Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 3[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 3, 2018.

2046 FIFA World Cup[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Now has some content, not a redirect (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 15:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason as Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 21#2038 FIFA World Cup and #2042 FIFA World Cup and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2046 FIFA World Cup, also salt Hhkohh (talk) 23:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 23:51, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Crisisler[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 10:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems an unplausible search term. The word "crisis" buried in there is also a problem. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not discussed at target or anywhere else in Wikipedia, and no such content can realistically be added due to lack of WP:RS. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:56, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as failed WP:NOTNEO neologism or foreign moniker. There are also non-notable people with this surname, and some random person named Cris Isler. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:06, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Presidential Medal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep. It seems that this is not actually ambiguous. Thryduulf (talk) 10:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is this term ambiguous or pointing to the correct place? I briefly considered a disambiguation page but I am not sure. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:37, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I believe it's correct. Created it because "Presidential Medal" is sometimes used as an abbreviated name. Couldn't find any other medals of the same name given out by national presidents. There are some university ones, but they're unlikely to have their own entries.
Hypothetically speaking, what would you disambiguate to? --pmj (talk) 04:44, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Doesn't look like there's actually a problem here. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

No party preference[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Independent voter. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not quite synonymous. In regard to the latter, the disambiguation is overkill. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate because there seems to be consensus that this is a plausible search term. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to independent voter per Mangoe (who explains why there isn't really any ambiguity/WP:XY problem here). In practice, all the usages of this term in Google Books are discussing voters, not politicians. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 03:00, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Right, what the heck am I thinking. Retarget per Mangoe. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 12:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to independent voter rather than politician, who doesn't state a preference but would just run as independent. Voters have preferences. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2042 FIFA World Cup[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Now has some content, not a redirect (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same reason as Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 21#2038 FIFA World Cup Hhkohh (talk) 13:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Muzzy (DJ)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The emerging consensus is that the current target isn't the only article with information about this DJ. Whether it's the split of destination or the possibility of a forthcoming article, deletion will the appropriate course of action. Deryck C. 10:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re-direct needs to be deleted if the draft reviewer wants to accept and move it into the mainspace. Micro (Talk) 06:31, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Can be G6-ed when it's going to be accepted. Don't see why it should be deleted now. The editor whose username is Z0 06:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per The editor and my comments on the nomination above. Thryduulf (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete has appeared on other compilations, information in each article is no more than that they appeared on it so why redirect to this one? Peter James (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 12:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LWIAY[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete without prejudice against recreation if a new version of the article, which mentions this title, persists. Deryck C. 10:57, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not in target PRehse (talk) 05:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It will be in the target when the second ref idea on the talk page will have been used. wumbolo ^^^ 11:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 12:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It has coverage in mainstream sources but lasted just the months of April and May 2018. Newsweek Guardian Daily Dot AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There is still no content in the article about this, and there is nothing on the talk page or its most recent archive to suggest this will change soon. Thryduulf (talk) 10:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

95FM[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to 95.0 FM. Thryduulf (talk) 10:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is an ambiguous redirect to a radio station that is actually on frequency 95.1 FM. There are other radio stations in existence operating on 95 FM so this is giving undue bias to a local station. Polyamorph (talk) 09:02, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Limerick's Live 95fm is an existing article (although unsourced!) that could be linked from it. Polyamorph (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm creating 95.0 FM for now. Not all stations are 95.0FM though when they use 95 FM as a name, but I will redirect them to that frequency. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:51, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Atlantic hurricane season redirect[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. This is a fork of the discussion over at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 1#2034 Atlantic hurricane season. Please comment there so the discussion stays in one place. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too early to create at this moment B dash (talk) 06:51, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nominator & WP:CRYSTAL, roughly. The US National Hurricane Center explicitly said they'll reuse the 2017 names for 2023, but they haven't said anything like that for 2024 and beyond, and so the target doesn't have any content about years after 2023. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 10:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:🙈🙉🙊[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:05, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meaningless and useless redirect B dash (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Reason 5 applies. Redirecting monkey emojis to WP:AGF doesn't make sense at all. ~ KN2731 {t · c} 12:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Delete No idea why this was created in the first place. Enigmamsg 19:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I think the title means "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil". SemiHypercube (talk) 14:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per KN2731. People might interpret the monkeys either as an admonishment to "see no evil, etc." or as a derogatory description of someone who closes their eyes to evil. In any case, neither interpretation is closely associated with any particular project page. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and send to WP:FREAK as very implausible search term. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I get the concept behind this — see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil — but nobody's actually going to type emojis to find Wikipedia policy statements. Bearcat (talk) 18:34, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_July_3&oldid=1036306799"