Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 10[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 10, 2019.

Draft:"Trelawny:, Soldiers Hill, Ballarat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary (and some malformed) quotation marks. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment/Question: @UnitedStatesian: Have you by chance verified if the versions of these redirects without quotation mark(s) exist (for the ones where the redirect's target is not the non-quotation equivalent)? Steel1943 (talk) 18:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • In the handful of cases where the non-quotation equivalent is not the target, it is a mixed bag: some exist, some don't; I am not convinced the non-quotation equivalents are necessarily valid rediirects either in all cases. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Mistakenly made articles that are unlikely links or search constructions. Reywas92Talk 19:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget Concordia Lutheran Junior College to Concordia University (disambiguation). I've moved the one with the quotes, so the original mistaken redirect can be deleted. The non-quoted version should be kept and retargeted. There were several Concordia Lutheran junior colleges (Ann Arbor, Fort Wayne, Austin, among others) so it's a reasonable redirect for people looking for the history of one of these Lutheran institutions. I have no opinion on the other redirects. schetm (talk) 19:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all, useless. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment/Question: @UnitedStatesian: Forgive me, I'm not sure what the question is, nor what problem we're trying to solve.
If the proposal is to move the current text from Common law#Common law legal systems in the present day to Common law legal systems in the present day, I'd oppose that. The full article needs that list of examples. Duplicating the text means that the two copies will diverge, and each will get only half as much correctness attention as the single copy gets today.
If the proposal is to delete the redirect-only page Common law legal systems in the present day, I don't see immense harm (though there is some harm -- readers find the page, sometimes up to 30 times a day -- seems odd to pull the rug out from under those readers).
My first impulse is "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." But maybe you see a "broke" that I don't.
At the end of the day, I'm largely indifferent.
BostonBowTie (talk) 16:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, no moves will happen. All we're doing is proposing to delete the "Common law legal systems in the present day redirect, which is malformed in that it only has one quotation mark. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:40, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Now I see the problem! Yes, have at it! BostonBowTie (talk) 16:43, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per above, useless clutter. PC78 (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Touch (Bebe Rexha song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned on target page, artist's page or discography. Richhoncho (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

/56 Nights[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete These redirects with the leading forward slash are obvious errors. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all. Obvious errors as per UnitedStatesian.Onel5969 TT me 15:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: I can only speak for the /Teaterladan, Hedemora. It was created to get around an error in QRpedia that has been present since November. It seems, however, that the bug does only affect all other language versions, not enwp. I have therefore no objections to a deletion on this language version. Vivo (talk) 20:15, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. None of these appear to have been created for any specific purpose, and none of them seem like valid search terms. Most of them fall under WP:G6 as leftovers from page moves. PC78 (talk) 14:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all, useless. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Motel Symphony[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at target, the artists page, the two albums released or the tour page. No other WP entries for the term I could find. Richhoncho (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Subject appears to have been a song that was leaked in 2016 but was never made publicly or legally available. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

"John"[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 18#"John"

Shooting Star Summit[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

non-notable video game location not mentioned at the target Druaga2 (talk) 10:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - not mentioned in the target, would suggest retargeting if there were a list of Mario locations or some such, but can't find any reference to it.Onel5969 TT me 15:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 18#Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana

Dunne D.10[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 18#Dunne D.10

Eclipse Engine[edit]

Two "Eclipse Engine"s exist, one by Digital Eclipse and one by BioWare. I don't think either is more notable than the other, and the redirect should possibly be deleted. Lordtobi (✉) 06:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Pick this one to be primary topic redirect and put a hatnote there. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and add a hatnote as this seems to be the primary topic (the only thing that seems to come close is (parts for) engines for the Mitsubishi Eclipse), but if you disagree that there is one then the redirect should be changed to a disambiguation page. There is certainly no case for deletion here. Thryduulf (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: B dash, please allow me to reopen this discussion as it had escaped my FOV and I hadn't watched this page. @Shhhnotsoloud and Thryduulf, you are saying that this one is the primary topic, but how come? On BioWare, this is three sentences, while that on Digital Eclipse has four sentences in a dedicated section. This is why I stated in my opening that neither is really more notable than the other. Should we be aiming for keep, though, the secluded section for Digital Eclipse's game engine would make for a better place for a redirect notice. On BioWare, it is a vanchor skippin into a section, so the hatnote at the top would go completely unnoticed. Furthermore, the current hatnote, "For eclipse engine in digital eclipse, see ..." is very unsatisfactory. Lordtobi (✉) 06:14, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Picking one to be a primary topic, redirecting there, and having a hatnote, is far preferable to not picking a primary topic, and having a 2-entry disambiguation page. I don't really mind which is primary, as long as one is. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Huricane[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an implausible misspelling/typo. CycloneYoris talk! 03:35, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Missing a letter is an entirely plausible misspelling, in my opinion. —Hugh (talk) 03:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. PrussianOwl (talk) 05:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. "Huricane" for "Hurricane" is a very plausible misspelling - see as just one example The Irish Times. The redirect got 101 hits in the 30 days prior to this nomination and 1253 last year, again demonstrating its plausibility. Thryduulf (talk) 09:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Totally plausible misspelling. Steel1943 (talk) 18:58, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the above. NoahTalk 17:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Conduction block[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 18#Conduction block

Industrial food[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:21, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhat derogatory, odd redirect PrussianOwl (talk) 04:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • We might consider Convenience food, where Processed food redirects, though I don't know if that's really a synonym ("tertiary processed food" is the bolded term in the lede). --BDD (talk) 14:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambig. The first hit on google is for a textbook [1] which defines the term as "foods that are mass produced in a factory setting and require no or very little cooking to make them edible. These foods are also packaged which make them highly portable." which closely matches the lead of Convenience food and the examples have a lot of overlap with our article. The rest of the hits on the next few pages are for a mix of processed food, Industrial agriculture and either the "industrial food system" (the food supply chain starting with intensive agriculture and ending in supermarkets, either as processed food or mass-produced fresh foods) or a part of that system - which seems best covered by our Food industry article. Accordingly I think a dab page listing Food industry, Convenience food (via Processed food), Intensive farming (via Industrial agriculture) and Factory farming (maybe with a see also to Agribusiness) would be the best bet. Thryduulf (talk) 11:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 00:16, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambig as suggested makes sense to me--they are all possible meanings. DGG ( talk ) 11:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to convenience food as more-or-less synonymous. Anything else is a reach. -- Tavix (talk) 13:20, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I strongly disagree that anything other than convenience food is a reach. While academic definitions of the term are nearly synonymous with convenience food, search results indicate that there is no primary topic for the term across all contexts. Thryduulf (talk) 14:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • note I've drafted a disambiguation page below the redirect. If the consensus is to retarget (which per above I disagree with) then this should be moved to Industrial food (disambiguation) and a hatnote added. Thryduulf (talk) 14:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Which I strongly disagree with because none of those entries are "industrial food". For example, "food industry" and "industrial food" are nowhere near the same thing. You can't say that something in the "foo industry" is "industrial foo". -- Tavix (talk) 14:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Nice theory, but if you actually look at the search results what you find is that people do mean the (products produced by) the food industry and/or (a specific type of) industrial farming when they talk about "industrial food". Thryduulf (talk) 15:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Nothing links to it; it isn't in use. Let whoever happens to use that phrase in an article and who happens to want it to mean something specific pipe a link to whatever that is. I don't believe a disambiguation is the way to go, as some of the proposed possible meanings in the dab at this moment [2] are definitely too much of a reach. Softlavender (talk) 09:37, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Lack of links is explicitly not a reason to delete a redirect, and in this case it's not surprising given it was nominated for deletion less than three hours after it was created. It is however very useful as a search term. Thryduulf (talk) 11:20, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ngāti Apa ki Te Rā Tō[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article at Ngāti Apa ki Te Rā Tō should be a redlink for now. Ngāti Apa (website), the target of this redirect, is not the same iwi as Ngāti Apa ki Te Rā Tō (website). —Hugh (talk) 01:37, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_April_10&oldid=893177481"