Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 September 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 2, 2018.

Template:Infobox coat of arms/doc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G6/G8 by Plastikspork. -- Tavix (talk) 01:51, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects were created from page moves following merging of Template:Infobox emblem into Template:Infobox coat of arms and moving to Template:Infobox emblem, and then moving all related pages. All of these are subpages with no substantive links. Bsherr (talk) 23:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Katherine Graham Sulzberger[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Bbb23. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 08:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence this is a valid name or was ever in use by reliable sources: appears to misleadingly conflate Katharine Graham, publisher of The Washington Post, with the Sulzberger family, longtime publishers of the The New York Times. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Opamacare[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 08:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A mispronunciation of Obamacare in the speech at this target (but not mentioned in the target). suggest redirect to that Obamacare as misspelling. Widefox; talk 17:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even better. Widefox; talk 18:06, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ismail Mohammed (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. [withdrawn] Vexations (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

redirects to a disambiguation page where no primary topic exists Vexations (talk) 17:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep User:Vexations It is correct per WP:HOWTODAB - all dabs without primary topics should have such a redirect. (If it had a primary topic, the dab would be at that title and no redirect would be possible.) Widefox; talk 17:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I didnd't explain that very well, did I? There are two disambiguation pages, with very similar names, Ismail Mohamed and Ismail Mohammed, neither of which have a primary topic. Should either Ismail Mohamed (disambiguation) or Ismail Mohammed (disambiguation) exist then? Vexations (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If that's the same question for the second dab, then it's the same answer.
If your asking about merging them, which is possible, but... a) this is the wrong venue (and focussing on the wrong aspect - the redirects will still exist even if the two dabs are merged) b) bad nom for that Widefox; talk 18:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gay propaganda[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Homosexual agenda.
(non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 08:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The forwarding is not correct. The article "Homosexual agenda" does not describe the term "gay propaganda". The term is neither explained nor even mentioned. Thus, this forwarding is an original invention and must be deleted. --Charmbook (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT propaganda was created 21 July 2018 and also redirects to Homosexual agenda. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:10, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'm having trouble understanding the desired outcome for some of you. Bearian, are you suggesting merging one of the target articles into the other? Desmay, do you want these to continue to point to different places despite seeing them as synonyms?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 16:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would like more discussion and a clearer consensus on what the target should be
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kalyanasundaranar[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 September 9#Kalyanasundaranar

MERU, Holland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Kolleg St. Ludwig. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 08:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect target does not mention what is MERU. Nowak Kowalski (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

IPhone VIII[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 12:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible. We don't have iPhone IV, iPhone V, iPhone VI or iPhone VII, iPhone X is so called because that's what the product is called. By the way, this reminds me of this RfD. Update, turns out the creator is a sockpuppet of the redirects mentioned above. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_September_2&oldid=1036307961"