User talk:Jaseromer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jaseromer! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cumulative match characteristic CMC (November 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jaseromer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amaala[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amaala, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 03:29, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Saudi Space Agency) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Saudi Space Agency.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

nice stub!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 13:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi Local Content and Government Procurement Commission moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Saudi Local Content and Government Procurement Commission, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DannyS712 (talk) 01:18, 15 January 2019 (UTC) @DannyS712: Thank you for your valuable feedback, I've added more sources and resubmitted for the review. Regards,[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saudi Local Content and Government Procurement Commission (February 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SITH (talk) 15:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Jaseromer, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Technical and Vocational Training Corporation have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Christchurch shooting[edit]

I removed your addition of King Salman’s reaction to the article because it is already present. See “Politicians and world leaders condemned the attacks,[22][note 3]”. It is within “note 3” with other world leaders already like Australia, Russia, because he didn’t do anything special other than condemn the attack. starship.paint ~ KO 00:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Saudi Heritage Preservation Society) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Saudi Heritage Preservation Society.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on the Saudi Heritage Preservation Society.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cumulative match characteristic CMC[edit]

Hello, Jaseromer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Cumulative match characteristic CMC.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:32, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quality of Life Program 2020[edit]

Notice

The article Quality of Life Program 2020 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no significant information

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:34, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saudi Local Content and Government Procurement Commission[edit]

Hello, Jaseromer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saudi Local Content and Government Procurement Commission".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:37, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of forts in Saudi Arabia moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of forts in Saudi Arabia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:20, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:CASSIOPEIA @CASSIOPEIA: thank you for your review. This is not an article in which should be referenced. It's a list where all items listed are linked with their pages. Most of the listed pages are provided with references and information indicating the location of the site/fort. Regards Jaseromer (talk) 15:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jaseromer, greetings. Stand alone list do need sources just like any other article - see WP:STAND. Group sources are accepted for stand alone list and sources can be in any languages. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:44, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@CASSIOPEIA:, Thank you. Jaseromer (talk) 15:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of forts in Saudi Arabia has been accepted[edit]

List of forts in Saudi Arabia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
nice work. Please do more like this . I think you know now that each item needs to be referenced DGG ( talk ) 05:07, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @DGG: for your valuable review and encouraging. Regards Jaseromer (talk) 18:46, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Government independence[edit]

Please have a read through Human rights in Saudi Arabia and find serious sources before you start claiming that the Human Rights Commission (Saudi Arabia) is independent from the KSA government. Surprising claims can sometimes be right, but they need to be backed by extremely solid sources. I had a quick look around for third-party sources, and the first source I found gave (unsurprisingly) evidence that the "Human Rights Commission" was opposed to the elementary human rights of Khashoggi's family and friends and colleagues and readers - the right to have an independent enquiry into his assassination and a criminal case launched against those suspected of the assassination. Since MBS is strongly suspected to have ordered the assassination, a secretive KSA national-level investigation is not going to be independent in a country with no evidence of separation between the executive, legislative and judicial powers of government.

Some of your recent edits which I've had to tidy up included:

People might start getting worried that you might be one of the influencers hired by the KSA government, and any such influencer would have to read the guidelines under WP:PAID and follow them. I don't expect that other Wikipedians would object to people being paid to make articles on forts, ministers, and so on in KSA. On the other hand, helping to whitewash an abominable level of human rights violations and getting paid for it might be less well accepted. Boud (talk) 23:19, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Boud: Thank you for your comments and edits in Human Rights Commission (Saudi Arabia). I relied on the commission's website as a supporting source to write what they described themselves including their claim of being independent in performing their functions. Your rewording (thanks) might have explained the meaning in a better way. Regarding my articles about Saudi Arabia, I often write articles about general topics related to Saudi Arabia (cultural, tourist, public). I am trying to contribute and improve the English content of the country in Wikipedia. Doing this does not mean to be one of the influencers you mentioned or being paid by the Saudi government. I think it is not fair to accuse someone of being paid by the Saudi government because he edits articles about Saudi Arabia.Regards Jaseromer (talk) 16:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
hi again Jaseromer. I don't think it's unfair for me to have raised the topic in the context of the Guardian article and your recent edit history. Anyway, looking forward to your edits! :) Boud (talk) 04:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Jaseromer

Thank you for creating List of islands of Saudi Arabia.

User:DGG, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

It would really help to add geographic cordinates.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DGG}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DGG ( talk ) 20:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DGG: thank you for your valuable review and comments, I'll improve the article by adding what you've suggested. Regards Jaseromer (talk) 19:14, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arda dam moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Arda dam, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arda dam has been accepted[edit]

Arda dam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 02:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop mass-producing articles[edit]

Existence of a dam is not WP:Notability: it needs substantive sources to establish notability, not an small entry in a database. If there is no information beyond the year built it should not have its own article, rather List of dams in Saudi Arabia should just be expanded with such data in a table, with the names of dams redirected there.

Your article Hareeq dam moved to Hareeq Dam[edit]

Hello, I moved the article you created Hareeq dam to Hareeq Dam to meet naming standards. However, if you think it shouldn't be moved or renamed, talk to me here.King Onyx (talk) 02:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding on, yeah. "Dam" is usually capitalized. It's not going to cripple an article or anything, but it's a good convention to know. Stikkyy t/c 05:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Stikkyy: , Regards. Jaseromer (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Jaseromer

Thank you for creating Ittwid dam.

User:Stikkyy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Might want to tag WP:WikiProject Dams on the talk page of all the dam articles you're creating.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Stikkyy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Stikkyy t/c 05:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Stikkyy: , Thank you for your review and kind suggestions. Regards Jaseromer (talk) 21:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted[edit]

Hi Jaseromer, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Beeblebrox:, thank you for granting me the "autopatrolled" permission, I appreciate your message. Regards. Jaseromer (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Independent sources[edit]

Apologies, I must inflict advice upon you. Because Saudi domestic media are state-controlled, they not independent sources for any topic in which the Saudi government has a stake. This means that they are not WP:reliable sources, and they may not be cited in Wikipedia articles in support of statement on such topics. Their inaccuracies and inconsistencies on such topics are a separate issue; just the lack of independence is enough to make them non-reliable, though. It's OK to cite them for trivial, non-controversial facts. Information ultimately sourced from them should also be attributed if reported by third parties (for example, if an independant newspaper writes "The Saudi Gazette reports that eight people were involved", then Wikipedia should not say "eight people were involved").

At Riyadh International Book Fair (which contains an explicit description of the non-independence of the Saudi media), you added some non-independent sources, and removed some independent ones. I've reverted those changes, although I kept your helpful wikilink corrections. Citing facts in infoboxes is perfectly conventional (though not always done), and such citations aren't irrelevant.

Please also be careful that your edit summaries don't mislead someone skimming through the edit history. "the book fair is organized by the Ministry of Culture. source provided" is not a good description if you are also removing three sources and a statement. "correction according the the provided source" is an appropriate if the statement you edited was contradicted by the source, but not if you are replacing one statement supported by the source with a different statement. "rephrased content according to the ref" is also not appropriate for such a case. In other articles, "improvements" is not an accurate description of replacing information about censorship with a list of cultural accomplishments.

On edits like this and this; not being able to access a web reference is not adequate reason for removing it and the cited statment. People in Saudi Arabia may not be able to access a lot of web pages, but I can access the first, and easily find the second, and they did support the statements.

I understand you've written a fair amount of content about Saudi Arabia, and I understand that such content can be difficult to source, and difficult for people in Saudi Arabia to write. If you could go over it and remove things which cannot be supported by a reliable source, except where the government-dependent sources are clearly not being self-serving, that would be great. We can't trust these sources to be accurate, and Wikipedia really should not be a place for propaganda to propagate. In particular, some articles you've made, such as Royal Commission for Riyadh, have no independent sources and thus don't meet notability requirements. I've worked on fixing some of the issues I've mentioned, and will try and go over more. I'm really sorry that this may involve undoing some of your work. I'll try to find independent sources where reasonably possible. HLHJ (talk) 03:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HLHJ:, thank you for your advice, appreciate your comments. Regards. Jaseromer (talk) 17:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that exceedingly civil response to what must have been an unpleasant message. HLHJ (talk) 04:29, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI Disclosure[edit]

Do you have any connection to the Saudi Arabian government? A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 16:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. Jaseromer (talk) 14:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jaseromer&oldid=1051953336"