Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 11[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 11, 2019.

Template:Cv[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 19#Template:Cv

Template:Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 19#Template:Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths)

Portal:North American Roads[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:58, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From a page move but misleading. There are also roads in Canada, Mexico and other places that form North America There is even Portal:Roads of Canada Legacypac (talk) 19:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete artifact of a failed portal merger. --Rschen7754 00:29, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Unneeded redirect from portal move from 2007. Dough4872 02:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Portal:Guided Missiles of India[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete as a redirect so obviously wrong and created basically by accident that I belive deleting it qualifies as housekeeping. If I miss any of those subpages please let me know and I'll delete those as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was from a weird move "remake portal". Serves no use whatsoever. Also the redirect has unused subpages that should be deleted. Legacypac (talk) 19:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC) Legacypac (talk) 19:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: useless and somewhat misleading; I don't see any reason to keep this. Geolodus (talk) 06:59, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Useras/Les Useres[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. by nominator. (non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:26, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The forward slash (creating a subpage) is not how we normally account for alternate names. Unlikely search term. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nunquam[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 19#Nunquam

Ghost (2011 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as housekeeping, leftover from a page move. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:08, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Film was not released until January 2012. PC78 (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eurasian Economic UnionEAEU[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 19#Eurasian Economic UnionEAEU

Template:Palace of Versailles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

redirects to Template:Versailles, which is actually about Versailles (band), a Japanese visual kei metal band.
Note that this redirect was created by the now topic-banned portalspammer @The Transhumanist as the basis of Portal:Palace of Versailles. The portal is being discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Palace of Versailles, where I have explained the sequence of edits and their impact. In summary, this is one of the steps which led to a portal supposedly about the French palace to be filed with content about a Japanese band. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The template is not about the palace. I think the creation of the portal is not really very relevant to the redirect though (if the redirect is deleted but the portal kept then the portal will need editing, but that's not a reason to keep or delete the redirect). Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Whether the original template is appropriate, since it could be assumed to be about the palace, is not the issue, but this redirect confuses things. Robert McClenon (talk) 12:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Repurpose. It seems to me that there may be a case for a navbox relating to the Palace of Versailles, as there are articles for a number of the rooms, etc, etc. See Category:Palace of Versailles for some of the articles that could be included. --woodensuperman 15:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment say what? (Commmenting on the template not the last comment.) Legacypac (talk) 15:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the full set, over the period April '18 to Feb. '19, of this user's template redirect creations and template moves falls squarely into the "you'll spit out your coffee" category. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like topic ban from template space is in order? His Outline project is no better. Legacypac (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Anyone can create a useful navbox at this title but the redirect is useless for that. This was used to build a portal by the guy who made the redorect with astonishing results Legacypac (talk) 11:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PutItToThePeople[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Hashtag activism##PutItToThePeople. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 07:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2013's Tropical Storm Yagi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 07:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. Not a formal written form for tropical cyclones. Tropical Storm Yagi (2013) and Tropical Storm Wukong (2012) already existed. B dash (talk) 03:12, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose (at least without a better reason to delete). At least one editor has used that form. If the redirects are deleted then any pages linking to them should be fixed (i.e. avoid them becoming redlinks). (Redirect creator) DexDor (talk) 05:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep these don't seem implausible as search terms. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hamburder[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 19#Hamburder

Mister Bone Saw[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mohammad bin Salman#Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 06:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

deletion, this redirect implies offensive phrase about a living person Biographies of living persons Motqen (talk) 15:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: The phrase "Mister Bone Saw" as applied to the article's subject is mentioned and explained in the article with appropriate citations, including one from the New York Times. Dylanexpert (talk) 16:12, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep a recognized nickname. He is a dictator so I'm not too concerned with the negative nature of the nickname. Legacypac (talk) 22:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Whether the target is a dictator or not is irrelevant. Every subject is entitled to equal treatment under NPOV and (where relevant) BLP. This nickname is ok as a redirect as it is established and verified, any other nicknames for them which are not established and verified would not be ok, regardless of our opinions about the subject as a person. Thryduulf (talk) 09:51, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Stop following me around and acting like a troll. Legacypac (talk) 05:45, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop accusing those who disagree with you of being disruptive and similar. I did not follow you here (it's quite possible I've commented on more RfD discussions than any other user in the history of the project if you know how to calculate the statistic I'd like to know if my guess is correct), and there is nothing inappropriate or even unusual in responding to another editor's comment in a deletion discussion noting that they've misinterpreted a policy/guideline/etc and explaining why. Thryduulf (talk) 10:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The title contains an offensive phrase, uses non-neutral terms and violate the encyclopedic content of Wikipedia.(see WP:RNEUTRAL) Motqen (talk) 03:55, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Striking above vote by nom. We do not cast a duplicate vote when we nominate for deletion. Sam Sailor 07:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Nickname is sourced in the target. Sam Sailor 07:26, 4 April 2019 (UTC) !vote changed to retarget to anchor, see below. Sam Sailor 07:43, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Sam and Dylanexpert. WP:RNEUTRAL actually permits uses like this - "In most cases, non-neutral but verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term." Thryduulf (talk) 09:51, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to section Mohammad bin Salman#Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi, where the term is mentioned. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:34, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is an improvement, as long as the section title stays stable. Legacypac (talk) 05:46, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You lost me cause I don't know how to do that, but sounds good. Legacypac (talk) 07:46, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would support a redirect to the appropriate sentence. Dylanexpert (talk) 20:52, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This term involves a false accusation of a crime. It has emerged in the opinion columns, as an opinion rather than fact, even before the defendants' identity is revealed. Jaseromer (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget using anchor per User:Sam Sailor UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @B dash: Why was this relisted? This looks like a pretty clear "keep" consensus to me. feminist (talk) 01:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lambda Omega sorority Norroena[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 19#Lambda Omega sorority Norroena

Wikipedia:WEAK[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 19#Wikipedia:WEAK

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_April_11&oldid=1072177047"