Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 16, 2018.

Neoclassical poetry[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Poetry is not mentioned in the target, so a reader who searches for this term is left none the wiser as to its meaning. None of the articles that mention this phrase seems like a better target. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This redirect is not as good as using Search. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:38, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled Trooper (album)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 27#Untitled Trooper (album)

"Untitled" subjects that now have titles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These subjects now all have titles, and thus are misleading/outdated. Steel1943 (talk) 18:48, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - per nom, no longer of use. Technically, the Yoshi one wasn’t ever any good, just the by-product of a bad page move. Sergecross73 msg me 19:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I do also believe that these pages are unnecessary to keep, since existing pages have content based on them. Cosecant57 (talk) 05:16, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. While these redirects are useful for a while after the article is moved, that period has passed in all these cases. Thryduulf (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled X-Men TV series[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Unopposed ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:52, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear what this refers to, especially considering that it targets a “film series” article. Steel1943 (talk) 18:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled Shadows Project[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 26#Untitled Shadows Project

High strength[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 27#High strength

भौतिक शास्त्र[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:52, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FORRED. The target does not have affinity for any particular language. Steel1943 (talk) 18:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Research and discovery[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 12:25, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:XY. Could also refer to one of many subjects listed at Discovery. Steel1943 (talk) 18:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Graduate Certificate Research Commercialisation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 12:25, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target, and the redirect is so WP:PRECISE that it is a WP:SURPRISE. Steel1943 (talk) 18:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Reskin[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 26#Reskin

Own label[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 26#Own label

Private label credit card[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Deryck C. 11:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stencil brand[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 11:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. In addition, third party search engines do not return any definite results for the definition of this redirect, nor does it make any connection to “store brand”. Steel1943 (talk) 17:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No indication of what 'Stencil brand' means in this instance. An 'own label' brand or a synonym for store brand? In any case it is not mentioned in the target article. Google returns virtually nothing bar someone's 'scrapbooking' pinterest page. Eagleash (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of store brands[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 26#List of store brands

Vegetarian Festival[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Nine Emperor Gods Festival#Celebration in Thailand. Deryck C. 22:10, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest retargeting to Nine Emperor Gods Festival#Celebration in Thailand, with a hatnote to the list page. This was the original target before User:Huggi changed the target in 2015. I believe the Thai festival is the primary topic for the term, as evidenced by the sheer number of Google search results that are about it. Paul_012 (talk) 15:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget per nom, the Thai festival does seem to be the primary topic. A hatnote to the list should of course be added to the target section. Thryduulf (talk) 16:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Birmingham Legion FC[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:01, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Professional soccer team is building roster and competing in new 2019 season. Needs redirect removing so their page can be built. deathgripz 15:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 17:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Seth Cummings[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 26#Seth Cummings

Marie Marthe Augustine Mesange Lemaitre Brémont[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. This one is a difficult call, but taking this discussion and the discussion below about another French supercentenarian together, I think there's a rough consensus supporting deletion. Against some dissent, the general sentiment is that the combination of (1) a misspelling in the name and (2) these permutations of names being uncommon (particularly the use of a husband's name for a married woman who generally prefers to use her maiden name) pushes these over the edge. Deryck C. 14:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term for Marie Brémont — JFG talk 11:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is her full name, I cannot think of any reason why that would not be a plausible search term. Redirects from people's full names are as plausible as you can get. Thryduulf (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Contrary to Spain and Portugal, France does not traditionally use full baptism names or maiden names to refer to people. The intermediate names are not even spelled right, and one of them belonged to her first husband (Lemaître). You'd be hard pressed to find any mention of this person using the full full full name outside of Wikipedia.[1] In fact, the only one I found is her "find a grave" entry; whoever wrote that probably decided it was cool to smash together her three Christian names, her maiden name and the names of her two husbands into the longest possible name they could conjure up. Not worth keeping. — JFG talk 11:53, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This search term indeed seems quite unlikely to be used and there is no need to spam redirect possibilities. A simple Marie Brémont is perfect for this encyclopedias search needs, not a proliferation of possibilities. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:49, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Camille Louiseau Chadal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. (See combined closing rationale in section above.) Deryck C. 14:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of Camille Loiseau and Camille Loiseau Chadal, but with a misspelling, making this an unlikely search term and a possible source of confusion among search box results. — JFG talk 10:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Seems a plausible misspelling for English speakers to me and even if people do select this rather than the correctly spelled redirect it will take them to the article they were looking for, with the correct spelling, so there will be no harm done. Thryduulf (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I see this has been deleted by RHaworth with the deletion summary of "misspelling". That is not a valid CSD criterion since this is not a recent creation, so I have left him a note to restore it. -- Tavix (talk) 14:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is no reason to keep this redirect, as it is a misspelling of the name of a person of minor notability. Few people are likely to even use a proper redirect and Wikipedia does not need to create countless misspelled redirects on every single topic for people too sloppy to use an accurate search term. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

FYROM - Denar[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 27#FYROM - Denar

Scamway[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 25#Scamway

List of retailers' cooperatives.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely typo due to period at the end. Steel1943 (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_November_16&oldid=1036305862"