Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 6, 2019.

C15H26[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:02, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C15H26 was created by mistake: formula of Capnellene is C15H24 not C15H26. There is no molecule in enWiki (more exactly: in my list of 15282 formulas extracted from chemical infoboxes of enWiki) with formula C15H26. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 23:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. If there is no Wikipedia article for any chemical compound that matches this molecular formula, the redirect should be deleted. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as misleading and not a typo. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Need You (Travie McCoy song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Article was moved to Need You (Travie McCoy song) by Anthony Appleyard per request at WP:RM/TR, Need You (song) has been retargeted to Need You. PC78 (talk) 11:46, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be the other way around, as the primary topic's article is also about a song. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 22:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ghost people[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Ghost People. As the nominator, I agree with the retarget. It seems to be an extremely obvious case. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect that is sure to result in a WP:SURPRISE for anyone going directly to it. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dennis Highby[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 16#Dennis Highby

Stoneman Douglas High School shooting survivors[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Survivors (presumably) of the shooting with no mention in the article, not sure it's really useful or appropriate to have redirects for them. Some of them have received some attention in the media, at least one of them for committing suicide after the fact. Edit: a slight error in my original nomination, Madeleine Wilford is mentioned as Maddy Wilford in the caption of a photo. The rest are still unmentioned. signed, Rosguill talk 20:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC) 20:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Baten Kaitos series[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no series page to be found here. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @AngusWOOF: I'd assume that there needs to be at least 3 games for it to be a series, meaning there is no "Baten Kaitos series" and this redirect is irrelevant. (And possibly violating WP:CRYSTALBALL.)ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
True, same with (franchise) if that were created. Searches show only the game websites and Fandom Wikias are calling them a series after 2 games. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shelley and Mary Godwin (Xenosaga)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Xenosaga characters as an alternative to deletion. Deryck C. 11:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary, as there is not even a redirect for Shelley and Mary Godwin that would need to be disambiguated. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't tell if they are twins or are always paired together in the series. They are voiced by the same person in the English dub. It could be renamed to Mary and Shelley Godwin instead. I don't see where it is listed as Shelley first. https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/characters/Xenosaga/Mary-Godwin/ AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:33, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hilbert Effect[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There was a real life mathematician named Hilbert, so this might confuse people who are looking for actual scientific laws. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:33, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Omega System[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 14#Omega System

Elsa Crew[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Xenosaga characters#Elsa Crew. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 19:11, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pure fancruft. Shockingly, it doesn't refer to the stage crew of Frozen: The Musical. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Y-Data[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a generic sci-fi term, or term in general, that would be confusing to redirect here. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete searches point to some non-notable science and education organizations, but mainly that Y-Data is not explained at all in the Xenosaga article so it is not a notable term. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:17, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It's not mentioned in the target article, but it is mentioned several times at List of Xenosaga characters. It's strange how it doesn't show up in any of the individual game plot summaries if it's supposed to be important. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:29, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xenosaga (Organizations)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a properly formatted or useful redirect. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Galactic Federation (version 2)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be left over from a page move, should be deleted as housekeeping. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Zenosāga[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 13#Zenosāga

Tamil God[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 13#Tamil God

C23H26Cl2N4O4[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 13#C23H26Cl2N4O4

Satisfya (Song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was already deleted by Athaenara per WP:G8 following the deletion of Satisfya by ErikHaugen per WP:G5, all of which makes this discussion moot. PC78 (talk) 10:28, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Useless redirect. CptViraj (📧) 07:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to (song) without redirect At least clean up the capital S part. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Any Satisfya (foo) redirect is unnecessary disambiguation, and this one has an upper case error. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Server Sundaram (2018 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did not release in 2018/2017/2016. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vector Industries[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 13#Vector Industries

List of starships in Xenosaga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is simply no such list in the article, or anywhere on the site. Any person following the redirect will be confused. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anima (relic)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The disambiguation makes little sense. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Anima itself is a disambiguation, but there can be all sorts of relics related to any of those animas. It's not specific to the game. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @AngusWOOF:I've also added Anima Relics which falls under a similar reason. Just letting you know, though it shouldn't likely change your vote.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:20, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ZXCVBNM, same vote. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:15, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cathedral Ship[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also happens to be a Star Wars term, and I'd bet it's probably used somewhere in Warhammer too. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not mentioned in the Xenosaga article as a key fictional element. 14:47, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete, too vague to be useful. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Multiple Weapon System[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vague term, I can imagine it applying to real life weapons. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Executive Committee Director[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A vague term that has no business being redirected to any specific article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Old Miltia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very vague term, too confusing for a redirect. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all as confusing and not specified. There is a planet called Miltia that is mentioned multiple times in the article. Another planet called Second Miltia is also mentioned. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:03, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I created Miltia as a redirect. It may be confused with militia so I added a hatnote, but it can go the other way around: hatnote to Miltia (Xenosaga) and redirect Miltia to Militia first. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think that "Miltia" is too similar to "Militia" to work as a straight redirect to Xenosaga. It should redirect to "Militia" as an R from Misspelling. There shouldn't be a hatnote on either page, it's too minor of a crufty term to merit one.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I can redirect that to militia then. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:09, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

GFG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all except GFG. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:32, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Way too vague of an acronym to merit a redirect. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GFG now has a number of acronym entries. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep GFG since we now have a dab page. Delete the others.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 02:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep GFG which is now a dab. Delete everything else --Lenticel (talk) 01:07, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kuraudo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just the romanized version of "cloud". Doesn't necessarily refer to the character. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:59, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I doubt many people would type the romanized version of cloud on the English Wikipedia and even if they did for some reason any evidence that they would be searching for this character in particular. Also do we need Kuraudo Sutoraifu? I noticed we don’t include the romanized names of other main characters from that game such as Tifa Rokkuhāto or Baretto Wōresu so I don’t see why Cloud should be an exception.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 05:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We also don’t use Earisu Geinzubūru the romanized name for Aerith Gainsborough or Vinsento Varentain the romanized name of Vincent Valentine, finally Zakkusu Fea doesn't redirect to Zack Fair either.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 06:04, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chocobo’s Mystery Dungeon Every Buddy![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Final Fantasy Fables: Chocobo's Dungeon. Since it's a remaster, it doesn't need its own page. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:R#DELETE, criterion #10. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boldly retargeted. If this is good then recommend speedy close. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Homme fatale[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 16#Homme fatale

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_July_6&oldid=1138582704"