Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 13, 2018.

Answers from Wikia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I have restored the sections that Superdadsuper deleted without discussion. Now that there is content at the target, the nominator's concerns have been resolved. -- Tavix (talk) 14:55, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of these are mentioned in the target article. Also, the section “Questions and answers site” does not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 22:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete for the reasons given in the nomination. --Bsherr (talk) 23:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Superdadsuper removed this section (and others) in this edit: "Removed obsolete/outdated/irrelevant info, added headings". Given the number of defunct Wikia projects I wonder if there should be a separate article combining the small amounts of info about each - they seem to have been notable at the time and meet GNG, but didn't go anywhere so they would overwhelm the main article and there isn't enough to sustain a full article. Thryduulf (talk) 13:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikiasari[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikia Search. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 06:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note that I have boldly reverted to the previous target. Per other discussions on this log page, I have restored sections that Superdadsuper deleted without discussion. With this content restored, the former target is once again the best one. Please contact me with any concerns. -- Tavix (talk) 14:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, but the redirect is a {{R from history}}. Also, the section “Search engines” does not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 22:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Wikia. It appears from my research that this was a pipeline project of the company at the target. --Bsherr (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • In the current state of the article Wikia, unless information is added to the article regarding the subject of the redirect, readers searching this term will be sadly disappointed to find nothing about this subject. Steel1943 (talk) 23:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Delete. Fair enough. Okay. --Bsherr (talk) 22:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Bsherr: I’ve been thinking, and considering ... is the research you found notable enough to tag this redirect with {{R without mention}} and keep it in existence even without mention in the target? Steel1943 (talk) 04:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
          • Yes, I think so. [1] (btw, I'm watching this page). --Bsherr (talk) 12:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Wikia Search, which seems to be about the same thing although "wikiasari" is only mentioned in the title of a reference. Thryduulf (talk) 13:09, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Wikia Search. Per Thryduulf. --Bsherr (talk) 18:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikia Green[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target page, but the redirect is a {{R with history}}. Also, section “Wikia Green” does not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 22:53, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete no content from the former stub exists in the article, and this specific Wiki is not notable. There isn't a list of Wikia wikis to target it to, and nowhere else we have coverage either. Thryduulf (talk) 13:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Central Wikia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete without opposition. -- Tavix (talk) 14:59, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target page. Steel1943 (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Community Central[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:12, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target page. Steel1943 (talk) 22:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It is mentioned in some of the citations in the target, but there doesn't seem to be any primary topic given the vague wording, My searches turned up several non notable organizations, thus it's not useful for anything. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Champion. Thryduulf (talk) 13:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Memory Gamma[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Star Trek planets (M–Q)#M. {{R to list entry}} (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 11:37, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. The closest retarget option I could find would be Memory Alpha, but the redirect isn’t mentioned there either. Steel1943 (talk) 22:48, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Various Wikia-page redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete without opposition. -- Tavix (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Various Wikia pages (either existing or not existing) not mentioned at target page. Steel1943 (talk) 22:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

OpenServing[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I have restored the sections that Superdadsuper deleted without discussion. Now that there is content at the target, the nominator's concerns have been resolved. -- Tavix (talk) 15:00, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, and section “OpenServing” does not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: OpenServing is a {{R with history}}. Steel1943 (talk) 22:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Here is the edit where mention of OpenServing was removed from the Wikia article. Angela (talk) 23:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • See my comment at #Answers from Wikia. The removal appears to have been done boldly rather than following any discussion on the talk. Thryduulf (talk) 13:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Catherine Munro[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target page. Steel1943 (talk) 22:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This person was apparently an employee in the "Community Team" at Wikia, but they weren't even mentioned in the article when the redirect was created. As CatherineMunro they were also admin here, but haven't edited since 2015. IMDB knows of two different actresses with this name, neither at first glance notable enough for an article, and multiple wives of various minor Scottish nobles. There is nowhere suitable to target this. Thryduulf (talk) 13:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elements of Peace[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete this is a very common phrase used in many different unrelated contexts related to various studies of and theories about "peace" in at least two different senses. This is one of those occasions where search results really are the best thing we can offer someone. Thryduulf (talk) 14:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DePaul Hospital[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bon Secours DePaul Medical Center. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No specific hospital named "DePaul Hospital" in article.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  22:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3Apes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 14:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I created this redirect but I don't think it's needed now. Angela (talk) 23:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ArmchairGM[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I have restored the sections that Superdadsuper deleted without discussion. Now that there is content at the target, the nominator's concerns have been resolved. -- Tavix (talk) 15:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, and section “ArmchairGM” does not exist at target. Steel1943 (talk) 22:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: ArmchairGM is a {{R with history}}. Steel1943 (talk) 22:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Armchair was an important part of Wikia's history. I don't know why it was removed in this edit. Angela (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore content and keep. The removal was done boldly as far as I can tell, so there is no reason why it cannot be restored. If anyone does want it deleted then it can be discussed and the redirect evaluated again if required. See also my comments at #Answers from Wikia. Thryduulf (talk) 14:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Captain(1900s magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:27, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo, redundant with The Captain (1900s magazine) Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects with “(magazine)” and no space targeting page with space[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:20, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I auto-created this ages ago by moving a typoed page creation to the correct title and it just stuck around. --Delirium (talk) 20:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: The aforementioned “delete” vote applies only to Flying Saucers(magazine). Steel1943 (talk) 23:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as useless. — JFG talk 10:08, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. For reasons stated in nomination. --Bsherr (talk) 22:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Systematic biology(journal)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo, redundant with Systematic Biology (journal) Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:20, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this redirect is a remainder of me correcting the page title a long time ago. MichaK (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Starz(magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo, redundant with Starz (magazine) Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ManC(magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo, redundant with ManC (magazine) Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Empire(magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo, redundant with Empire (magazine) Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chief Priest Say(magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo, redundant with the correct Chief Priest Say (magazine) Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1984(magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

10 Magazine (magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely search term Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The redirect is a {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}. Steel1943 (talk) 23:15, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Steel1943. — JFG talk 10:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Who in the world looks at "10 Magazine" and ask "Hmm... I wonder what 10 Magazine could be refering to... I know! It's a magazine! I'm going to search for 10 Magazine (magazine) instead!" ? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Considering that 10 Magazine is a disambiguation page and the subjects 10 Magazine (South Korean magazine) and 10 Magazine (British magazine) are listed there, this redirect is a perfectly valid {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}. The previous comment regarding "Who in the world looks at..." would only apply if the subjects on the page were named 10 Magazine (South Korean) and 10 Magazine (British), which they are not and these titles shouldn’t be created anyways. Steel1943 (talk) 18:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    10 Magazine (Korea) and 10 Magazine (UK) exist though. – Uanfala (talk) 23:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Right, but those disambiguators represent countries/geographic areas, not ethnic groups and/or languages. So, I could see those being plausible as the disambiguators, from my understanding, represent where the magazines are published and/or originated. Steel1943 (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Steel1943. There could easily be other things called "10 Magazine", particularly in the artillery or firearms senses. Thryduulf (talk) 15:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    But there aren't. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:38, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Why should someone be required to know what else does and doesn't exist? {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} exists so that people who think that a topic might be ambiguous can find what they are looking for even if it turns out not to be. Redirects like this help readers while not harming anything else - deletion won't bring any benefits. Thryduulf (talk) 19:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    The person who doesn't know that non-magazine "10 Magazine" don't exist won't be search for a non-magazine "10 Magazine" in the first place, because they won't have a reason to search for them, since they don't exist. For 10 Magazine (magazine) to make sense, there needs to be a legit non-magazine "10 Magazine" that it could be confused with. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:27, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    It's for the people who want to read and/or link to the article about the magazine and don't know whether a non-magazine use does or does not exist, but think its possible that one or more might either now or in the future. Even if that isn't a very large group of people it's a nonzero number, whereas the number of people who will benefit from deleting this redirect is exactly zero. Thryduulf (talk) 19:49, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

/Billboard (magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as useless. — JFG talk 10:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete its history suggests that this term had a large number of page views when created, but page view statistics show that its usage has been minimal for the past 3 years. feminist (talk) 06:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

"Proletarian" (journal)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely search term Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as useless. — JFG talk 10:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Use of quotation marks and disambiguator an unlikely search term or link. --Bsherr (talk) 12:20, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Aquila(children's magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unlikely typo Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dragon Lineage[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 26#Dragon Lineage

DJ redirects to DJ Mag[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
full list of DJs

This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 5#DJ Proteus, the same rationale applies. -- Tavix (talk) 15:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all, the reader is much better served with a redlink rather than a tangentially related article that doesn't even mention what they were looking for. —Xezbeth (talk) 18:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the reason explained in the mentioned DJ Proteus nomination. -Delirium (talk) 20:00, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. For the abovementioned reasons. --Bsherr (talk) 12:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per above. Kind of of like redirecting Michael Jordan to ESPN - yes, it may mention the subject, but it’s unlikely to cover it in the capacity that would be beneficial or helpful for a reader doing a search on the subject. Sergecross73 msg me 02:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gujarati language (Kashmir)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 25#Gujarati language (Kashmir)

List organisations in the United Kingdom with a royal charter[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very unlikely someone would search without including the "of". UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I don't completely understand what's going on with the article history but it looks to have been an error made and quickly fixed by Mais oui! in July 2006 and then fixed again somehow in February 2007 by Smurrayinchester, but whatever it was certainly an accidental creation. Thryduulf (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Have removed the inbound links (somehow there were still some a decade later). Smurrayinchester 12:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. For the abovementioned reasons. --Bsherr (talk) 12:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anne Matthiesen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Danish supercentenarians. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the target list of oldest people by country, as other people from Denmark got older since she was listed in 2005. Therefore the redirect is unnecessary and misleading. — JFG talk 11:56, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Johanne Svensson[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Swedish supercentenarians. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the target list of oldest people by country, as other people from Denmark and Sweden got older since she was listed in 2005. Therefore the redirect is unnecessary and misleading. — JFG talk 11:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to List of Swedish supercentenarians where they are mentioned. Thryduulf (talk) 18:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This person is not in the target article and is not notable enough for a redirect elsewhere. They are just a random name on two other lists, so there is no proper redirect choice either. Newshunter12 (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ethel Booth[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of supercentenarians by continent#Oldest Oceanian people ever. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the target list of oldest people by country, as other people from New Zealand got older since she was listed in 2005. Therefore the redirect is unnecessary and misleading. — JFG talk 11:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marija Bandelj[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the target list of oldest people by country, as other people from Slovenia got older since she was listed in 2005. Therefore the redirect is unnecessary and misleading. — JFG talk 11:40, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete They are not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Emilie Doležalová[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the target list of oldest people by country, as other Czech people got older since she was listed in 2008. Therefore the redirect is unnecessary and misleading. — JFG talk 11:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete She is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bengt Helldal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the target list of oldest people by country, as other people from Sweden got older since the he was listed in 2006. Therefore the redirect is unnecessary and misleading. — JFG talk 11:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. For the reason given in the nomination. --Bsherr (talk) 12:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete He is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Csiki Sándorné[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the target list of oldest people by country, as other people from Hungary got older since she was listed in 2005. Therefore the redirect is unnecessary and misleading. — JFG talk 11:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete She is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rozália Földes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This person is no longer on the target list of oldest people by country, as other people from Hungary got older since she was listed in 2005. Therefore the redirect is unnecessary and misleading. — JFG talk 11:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 18:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete She is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural close. This is not a redirect, and one cannot be created at this title, so there is nothing we can do here. If you want that to change you will need to make a request at phabricator. Thryduulf (talk) 18:40, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bad planning on part of devs means we can't create the most obvious redirect to Full stop. Kamafa Delgato (Lojbanist)Styrofoam is not made from kittens. 02:53, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fayetteville Highlanders[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The discussion has shown that these two team names don't refer to the same franchise. None of the suggested solutions involve keeping the redirect as it is, so I'm deleting it. Editors can write a new article or add information to a related page. Deryck C. 10:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same minor league franchise. Two teams 30 years apart. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 02:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same town, and 30 years is a long time, but minor league teams change names and affiliation all the time. Including both under the town with the redirect seems reasonable, especially if there isn't a Highlanders page now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skilgis1900 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
They aren't the same franchise. A problem this editor has shown on at least one other occasion here[2] where he put a totally different team's players on a page....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 02:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:WP8T[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensical redirect. 8T = album? 8-track? 80? Those can't be it. Nothing in 8T would suggest this to have anything to do with albums. Why use something nonsensical when {{album}} exists as an option? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. "Unless a WikiProject [or anyone else, for that matter] has actually expressed interest in usurping [this redirect], I don't see [it] doing any harm." To date, no other use for {{WP8T}} has been suggested at all. Per WP:R#KEEP, "If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do".
  2. Alleged confusion is not very plausible at all. So absent evidence of any harm there is no reason to delete.
  3. "There seems to be no evidence of confusion, just conjecture on the part of nominator, and no argument grounded in WP:R. Laziness is the exact purpose of redirects, to be perfectly honest, and the creator of a useful redirect that saves one or two characters should be commended. We don't delete redirects based merely on conjecture. Someone obviously found these useful given they were created."
  4. "One of the lowest things one can do is steal another mans tools. So you have no use for it. That it's being used on [talk pages] is good enough, and there is zero reason to take away something that has no higher use. Such Nominators should be required to be the one to hand edit and remove any deleted tags."
  5. "Redirects are not only cheap but this is a redirect from and to template namespace. That would tend to indicate to me that anyone using it is an editor rather than a general reader and they are hardly likely to get it [confused]. There are lots of little abbreviated things pulled up over the years such as {{tlc}} or {{tlx}} or whatever as useful shorthand for editors."

--Jax 0677 (talk) 13:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Typical copy/paste argument from Jax, who has done this countless times and doesn't address the concerns of the nomination. It's not about confusion but about not making any sense at all. There haven't been 8-tracks for this use in over 30 years and were only popular for a short time and no one has ever called an 8-track "8T". This implies Template:WPCD would be just as obvious a choice (it's not). This one makes less sense than all the others that you created this year which have been deleted. Maybe I should create Template:WPSTAN as a redirect to {{WikiProject Comics}} or Template:WPMM to {{WikiProject Disney}}. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This seems to imply there is a WikiProject specifically for 8-tracks. Since such a WikiProject does not exist, neither should this redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 16:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. If this is supposed to be shorthand for 8-track tapes, why is it only being placed on albums released in the current decade (e.g. Talk:Ticket to L.A. and Talk:Joni Was Right). Recent albums are extremely unlikely to have been released as 8-tracks. The redirect is only being used by it's creator (and sat completely unused for two weeks until after this discussion started), isn't being used as for 8-tracks as it's name would indicate, and the difficult to comprehend name only saves one character over {{album}}. Plantdrew (talk) 18:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 22:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Both it’s existence and it’s use makes little sense. WP:CHEAP doesn’t defend redirects that are actively confusing. Sergecross73 msg me 01:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_November_13&oldid=1036308956"