Mixed English and Spanish, makes no sense. Narky Blert (talk) 12:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I also found the version without the accent, which I'll be adding here. Working on it...done. Regards, SONIC678 15:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lefnui[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, only mention on the WP is in the sentence "During this time, science fiction fandom produced many fanzines with little or no Tolkien content but Tolkien-inspired names: Ancalagon, Glamdring, Lefnui, Mathom, Perian, Ringwraith, Shadowfax, Silmé, and undoubtedly others." at Tolkien fandom. That content doesn't exactly illuminate the meaning of this. Hog Farm (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:27, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@CycloneYoris: There is only one comment. CrazyBoy826 21:23, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Teletherapy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 06:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is the appropriate target page for this redirect. This phrase could mean therapy for mental health that is online. I recommend that this either be disambiguated or retargeted. Interstellarity (talk) 11:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This could mean anything. Therapy by telepathy? by telekinesis? by television? by televangelists? Or, therapy designed to counter an addiction to television? Narky Blert (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Telehealth, as the most likely topic going forward. BD2412 T 03:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The vast majority of teletherapy mentions on Wikipedia use the term in a radiation therapy context. There are a handful of mentions that use the term to refer to telehealth, telerehabilitation, and online counseling, so a disambiguation page may be useful, as well. I think we have a clear primary topic, though. - Eureka Lott 23:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate No clear primary topic and can refer to many things including EBR, other radiation therapies and telehealth etc 1.Ayana (talk) 23:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. DAB page entries must either have relevant bluelinks or satisfy WP:DABMENTION. That would be impossible here. Narky Blert (talk) 08:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pribyslavitz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Přibyslavice. Reasonable arguments have been made that most uses of this spelling are likely to refer to Kingdom Come: Deliverance's setting, but other reasonable arguments are made that it's a very plausible Anglicisation of Přibyslavice, of which there are several real-life towns named as such, one of which the game's setting was based on. Given there's minimal discussion of this in the video game's section, there's a rough consensus here that retargeting to the disambiguation page at Přibyslavice is the option least likely to confuse the majority of readers, as that's where all these options are mentioned. ~ mazca talk 15:00, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mbdfar has asserted that Pribyslavitz is the anglicized term from the video game to refer to this specific village of Přibyslavice. Those searching for the real life analog would use this name. I cannot find any evidence online, on Wikipedia or on Google Scholar that this is the case. If sources backing up this interpretation, I would suggest either redirecting to Kingdom Come: Deliverance, or possibly deletion, as it does not appear to currently be mentioned at that target. signed, Rosguill talk 20:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, I'll admit, this is a tough one to prove. All I can say is that it is common for the German words for Czech locations often switch the -ice ending for itz, (see German words for Czech locations). Hence, Přibyslavice becomes Pribyslavitz. I was going off of the location in the game (see gameplay map) where it is referred to as Pribyslavitz. If this is insubstantial, I would support a redirect to Přibyslavice as it could theoretically be used for any location of this name. Mbdfar (talk) 21:27, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. German WP has two articles on places called de:Přibyslavice, and neither has this German exonym (rather, Přibyslavice/Przibislawitz and Pribislaw/Přibislawitz). Czech WP has articles on four places, cs:Přibyslavice, and gives German exonyms for three of them: Przibislawitz/Pschibislawitz, Pribislaw and Pschibislawitz. Neither German nor Czech WP knows any Pribyslavitz. Přibyslavice (Prague-East District) (no equivalent in German or Czech) asserts that the village is called Pribyslavitz in Kingdom Come: Deliverance. Google searches show that that game takes place in Pribyslavitz, which was razed in 1390 or 1391; but I could find nothing to connect it with Přibyslavice (Prague-East District) or anywhere else, and it may be fictional. That is all too tenuous to keep this redirect. Narky Blert (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per confirmation from game designer Dan Vávra (see tweet). To reiterate, the majority of people looking for this location would search the term 'Pribyslavitz' as used in the American version of the video game. Mbdfar (talk) 00:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Per that confirmation, I wonder whether the better target may not still be Kingdom Come: Deliverance, as it seems like the game is the only place this spelling is used per Narky's comment above. Anyone further interested in the inspiration for the location can follow links from that page to Přibyslavice (Prague-East District) signed, Rosguill talk 00:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Rosguill, I think keeping the more specific redirect makes sense. Narky Blert also noted that this is the only known location be called this term. If people are using the search bar to find this village, I think it would be more user friendly to keep the redirect as it is. I don't see the benefit to having people scrolling to find the article link on the KCD page. Mbdfar (talk) 00:55, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Mbdfar, I'm not seeing why we should assume that they're searching for the village to find the real-life equivalent, rather than information about it related to the game itself. If we point the search term to Kingdom_Come:_Deliverance#Setting, then they won't need to scroll at all. signed, Rosguill talk 01:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Rosguill, that is a valid point. I suppose I was projecting my own interests a bit. If you believe it to be the best course of action, I support your idea of a retarget to Kingdom_Come:_Deliverance#Setting. I appreciate the discussion. Mbdfar (talk) 01:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CrazyBoy826 01:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Přibyslavice. I buy the argument that Pribyslavitz is a possible anglicization of Přibyslavice, and would be used to find the real-world village that the video game version is based on. However, if this is a valid anglicization, it would be valid for any of the Přibyslavices. If this was explained at Kingdom Come: Deliverance, I'd be fine with a retarget there, but as it stands, it would be too much of an Easter egg for my liking. -- Tavix (talk) 01:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • First choice Kingdom_Come:_Deliverance#Setting, second choice Přibyslavice (disambiguation). We have established in this discussion so far that the only notable use of the exact spelling "Pribyslavitz" is in the video game, but the video game location is in turn based on the real place in Prague. I accept the argument that "Pribyslavitz" is a plausible Anglicization of Přibyslavice, but the combined choice of retaining the Y, converting the Ř into R, and parsing CE as TZ make this rather idiosyncratic and only works in English. Until we see any resident of any of the Přibyslavice start calling their village Pribyslavitz, I think the video game location is the primary topic. Deryck C. 17:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Přibyslavice per Tavix. Given that the town only gets a single mention in the video game article, with minimal context, this makes the most sense to me. --BDD (talk) 18:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Attitudinal indicator[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded and misleading redirect. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 01:15, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This redirect is ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American Civil War homefront[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There were two home fronts during the war, it's not really appropriate to pick on side of the conflict for this. Hog Farm (talk) 21:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • ... neither of which mention "homefront" in the text of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. These redirects are ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

V*[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:37, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May also mean a dual space. I suggest disambiguating. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate: I immediately assumed that this was dual space due to the V (which has extra prominence for notating vector spaces, while the Kleene star notation is just a general *). — MarkH21talk 18:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per above.CrazyBoy826 (talk)       18:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: In both meanings, "V" is an arbitrary variable name. Although vector spaces are favorably named "V", other names are used as well (e.g. "W"). We wouldn't have a direct of (a+b)^2 and (x+y)^2 and ... to binomial theorem, either. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:24, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: In both meanings this is the * that is meaningful, not the whole expression. In fact, both meanings, are listed in * (but surprisingly none in * (disambiguation)). Having this redirect is exactly the same as having a redirect for yellow tulip because many tulips are yellow (fortunately, this redirect does not exist). D.Lazard (talk) 14:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:55, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

10 Things You Need to Know About Losing Weight[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 06:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to just be the name of a documentary they made- not sure if this redirect is necessary. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - as stated, it appears to have been a one-off documentary, but looking at the history of the article it looks like it just listed the '10 things' rather than any information about the actual documentary, so can't be restored as a stub. It's not particularly useful as it stands. Bob talk 23:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, might be more useful as a redirect to Michael Mosley (broadcaster), in which case it's not really doing any harm. Bob talk 23:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; basically no useful information about it at either possible target. I don't see any hypothetical reader that would particularly be helped by being sent to either. ~ mazca talk 23:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Li Changgeng[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 01:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, internet searches just returned results for contemporary people with this name. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 20:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This is a transliteration of "李长庚", which is an alternative name for the target according to Baidu Baike (non-RS). zh:李長庚 exists, but is about a general who lived between 1752 - 1807. Other people with this name who prominently appear in search results include a musician and a general manager for a financial firm in Taiwan. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:29, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given the above comment about Baidu Baike using this spelling, I'm fine with this being closed as no consensus if no one else has anything to add before then. signed, Rosguill talk 22:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_17&oldid=959185624"