Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 15[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 15, 2018.

Flight from the world[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:40, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Term not present in target article: no evidence that this is a useful redirect. PamD 23:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - This is vague enough that it can refer to a bunch of different things. Longest flights in aviation history come to mind. I'd rather that we just be rid of this. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep - it's a pretty close paraphrasing of what the article says is the transliteration of the original Greek, "one who has retired from the world". I don't see this being ambiguous with any other topic. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There are some songs about Leave This World Behind, Leave the World Behind, and Leave Behind. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm sympathetic to IV's rationale, and fairly convinced, but I just don't think people will perceive it that way in a neutral context. I don't think most options will be helpful (my first thought is a poetic version of space travel), hence the delete !vote. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beyond RPG[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Nom withdrawn (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 19:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Term not present in target article: no evidence that this is a useful redirect. PamD 23:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both "Beyond" and "BTS" are listed as "synonynm" in the template. Appending RPG is descriptive, much like Palladium RPG, or Shadow Chronicles RPG or TMNT RPG. ScratchMarshall (talk) 04:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw: thanks for explanation @ScratchMarshall:, I now know more about games terminology and won't make that mistake again. PamD 06:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elongated Muskrat[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. I am also courtesy blanking this discussion. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 11:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nile rhinoceros[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Term not found in target article; no indication that this is a useful redirect. PamD 22:51, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • I created the redirect. At the time, Nile rhinoceros was listed as a common name for the subspecies on the page. Sometime after, it was found to be inapplicable. I had forgotten about the redirect in the time since then. I agree it should be removed. Luke Beall (talk) 05:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Luke Beall: Thanks. If you could either blank it or add {{db-self}} it will be speedy-deleted and clear up this page. PamD 06:53, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sir Bruce[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bruce Forsyth. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose redirecting to Bruce Forsyth. Forsyth was commonly known as Sir Bruce, and is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC compared to Woodcock Joseph2302 (talk) 22:31, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • If that's the case then Sir Bruce should be a dab page, since the term refers to both an online handle and a nickname (short name? Hypocorism? Whatever it is). —Xezbeth (talk) 13:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget - I agree that this should go to Bruce Forsyth. Apparently, being known as simply "Sir Bruce" was common enough for him that there's a major program titled Sir Bruce that aired after his death. Woodcock's use of "Sir Bruce" could be handled by a hat-note. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    This redirect had been viewed twelve times in the last three months before this RfD. There is certainly not a primary topic. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Bruce Forsyth - Forsyth was often referred to as Sir Bruce so personally I would say Forsyth is the PRIMARYTOPIC here, As noted above I would suggest adding a hat note to both the Bruce Forsyth article and the Bruce Woodcock article to avoid any potential confusion. –Davey2010Talk 13:31, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rauding[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, this redirect has an WP:XY issue between Reading and "Auding", but the latter doesn't exist. Steel1943 (talk) 13:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Rauding theory seems to be a term coined by Ronald P. Carver, who is cited in the article. [1] [2] but as the reading process article doesn't describe this concept or even what auding means, there is nothing to warrant a redirect. Revisit if Ronald P. Carver is notable for his own article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft redirect to wikt:rauding, which has more information on the subject than any Wikipedia article. - Eureka Lott 21:20, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or soft redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I vote delete. Soft redirects to wiktionary are pretty much never useful, especially for those using search engines who might get this useless link to a dictionary page. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:28, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete In favor of wiktionary soft redirects when useful, but there isn't much there anyway. I don't think this needs to exist, it seems like it's just a neologism, made up for branding. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG OM CH TD PCc DL FRS RA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a plausible search term. PamD 18:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Right Honourable Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG OM CH TD PCc DL FRS RA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:28, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a plausible search term. PamD 18:18, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Anyone searching for that clearly knows a lot about Winston Churchill, so they could just search by his common name instead. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Of the 21,045,671 pageviews of Winston Churchill since this redirect was made, this redirect has been used nine times. By comparison, the redirect Churchill has been used 154,608 times. This isn't a plausible or useful redirect. Ralbegen (talk) 10:54, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Some of the suffixes like PCc aren't even listed in the article's lead sentence. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:10, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

IBM Cloud Video[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 26#IBM Cloud Video

ASU Politehnica Timişoara[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget. Took me a while, but the thing under the s is slightly different: ş VS ș. My eyes hurt. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taking this here because I'm confused. This is in response to this protected edit request (redirect is full-protected) from user Rhinen:

"Things are more clear now than in 2014 or 2013. FC Politehnica Timișoara was dissolved in 2012. Two clubs were formed ACS Poli Timișoara, with some continuity rights in the old clubs history (FC Politehnica) and ASU Politehnica Timișoara, supporters club, recognized as "ASU" even by Romanian Football Federation. The two clubs are known as ACS Poli and ASU Poli, no reason for ASU Politehnica Timişoara to be redirect to ACS Poli Timisoara, can create confusion. ASU Politehnica Timişoara need to be redirect to ASU Politehnica Timișoara." Rhinen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhinen (talk • contribs) 19:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused partly because the redirect and the proposed target seem to be the same to me, but they are definitely distinct pages and I can't tell what's different in the titles. There are past discussions about this title (AfD; previous edit request) which cast some doubt. On the whole I do think the redirect should be retargeted, but should be discussed first in case there are differing opinions. I also added the "squad" redirect which should be deleted, it was clearly created to evade the consensus target and full protection, and is redundant anyway. Courtesy ping Mark Arsten, the protecting administrator. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget (as nom) ASU Politehnica Timişoara to ASU Politehnica Timișoara per the edit request. I want to add some details to be more clear. The case is a little confusing in Romania too, but it looks like a bit of MK Dons vs AFC Wimbledon case, for those who know it. FC Politehnica (the parent club, like Wimbledon FC) was dissolved. ACS Recaș was moved to Timișoara and renamed as ACS Poli Timișoara, there were some decisions that this team could continue the tradition of the old team, but there is absolutely nothing clear, the decisions being quite disputed. So ACS Poli is quite simillar with MK Dons, a moved team from another city, but in this case ACS Poli want FC Politehnica history and honours, which is a disputed thing, nothing 100% clear now. ASU Politehnica Timișoara was founded by old team, FC Politehnica Timișoara, supporters and started from lower leagues, kind of AFC Wimbledon. In my opinion none of the two are a legal succesor of the old team, but ACS Poli tried some legal procedures, not a very clear result yet. So in fact are 2 new born clubs after the dissolution of the old one, ACS Poli (Municipality club) and ASU Politehnica (ex-FC Politehnica supporters club). Someone tried probably years ago to redirect ASU Politehnica Timişoara to ACS Poli Timișoara to create confusion and minimalize ASU Politehnica, so probably this action was a result of the ACS Poli vs ASU Politehnica war. The 2 teams even played one against the other in the Romanian Cup and both claim the record of the old team, so a lot of tension there. Rhinen Talk 15:47, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:44, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Illogicality[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 26#Illogicality

Baragama[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:R2 - TNT❤ 10:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

R to draft after page move. PamD 09:49, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This can be speedily deleted per WP:R2. I'll grab an admin. Vermont | reply here 10:06, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Phantom trading[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 23#Phantom trading

Krazy Kids[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and delete, respectively. --BDD (talk) 21:19, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are many things and places termed Krazy kids and this redirect pushes the target right to the top of google search results, unfairly in my view. There is also The Crazy Kids of the War amd Wild & Crazy Kids Legacypac (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Then it will become a disambiguation page? Bod (talk) 05:03, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Krazy Kids Disambiguations are not for partial title matches. It's a plausible typo for Crazy Kids. Delete Krazy kid too many typos to be plausible.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the K version of the phrase has only been used for non-notable businesses. Crazy Kids song is not primary topic. It'd be different if Krazy Kids was the song title and Crazy Kids redirected to it. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't think we're at the point yet where everyone assumes there's a krazy-kool, hip spelling anytime there is alliteration. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:43, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete lots of things called krazy kids Galobtter (pingó mió) 09:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Krazy Kids as plausible. It's a Ke$ha song and she has had some kreative spellings in the past... Delete Krazy kid, that's not close enough. -- Tavix (talk) 16:33, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Where kould you po$$ibly get that idea? ~ Amory (u • t • c) 11:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep/delete per Tavix. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Krazy Kids and delete Krazy kid per Zxcvbnm and Tavix. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There seems to be consensus to delete Krazy kid, but it'd be nice to solidify.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:35, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

African Aster[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:42, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not an English name for this plant. Introduced to en.wiki with this edit linking to a German language site where the term "Afrikanische Aster" is used, although that doesn't really seem to be a commonly used name in German either. Plantdrew (talk) 02:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Plantdrew (talk) 02:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - This term appears to have been used in print at least once, in an English language context. It seems that a different plant is referred to, though? CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:20, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suppose theoretically a retarget is worthwhile, then, to Amellus? The German article on Gerbera says that before 1737 Gerbera was referred to as the African Aster, but gives no inline citation. I'm not finding a whole lot of references beyond the book above, so absent anything, I'd say this refers to any aster from Africa, and thus should be deleted or disambiguated, with a heavy preference for the former. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:50, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:32, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete - This is a frustrating case given that the aforementioned textbook doesn't give any detailed information other than a quick listing of the term. Given the ambiguity, it seems like maybe the best thing is just to delete the redirect and let people search. Yet I'm not too sure. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:40, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

White guy[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 26#White guy

Surburbia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling. Also, Surburb doesn't exist. Steel1943 (talk) 18:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as likely typo for Suburbia which retargets to Suburb. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:11, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Week keep. I'm all for removing useless redirects, but I am aware of WP:CHEAP, and this seems just barely plausible enough of a misspelling to be worth keeping. In fact, perhaps Surburb should exist... Thegreatluigi (talk) 19:52, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Who does this help? Seems no more likely a typo than Saburbia or Subburbia or anything else. SteveStrummer (talk) 23:40, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - surburb would be an antonym of suburb, and I don't know what that would even mean. Not a plausible misspelling. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible mispronunciation (and therefore a predictable misspelling). - Eureka Lott 04:03, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep - Accidentally using "Surburb" is common enough that there are multiple examples of online publications doing it (see this article, for instance). I'm more wary about "Surburbia", though, but it still seems to be a plausible mispronunciation to me. I'm not that sure. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:36, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Cheap enough. Seems a common enough typo for suburbia, and, with some accents, might even be not-to-far-off from some pronunciation. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:01, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - does seem to be a plausible error, e.g. [3]. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fresh salsa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:35, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the lack of identifying the term "fresh" in respect to the target article, this redirect targeting its current target is misleading since readers will not find information regarding "fresh" salsa. The closest match I could find for "fresh salsa" is Pico de gallo since an alternative name for that subject is apparently "salsa fresca" which, if I recall, in English, means "fresh sauce". But, it may just be better to delete this redirect to allow Wikipedia's search function to do its job. Steel1943 (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Probably delete. Salsa (sauce) is fresh by definition - you would not want to experience non-fresh salsa. As for pico de gallo salsa fresca is correct, but the equivalent of that in English is not "fresh salsa", the literal equivalent is "fresh sauce". But I don't think anyone calls it that. (Pico de gallo translates literally to "beak of rooster", according to the article). Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Pico de gallo salsa is spanish for sauce but in English it means a Mexicanstyle sauce. Salsa comes canned so it is not always (normally in some areas) fresh. Legacypac (talk) 02:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:28, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The labeling of something as "fresh" versus "not fresh" can be loaded language. Given the ambiguity, anyways, deletion seems right the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as Salsa fresca term already exists, and not all salsa is prepared fresh, even pico de gallo could be jarred. [4] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Upper Vardar dialect[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 12:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Term not found in target article; no evidence that this is a useful redirect. PamD 21:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, the term is descriptively accurate, but at least in English it doesn't seem to be used at all. A two-minute gbooks search reveals plenty of sources in Bulgarian and Macedonian, but only in an ethnographical (and not dialectological) context. I don't see any particular harms in either deleting or keeping. – Uanfala (talk) 19:53, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 20:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:28, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete - It's not misleading, true, but it also doesn't appear to be helpful either. I suppose this wording might be used in obscure, non-English publications. Still, we're editing an English encyclopedia, and while I've got no strong opinions here I'd prefer deletion. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:36, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Baseball USA (Houston)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:42, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This refers to a non-notable business in Houston that isn't mentioned on the Sports in Houston page. [5] Note this is not USA Baseball AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be kept because it was an NCAA Division I softball venue for the Houston Cougars. If someone would take the time to research it and find references, it would qualify as notable. Sadly, that won't happen. It was redirected to Sports in Houston b/c it doubles as a baseball venue and softball venue and not solely dedicated to the Houston Cougars. I also think it should be kept so the history of the stadiums for the university isn't lost. I'd add the venue to the section on the Sports in Houston page dedicated to the Houston Cougars. This type of sports venue history is being lost on Wikipedia too often even though it is very meaningful in American culture.User:Spatms (talk) 23:59, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it can be thrown into a draft so that you can find sources like this one and write up the history of the venue. It isn't currently serving as the baseball venue for the Cougars, but Houston Cougars softball does mention it was used for one season. I don't see much notability for it besides that, as then it's a heavily local business. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure I'll have time to work on this right now, but when I find enough sources maybe I can bring it back if it gets deleted.User:Spatms (talk) 06:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:27, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Local field, not likely to be notable or even a common search topic. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 13:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Kollam[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:36, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Was an incorrectly named wikiproject, redirect left behind after move. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 06:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"precedent" for these sort of redirects Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:59, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of programs shown on Myx TV[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 26#List of programs shown on Myx TV

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_March_15&oldid=1036306532"