Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 8[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 8, 2018.

C=O=O=O=O=O=C[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G7 by RHaworth. -- Tavix (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This redirects to a compound the code of which is O=C=C=C=C=C=O. Could not find an article which uses this particular compound code. In addition, there is nothing on the target which mentions this code. Either needs to be directed to correct target. Onel5969 TT me 16:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is the SMILES code. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 00:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Nth User, is there any reason why the SMILES code in this instance should be using C for oxygen and O for carbon? – Uanfala (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Uanfala: That is an honest mistake that I didn't even realize until you pointed it out to me just now. It should definitely be corrected, and the incorrect redirect removed. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 04:00, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marie Marthe Augustine Mesange Lemaitre Brémont[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 16#Marie Marthe Augustine Mesange Lemaitre Brémont

Camille Louiseau Chadal[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 16#Camille Louiseau Chadal

Philippe Vocanson[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Saint-Jeures. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the list of the oldest French people, as some others got older. Hence the redirect is misleading and serves no purpose. — JFG talk 10:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Saint-Jeures where he is mentioned and any biography that used to be on the list article can be added. Thryduulf (talk) 12:23, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK to retarget to this village. — JFG talk 11:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is a person of very minor notability and there is no need for a redirect anywhere. He's just not notable. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:58, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Thryduulf. If there is sourced, encyclopedic content we can redirect readers to, we should do that. Notability is not the prerequisite for a redirect's existence, or we would have to delete many of them. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Aime Avignon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the list of the oldest French people, as some others got older. Hence the redirect is misleading and serves no purpose. — JFG talk 10:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. They are mentioned in passing at Maurice Floquet but that would not be a good target, but nowhere else. Thryduulf (talk) 12:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is a person of very minor notability and there is no need for a redirect anywhere. They are just not notable. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Henri Perignon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Oldest people#Chronological list of the oldest living man since 1973. WP:N is not relevant to whether a redirect should be kept or deleted. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the list of the oldest French people, as some others got older. Hence the redirect is misleading and serves no purpose. — JFG talk 10:15, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right. This person's notability is little more than an WP:ITEXISTS argument. If we exclude Wikipedia from searches, his name is only mentioned in blogs and specialist "trackers" of old people.[1] I'm all for creating redirects on names of supercentenarians who have received some coverage (I created a few recently while cleaning up List of French supercentenarians), but this one simply doesn't pass the bar. On top of that, his last name is misspelled. — JFG talk 07:25, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shahpur Tehsil[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Req. delete. Pragmocialist (talk) 08:16, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not sure what the point of deletion could possibly be, but there are several tehsils with this name, so I've drafted a disambiguation page below the redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambig per Uanfala. Thryduulf (talk) 12:27, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

FYROM - Denar[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 16#FYROM - Denar

FYROM Denar[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYROM is the country name not nationality, FYROM denar is used nowehere and hence should be called Macedonian denar only Macedonia (talk) 03:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Country name and currency is a very plausible search term (c.f. Japan Yen, UK Pound, USA Dollar, etc), indeed this has had 24 hits so far this year indicating use. It is unambiguous and harmless so there really is no justification for deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 12:41, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. --BDD (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:52, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:WPNI category[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per WP:G7. Deryck C. 11:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant and in the way.
This was a WPbanner template, which I created to make tagging easier in an earlier age (late 2007). It became redundant in 2008 when Template:WikiProject Northern Ireland was converted to use Template:WPBannerMeta, and this template was redirected. It has long since been replaced in every use by the canonical form, and its only purpose now is to add verbosity to the regex searches when using AWB to add or modify banners. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.